S5E4 - The Collective's Architect (Ayn Rand's life)

1
00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:02,045
Chris: Get that bastard down here.

2
00:00:02,158 --> 00:00:03,670
Kayla: Okay. I love her. I love her. Again.

3
00:00:03,750 --> 00:00:07,270
Chris: Rand screamed upon hearing the news. Or I'll drag him here myself.

4
00:00:07,350 --> 00:00:08,838
Kayla: I'm back on. I'm back on board.

5
00:00:08,934 --> 00:01:03,332
Chris: It's finished. Your whole act, she told him. I'll tear down your facade as I built it up. I'll denounce you publicly. I'll destroy you as I created you. I don't even care what it does to me. You won't have the career I gave you, or the name or the wealth or the prestige. You'll have nothing. The barrage continued on for several minutes, until she pronounced her final curse. If you have an ounce of morality left in you, an ounce of psychological health, youll be impotent for the next 20 years. Recording in progress.

6
00:01:03,476 --> 00:01:04,324
Kayla: I'm a zoom.

7
00:01:04,412 --> 00:01:05,519
Chris: Hello? Kayla?

8
00:01:06,660 --> 00:01:07,400
Kayla: Hi.

9
00:01:07,980 --> 00:01:09,200
Chris: Hi. It's Chris.

10
00:01:09,700 --> 00:01:10,788
Kayla: It's Kayla.

11
00:01:10,884 --> 00:01:11,588
Chris: Cool.

12
00:01:11,764 --> 00:01:13,068
Kayla: I didn't know where we're starting.

13
00:01:13,164 --> 00:01:17,524
Chris: Well, I don't know. We always like. Because we haven't done banter in a while. Let's figure out, do you want to do banter this time?

14
00:01:17,572 --> 00:01:19,100
Kayla: How do. I don't know how to banter.

15
00:01:19,180 --> 00:01:20,748
Chris: I don't really know how to banter either.

16
00:01:20,884 --> 00:01:22,760
Kayla: What are you up to these days?

17
00:01:23,300 --> 00:01:30,654
Chris: Playing Zelda. Same with you. Working on this podcast quite a bit.

18
00:01:30,702 --> 00:01:31,174
Kayla: Same.

19
00:01:31,302 --> 00:01:35,326
Chris: So there's that. Helping you strike.

20
00:01:35,478 --> 00:01:36,126
Kayla: Same.

21
00:01:36,278 --> 00:01:37,694
Chris: Okay. All right.

22
00:01:37,782 --> 00:01:39,030
Kayla: Great. Great banter.

23
00:01:39,110 --> 00:01:39,966
Chris: That was good banter.

24
00:01:40,038 --> 00:01:40,318
Kayla: Yeah.

25
00:01:40,374 --> 00:01:52,398
Chris: Jokey Jokerson. Fine. Let's get to it. It's another biggie, which I know is maybe unexpected since we're breaking this up into three, but I just have a problem. So what are you gonna do?

26
00:01:52,414 --> 00:01:54,766
Kayla: And that problem is called objectivism.

27
00:01:54,958 --> 00:01:57,934
Chris: Yeah. Okay. So I have multiple problems. That's one of them.

28
00:01:57,982 --> 00:02:00,570
Kayla: Well, first of all, welcome to cult or just weird.

29
00:02:00,610 --> 00:02:01,642
Chris: Welcome to cult or just weird.

30
00:02:01,706 --> 00:02:03,442
Kayla: I'm Kayla. I'm a television writer.

31
00:02:03,546 --> 00:02:08,314
Chris: I am Chris. I am game designer Slash data scientist.

32
00:02:08,442 --> 00:02:09,633
Kayla: And this is our podcast.

33
00:02:09,722 --> 00:02:50,480
Chris: It is. It's our podcast where we cast pods and get on soapboxes before we get into it today, we have the. So we have normal business. We have our regularly scheduled business, which is. We gotta thank our new patrons. We have two new patrons. So big thank you to Tessa Hamilton and Noelle Hoover. Thank you for joining us. Thank you for supporting us on Patreon. It was a good time to join, actually, because we finally did the thing that we said were going to do. We said were going to do it last episode. We also said were going to do it. The entirety of this podcast, all five seasons, where we argue with each other about capitalism.

34
00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:55,880
Kayla: We finally did as capitalism, occult, you guys. And it was supposed to be a bonus episode. And it's like. It's like an hour and a half.

35
00:02:55,910 --> 00:02:56,908
Chris: It's like a regular episode.

36
00:02:56,964 --> 00:02:57,600
Kayla: Yeah.

37
00:02:58,660 --> 00:03:02,636
Chris: So it's probably a good thing we didn't talk about it on the main feed. Cause it was already a long episode.

38
00:03:02,748 --> 00:03:04,480
Kayla: Go check it out on our Patreon.

39
00:03:05,260 --> 00:03:09,652
Chris: So other than mentioning that, we finally decided whether capitalism was a cult or not.

40
00:03:09,756 --> 00:03:11,460
Kayla: Oh, and we reached a decision, you guys.

41
00:03:11,540 --> 00:03:17,440
Chris: We did reach a decision, but we're not gonna spoil it because that's, you know, that's behind the paywall, you know.

42
00:03:17,780 --> 00:03:24,680
Kayla: So Patreon's four baby. Patreon.com culturjisweird so before we get into.

43
00:03:24,980 --> 00:04:07,674
Chris: The topic today, the topic for this episode, I do want to talk a little bit about some things that have been on my mind, okay. Since doing the last episode, all right. Some things where I was like, oh, I wish I had said this, or, oh, I just thought of this based on what we talked about. And I kind of wrote them down, and then I stuck them in my script. Okay, so I have a list of things I thought of over the past couple weeks. So last episode, just to recap, we talked about, like, the beliefs of objectivism and sort of, like, went into a little bit of, like, the broader philosophy, the philosophical framework that they fall under. I didn't talk too much about the books that Ayn Rand wrote. We will talk a little bit more about that today.

44
00:04:07,722 --> 00:04:26,376
Chris: But one of the things that I did want to say is that the fountainhead in her first, like, real novel, first successful novel, was. It was the first time that I was really exposed to the idea that something entirely secular could be spiritual or produce a spiritual experience, because it's so.

45
00:04:26,408 --> 00:04:28,576
Kayla: Much about the experience of art.

46
00:04:28,688 --> 00:04:43,872
Chris: Right, exactly. And before that, my perception was that it was either a traditional religion or something outside the norm, but still supernatural, like a new age spirituality thing, I thought that had the monopoly on spiritual experiences.

47
00:04:44,016 --> 00:04:48,266
Kayla: You hadn't been introduced to the idea of secular spirituality.

48
00:04:48,378 --> 00:05:31,666
Chris: Right. And the fountain had sort of introduced me to that idea, gave me sort of like an alternative to that idea that we can have awe and reverence and a spiritual experience based on things that are entirely grounded in reality. Like, you know, not to sound cliche, but like the vastness of the universe or the unknowability of the universe, or, I don't know, some art. You know, some art produces that. Some art, you watch an art sometimes if you watch an art, it makes you get that feeling. But true, though, sometimes, you know, you look at a piece of art or you watch a television show or whatever, and it just gives you that, like, holy shit, there are some beautiful, crazy things out there. Whatever that spiritual feeling is that we don't have a great word for other than spiritual, I guess.

49
00:05:31,738 --> 00:05:32,350
Kayla: Right.

50
00:05:32,650 --> 00:06:22,624
Chris: So wanted to mention that maybe put that in the pro column. One of the things that I forgot to bring up when were talking about the. The tiers of the kingdom, the tears of the kingdom, which is the game that I'm playing right now. But no, the tiers, the philosophical tiers. So there's metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and then politics. One of the ways that was helpful for me, and again, Ayn Rand didn't necessarily, like, invent the idea of, you know, those tears, but it's the first time I was exposed to it. And one of the ways that it's helpful for me is that if you're, like, having an argument with somebody, it's actually useful to know what tier that argument is happening on. Let's say, intelligent design or something like that.

51
00:06:22,752 --> 00:06:38,898
Chris: If somebody is having that argument based on a more like, they're coming from it in a creationism, they believe in the Bible. And therefore, there's this metaphysical disagreement you have about whether the universe simply exists or. Or whether there was a God that created it.

52
00:06:38,954 --> 00:06:39,550
Kayla: Right.

53
00:06:39,890 --> 00:06:58,058
Chris: That's at a lower level than just, like, the content of, like, well, here are some specific things about creationism. Right. You're not gonna like. That's why frequently, it doesn't surprise me that no matter how many, like, details and facts we talk about with each other on certain topics, it's not gonna change somebody's mind.

54
00:06:58,114 --> 00:06:58,522
Kayla: Right.

55
00:06:58,626 --> 00:07:13,138
Chris: Like, I. No matter how many facts and whatever I show someone, if they already believe in God and the primacy of God having created the universe, yada, then I know that it's just sort of like a waste of time to talk about the, like, you know, the science of it.

56
00:07:13,314 --> 00:07:23,066
Kayla: It doesn't matter how many facts and figures you come at me with, I refuse to change my stance that zero and infinity are the same thing.

57
00:07:23,098 --> 00:07:23,898
Chris: Oh, my God.

58
00:07:24,034 --> 00:07:25,842
Kayla: So, yes, I understand this as well.

59
00:07:25,946 --> 00:07:32,756
Chris: Yeah, exactly. So you have your own little pet supernatural stuff that you think about. You know, if you just said related instead of same thing.

60
00:07:32,788 --> 00:07:36,860
Kayla: No, they're exactly the same thing. I have some YouTube videos to show you.

61
00:07:36,900 --> 00:08:15,550
Chris: Oh, great. Yeah, no, you have, like, some actual cult YouTube videos. Please don't share that with anyone. So, yeah, so I find that helpful. Or, like, even, like, the virtue of capitalism. Right? Like, it's easier to talk about, like, whether that's right or wrong. If you have, like, some sort of same base to start from, like, you at least. Well, okay, we agree that existence exists, and we agree that reason is important, but we don't agree whether capitalism is good or not or which aspects of it are good or not. I think it's maybe easier to have that discussion, or it should be easier to have that discussion with objectivists. Frequently it isn't, which I think is part of the problem.

62
00:08:15,670 --> 00:08:19,718
Kayla: Are you saying they're hard to have conversations with or hard to have disagreements with?

63
00:08:19,774 --> 00:08:33,778
Chris: Well, yes and no. Individual objectivists I've met, I've got a big question here, are pretty reasonable. But objectivism as a whole, if you like, when you're talking about Ari and the official stance. Yeah, no disagreement.

64
00:08:33,833 --> 00:08:38,710
Kayla: This sounds like a lot of work. Like, why do they care?

65
00:08:39,970 --> 00:08:41,058
Chris: Well, we'll get to that a little.

66
00:08:41,073 --> 00:08:43,270
Kayla: Bit, but what's the deal?

67
00:08:43,890 --> 00:08:45,450
Chris: Well, yeah.

68
00:08:45,490 --> 00:08:46,602
Kayla: Aren't they tired?

69
00:08:46,786 --> 00:08:50,978
Chris: I think so. I'm tired. Tired of talking about this stuff.

70
00:08:51,034 --> 00:09:00,712
Kayla: Just having a stance on anything is really hard and draining. And then to have a stance on, like, metaphysics, epistemology, everything.

71
00:09:00,856 --> 00:09:01,552
Chris: We will get to this.

72
00:09:01,576 --> 00:09:03,020
Kayla: And what was the last one?

73
00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:04,456
Chris: Art.

74
00:09:04,608 --> 00:09:05,056
Kayla: Ethics.

75
00:09:05,128 --> 00:09:09,440
Chris: Oh, sorry. Ethics, then politics. Ethics, then politics, art, and other things.

76
00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:10,904
Kayla: That's just a lot of work.

77
00:09:10,992 --> 00:09:20,792
Chris: I know. No, it is. It's been described as a complete philosophical framework. And I think by complete, they mean, like, they have an opinion about everything.

78
00:09:20,856 --> 00:09:22,312
Kayla: As part of this complete breakfast.

79
00:09:22,416 --> 00:09:43,100
Chris: Yeah, as part of this complete breakfast. We will get to all of that, actually. But I did want to talk about how the philosophical tier thing kind of helps me know whether it's, like, worth my time to discuss something with someone. Like, if we can't agree on some, like, basic metaphysical stuff, it doesn't matter whether we're gonna agree on the details. Beyond that, the other thing I wanted to mention, that's a really big statement.

80
00:09:43,180 --> 00:09:44,988
Kayla: I won't get into it, but that is a really big statement.

81
00:09:45,044 --> 00:09:47,484
Chris: Oh, you think you do? You have a potential disagreement.

82
00:09:47,532 --> 00:10:02,274
Kayla: No, I guess my great disagreement is not that. It's like, is that a reason then, to figure out how to have a common ground, finding conversations with those people? Obviously not in all circumstances, but.

83
00:10:02,322 --> 00:10:03,938
Chris: Oh, yeah, you're right. This is a can of worms, isn't it?

84
00:10:03,954 --> 00:10:07,306
Kayla: Yeah. Yeah. So that's why I shouldn't even have said anything. I shouldn't even have said anything.

85
00:10:07,418 --> 00:10:30,682
Chris: Stuff the lid back on the worms. They're getting out. It's okay. We'll talk about it later. Moving on. The law of identity is something we talked about in last episode. And that's the thing where it's like a. Is a thing, is what it is. A thing can't be something else that is different than it at the same time and in the same regard is kind of like, how that law is stated.

86
00:10:30,746 --> 00:10:31,090
Kayla: Right.

87
00:10:31,170 --> 00:10:40,738
Chris: And we talked a little bit about, like, okay, but is it dangerous to, like, take that. Well, like, a thing is what it is and extend it out further down than just, like, the metaphysical layer.

88
00:10:40,794 --> 00:10:41,390
Kayla: Right.

89
00:10:42,410 --> 00:10:46,218
Chris: And of course, the way that came up was like, you know, a man is a man and a woman's a woman.

90
00:10:46,314 --> 00:10:46,618
Kayla: Right.

91
00:10:46,674 --> 00:10:49,418
Chris: Right. And how that can be dangerous. And one of the things that I.

92
00:10:49,474 --> 00:10:57,110
Kayla: It's hard to apply any sort of binary to human beings, because we just. We're wild and crazy. We are wild and crazy out here.

93
00:10:57,190 --> 00:11:24,712
Chris: Yeah. And that's kind of what we mentioned last episode. And I agree that, like, binary versus spectrum is definitely, like, a fallacy and one that I think objectivism gets into a lot. But I also thought of over the past few weeks that, like, the law of identity also doesn't. That in this respect, the law of identity doesn't. It's not, like, monopolized either by bigots. Right. Like, a trans person could very easily say, yes, a woman is a woman, and that's what I am.

94
00:11:24,776 --> 00:11:25,336
Kayla: Right.

95
00:11:25,488 --> 00:11:28,832
Chris: I am a woman. I know that it is what it is, and that is what me is.

96
00:11:28,896 --> 00:11:29,408
Kayla: Right?

97
00:11:29,544 --> 00:11:55,554
Chris: Me is. Yeah. So I just wanted to mention that was another angle on that I hadn't thought of until after the show. And then the only other business I want to talk about, it's not really business. It's maybe just like, a little bit of, like a. Hey, this is sort of related to what we're talking about is. And this is something you and I talk about on the couch all the time. You don't seem to think it's very cool. I don't know. I do.

98
00:11:55,602 --> 00:11:56,122
Kayla: What?

99
00:11:56,266 --> 00:11:57,402
Chris: Mary's room.

100
00:11:57,586 --> 00:11:59,274
Kayla: I'm just upset about. I'm just sick of it.

101
00:11:59,282 --> 00:12:01,634
Chris: You just don't think that Mary's room is, like, a big deal.

102
00:12:01,682 --> 00:12:08,146
Kayla: I don't even know why. I don't even know why. I don't even remember anymore. I just gotta have a take on everything you do.

103
00:12:08,178 --> 00:12:16,582
Chris: Well, it's, you know, we're of the Internet age, so you gotta have a take on everything. I'm just gonna read you the experiment as it was originally. The thought experiment.

104
00:12:16,646 --> 00:12:17,886
Kayla: Excuse me. I'm sick of this one.

105
00:12:17,958 --> 00:12:23,046
Chris: The thought experiment. Well, you know what? Some of our listeners maybe haven't heard what Mary's room is, so I'm gonna say it for them.

106
00:12:23,078 --> 00:12:23,774
Kayla: Nah, that's cool.

107
00:12:23,862 --> 00:13:11,920
Chris: Thought experiment, originally proposed by Frank Jackson as Mary is a brilliant scientist who is, for whatever reason, forced to investigate the world from a black and white room via a black and white television monitor. She specializes in the neurophysiology of vision and acquires all of the physical information there is to obtain a about what goes on when we see ripe tomatoes or the sky. And she uses terms like red and blue and so on. She discovers, for example, just which wavelength combinations from the sky stimulate the retina and exactly how this produces, via the central nervous system, the contraction of the vocal cords and expulsion of air from the lungs. That results in the uttering of the sentence, the sky is blue. What happens when Mary is released from her black and white room or is given a color television monitor?

108
00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:14,700
Chris: Does she learn anything new or not?

109
00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:58,400
Kayla: Look, okay. I just don't see how it's shocking to come to the conclusion of, yes, obviously. And I think what irks me about Mary's room relates back to this common refrain that you will see on the Internet sometimes and hear me out, and then let me do my explanation, must I? So this common refrain that I'm referring to says something like, some men will have transformative drug trips in their twenties and thirties and come to realizations that girls had when they were 14 at a slumber party. And what I take that to mean.

110
00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:00,384
Chris: What are you guys doing at your slumber parties?

111
00:14:00,552 --> 00:14:45,546
Kayla: We are having conversations. What I take that to mean is that some people in our society are set up to truly to be forced to truly experience empathizing with somebody else's perspective. And some people in our society are not forced to do that until maybe later in life or have to come to that realization themselves. Most somewhat marginalized groups are forced as a survival mechanism to be able to understand the pov of dominant groups. Women are forced to understand the perspective of men. Black people are forced to understand the perspective of white people because white men traditionally are the heroes of our stories, are shaping our stories, yada, yada.

112
00:14:45,618 --> 00:14:46,114
Chris: Okay.

113
00:14:46,202 --> 00:14:48,834
Kayla: And so I just don't think, how.

114
00:14:48,842 --> 00:14:49,794
Chris: Are you gonna land this plane?

115
00:14:49,842 --> 00:15:00,466
Kayla: I don't think it is that controversial to large swaths of the population to say, well, yeah, of course Mary experiences something different. If she sees that the sky is actually blue, of course you learn something different.

116
00:15:00,498 --> 00:15:02,890
Chris: What does that have to do with somebody else, though?

117
00:15:03,050 --> 00:15:14,512
Kayla: Because you've come to that realization that, like, oh, other people have a different perspective that is entirely informed by their experience that I don't have access to, necessarily.

118
00:15:14,656 --> 00:15:34,224
Chris: Well, I mean, the formulation of Mary's room doesn't even involve other people. Right. Like, the formulation of Mary's room, I understand, is more about, like, even if nobody else in the universe exists, does she learn something new? Like, not. She doesn't even, I think, have to have the thought that somebody else saw something differently than her eyeballs.

119
00:15:34,272 --> 00:15:44,654
Kayla: I'm not saying that Mary has that experience. I'm saying that it doesn't. I guess I don't understand why. It's like a philosophical question. It's like, of course she learned something new.

120
00:15:44,782 --> 00:16:29,612
Chris: I mean, I think it goes a little deeper than just povs and perspective and walking in somebody else's shoes. The core thrust of this is, and the reason I bring it up in this episode is, can you actually learn any truth you need to learn via reason alone? Or is. And this is where the word qualia comes in. And I don't want to, like, go into all this too much, but qualia is like, is there an aspect of this entity, of this thing or of this experience that cannot be described in any formal way whatsoever, that I can only gain some sort of knowledge about it experientially? And what that implies is, since she's read every single thing that can possibly be read about. Red, blue, green, yellow.

121
00:16:29,676 --> 00:16:30,280
Kayla: Right.

122
00:16:30,580 --> 00:16:49,860
Chris: That means that thing cannot be put into words. Cause if it was put into words, she would have already read it. Cause she's brilliant brain scientist for 30 years in the black and white room. You don't find that interesting that there might be an idea that there's experiences and knowledge that literally cannot be formulated into words?

123
00:16:49,940 --> 00:17:02,112
Kayla: Yes, I do find that interesting. What I don't find interesting is the question. I think that maybe that's all it is. You can do your whole Mary's room, but then don't end it with a. Does she learn? Yes, of course. She learned something new. Of course. Of course.

124
00:17:02,136 --> 00:17:03,424
Chris: Well, but that's the question, right?

125
00:17:03,472 --> 00:17:04,432
Kayla: No, it's not a question.

126
00:17:04,536 --> 00:17:17,896
Chris: Yes, it is. Because if she. If the answer is yes, then that means you are saying that there is something that she experienced that could not be put into words, no matter how hard you try. Yes, I just. I think that's actually a pretty significant statement, Kayla.

127
00:17:18,048 --> 00:17:35,249
Kayla: I know, but the statement is already made. Now we're getting into the semantics. The statement is already made by everything you say before you ask the question. The statement's already been made. So then I I just don't understand the questions there. Okay, well, the experiment sets up the yes answer.

128
00:17:36,109 --> 00:17:41,957
Chris: I don't think that is, to me, that is not at all obvious. That being said, that being said, you.

129
00:17:41,973 --> 00:17:44,565
Kayla: Never went to a slumber party when you were a 14 year old girl, right?

130
00:17:44,597 --> 00:18:03,490
Chris: So I've never been to 14 year old girl slumber parties, and it's probably too late for that now. But I do think that it is an interesting thought experiment to talk about in context of objectivism, because I believe an objectivist might say to that the answer is actually no. Well, an objectivist would be wrong, objectively wrong.

131
00:18:03,650 --> 00:18:06,274
Kayla: Has an objectivist never gone like, whoa.

132
00:18:06,402 --> 00:18:09,274
Chris: What if you look at the color red?

133
00:18:09,322 --> 00:18:11,458
Kayla: I really think you're seeing the color blue.

134
00:18:11,554 --> 00:18:15,346
Chris: I really think that you're kind of being dogmatic about this, but you look.

135
00:18:15,378 --> 00:18:18,274
Kayla: At it, and you see, we just will never know if we see it.

136
00:18:18,282 --> 00:18:23,154
Chris: I feel like you're in your own Mary's room about Mary's room, potentially.

137
00:18:23,322 --> 00:18:27,922
Kayla: No, but you know what I'm saying? Like, has an objectivist never had that conversation of thinking like, I think they have. Well, what if.

138
00:18:27,946 --> 00:18:35,446
Chris: But the question isn't, have they thought about these things? The question is, can you learn everything you need to know via pure reason?

139
00:18:35,558 --> 00:18:35,902
Kayla: No.

140
00:18:35,966 --> 00:18:36,810
Chris: Or not?

141
00:18:37,110 --> 00:18:40,686
Kayla: Wait, wait. Hold on. Can you learn everything you need to know?

142
00:18:40,758 --> 00:18:42,534
Chris: Can you learn everything there is to know?

143
00:18:42,582 --> 00:18:45,410
Kayla: No. That is. The answer is absolutely not.

144
00:18:45,790 --> 00:18:49,050
Chris: Okay, well, that is Kayla's official position.

145
00:18:49,350 --> 00:18:50,926
Kayla: My official position, I think we should say.

146
00:18:51,078 --> 00:18:55,254
Chris: I'm a little short, saying it's the podcast official position, but I find the question.

147
00:18:55,342 --> 00:18:57,358
Kayla: So you don't think there's something we.

148
00:18:57,374 --> 00:18:59,728
Chris: Should probably get to the episode that.

149
00:18:59,784 --> 00:19:03,620
Kayla: Qualia exists only experientially?

150
00:19:05,320 --> 00:19:10,440
Chris: No, that's the definition of qualia. The question that I'm not sure about is that real?

151
00:19:10,560 --> 00:19:12,768
Kayla: And you're saying you're not sure if that's real?

152
00:19:12,864 --> 00:19:32,500
Chris: Yeah, I'm not sure if that is a real thing or not. It feels real, but I don't know. Nobody's ever put a brilliant scientist in a room for 30 years with only black and white television. Mary herself might come out and be like, no, I don't think I really learned anything new. Like, it's cool that I saw the color blue, but it didn't really teach me anything.

153
00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:35,104
Kayla: I think you and Mary need to go take a hike.

154
00:19:35,232 --> 00:19:38,472
Chris: Well, I think that we need to continue with the episode.

155
00:19:38,536 --> 00:19:39,860
Kayla: You're the one who brought it up.

156
00:19:40,280 --> 00:20:26,734
Chris: Let's recap. This episode is part two of three, so if you really want to catch up, go listen to our previous episode. Listen to that first. Or don't. I don't give a fuck. Whatever. This will be cool anyway. But to recap that episode, we talked about objectivist beliefs and, more generally, philosophical tiers, the ones were just talking about a minute ago. Speaking of last episode, Kayla, when we got into it, I asked you about how much you feel like your personal values and beliefs have evolved in the last 15 or so years, and we talked a little bit about how and why. Now, instead of asking you about how your personal feelings have changed and evolved, I want to ask you if you have any people for whom your feelings have changed and evolved.

157
00:20:26,822 --> 00:20:27,078
Kayla: Oh, wow.

158
00:20:27,094 --> 00:20:36,086
Chris: This could be people in your personal life. But I imagine this conversation is gonna include maybe some, like, role models, like mentors, heroes, artists you admire, et cetera.

159
00:20:36,158 --> 00:20:51,194
Kayla: Look, I went back and forth so many times. I have gone. I have snip snap, snipped on Kim Kardashian. So, yes, obviously.

160
00:20:51,322 --> 00:20:52,114
Chris: What was that?

161
00:20:52,202 --> 00:20:53,026
Kayla: Snip, snap snip.

162
00:20:53,098 --> 00:21:02,226
Chris: No, what was. What were you doing? What is that? Are we keeping this? I have no idea.

163
00:21:02,258 --> 00:21:10,426
Kayla: I don't know. Yes. I mean, how much do you want me to get into this? Obviously not the Kardashian thing, but how many people do you want me to tell you that I've changed my opinion on?

164
00:21:10,538 --> 00:21:17,910
Chris: I want you to list them all in alphabetical ways. And in the last 15 years, just a few people. Look, we're just trying to get the idea that you.

165
00:21:18,270 --> 00:21:24,758
Kayla: Any female who was present in pop culture in 2003.

166
00:21:24,894 --> 00:21:30,238
Chris: Mm mm. Right? We all shit on them then. And now we're kind of coming to terms with that. Is that what you're talking about?

167
00:21:30,254 --> 00:21:43,462
Kayla: Cam Anderson, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera, Paris Hilton, like Jessica Simpson. You name it, we're there. Kim Kardashian. I've gone, snip, snap, snip on. I was like, boo, Kim K. Then I was like, yay, Kim K. Now you're boo again. Very, very boo.

168
00:21:43,526 --> 00:21:46,142
Chris: Speaking of Kim K, I assume that Kanye's on the list.

169
00:21:46,206 --> 00:21:49,158
Kayla: Kanye was on the list. I was boo. Yay. And then very boo.

170
00:21:49,294 --> 00:21:59,582
Chris: Yeah, yeah. It was like, boo at first. Cause it was like, man, shut up about Hurricane Katrina. Like that. And shut up about, like, Taylor Swift. But your music is awesome.

171
00:21:59,646 --> 00:22:02,310
Kayla: And then it was like, hell, yeah. You were right about Hurricane King.

172
00:22:02,350 --> 00:22:06,270
Chris: Yeah, yeah. And then. And then, like, in the last couple years, it's been like, oh, shit.

173
00:22:06,310 --> 00:22:34,182
Kayla: Oh, you were. You have some views that I do not want to be anywhere near. And there's plenty of people like that aren't, you know, not just celebrities, but I'm sure I could name you a handful of politicians. I'm sure I could name you a handful of thought leaders, quote, unquote. I'm sure I could name you a handful of writers. Yes, of course. There are many people who I have changed my opinion on, especially now. We've gotten a lot more knowledge about various people. With things like the Internet, we have more access to the inner lives of our celebrities, and there's a lot that comes with that.

174
00:22:34,206 --> 00:23:20,386
Chris: Yeah. Twitter is like, basically, I've heard this. Twitter is described as, like, we handed every celebrity, like, a loaded gun, and we're like, here you go. And then, like, a bunch of them are like, cool, I'm gonna shoot myself with this. So, reputationally. Reputationally. Yeah. So, yeah, I mean, this is something that we're all sort of dealing with lately. We've talked about on the show. Certainly. We just talked about Louis CK, I think, last episode or last bonus episode. And of course, you know, in case this wasn't painfully obvious, I ask you this because today we're talking about the charismatic leader who created the objectivist belief system, Ayn Rand. And as we already hinted at many times in the previous episode, she is an extremely mixed bag, both in terms of the things that she well and truly believes.

175
00:23:20,578 --> 00:23:31,802
Chris: Some of those beliefs are cool and some are more of a drag. And also in terms of whether she actually walks the walk on the things that maybe she does believe, which is also a mixed bag.

176
00:23:31,906 --> 00:23:34,258
Kayla: This is the stuff I know a little bit more about.

177
00:23:34,394 --> 00:23:36,714
Chris: Oh, you already know the juicy stuff.

178
00:23:36,842 --> 00:23:39,754
Kayla: I don't necessarily know the horrendous things.

179
00:23:39,802 --> 00:23:41,138
Chris: That she has said, the juicy stuff.

180
00:23:41,194 --> 00:23:48,750
Kayla: That potentially outweigh the good things that she said, but I definitely know certain things that she did in her life in the later years.

181
00:23:48,790 --> 00:23:55,810
Chris: Okay, but what would a charismatic leader be without having some of their influence over other human beings go to their head? Am I right?

182
00:23:57,030 --> 00:24:00,198
Kayla: Happens to the worst of us and the best of us.

183
00:24:00,334 --> 00:24:05,486
Chris: Of course, nobody starts out charismatic, influential, or hubristic.

184
00:24:05,638 --> 00:24:08,250
Kayla: Excuse you. I've read the Bible.

185
00:24:08,790 --> 00:24:11,404
Chris: Who starts out charismatic in the Bible?

186
00:24:11,582 --> 00:24:12,960
Kayla: Jesus Christ, baby.

187
00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:13,832
Chris: I guess he pops out.

188
00:24:13,856 --> 00:24:16,360
Kayla: And he pops out, and people are showing up, giving him gifts.

189
00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:41,972
Chris: Yeah, you're right. Well, as charismatic as he maybe started out life, Ayn Rand probably started out with a little bit of hubris at least, too. But what she wasn't born with was the name Ayn Rand. She was born Alyssa Rosenbaum on February 2, 1905, in St. Petersburg, Russia, which, yes, it was still called St. Petersburg back in 1905. Her family, she also had two sisters.

190
00:24:41,996 --> 00:24:45,660
Kayla: By the way, and their names were Bind and Dyne.

191
00:24:45,780 --> 00:25:10,406
Chris: Yeah. Ayn Rand. Bin Rand and Dyne Rand. Yep, very. Wouldn't it be Kyn Rand? ABC Kyne kyung, Keanu Rand. No, I don't know what their names were, and I'm not willing to look it up right now, but they were considered a, like a bourgeois class family. So her parents owned a pharmacy, and they did pretty well until she was twelve years old. So her 12th birthday happened in 1917.

192
00:25:10,598 --> 00:25:11,990
Kayla: That's an important year.

193
00:25:12,070 --> 00:26:07,330
Chris: Yep. That was a pretty important year in russian history. That was the year that the Bolsheviks took control of the russian soviet government, and as a consequence, many businesses were nationalized, including the Rosenbaums pharmacy. They fled St. Petersburg, now Petrograd, to another city in Russia. Let's see if I pronounce this correctly, Yevpatoria. I think that city was under white army control, which white army was like the anti Bolsheviks. But eventually they did have to move back to Petrograd. Alyssa attended high school during their time in Yevpatoria, and then when they got back to Petrograd, she enrolled in university. I think it was University of Petrograd where she studied philosophy and history. This is where she picked up her love of Aristotle, supposedly. So that's where that comes from. Life was indeed hard for her family during this time. Reportedly, they were near starving.

194
00:26:07,410 --> 00:26:12,538
Chris: Several times she and others considered bourgeois class students.

195
00:26:12,634 --> 00:26:15,874
Kayla: Is that how it's pronounced, bourgeois?

196
00:26:16,042 --> 00:26:19,298
Chris: Bourgeois? Should I say bourgeois? Am I saying bourgeois?

197
00:26:19,354 --> 00:26:21,630
Kayla: Saying bourgeois? I don't know what I was pronounced.

198
00:26:22,130 --> 00:26:39,316
Chris: Burgoyce. So, yeah, I think you're right. I think I've been pronouncing it stupidly bourgeois. Other students of that class faced a purge from her university, although they were eventually reinstated after some visiting foreigners protested.

199
00:26:39,388 --> 00:26:40,120
Kayla: Geez.

200
00:26:40,780 --> 00:26:50,160
Chris: So just a quick note here. Objectivists don't really like to admit that nature or nurture is a thing.

201
00:26:50,980 --> 00:26:51,960
Kayla: What do you mean?

202
00:26:52,380 --> 00:27:19,580
Chris: Whenever they're faced with a question or not whenever, I shouldn't say whenever, but several times I have seen when they're faced with this question of, well, you think it's nature or nurture more? Well, what about, like, individual choice? Like, they always just sort of like, barrel through that and say, like, well, a lot of people have been grown up in this yada, but they didn't do well, and I did do well, or this person didn't. This person emigrated from blah, blah, and so did Andrew Carnegie or whatever. So they like to sort of like.

203
00:27:20,120 --> 00:27:22,360
Kayla: Oh, they're saying it doesn't matter, just like, kind of.

204
00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:30,136
Chris: Yeah, yeah, they're kind of saying that. Like, that's interesting that it's a collectivist fallacy to talk about nature versus nurture when it's all about individual choice.

205
00:27:30,248 --> 00:27:47,284
Kayla: That's so interesting, because you said things that, like, they recognize some systemic issues like police brutality or whatever, or systemic racism. But then, I guess, choose when not to think about the systems at play individuals lives.

206
00:27:47,372 --> 00:28:15,196
Chris: I think it's just one of those things. I think that, like, when they're, when somebody's having. When an objectivist is having, like, a normal conversation about things, like, about systemic issues and about, like, things you can actually study and point to, I think where it gets a little weird is when you get into, like, the ideological part, about when you get into the very theory, crafty land, about nature versus nurture. Right? Like, if you can actually sit here and point to like, oh, yeah, redlining, that is documented.

207
00:28:15,268 --> 00:28:15,668
Kayla: Okay.

208
00:28:15,724 --> 00:29:07,166
Chris: There's evidence for that, right? Whereas with nature versus nurture, like, it's much more nebulous. Right? So I think it's easier for them to say, like, well, it's not nature or nurture. It's individual choice. The reason I bring it up here is because while I think that there is maybe some merit to the fact that individual choice is certainly something that matters, it just doesn't. To me, it's not incompatible at all with the notion of nature or nurture. And it feels like it shouldn't be incompatible with the way Ayn Rand feels about it, too. Cause the way that she seems to feel about it is things happen to you, and then you sort of incorporate those ideas and experiences, and then that in turn, generates your, you know, your decision making apparatus about these things, which I think is roughly how neuroscientists think of it.

209
00:29:07,198 --> 00:29:07,510
Chris: Roughly.

210
00:29:07,550 --> 00:29:15,598
Kayla: It doesn't seem like they deny the fact that, like, influence exists to go, like, no, nature nurture individual choice.

211
00:29:15,694 --> 00:29:18,166
Chris: Right. It feels like they kind of cherry pick a little bit there also.

212
00:29:18,198 --> 00:29:27,354
Kayla: Like, is nature nurture even, like a thing? Like, what does that mean? Do they even talk about that in real science? Like, is that. Or is that just, like, thing that dinguses? Like, you and me talk about, I.

213
00:29:27,362 --> 00:29:32,482
Chris: Think it's a dingus thing, but what do you mean real? Okay, hold on. Let's not go down this tangent.

214
00:29:32,546 --> 00:29:46,306
Kayla: I'm just saying, if I sit here and get all indignant about how objectivists feel about nature versus nurture, is that even a useful way to spend my time? Nature and nurture is not like, okay.

215
00:29:46,378 --> 00:29:54,484
Chris: I think it's like a framework for debate, not a studied phenomenon. And I think if you were to study it would be, like, from a sociological perspective.

216
00:29:54,572 --> 00:29:55,480
Kayla: Copy that.

217
00:29:56,380 --> 00:30:16,596
Chris: The reason I bring it up, though, is because you can look at Ayn Rand's early childhood and go like, oh, okay. Yeah. That's why she cares about that stuff. Right, right. You can look at the fact that her family's business was nationalized and the fact that they were, like, a bourgeois class family that lost everything thanks to the soviet government, and go like, okay, that makes sense that she would hate.

218
00:30:16,628 --> 00:30:17,948
Kayla: That a lot, right?

219
00:30:18,124 --> 00:30:45,490
Chris: The fact that she starved almost, and, like, had that purge, a student purge in her university kind of points all to the like. I do get that. So there's a lot of nurture in there. A lot of it is also her decisions, because there's other people that had their businesses nationalized and didn't do what Ayn Rand did. So you can definitely point to that. But there's also, clearly she was influenced by her early childhood there.

220
00:30:45,530 --> 00:30:46,110
Kayla: Right?

221
00:30:46,820 --> 00:31:02,788
Chris: So she emigrated to the United States in 1926 on pretext of enriching the soviet film industry. Although she had no intention of ever returning. Her first stop was Chicago briefly, and one of her first acts was to change her name to Ayn Rand.

222
00:31:02,924 --> 00:31:03,932
Kayla: Where did that come from?

223
00:31:03,996 --> 00:31:38,690
Chris: So that's her actual name, not a pen name. And that came from. I didn't write it down, but I meant to. So her. So her pen name. Okay, so, first of all, I've seen it as, like, she actually changed her name, and I've seen it as pen name. I think she actually changed her name, though. So Rand, according to her, was taken from the russian Alphabet spelling of Rosenbaum, her actual last name. So that was derived from her last name. And she said she chose Ein after the name of a writer she liked from Finland, a finnish writer. I don't know who. I have not seen who, but someone she liked. Name Ein.

224
00:31:39,390 --> 00:31:41,278
Kayla: I wish there was more info.

225
00:31:41,414 --> 00:31:45,870
Chris: I know there might be. I just didn't dig too deeply on, like, the name change thing.

226
00:31:45,910 --> 00:31:46,326
Kayla: Right.

227
00:31:46,438 --> 00:31:51,546
Chris: I also saw something suggesting that maybe she did that to protect her family back in Russia.

228
00:31:51,658 --> 00:31:52,306
Kayla: Okay.

229
00:31:52,418 --> 00:32:03,322
Chris: But anyway, so she was in the United States by 1926, changed her name to Ayn Rand. She was only in Chicago for a few months before moving to Hollywood to become a screenwriter.

230
00:32:03,386 --> 00:32:04,074
Kayla: Yay.

231
00:32:04,242 --> 00:32:11,946
Chris: She actually met Cecil B. DeMille by lucky accident, and he gave her opportunities as an extra and eventually as a screenwriter.

232
00:32:12,018 --> 00:32:21,130
Kayla: Isn't that how it used to work in the old days? You could just roll up to Hollywood and run into someone, and then they're like, I like, cut of your jib. You should be in the pictures.

233
00:32:21,550 --> 00:32:29,070
Chris: You have a face for pictures. Yeah, apparently. But, you know, bootstraps, though, Kayla, she didn't get any help from.

234
00:32:29,110 --> 00:32:29,966
Kayla: There was no luck involved.

235
00:32:29,998 --> 00:32:54,222
Chris: There was no luck involved, and she did everything on her own. Three years after emigrating, she married actor Frank O'Connor, and two years after that, she became an american citizen. If you're keeping track at home, that puts us at 1931. In 1933, she wrote her first successful play, a Broadway play entitled Night of January 16. I think it's, like a courtroom drama.

236
00:32:54,406 --> 00:32:55,182
Kayla: Compelling.

237
00:32:55,286 --> 00:33:43,206
Chris: Yeah. Which essentially is, like, what the fountainhead amounts to being. Anyway, she and her husband Frank then moved to New York City so she could oversee production of this play, and in the next several years, she wrote her first two literature works, we the Living and Anthem, which both were about the evils of collectivist, totalitarian states. And I think both were, like, dystopian setting. Like, one was like, future dystopia, and one was, like, actual soviet setting, I think. I think it was anthem, where part of the setting was that, like, the word. I had been eliminated from the english language, so that was fun. But, you know, it's whatever. Like, people write in Sci-fi sometimes they do weird stuff. It's, you know, it's not that cringe. So these two novels did okay.

238
00:33:43,238 --> 00:33:48,254
Chris: And I'd certainly say that having written a Broadway play counts squarely as success, right?

239
00:33:48,302 --> 00:33:48,510
Kayla: Sure.

240
00:33:48,550 --> 00:34:18,456
Chris: But her first mass market pop culture, this is why you've heard of this person's success, was a novel we've mentioned several times already, the Fountainhead. The Fountainhead was published in 1943, and it tells the story of Howard Roerich, sort of like a doctor house of architecture. So he's, like, brilliant, egotistical, but not exactly personable, although I will say 99% of the time, Roark is merely unpersonal, because he just kind of doesn't care.

241
00:34:18,568 --> 00:34:30,760
Kayla: Yeah, I was gonna say, I don't think the Doctor house comparison is accurate, honestly, because Doctor House says things to be mean, and Howard Rourke. It's that whole meme of, like, I don't think of you at all. Doesn't he say that in the book?

242
00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:31,848
Chris: He does, actually. Yeah.

243
00:34:31,904 --> 00:34:38,159
Kayla: It's not that he's pointedly mean to anyone. It's that he simply is not. He does not think of others. He thinks of himself and his.

244
00:34:38,199 --> 00:34:44,159
Chris: Right. When he says that. When he says, I don't think of you at all, and I think you're right.

245
00:34:46,179 --> 00:34:50,636
Kayla: I know I've said it, but I'm gonna say here. I really loved that book. I really liked that book a lot.

246
00:34:50,708 --> 00:34:54,516
Chris: Yeah. There's a lot to like about it. There's a lot that's, like, inspirational about it.

247
00:34:54,588 --> 00:35:02,516
Kayla: That whole thing of I don't think of you at all. To say to somebody who thinks they're your nemesis, to say that and mean.

248
00:35:02,548 --> 00:35:03,932
Chris: It, it is the ultimate dunk. Yeah.

249
00:35:03,956 --> 00:35:06,068
Kayla: Oh, it is. And then just.

250
00:35:06,124 --> 00:35:12,732
Chris: But if you really mean it's, like, not even a dunkin, but it's right. It's, like, only a dunk to them.

251
00:35:12,876 --> 00:35:13,308
Kayla: Oh, my gosh.

252
00:35:13,324 --> 00:35:14,972
Chris: Which is, like, I think makes it better.

253
00:35:15,036 --> 00:35:16,000
Kayla: Yeah, it's.

254
00:35:16,340 --> 00:35:21,084
Chris: Yeah. I mean, that was probably, like, one of, like, the two or three things in that book where that, like, really hooked me.

255
00:35:21,172 --> 00:35:31,780
Kayla: Yeah. And there's lots. There's lots that we can sit here and, like, say, oh, this is wrong, and that's wrong. And, like, I don't care for its depiction of rape and I don't care for this. That. We'll get to that, but. Oh, man, I really liked that book.

256
00:35:31,900 --> 00:35:39,986
Chris: Yeah. So just for context, what happens is, like, the. The villain character, who's just, like, this smart, is, like. He's like, a banality of evil type villain, right?

257
00:35:40,098 --> 00:35:42,002
Kayla: He's Pete from Mad Men.

258
00:35:42,146 --> 00:35:46,058
Chris: He's Pete from Mad Men. Right. And he comes. He finally finds Roarke, who's trying to.

259
00:35:46,074 --> 00:35:48,826
Kayla: Like, not even Don Draper. He's better than Don Draper.

260
00:35:48,938 --> 00:35:58,290
Chris: Right. And he says, like, well, I'm really quite curious. Like, what do you. Really, deep down, what do you actually think of me, Howard? And he says, I don't think of you.

261
00:35:58,370 --> 00:35:59,154
Kayla: Oh, my God.

262
00:35:59,202 --> 00:35:59,730
Chris: So good.

263
00:35:59,810 --> 00:36:01,130
Kayla: It's so good.

264
00:36:01,290 --> 00:36:14,374
Chris: So, like, 99% of the time, Roark is, I would say, not such a piece of shit like Doctor house. But the other 1% of the time is where he is a rapist, maybe. Probably. So it kind of balances out.

265
00:36:14,422 --> 00:36:22,318
Kayla: No, he's explicit. I mean, that's the thing. It's like the initial intercourse that occurs between Howard work and. What's her name?

266
00:36:22,414 --> 00:36:23,190
Chris: Dominique Francon.

267
00:36:23,230 --> 00:36:24,646
Kayla: And Dominique Franco.

268
00:36:24,718 --> 00:36:29,686
Chris: Francon. Domin or maybe Frank Sol. I don't know, bourgeois. I can't pronounce things.

269
00:36:29,758 --> 00:36:35,780
Kayla: And Dominique Francon is explicitly referred to as rape in.

270
00:36:35,820 --> 00:36:38,492
Chris: It is, but it's also contested. I want to read you something from.

271
00:36:38,676 --> 00:36:48,160
Kayla: Dominique Francon calls it rape to herself. And yes, she's saying it in a way that is like, oh, my gosh, I just got raped.

272
00:36:48,500 --> 00:36:49,172
Chris: Right.

273
00:36:49,316 --> 00:37:07,382
Kayla: The r word is explicitly used, and the use is also, alongside her, also explicitly having invited and enjoyed the encounter. So there's nuance and there's conflict, and there's a lot going on in the scene. But I. You know. Right, well, that word is used.

274
00:37:07,486 --> 00:37:57,190
Chris: It's sort of a famously, like, to use the best possible word, famously controversial scene in the book. I would say maybe for me and maybe for others that are more towards, like, my side of thinking. It doesn't feel as controversial as it feels like, ew, kind of icky, especially because it's like, the protagonist. And what is she trying to say with how the protagonist first has a sexual encounter with his female other? But anyway, I want to read this bit from the Wikipedia article on the Fountainhead, because it gives a lot of interesting context. Feminist critics have condemned Roarks and Dominique's first sexual encounter, accusing Rand of endorsing rape. This was one of the most controversial elements of the book. Feminist critics have attacked the scene as representative of anti feminist viewpoint in Rand's works that makes women subservient to Mendez.

275
00:37:57,720 --> 00:38:01,280
Chris: A side note from me, Chris, can confirm.

276
00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:02,000
Kayla: Yeah, that's.

277
00:38:02,040 --> 00:38:12,864
Chris: It's pretty clear there are other things that Rand has said that, like, 100% corroborate that viewpoint, that she had a pretty misogynistic outlook.

278
00:38:12,952 --> 00:38:22,184
Kayla: You can have, quote unquote, strong female characters, which Ayn Rand clearly does and still have a philosophical stance that is anti feminist.

279
00:38:22,272 --> 00:38:52,152
Chris: Right. Which is absolutely the case with her continuing the quote. Susan Brown Miller, in her 1975 work against our will, Men, Women and Rape, denounced what she called Rand's philosophy of rape for portraying women as wanting humiliation at the hands of a superior man, unquote. I think that quote is from Susan, not from Ayn Rand. I don't know if she would have said humiliation. Certainly that's what happened in this scene, but I think that she definitely had the flavor of superior man throughout her beliefs.

280
00:38:52,216 --> 00:39:19,708
Kayla: The whole thing in that scene is that the reason why Dominique enjoys it is because she's like, oh, my gosh, I am so sexually turned on by a man who will just take what he wants without any concern for the other. That is peak rain right there. And then she, as a character, basically, then supports him through the rest of the book. Like he's a supportive force in the rest of the book.

281
00:39:19,764 --> 00:39:45,380
Chris: Yeah. And it may also be worth noting that their relationship is weird. Like, she's not supportive of him. Her support of him is this weird sort of like destructive support. So that kind of plays into it, too. Her thing is she doesn't think that the world. She's kind of nihilist about it. She doesn't think the world deserves his artistic genius. So she tries to take him down, too. But it's very dramatic.

282
00:39:46,120 --> 00:40:04,616
Kayla: Look, again, I really love this book, and I don't think that I'm not going to sit here and say artists shouldn't write or create art about controversial things, and you get to have controversial stances. It's just as you were discussing. This particular scene is often talked about when this book is talked about.

283
00:40:04,648 --> 00:40:06,432
Chris: Yeah, it's a challenging scene for sure.

284
00:40:06,496 --> 00:40:26,386
Kayla: And I think it's challenging even in Ayn Rand's own philosophies. I don't think that the Howard work that she writes and the Howard work that is to represent her objectivist philosophies, this act that he chooses to does not really feel compatible with how he is and acts as a character.

285
00:40:26,498 --> 00:40:26,898
Chris: Yeah.

286
00:40:26,954 --> 00:40:33,762
Kayla: He's not really into, like, dominating and subjugating others for his own will. He's just into making his buildings.

287
00:40:33,866 --> 00:40:50,160
Chris: Right. So I agree that it feels weirdly actually out of character for him. It doesn't feel out of character for Rand. But again, I think that's because she has this sort of, like, I don't want to use the wrong words here, but, like, she sort of has this fetish for, like, subservience and dominant. And, like, she has this.

288
00:40:50,200 --> 00:40:51,424
Kayla: Well, she has a clear view that women.

289
00:40:51,512 --> 00:41:08,510
Chris: Clear view that, like, the ideal man is, like, a big deal for her. Like, the ideal man is like this shining example, and she means man explicitly. Man explicitly. And, like, women are defined to her, like, by their relationship to, like, the ideal woman is someone who supports the ideal man. Like that kind of thing.

290
00:41:08,590 --> 00:41:09,238
Kayla: Sure.

291
00:41:09,414 --> 00:41:24,574
Chris: So I'll continue with this quote. Susan Love Brown said the scene presents Rand's view of sex as sadomasochism involving feminine subordination and passivity. Another writer, Barbara Harrison, suggested women who enjoy such masochistic fantasies are damaged and have low self esteem.

292
00:41:24,662 --> 00:41:27,054
Kayla: See these? We're getting into some territory here.

293
00:41:27,102 --> 00:41:28,342
Chris: Right? I know, I know.

294
00:41:28,406 --> 00:41:29,334
Kayla: Is also controversial.

295
00:41:29,342 --> 00:41:30,878
Chris: That's why I'm reading all of them, yeah.

296
00:41:30,974 --> 00:41:32,750
Kayla: Some of these statements are a little broad.

297
00:41:32,910 --> 00:42:13,840
Chris: While Mimi Gladstein found elements to admire in Rand's female protagonist, she said that readers who have, quote, a raised consciousness about the nature of rape and, quote, would disapprove of Rand's romanticized rapes. Rand, for her part, posthumously published working notes for the novel that indicate that when she started on the book in 1936, she conceived of Rourke's character that were it necess. Quote. This is a quote from her notes. Were it necessary, he could rape her and feel justified, end quote. She denied that what happened in the finished novel was actually rape, referring to it as, quote, raped by engraved invitation, end quote.

298
00:42:14,460 --> 00:42:15,724
Kayla: Because. Yeah, the whole way.

299
00:42:15,732 --> 00:42:17,596
Chris: That's the best way of putting it. But yes.

300
00:42:17,668 --> 00:42:23,172
Kayla: Oh, Dominique is, like, enticing him, and then he comes in and has sex with her against her will. But she wanted it.

301
00:42:23,236 --> 00:42:36,980
Chris: She invites him into her house, but, like, on the pretext of, like, fixing some, like, marble fireplace or something. And then she does the like, I think she likes dressed that way type of thing, too. Like, I think she. Like. Not to say that, but, like, I think.

302
00:42:37,020 --> 00:42:38,796
Kayla: But that's the implication. Yeah.

303
00:42:38,908 --> 00:42:39,268
Chris: Yeah.

304
00:42:39,324 --> 00:42:40,480
Kayla: It's not the most.

305
00:42:41,100 --> 00:42:41,948
Chris: It's problematic.

306
00:42:42,004 --> 00:42:42,640
Kayla: Yeah.

307
00:42:43,420 --> 00:43:21,276
Chris: Rand said Dominique wanted and all but invited the act, citing, among other things, a passage where Dominique scratches a marble slab. This is what we just talked about. Scratches a marvel slab in her bedroom. Oh, it's in her bedroom. Okay. To invite Roerich to repair it so she intentionally scratches it so she can invite him to her bedroom. A true rape, Rand said, would be a quote, unquote, dreadful crime. Defenders of the novel have agreed with this interpretation. In an essay specifically explaining the scene, Andrew Bernstein wrote that, although much confusion exists about it, the descriptions in the novel provide conclusive evidence of Dominique's strong attraction to Roerich and her desire to have sex with him.

308
00:43:21,388 --> 00:43:39,468
Kayla: Yes, I agree. And I think that if simply Dominique had not used the word rape to herself, it would greatly change the conversations around this scene, because then it's just an empowered woman being like, I want to have sex with that guy.

309
00:43:39,524 --> 00:43:40,192
Chris: And so I'm inviting her to.

310
00:43:40,206 --> 00:43:42,988
Kayla: Then they have sex rather than her.

311
00:43:43,084 --> 00:43:45,388
Chris: I do think that explicit word changes a lot.

312
00:43:45,484 --> 00:43:59,582
Kayla: And her to be inwardly titillated that the idea is that guy thinks that he raped me, not we had an encounter, it's her going, he thinks he raped me. And that's hot in this context.

313
00:43:59,646 --> 00:44:03,902
Chris: Right. It's not really like a role play where there's, like, a dom, because, like, that's fine. Like, that's normal.

314
00:44:03,966 --> 00:44:04,990
Kayla: People are, people do things.

315
00:44:05,030 --> 00:44:34,602
Chris: People dominant, submissive roleplay all the time. But to actually view it as like, you know, a non consensual act. Anyway, let me read the last sentence here. So individuals. Feminist Wendy McElroy said that while Dominique is thoroughly taken, there is nonetheless clear indication, quote, that Dominique both gave consent for and enjoyed the experience. Both Bernstein and McElroy saw the interpretations of feminists such as Brown Miller as based in a false understanding of sexuality. And large quote from Wikipedia.

316
00:44:34,746 --> 00:44:38,610
Kayla: I'm glad that people are having conversations about things like this.

317
00:44:38,770 --> 00:44:56,818
Chris: Yeah, I agree. And that's kind of what I wanted to do here. Like, I didn't want to like, gloss over it and be like, anyway, there's a rape. Like, I wanted to talk about it a little bit. And yeah, it is challenging, it is problematic. It is kind of tough to parse, like, what the author intended or what she didn't intend or whether she intended it or not, what the characters are experiencing.

318
00:44:56,914 --> 00:45:05,346
Kayla: Because it's like we don't really get, from what I remember, we don't really get Howard work's perspective on this. We don't get his internal monologue about this.

319
00:45:05,378 --> 00:45:06,562
Chris: We only get, we only get her.

320
00:45:06,626 --> 00:45:07,170
Kayla: Dominique's.

321
00:45:07,210 --> 00:45:08,338
Chris: Yeah, this is during her pov.

322
00:45:08,394 --> 00:45:23,796
Kayla: So, you know, that adds some complication and maybe some interesting complication. Because just because Dominique is saying certain words to herself, that doesn't necessarily mean that's what's in the other person's head. Like, it is a rich text. It's just a deeply concerning, troubling one in some way.

323
00:45:23,868 --> 00:45:31,880
Chris: And it's a tough thing for readers to get through sometimes, which understandably, like, I've recommended the book to a lot of my friends over the years.

324
00:45:32,340 --> 00:45:33,560
Kayla: To your mother.

325
00:45:34,060 --> 00:45:53,466
Chris: To my mother. And like, when I was, when I first read this when I was 17, I think 18, right. You know, I remember, like, after I recommended it to a female friend of mine, she read it and she was like, I got to this one part and I think I might have to. She ended up finishing the book. But, like, I think I might have to stop.

326
00:45:53,578 --> 00:45:53,826
Kayla: Right?

327
00:45:53,858 --> 00:46:04,318
Chris: And it was that scene. And me as a 17 year old, this is just like me confessing all of my shittiness as like a 17 1822 year old. But like, I was like, what are you talking about?

328
00:46:04,454 --> 00:46:05,014
Kayla: Right?

329
00:46:05,142 --> 00:46:38,844
Chris: And I had read the whole book. So I had apparently even read the part later where Dominique introspects that it was rape. And I was still like, oh, I didn't notice that at all, which is a little bit of a commentary on, like, what things are presented to us as rape and not rape. Like, if you go back and watch, like, blade Runner or some things about raiders of the lost Ark that really. I don't even want to talk about. Cause it's horrible. But there's just things that get presented to the point where, like, as a 17 year old boy reading that scene, it literally didn't even occur to me.

330
00:46:38,892 --> 00:47:03,470
Kayla: I think that's one of the damaging things in portraying sexual encounters like this, is that it does normalize certain things. It does normalize a lack of consent. It does normalize the idea. And this is so normalized in our society, we don't need to go down this rabbit hole. But not getting or asking for consent explicitly is super romanticized in a lot of our mainstream media. And this is.

331
00:47:03,620 --> 00:47:06,698
Chris: Right. And I'm just saying this is like a can confirm.

332
00:47:06,754 --> 00:47:06,994
Kayla: Right.

333
00:47:07,042 --> 00:47:19,226
Chris: This was normalized for me to the point where I didn't even know. Like, that. Like, to this day, I'm like, that's the person that first informed me about this controversy. I didn't even know.

334
00:47:19,298 --> 00:47:19,794
Kayla: Right.

335
00:47:19,922 --> 00:47:25,322
Chris: And that's not. That's not great. Anyway, putting that very real and very large discussion.

336
00:47:25,386 --> 00:47:27,306
Kayla: Oh, wait. I want to say one more thing. Sorry, can I say one more thing?

337
00:47:27,338 --> 00:47:30,110
Chris: Stuff are in a box. Okay, fine. Go ahead.

338
00:47:30,170 --> 00:47:56,078
Kayla: I just want to say, you know, we've said all of the things that make this controversial. I think it's also. There's one thing about, like, having a nuanced and conflicted conversation about a piece of art, and then when you explicitly have the artist's entire philosophy and set of beliefs summed up very, like, well documented, including their view of men and women.

339
00:47:56,174 --> 00:47:56,526
Chris: Right.

340
00:47:56,598 --> 00:48:05,336
Kayla: That makes those conversations a little less nuanced and interesting because they're just really heavily colored by. Okay, well, we know what the artist thinks.

341
00:48:05,448 --> 00:48:13,616
Chris: Yeah. This scene in context of how she feels about men and women and about gender. Yeah, it's less good.

342
00:48:13,728 --> 00:48:18,584
Kayla: It makes it less fun to have a conversation about. Naive's fun. Loosely. Continue.

343
00:48:18,712 --> 00:49:07,440
Chris: So back to the very abridged plot summary for the fountainhead. So Mister Roarke values artistic integrity to a caricature extreme. But I don't necessarily say that in a bad way. Rhin's works are sort of like comic books in literature form. There's this really heightened sense of reality going on where all the characters are larger than life. Nobody really talks like real people talk. And you just kind of imagine that everywhere just sort of looks like, the design from BioShock. Like, level design from BioShock. If it was, like, maybe utopia instead of dystopia. And by the way, for anyone who's played BioShock, yes. BioShock's setting and characters are explicitly inspired by Rand's works. And if you haven't played BioShock, then what I mean by that is that there's, like, over the top art deco, right? So, like, that's just what I'm.

344
00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:15,786
Chris: When I say heightened settings, heightened characters. Like, I'm just picturing, like, Art deco everywhere and, like, larger than life comic book characters.

345
00:49:15,938 --> 00:49:19,910
Kayla: Oster. Great Gatsby. Dialed up to eleven in stripped of any joy.

346
00:49:20,370 --> 00:49:22,002
Chris: Well, okay, I don't know.

347
00:49:22,026 --> 00:49:25,266
Kayla: No one's doing the Charleston in the fountainhead, right?

348
00:49:25,298 --> 00:49:29,546
Chris: But the joy comes from, like, weird, sort of like, oh, my God, that.

349
00:49:29,578 --> 00:49:30,378
Kayla: Building looks so beautiful.

350
00:49:30,394 --> 00:49:34,170
Chris: That building is so spiritual to me. Like, that's the joy in the fountainhead.

351
00:49:34,330 --> 00:49:37,474
Kayla: It's not really a happy joy. It's more reverence.

352
00:49:37,642 --> 00:49:44,374
Chris: Yeah, I would say that. Anyway, in this heightened context, I'm like, kind of okay with how the protagonist ends the story.

353
00:49:44,502 --> 00:49:46,022
Kayla: Oh, my God, I love it.

354
00:49:46,126 --> 00:49:52,650
Chris: She's trying to make a point with it. I don't want spoilers for the fountainhead. Yeah, I don't want to spoil it here. So I won't say anymore.

355
00:49:52,950 --> 00:49:54,718
Kayla: The artist takes his art into his.

356
00:49:54,734 --> 00:49:57,646
Chris: Own hands in a very extreme way.

357
00:49:57,718 --> 00:49:58,670
Kayla: And I loved it.

358
00:49:58,750 --> 00:50:30,386
Chris: Yes. So the fountainhead apparently went through twelve publishers saying no before seeing print. And it would have been 13 if an editor involved hadn't threatened to quit over its rejection. Sales were initially slow, but thanks to word of mouth, that editor turned out to be right, as the book eventually did well enough to bring Rand, quote, lasting fame and financial success. Success. A 1949 adaptation on film starring Gary Cooper, for which Rand herself wrote the screenplay. And. Oh, now we're back in Los Angeles.

359
00:50:30,498 --> 00:50:32,250
Kayla: Wait, hold on 1 second. I have to say something about this.

360
00:50:32,290 --> 00:50:32,666
Chris: Yes.

361
00:50:32,738 --> 00:50:35,836
Kayla: How old is Gary Cooper? He was like 49 or something.

362
00:50:35,868 --> 00:50:38,956
Chris: Oh, yeah. He was like, yeah, and like, roark supposed to be like 22 or something?

363
00:50:38,988 --> 00:50:43,380
Kayla: He was like, in his late forties and hard work. Supposed to be like 22 when the book starts.

364
00:50:43,420 --> 00:50:47,516
Chris: Yeah. So I've watched the movie. It's pretty jarring. Like, he's a good actor and like.

365
00:50:47,548 --> 00:50:49,284
Kayla: He has to be that young.

366
00:50:49,332 --> 00:51:36,766
Chris: Like, it's pretty relevant to his character that. Yeah, like, he's got the, like, rebelliousness of youth thing going on that, like Gary Cooper, you know, he does his best. He's a good actor. So, anyway, Rand herself wrote the screenplay for this, which means we're back in LA. Her whole life after moving to America is just like going back and forth between LA and New York City. Speaking of which, she moves back to New York again in 1951. So, two years later, back to New York. And don't worry, she stays there for a while. Now, the success and influence of the fountainhead had many downstream effects for Rand, above and beyond. Just the money it also earned her admirers and followers. And after she moved back to New York, she started up a little club consisting of these admirers.

367
00:51:36,878 --> 00:51:46,622
Kayla: See, now it's a cult. Just. Just be successful. Just half your book. Just have your movie. Don't get the groupies. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it.

368
00:51:46,806 --> 00:52:34,400
Chris: At first, no, it really was just a bunch of dorks that went to Ayn Rand's apartment once a week and talked about philosophy. Exactly like my club at Penn, actually, we'll get back to these guys. But first, the timeline here warrants that I mention her second big novel, her magnum opus, as it's called, atlas Shrugged, which some discussions from her dork fan club actually did influence the writing of. So, Atlas Drugged was published in 1957, and the reaction was pretty mixed from critics. Quoting from Wikipedia here, despite many negative reviews, Atlas Drug became an international bestseller. But the reaction of intellectuals to the novel discouraged and depressed Rand. Atlas Shrugged was her last completed work of fiction, marking the end of her career as a novelist and the beginning of her role as a popular philosopher.

369
00:52:34,480 --> 00:52:37,992
Kayla: Wait, I'm sorry, say that again. Why did she stop writing fiction after Atlas?

370
00:52:38,016 --> 00:52:49,642
Chris: Well, I don't think there's a. Because there. There's a maybe because. Oh, but she didn't. She was depressed by the reaction to it, by, like, elites, like other interactions.

371
00:52:49,666 --> 00:52:51,430
Kayla: I have a lot to say about this.

372
00:52:52,570 --> 00:53:01,898
Chris: Well, if you want to say it now, go for it. There's more about her life that we can. I mean, like, we got more text to go through.

373
00:53:01,954 --> 00:53:06,066
Kayla: I'm gonna bite my tongue. Cause I'm just gonna be saying some things that I shouldn't be saying.

374
00:53:06,138 --> 00:53:06,962
Chris: All right, we'll hold that thought about.

375
00:53:06,986 --> 00:53:10,538
Kayla: My industry and the people that come out of it sometimes.

376
00:53:10,594 --> 00:53:33,840
Chris: Don't lose that thought. So, back to the philosophy club, comprised of the Ayn Rand sycophants. I mean, superfans. Excuse me. Superfans. Among this group included the following folks. You might recognize one of these names. All right, so there was Nathaniel Brandon and spouse Barbara Brandon. There was Leonard Peacock. And there was Alan Greenspan.

377
00:53:34,300 --> 00:53:37,244
Kayla: Why do I know that guy Fred chair Fred?

378
00:53:37,292 --> 00:53:41,964
Chris: Yeah. No, that Alan Greenspan. He was part of Ayn Rand's inner circle way back in the day, and.

379
00:53:41,972 --> 00:53:42,620
Kayla: He was the chef.

380
00:53:42,660 --> 00:53:46,856
Chris: And then he became. Eventually found his way to being chairman of the Fed.

381
00:53:46,928 --> 00:53:48,112
Kayla: Why do I know that?

382
00:53:48,216 --> 00:54:01,300
Chris: Because he was like. Not only was he chairman of the Fed for a while in, like, the nineties, and I don't know what the Fed is, he was also, like, kind of in the news a lot. The Fed is the Federal Reserve board. It's like the. Think of it as, like, the National Bank.

383
00:54:01,680 --> 00:54:03,064
Kayla: I refuse to think of it like.

384
00:54:03,112 --> 00:54:05,376
Chris: The head finance guy of the country.

385
00:54:05,488 --> 00:54:11,910
Kayla: Okay, is that track good enough for me?

386
00:54:12,410 --> 00:54:24,090
Chris: Now get ready, because the right is starting to get better at comedy, and it's making the left nervous. This group of theirs ironically called themselves unironically or ironically. Ironically.

387
00:54:24,170 --> 00:54:24,514
Kayla: Okay.

388
00:54:24,562 --> 00:54:26,986
Chris: Ironically called themselves the collective.

389
00:54:27,178 --> 00:54:29,242
Kayla: I'm gonna throw a bomb at that.

390
00:54:29,266 --> 00:54:33,150
Chris: Get it? Cause they hate collectivism. It's so good.

391
00:54:34,570 --> 00:54:43,760
Kayla: That's the lamest thing I've ever heard. Good God. We're gonna all sit around and talk together in one big group and say that groups are bad.

392
00:54:45,860 --> 00:54:56,668
Chris: So we all kind of know Alan Greenspan, so I won't really get into his deal. It's just kind of a whoa. Moment to be like, oh, shit. Alan Greenspan was one of her, like, inner circle disciples. That's.

393
00:54:56,724 --> 00:54:58,236
Kayla: How old is he?

394
00:54:58,348 --> 00:55:11,058
Chris: I don't know how old he was at the time. But the other folks on the list. We'll start with a Leonard Peekoff. Pecoff. Peekoff. P e I k o f f. I'm gonna say peekoff now. He was 17 years old when he started hanging out.

395
00:55:11,114 --> 00:55:17,030
Kayla: Okay, Ayn Rand with a. I gotta tell you something. Don't be an adult hanging out with 17 year olds.

396
00:55:17,410 --> 00:55:26,762
Chris: Rand had no children, and she became close enough with Mister Peekoff, eventually, that she legally designated him as heir to her estate.

397
00:55:26,866 --> 00:55:27,714
Kayla: That's cool.

398
00:55:27,882 --> 00:55:41,330
Chris: He's followed through on that since. He was the co founder, actually, of the Ayn Rand Institute. The one in Irvine. The one that I got all the free pamphlets and brochures from when I registered my pen club. The one that sent some of those speakers for the lecture series.

399
00:55:41,670 --> 00:55:43,334
Kayla: Yeah, the teachers did 911.

400
00:55:43,382 --> 00:56:05,626
Chris: Teachers did 911 lecture series. Yep. So that's the. He started or co founded the Ayn Rand Institute. He's also done a ton of other stuff by now, mostly in the academic sphere and a bunch of, like, the free online courses you're able to take at Ari's website. Feature him as the lecturer and who's taking these courses? I took one.

401
00:56:05,738 --> 00:56:06,858
Kayla: Yeah, but who else?

402
00:56:06,994 --> 00:56:40,476
Chris: Who else? I don't know. People that. It's probably like, here's what it probably is. It's probably like you have annoying friend who's an objectivist and is like, hey, man, you gotta watch this lecture. Like, it's. It's. It'll change your life. It's probably stuff like that. Cause I can't imagine how you'd, like, organically come across this thing, but there's, like, tons. So I'll get into this here in a second, because I do want to take a quick detour before talking about the other folks in the collective. You can take a shit ton of classes on the Ari website, and some are quite long. So, as I mentioned, I did a short course, one, like, just over an hour.

403
00:56:40,588 --> 00:56:42,604
Kayla: This was your experiential portion?

404
00:56:42,692 --> 00:56:43,180
Chris: Yeah.

405
00:56:43,300 --> 00:56:48,844
Kayla: In addition to, like, the experience of being in the objectivist realm for many years.

406
00:56:48,932 --> 00:56:56,144
Chris: Right. This was my checking the box on the season five theme of experientialism. But you're right. I almost feel like I didn't need to check that box.

407
00:56:56,192 --> 00:56:58,792
Kayla: Since you checked that box when you were 20 years old.

408
00:56:58,856 --> 00:57:13,824
Chris: I lived it. Yeah. So this class was called introduction to objectivism. It was mainly a refresher course for me, but it was also recorded in 1995, so that is a long time ago. I just want to show you a picture of Leonard Peekoff's hair from this lecture. But just be warned.

409
00:57:13,872 --> 00:57:14,608
Kayla: Is it grand?

410
00:57:14,704 --> 00:57:18,380
Chris: You are going to want to instantly join the cult after seeing this.

411
00:57:19,850 --> 00:57:20,490
Kayla: I'm in.

412
00:57:20,570 --> 00:57:21,754
Chris: All right, so there's picture number one.

413
00:57:21,802 --> 00:57:32,338
Kayla: I'm in. Okay. That is the most nineties I know. That's like, oh, he's in 1995. My God. He's got pleated dockers on, and he's got a mullet. Curly mullet.

414
00:57:32,434 --> 00:57:35,186
Chris: Curly. Epic mullet. Here's a close up of the curly epic.

415
00:57:35,258 --> 00:57:37,842
Kayla: Oh, my God, he looks so muddy. He looks great.

416
00:57:37,946 --> 00:57:40,194
Chris: The mullet, like, flares out at the bottom.

417
00:57:40,282 --> 00:57:44,434
Kayla: I don't even know how he did that. That guy's definitely a cult leader. There's a cult.

418
00:57:44,562 --> 00:57:46,114
Chris: He does kind of have the cult leader glasses.

419
00:57:46,162 --> 00:57:47,194
Kayla: Yeah, he's a cult.

420
00:57:47,322 --> 00:57:57,058
Chris: Speaking of experientialism, it actually is possible, sort of, to visit the Ayn Rand Institute. But it's, like, just a little office space and an office building in Irvine.

421
00:57:57,194 --> 00:58:00,274
Kayla: The Ayn Rand Institute makes it sound like it's, like, a grand campus.

422
00:58:00,362 --> 00:58:14,242
Chris: Yeah, that's kind of how I always envisioned it. Until I found some article that was written by somebody else who had gone to visit. And it was like little. It's like when you go to a doctor's office, you know, and it's like, go to the third floor and it's like, down this hall. It's like that kind of thing.

423
00:58:14,306 --> 00:58:16,070
Kayla: That's not what I pictured at all.

424
00:58:16,250 --> 00:58:20,310
Chris: Me either. I pictured it in a building, sprawling campus with tours and statues.

425
00:58:20,390 --> 00:58:24,610
Kayla: Yeah, and the building was clearly designed by architect Howard Rohr.

426
00:58:24,910 --> 00:58:29,342
Chris: Right. Exactly. By the way, shout out to season one, episode three with Irvine.

427
00:58:29,486 --> 00:58:30,230
Kayla: Irvine.

428
00:58:30,350 --> 00:58:43,966
Chris: As we discussed in last episode, I also reached out to Ari for an interview, and they politely declined, although they did send me that other interview between former director Jerome Brooke and Michael Shermer, which I might end up referencing again here.

429
00:58:43,998 --> 00:58:47,980
Kayla: Once or twice they responded with, no, and we are not a cult. And here's why.

430
00:58:48,060 --> 00:58:49,596
Chris: No, and definitely not a cult.

431
00:58:49,628 --> 00:58:54,280
Kayla: No, and here's the faq on why we're not a cult. A totally normal thing for someone to have.

432
00:58:54,940 --> 00:59:02,708
Chris: Back to Mister Peekaf, though. So my first exposure to Ayn Rand was the fountainhead. And I think it's safe to say that Atlas Shrugged was my second real exposure.

433
00:59:02,764 --> 00:59:03,892
Kayla: Which book do you like more?

434
00:59:03,996 --> 00:59:05,468
Chris: Oh, the fountainhead. It's not even close.

435
00:59:05,524 --> 00:59:06,172
Kayla: Okay.

436
00:59:06,316 --> 00:59:12,958
Chris: Like, Atlas Shrugged is interesting. It's interesting. But it is a dagny Taggart.

437
00:59:13,054 --> 00:59:14,534
Kayla: Mouthful is a great name.

438
00:59:14,582 --> 00:59:19,014
Chris: Dagny Taggart is a good name. And I don't know, the book is just very big.

439
00:59:19,102 --> 00:59:22,566
Kayla: I don't know what it means. But who is John Galt? I'm in. I want to know.

440
00:59:22,758 --> 00:59:47,710
Chris: My interest is piqued after those two books when you kind of start googling stuff, when you start digging more into the Ayn Rand cinematic universe. Peekaf's name obviously comes up thanks to the air thing and all of his own work. One of his own works is a book called the Ominous the end of freedom in America.

441
00:59:48,490 --> 00:59:51,270
Kayla: I think you should write a book called my mom is Ayn Rand.

442
00:59:53,970 --> 01:00:03,098
Chris: It's more like mommy, though. Cause it's like, all right, so anyway, this was me in my rand honeymoon period.

443
01:00:03,234 --> 01:00:03,770
Kayla: Okay.

444
01:00:03,850 --> 01:00:10,854
Chris: And even then, I was still like, yeah, I don't think I ever need to read that. That title is absurd. It's like Godwin's law.

445
01:00:10,862 --> 01:00:18,290
Kayla: It's always been the same. Like, even when you're different, you've always been the same. You've always been the same.

446
01:00:18,830 --> 01:00:31,758
Chris: Yeah. But, yeah, it's kind of like Godwin's law for books, you know? And Godwin's law is the Internet thing saying that as an online discussion grows longer, the probability of comparison to Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%?

447
01:00:31,854 --> 01:00:32,200
Kayla: Right.

448
01:00:32,270 --> 01:00:50,000
Chris: It kind of feels like it's part of that. According to book summaries and reviews, it basically does what it says in the tin. It draws parallels between America's current culture and german culture leading up to the nazi takeover, and then, surprise, prescribes objectivism as the cure.

449
01:00:50,540 --> 01:00:54,964
Kayla: Wait, what is culture he's talking about? What year is this?

450
01:00:55,052 --> 01:01:09,696
Chris: I have not read the book, so I don't know. But they have this sense, and I think that this contributes to their feeling of a cult. They sort of have the sense of, like, oh, everything is still wrong, and only we have the answer to make it right again.

451
01:01:09,768 --> 01:01:12,208
Kayla: That feels really culty.

452
01:01:12,304 --> 01:01:28,040
Chris: Yeah. I do want to kind of self reflect here. You know, we sit here and say, like, what a ridiculous name for a book. But then, like, I know that you and I sometimes use the word fasci. A lot we do to criticize America. So, like. But see here, is he not just doing the same thing?

453
01:01:28,120 --> 01:01:29,180
Kayla: Here's the difference.

454
01:01:29,710 --> 01:01:31,014
Chris: That we're okay and he's not.

455
01:01:31,062 --> 01:01:32,030
Kayla: That we're the mullet.

456
01:01:32,110 --> 01:01:32,574
Chris: We're. Right.

457
01:01:32,622 --> 01:01:33,926
Kayla: Yeah, I'm objectively correct.

458
01:01:33,958 --> 01:01:41,902
Chris: I'm objectively correct. No, I just. It's. It's hard because, like, I think there are fascistic elements that we can point to.

459
01:01:41,966 --> 01:01:42,286
Kayla: Right.

460
01:01:42,358 --> 01:01:49,070
Chris: But then I also, like, when I see somebody else do it and go like, oh, that's stupid. Then, like, I kind of have to think about how I do it, too.

461
01:01:49,150 --> 01:01:58,572
Kayla: No, when you said Godwin's law, I immediately thought about, like, yeah, that's. Everybody does that. That's nothing. No political belief system has a monopoly on that.

462
01:01:58,716 --> 01:02:05,044
Chris: Yeah, so that doesn't mean I don't still think that the book title is stupid. It just means that, like, I don't know.

463
01:02:05,092 --> 01:02:06,156
Kayla: It can be stupid for other reasons.

464
01:02:06,188 --> 01:02:06,988
Chris: Things are complicated.

465
01:02:07,044 --> 01:02:10,156
Kayla: Yeah, this can be stupid for. Shut up. You don't know how good you had it.

466
01:02:10,228 --> 01:02:26,234
Chris: Yeah, for real. So, since I did go through the trouble of watching the entire intro to objectivism lecture and Q and a session and took the trouble to take notes of, I will talk about a couple of the points he raised that I thought was interesting or at least informative.

467
01:02:26,362 --> 01:02:28,546
Kayla: Who was he doing this class for in the nineties?

468
01:02:28,618 --> 01:02:41,234
Chris: This was, like, a bunch of college students. I forget where. Okay, it might have been UCLA. I'm not sure. So Mister Peacock gets asked about liberals and conservatives, and while he says that both sides of the aisle are bad, of course. You know, everybody's bad except for objectivists. Right.

469
01:02:41,282 --> 01:02:41,706
Kayla: Right.

470
01:02:41,818 --> 01:03:02,664
Chris: As strange as this continues to sound, he says conservatives are actually worse because they want to control citizens moral and intellectual lives. And he cites, like, you know, criminalizing abortion, praying schools, that kind of thing, whereas liberals want to control citizens economic lives, which to him, at least in 1995, to him, that was the lesser of two evils.

471
01:03:02,792 --> 01:03:18,140
Kayla: This is why it's been so weird for me to like for us, I guess, for everybody to see the rampant uptake of love for Ayn Rand amongst the politically conservative, because the viewpoints are not explicitly on that side.

472
01:03:18,260 --> 01:03:19,160
Chris: It's odd.

473
01:03:21,140 --> 01:03:25,252
Kayla: They're like, oh, both sides. And that side's bad. But for some reason, and not only.

474
01:03:25,276 --> 01:03:32,700
Chris: Do they say both sides are bad, they're like, and the conservatives are probably worse. That's not every objectivist, but that's like, I would say, most of them.

475
01:03:32,740 --> 01:03:35,740
Kayla: That seems to be the stance of the root source.

476
01:03:35,860 --> 01:03:40,280
Chris: Yeah. And Ayn Rand has had some quotes to that effect as well.

477
01:03:40,580 --> 01:03:44,796
Kayla: I guess it's just the conservatives really hate welfare. Is it just that?

478
01:03:44,988 --> 01:04:35,970
Chris: I guess, I think so. I don't know, man. Like the alliance of the sort of like economic conservatism, neoliberal economics with the religious right is weird. That's worthy of its own, like, podcast series. So, you know, I think that's why some of these things are like, huh, really? And like, objectivists for their part, like, really don't care for religion and really don't care for that kind of stuff, like spiritual stuff. So I think that's why a lot of times, like, they'll just draw that hard line. But, so this kind of ties in, this next point kind of ties into what were just saying about the, like, everything's going to shit and only we have the cure. So I think that there's definitely within objectivism, or at least with objectivists, there's definitely a healthy helping of millenarian DNA in them. Right.

479
01:04:36,010 --> 01:04:37,202
Kayla: We live in a fallen society.

480
01:04:37,306 --> 01:04:44,246
Chris: Yep. In this lecture, Peacock talks about, and I'm paraphrasing here, the idea that our civilization is definitely headed toward collapse.

481
01:04:44,318 --> 01:04:44,598
Kayla: Right.

482
01:04:44,654 --> 01:05:00,662
Chris: And of course, only the ideas that we promote can save it, which again, is also what his book seems to have been about. I did write down part of his quote here, which is civil war, international war, economic collapse, a new dark ages are all possible, end quote.

483
01:05:00,766 --> 01:05:13,514
Kayla: What does he think about now? I must know if this is what he thought about the state of the world in 1995. And granted, and this was also, like, there's a lot of shit that was going on in 1995. There's no perfect era. No, but I want.

484
01:05:13,562 --> 01:05:25,722
Chris: But for an objectivist, we just had the eighties, and also the Soviet Union just collapsed. So, like, what are you. This is, like, yours should be at the peak of your game. Like, this is exactly what Ayn Rand wanted since, like, 1995.

485
01:05:25,746 --> 01:05:30,314
Kayla: I guess it was still really socially conservative in a lot of ways, and that was bad, I guess.

486
01:05:30,402 --> 01:05:50,742
Chris: I think that there was also, like, if you're viewing both sides as bad, then it's like, yeah, we're still creeping towards losing rights to abortion, and we're still creeping towards all the things that prayer in schools are kind of tied with. We hadn't quite gotten into the evolution debate yet, but that was just the next domino after prayer in schools, did.

487
01:05:50,766 --> 01:05:53,130
Kayla: They have any stance on roe getting overturned?

488
01:05:53,870 --> 01:06:23,170
Chris: I'm not sure officially, but I think that 90% of them would think that was a bad thing. Okay, don't quote me on that, but I'm pretty sure quoted anyway. Millenarianism definitely seems to be present and maybe even core a little bit to objectivism, because, like, actually, that's kind of what Atlas Shrugged was about. I know you didn't read that one, but Atlas Shrugged was about the creators in society, like, stopping, quote, unquote, stopping the motor of the world.

489
01:06:23,290 --> 01:06:23,802
Kayla: Okay.

490
01:06:23,866 --> 01:06:46,636
Chris: Right. So it was about the, like, essentially, like, the billionaires. Well, they weren't billionaires at the time. Let's be super clear. It was about the magnates, the tycoons. The tycoons, the titans of the creative titans of industry. Because don't, you know, all the titans of industry got there? Because, like, you know, in her mind, like, elon Musk, like, invented Tesla type of thing. That was the idea, you guys.

491
01:06:46,668 --> 01:06:47,440
Kayla: He didn't.

492
01:06:48,180 --> 01:06:56,710
Chris: So, in her mind, it's like, those types of people that don't exist going on strike, and therefore, oh, no, whatever.

493
01:06:56,750 --> 01:06:58,838
Kayla: Will we do if Elon Musk, when.

494
01:06:58,894 --> 01:07:12,470
Chris: Capital, goes on strike? Oh, man, that just ruins everything. But the point is, it's got this millenarian like, hey, we stopped the motor of the world, quote, unquote. Everything's kind of collapsed. Now we're gonna go, like, reset society with good values about money.

495
01:07:12,550 --> 01:07:13,894
Kayla: I'm gonna throw up.

496
01:07:13,982 --> 01:07:43,932
Chris: So, just seems to me that. That millenarianism is certainly core to the philosophy. So Peekaf gets into the weird logical loop that we talked on last episode, where someone asks, well, what about action XYZ? Like, this thing that we all agree is bad, like murder or something, right? What if that's in somebody's self interest? And the answer is inevitably, well, if you look at it in the right way, it's not actually in your self interest to do the thing. XYZ. It's not in your self interest to murder.

497
01:07:44,036 --> 01:07:44,516
Kayla: Right.

498
01:07:44,628 --> 01:08:22,974
Chris: Which, like, kind of seems like a closed logical loop to me. Right. If you can always just turn something around to say, like, this thing that seems like a counter argument is actually an argument in favor. Like, sure, it's probably in my self interest to not murder someone and steal their money, because I'll probably get in trouble for it. Like, I get that. But let's be real. Like, I think we're all going to agree that it's wrong to murder, regardless of whether I eventually get in trouble for it or not. So how does self interest factor into that? And besides, objectivism itself argues that selfishness is further down the philosophical trunk than something like law enforcement.

499
01:08:23,142 --> 01:08:52,750
Chris: So if you have to invoke law enforcement and consequences as the thing that makes it wrong, when deeper in the trunk, further towards the base, should be this ethics of selfishness, then that's just incredibly flimsy at that point. And to boot, objectivists absolutely think that there are bad laws that are immoral and probably ought to be broken, things like regulations and whatnot. So I just don't get how you can kind of invoke that. Like, well, you're probably gonna get in trouble. So it's not selfish, really, that feels.

500
01:08:52,790 --> 01:09:05,174
Kayla: Like someone missed the class and didn't read up on the part. Like, that feels like that's a really big oversight. If the collective and Ayn Rand didn't cover a better way to talk about that.

501
01:09:05,221 --> 01:09:09,264
Chris: Like, if that's the look, I might just be not doing it justice, too, but I've always had this.

502
01:09:09,312 --> 01:09:10,984
Kayla: It could be that you're really bad and dumb.

503
01:09:11,072 --> 01:09:19,752
Chris: I am stupid, so let's factor that in for sure. But we also. We had this conversation in our pen club several times where it was like, you try.

504
01:09:19,776 --> 01:09:29,888
Kayla: It's my dream. I want to sit in a room full of 19 year olds and hear their take on why you shouldn't murder 19 year olds at a very prestigious, expensive university.

505
01:09:30,064 --> 01:09:57,272
Chris: We were all like, 20, 21, 22. So that's way different. But, like, I think that what we're also running into here is the exact thing we talked about last episode is ought problem, right? Like, especially in the philosophy club, you know, you sit there, and you kind of go like, all right, we can think of a way to objectively define ethics based on, like, the laws of physics. And it just. It just doesn't work. It just doesn't seem to work.

506
01:09:57,416 --> 01:10:15,300
Kayla: Yeah. It kind of feels like with something like murder and some things that the more axiomatic argument for not doing it is that other people are other people and not. I must always act in my own self interest. It does kind of feel like that to me.

507
01:10:15,420 --> 01:10:33,482
Chris: And I think that. And this, I think an argument that a lot of atheists talk about with regard to ethics and moralism in religion and to the argument of, like, well, how can you possibly do the right thing if you're an atheist? Because you're not afraid of consequences. Kind of feels like that a little bit too. Right. Where, like, yes.

508
01:10:33,506 --> 01:10:34,962
Kayla: That pendulum thing of, like, I feel.

509
01:10:34,986 --> 01:10:40,754
Chris: Like you wouldn't murder anyway. Hopefully you feel like murder would be wrong whether or not, like, you went to hell.

510
01:10:40,842 --> 01:10:49,706
Kayla: Yeah. Penn Jillette literally says, I commit as many rapes and murders as I want. That answer is zero. That number is zero. And if your answer is something different, like, get the fuck away.

511
01:10:49,818 --> 01:10:59,598
Chris: Right. It feels more likely to me that it's like, a logical fallacy than, like, there's a bunch of, like, christians walking around just desperate to, like, rape and murder if it were, like, weren't for their.

512
01:10:59,694 --> 01:11:03,094
Kayla: But Jesus. Yeah, people don't like. Yeah.

513
01:11:03,262 --> 01:11:21,238
Chris: It's not that I think, honestly, like, my take on it, not to go into another huge rabbit hole, but, like, my take on it is that it's morality is more something that is hardwired a little bit into us for the purposes of making us able to work as a pro social species.

514
01:11:21,294 --> 01:11:33,638
Kayla: I hate to break it to the objectivist, but collectivism is one of the reasons why we are successful as a species. And so maybe there's some things that are hardwired into us, but just like you said, just to get along and.

515
01:11:33,654 --> 01:12:04,340
Chris: Work together, I think objectivists would say, well, of course we're built to be social. It's just, what is the proper way of interacting with another human? Is it sacrificing oneself or sacrificing them? Or is it free and mutual trade? That's how they would kind of answer that. But let me get back to this last point that peekaf made. Oh, sorry. Two more points. He blamed the increase in crime between the seventies and eighties in America on the, quote, morally bankrupt sixties culture, end quote.

516
01:12:04,680 --> 01:12:06,184
Kayla: Always comes back to hating hippies.

517
01:12:06,272 --> 01:12:26,116
Chris: I know. Exactly. And, like, why does it always also come back to the. It's the culture, like, everybody. This is every correct moral decay. It's always moral decay. Even when you have a philosophy built around reason and science, when you get to the end of it's still just an old white dude going, like, it's moral decay in the hippies.

518
01:12:26,188 --> 01:12:34,920
Kayla: People should behave in their own self interest and not kowtow to the man. And also, when these guys said, fuck the man, they were wrong and bad.

519
01:12:35,740 --> 01:12:40,652
Chris: And it's like the objectivists are anti Vietnam war, too. So it's like, I don't know.

520
01:12:40,716 --> 01:12:43,604
Kayla: We can all have problems with the hippies, but what exactly was the problem with the hippies?

521
01:12:43,692 --> 01:12:44,572
Chris: Yeah, I don't know.

522
01:12:44,596 --> 01:12:48,272
Kayla: It's just that they goofed around, looked goofy like that.

523
01:12:48,456 --> 01:12:51,000
Chris: I think free love or. I don't know. What is that?

524
01:12:51,040 --> 01:12:51,392
Kayla: How is that?

525
01:12:51,416 --> 01:12:51,912
Chris: I don't know.

526
01:12:51,976 --> 01:12:52,296
Kayla: What is that?

527
01:12:52,328 --> 01:12:54,976
Chris: No, that wouldn't be it either. I really don't know because it just.

528
01:12:55,008 --> 01:12:56,384
Kayla: That sounds like drugs.

529
01:12:56,472 --> 01:12:57,376
Chris: I don't know, Kayla.

530
01:12:57,448 --> 01:13:01,168
Kayla: Okay, you're gonna tell me the objectivists aren't, like, just do whatever drugs are?

531
01:13:01,184 --> 01:13:03,232
Chris: Actually, I bet the collective was, like, doing weed.

532
01:13:03,296 --> 01:13:12,644
Kayla: I don't even mean that. I just mean it feels like, given their standpoints on things, that it should be up to the individual whether or not they want to take drugs. And that's not a, like, moral issue.

533
01:13:12,792 --> 01:13:23,844
Chris: I cannot pinpoint it. All I know is that it's weird, but also not weird. The hippies that you have, these guys that supposedly hate religion, but suddenly, at the end of the day, they're still bitching about moral.

534
01:13:23,972 --> 01:13:31,840
Kayla: I know what it is. It's because the hippies were doing communes and stuff. Like, the hippies. There was a collectivist approach in some of their philosophies.

535
01:13:33,140 --> 01:14:24,792
Chris: I'm certain that factors into it. A few of his q and a answers reflected the lack of nuance and objectivism that I think really hurts it as a viable philosophy. You know, everything is absolute. Rand was an absolutist, and so was her philosophy. You know, only laissez faire capitalism is good enough. Capitalism. Several students asked him questions along the lines of, okay, but what about poor people who. Or people who need help? And after some explanation, he punctuates his answer with, quote, the only logical conclusion of a government that has state welfare is complete totalitarianism. End quote. Again, not a lot of nuance there that, like, you know, exists in the real world, right? And he gave the usual, like, objectivist libertarian answer about, like, okay, wait, so then poor people just get fucked in the system.

536
01:14:24,856 --> 01:15:00,048
Chris: And the answer that they usually give, depending on how you look at it, is charity or mutual aid. So his example was that supposedly farmers in the 18 hundreds before they could count on aid from the federal government, if a farmer was unlucky enough to get struck by disaster, he'd often be richer afterwards, actually, because the whole community around him would come together and support, which actually sounds pretty nice, not particularly selfish or like, I don't know, maybe it is because it implies a social contract involving mutual aid that you might benefit from. I don't know.

537
01:15:00,104 --> 01:15:05,620
Kayla: Do they know how charity works? Like, do they know. I'm not saying that's charity. I'm saying, do they know how charity works?

538
01:15:06,580 --> 01:15:07,500
Chris: What do you mean?

539
01:15:07,580 --> 01:15:16,300
Kayla: Like, they say, charity, charity. Are they talking about some nebulous idea of charity, or are they talking about charity as it exists?

540
01:15:16,380 --> 01:15:21,116
Chris: Nebulous idea. As an entity, as they tend to do? Nebulous idea.

541
01:15:21,308 --> 01:15:28,148
Kayla: So what are they saying? They're just saying that people will magically get helped by some benevolent billionaire.

542
01:15:28,244 --> 01:15:34,836
Chris: They're saying that there's no problem with helping the poor. They just don't think it should be the government doing it, because then you are.

543
01:15:34,868 --> 01:15:36,732
Kayla: So then who's helping the poor people.

544
01:15:36,796 --> 01:15:37,928
Chris: To help the poor.

545
01:15:37,984 --> 01:15:42,328
Kayla: So what I'm hearing is that the poor will not be helped.

546
01:15:42,424 --> 01:15:43,976
Chris: The poor may not be helped.

547
01:15:44,128 --> 01:15:45,720
Kayla: So they're saying that.

548
01:15:45,840 --> 01:15:50,936
Chris: They're saying if people don't decide that they want to help the poor, then the poor shouldn't be helped. That's what they're saying.

549
01:15:50,968 --> 01:15:54,992
Kayla: Then the poor should die. That's the natural consequence there, probably.

550
01:15:55,056 --> 01:15:55,464
Chris: Yes.

551
01:15:55,552 --> 01:16:00,224
Kayla: I just, I just have a lot of questions involved in a lot of things.

552
01:16:00,232 --> 01:16:57,710
Chris: I think the weirder part for me is that, like they frequently say, like, you know, oh, that's a good thing. And in, under capitalism, you know, under laissez faire capitalism, there's less poverty anyway, so it's actually a better system regardless. But that's not the moral basis for capitalism. The moral basis for capitalism is free interaction between two people. And if the government takes taxes from you and uses it to feed the poor, then that's not a free interaction. And a better way to maybe think about it again from the devil's advocate perspective is less like, well, I'd rather just hold onto my money and more like, well, what if you think that the biggest issue is poverty and I think that the biggest issue is healthcare and somebody else thinks that the biggest issue is helping, you know, third world sweatshops or something? Right?

553
01:16:57,750 --> 01:17:35,090
Chris: Like, then why do I have. Why is there an entity that can, like, override what I want and help with you? Like, let's say the government is like, we're gonna spend our money on homelessness, right? And then I'm like, well, what about the fucking, what about the third world? You know, slaves? Like, that fucking sucks. And so I think that's, like, a stronger argument because the argument there is, like, who decides what we spend that money on? Wouldn't it better if we all individually put our money where our mouth was and donate it or whatever to our own causes that we care about?

554
01:17:36,150 --> 01:18:04,546
Kayla: I remember when I was a young person and I thought a lot about taxes. That's all you need to know about me. And I remember being a child and going, well, wouldn't it just make a lot more sense if we could, like, pay the taxes to the things that we cared about? And that way people who, like, the military could pay their taxes to the military and, like, I could grow up and just pay my taxes to, like, schools. I think the objectivists would have really liked that pitch.

555
01:18:04,618 --> 01:18:17,492
Chris: So are you saying that they are childlike in their assessment, or are you saying that, like, this is actually kind of complicated sometimes? Because I think we. I mean, we've talked about this. It does suck.

556
01:18:17,596 --> 01:18:18,012
Kayla: I would.

557
01:18:18,076 --> 01:18:18,812
Chris: To pay taxes.

558
01:18:18,836 --> 01:18:21,612
Kayla: I would love to not pay taxes that go to cops and military, right?

559
01:18:21,676 --> 01:18:48,518
Chris: I mean, like, we are spending, like the military. Like, helicopters and missiles are insanely expensive. And a lot of the influence, because we have so much money influencing government comes from that. And, like, it creates this sort of, like, feedback cycle where we're just sort of, like, stuck in this, like, military industrial complex. So, you know, we've sat here and gone like, yeah, you know what? Fuck taxes. And then we're like, wait, am I just a libertarian now? What happened?

560
01:18:48,574 --> 01:19:03,862
Kayla: My problem is that I'm pro taxes and I'm anti the things our government chooses to prioritize. I view the government as something that should be, like, the will of the people that it represents. And currently our taxes are generally not distributed in such a way.

561
01:19:04,006 --> 01:19:05,414
Chris: Right, right.

562
01:19:05,582 --> 01:19:41,562
Kayla: But also, you can't do certain things. You can't do certain things just via charity alone. And I am totally on their side in saying that we could better organize our society to produce or to create few. To create less poverty, to create fewer people that need help. Need charity. Need aid. Absolutely. We absolutely could organize our society to create less poverty. And we're choosing not to do it. But in the meantime, I don't want the people that are in poverty right now because we have a fucked up system to die on the street.

563
01:19:41,706 --> 01:19:42,106
Chris: Right.

564
01:19:42,178 --> 01:19:48,870
Kayla: And so I kind of think until, like, you gotta do something to save those people. You do. Sorry. Bye.

565
01:19:49,410 --> 01:19:59,226
Chris: So again, this stuff is, like, kind of complicated, right? Because it's like, one hand, you're like, what? They're crazy. No, taxes are good. But then, like, when you think about it from a different perspective, you can kind of see what they're saying.

566
01:19:59,298 --> 01:20:00,234
Kayla: Oh, fuck taxes.

567
01:20:00,282 --> 01:20:39,126
Chris: Also gay taxes. All right, so let's go back down the tangent tree. We just talked a bit about the Leonard peekoff lecture that I watched for these episodes. Before we get back to the other folks in Rand's inner circle, the collective, here's a few courses that I didn't take. And I do mean a few, because, again, there are a ton of these courses on the Ari website. By the way, I noticed some of them are not free. Some of them you do actually have to register and pay for. And some of them are actually, like, not lectures that are, you know, just like from 1995. Some of them are actually, like, ongoing classes. So there's, like, some. Some things that are just lectures and some things that are, like, an actual.

568
01:20:39,288 --> 01:20:40,710
Kayla: Okay, gotcha.

569
01:20:41,130 --> 01:20:46,306
Chris: So here's some names. Certainty and happiness. Achieving success in thought and action. 2 hours.

570
01:20:46,418 --> 01:20:48,098
Kayla: I've got to say one thing about that.

571
01:20:48,194 --> 01:20:48,950
Chris: Okay.

572
01:20:49,730 --> 01:20:52,282
Kayla: I don't. I'm not happy.

573
01:20:52,426 --> 01:20:54,550
Chris: Okay, great. Maybe you should take that class.

574
01:20:54,930 --> 01:21:01,270
Kayla: I don't get a lot of communication from Ayn Rand's work about how to be a happy person.

575
01:21:01,650 --> 01:21:04,954
Chris: Oh, well, I feel like that's. Well, we'll get to that.

576
01:21:05,042 --> 01:21:05,870
Kayla: She does.

577
01:21:06,170 --> 01:21:27,674
Chris: Happiness and fulfillment are kind of like. That's why we gotta be selfish. Okay, next one. Lectures on culture and politics, 6 hours. Logic, the method of reason, 6 hours. Moral, 6 hours. And then there's a bunch of lectures on Rand's books, of course. There's one called the art of thinking. 14 hours.

578
01:21:27,802 --> 01:21:29,090
Kayla: The art of thinking.

579
01:21:29,170 --> 01:21:33,578
Chris: Free will, 3 hours. Eight great plays, 33 hours.

580
01:21:33,674 --> 01:21:34,310
Kayla: What?

581
01:21:34,910 --> 01:21:44,862
Chris: Eight great plays. Is hers one of them, actually. No, I did click in there is actually kind of a variety. The only one I remember is Othello and then seven others.

582
01:21:44,926 --> 01:21:45,930
Kayla: It is pretty great.

583
01:21:46,590 --> 01:22:31,700
Chris: There is a course on CRT, obviously, critical race theory. Yep. Which actually does have some interesting titled subtopics. But I don't trust it at all. Nor I like anybody who even says those letters. I'm just like, I don't trust anything you're about to say. But anyway, the list goes on again. The point of me selecting those particular titles is that they cover everything. Logic, moral virtue, happiness, culture, politics, Rand's books, other plays, free will, art of thinking. It just covers everything. And that's why there's so many courses. I guess that's just the nature of having a complete philosophical system. I don't know.

584
01:22:31,820 --> 01:22:33,012
Kayla: Yeah, that's a lot.

585
01:22:33,156 --> 01:23:26,206
Chris: Anyway, continuing back down the tangent tree, let us go ahead and talk about some of the other folks in the collective. So we talked about Peekaf Greenspan. We didn't really talk about him, actually, because he was already famous. And the other folks I mentioned in that initial inner circle were the Brandons, Nathaniel and Barbara. Nathaniel, Brandon, or. Sorry. Let's see. He started out as Nathaniel Blumenthal, and after marrying girlfriend Barbara, which was a few years after they started hanging out with Ayn, they changed their last names to Brandon. Brandon. Coincidence? Oh, I didn't dig into this to see whether he explicitly acknowledged that he changed his name to brand basically Brandon, or whether it's just like, speculation. I kind of want to give them the benefit of the doubt and just be like, oh, it's cool.

586
01:23:26,338 --> 01:23:28,350
Chris: Chose a different last name for both of you.

587
01:23:28,430 --> 01:23:29,030
Kayla: Right?

588
01:23:29,190 --> 01:23:36,870
Chris: But, yeah, but they did change their last name when they got married. Anyway, Nathaniel came into the inner circle at 20 years of age.

589
01:23:36,990 --> 01:23:38,982
Kayla: Why were they all so young and small?

590
01:23:39,126 --> 01:24:03,222
Chris: Well, in 1950, after reading the fountainhead, becoming enraptured, and exchanging fan mail with Ayn Rand, he ended up joining the group. Like, they. Like, he sent her a fan letter. They corresponded, and then he moved with Barbara across the country to go, like, become part of her collective. Pretty wild.

591
01:24:03,406 --> 01:24:09,550
Kayla: See, this is a reason why we shouldn't have this stage of capitalism that we're in is because you used to be able to do crazy shit.

592
01:24:09,630 --> 01:24:10,014
Chris: I know.

593
01:24:10,062 --> 01:24:12,574
Kayla: It makes me move across the country. You could just be.

594
01:24:12,622 --> 01:24:13,070
Chris: I know.

595
01:24:13,150 --> 01:24:16,862
Kayla: You could have a fucking mansion for your commune house and you could email.

596
01:24:16,926 --> 01:24:24,434
Chris: You could just send a message to a famous person, email Ayn Rand from the future, or send her regular mail, and she'd be like, hey, man, what's up?

597
01:24:24,522 --> 01:24:26,034
Kayla: Well, now you can tweet at Chris Pratt.

598
01:24:26,122 --> 01:24:32,474
Chris: That's true. And it makes me bummed, though. Cause, like, my fan mail to Shannon Miller when I was 16 never got me anywhere with her.

599
01:24:32,562 --> 01:24:33,922
Kayla: Did you actually send it?

600
01:24:34,066 --> 01:24:34,866
Chris: I think so.

601
01:24:34,938 --> 01:24:37,210
Kayla: Cause you have a copy of it at home. You won't let me read it.

602
01:24:37,330 --> 01:24:54,694
Chris: Cause it's too embarrassing, Kayla. But apparently it's possible that can work. I don't know. So I'm just bummed about that. Anyway, Mister Brandon quickly became Rand's favorite little guy, which led to her naming him as her heir.

603
01:24:54,822 --> 01:24:56,130
Kayla: Wait, what?

604
01:24:56,550 --> 01:24:57,270
Chris: What?

605
01:24:57,430 --> 01:25:01,650
Kayla: You already said that she had an heir and it was her other favorite little guy.

606
01:25:01,950 --> 01:25:05,782
Chris: Oh, we already talked about Rand's actual legal heir. Leonard Peacock, you mean?

607
01:25:05,886 --> 01:25:06,610
Kayla: Yes.

608
01:25:06,910 --> 01:25:16,050
Chris: Oh, that's true. And like the law of identity states, that a is a and a thing can't be true at the same time in the same way for two different things. So how is this possible?

609
01:25:16,210 --> 01:25:16,890
Kayla: Explain.

610
01:25:17,010 --> 01:25:18,618
Chris: We will get to that. Oh, no.

611
01:25:18,634 --> 01:25:19,002
Kayla: I need to know.

612
01:25:19,026 --> 01:25:43,774
Chris: Now back to her relationship with Mister Brandon. Here's what Encyclopedia Britannica has to say. Among members of the collective, Nathaniel Brandon was unquestionably Rand's favorite. She openly acknowledged him as her intellectual heir and formally designated him as such in the afterword of Atlas Shrugged, which she co dedicated to him and to O'Connor. End quote.

613
01:25:43,942 --> 01:25:44,966
Kayla: Who's O'Connor?

614
01:25:45,038 --> 01:25:55,010
Chris: O'Connor, if you don't remember from much earlier, was Ayn Rand's husband. So she co dedicated Atlas Shrugged to Nathaniel Brandon and her husband.

615
01:25:55,390 --> 01:26:07,138
Kayla: What's going on here? What's going on here? I think she. I don't know. I think there's a lot going on. I think that a. How old was she at this time? I think there's something weird about hanging out with little kids.

616
01:26:07,294 --> 01:26:08,002
Chris: She was.

617
01:26:08,106 --> 01:26:10,522
Kayla: They're not little kids. 17 and 20 are not little kids.

618
01:26:10,586 --> 01:26:19,990
Chris: But she was born in 1905, so in 1951 ish, which is, I think when this started, she was like 46, but this continued into the sixties.

619
01:26:20,370 --> 01:26:25,746
Kayla: Okay. I think there's. I think that I'm looking at these ages a little. With a little bit of a side eye.

620
01:26:25,818 --> 01:26:26,594
Chris: A little side eye.

621
01:26:26,642 --> 01:26:42,012
Kayla: Just because they're. I'm not saying like, ooh, she was a groomer. I'm just saying there's, you know, anytime you have those disparity in ages, in some sort of, like, mentorship, leadership, charismatic leader, capacity, there's like, where there's like.

622
01:26:42,036 --> 01:26:43,876
Chris: A heavy degree of, like, admiration.

623
01:26:43,948 --> 01:26:54,092
Kayla: There's an imbalance of power. Yeah, yeah. So it makes me concerned. And then also I'm just like, what's going on? What's happening? Yeah, tell me what's happening. Tell me what you think.

624
01:26:54,156 --> 01:27:19,540
Chris: I think that's pretty astute. It feels very much like that to me as well. Where, again, you have this, like, because, I mean, the power dynamic here is real, right? Like, this is a fan, right? I mean, it was a fan. Now it's like, it became much more than that, but it's a fan, 20 years old, Ayn Rand is 45 or whatever, in her forties, and is, like, this world renowned at this point, I think, for producing the fountainhead.

625
01:27:19,620 --> 01:27:19,908
Kayla: Right?

626
01:27:19,964 --> 01:27:36,092
Chris: So, you know, she's working with, like, Cecile DeMille and with Gary Cooper. So there's definitely, like a father yode thing here where, like, you have this, like, glowing figure that's like, way above you in terms of their, you know, position and power, right? Definitely feels like that, right?

627
01:27:36,116 --> 01:27:58,210
Kayla: And for some reason, his, you know, his. His favorite little guys in his team were a bunch of young people, a bunch of young women, right? There was anybody of all walks of age and life in his group, but his favorites were the young sycophants. And so I'm just looking at Ayn Rand, and you're telling me that her favorites were the young sycophants, and I just have questions.

628
01:27:58,750 --> 01:28:54,510
Chris: After Atlas Shrugged was published in 1957, with a bunch of input from Mister Brandon, I might add, Rand gave him her blessing to start a company with the objective to promote objectivism. Let me read you just a bit more from that Britannica article on this, which I think does a great job of summarizing this period of time in Rand's life. Quote. In the late 1950s, with Rand's permission, Brandon established a business designed to teach the basic principles of objectivism to sympathetic readers of Rand's novels. The Nathaniel Brandon Institute, NBI, as it was later called, offered courses in objectivism in New York and distributed tape recorded lectures by Brandon to objectivist centers in various other cities. Despite its outward appearance as an educational institution, NBI did not permit its students to think critically about objectivism or to develop objectivist ideas in novel ways.

629
01:28:54,930 --> 01:29:27,500
Chris: Through the success of NBI, Brandon would eventually become the public guardian of objectivist orthodoxy against innovation or unauthorized borrowing by objectivist sympathizers, especially among the growing student. Right. In 1962, Brandon and Rand launched the monthly objectivist newsletter, renamed the Objectivist, in 1968. Meanwhile, Rand's fame grew apace with the brisk sales of her novels. She was invited to speak at numerous colleges and universities and was interviewed on television talk shows and on the news program 60 minutes, end quote.

630
01:29:28,040 --> 01:29:30,784
Kayla: So we got dueling orgs or dueling.

631
01:29:30,872 --> 01:29:33,232
Chris: No, this is with her blessing. This is part like this.

632
01:29:33,256 --> 01:29:36,944
Kayla: But I'm saying. But I don't understand. You said there were two heirs. How are there two heirs?

633
01:29:37,112 --> 01:29:38,224
Chris: We haven't gotten to that part.

634
01:29:38,272 --> 01:29:39,300
Kayla: I'm confused.

635
01:29:39,730 --> 01:29:43,138
Chris: All right, so there's right now in the story and there's right now in real life.

636
01:29:43,194 --> 01:29:43,714
Kayla: Okay?

637
01:29:43,802 --> 01:29:47,306
Chris: So right now, as of in 2023, it's Leonard Peacock.

638
01:29:47,378 --> 01:29:47,890
Kayla: Okay.

639
01:29:48,010 --> 01:29:51,834
Chris: At this point in the story, in the fifties and sixties, it's still Brandon.

640
01:29:51,922 --> 01:29:52,474
Kayla: Okay.

641
01:29:52,562 --> 01:29:56,386
Chris: And we are. There's at some point that flips over.

642
01:29:56,538 --> 01:29:57,802
Kayla: And can you tell me why?

643
01:29:57,866 --> 01:30:16,892
Chris: So we will still get to that. But I do want to discuss real quick, like, the sort of, like, dogmatic orthodoxy part here, because this clearly refers to that. Right. Like, at this point in time, it says, Brandon would become the public guardian of objectivist orthodoxy against innovation or unauthorized borrowing.

644
01:30:16,956 --> 01:30:17,684
Kayla: Gotcha.

645
01:30:17,812 --> 01:30:44,400
Chris: So again, it feels rather dogmatic in that regard. I also, though, I want to present a counterargument to that I heard Jeron Brook make in his interview with Michael Shermer. So his thing was basically like, look, Ayn Rand invented something. She invented objectivism. And she wanted the thing that she said was objectivism to be objectivism. Right. She's not saying you can't go have other thoughts and do other things that just can't be called objectivism.

646
01:30:44,440 --> 01:30:47,176
Kayla: Right. It's a different thing. I'm not anti that.

647
01:30:47,248 --> 01:30:52,344
Chris: I'm not anti that either. I think it just. I don't know. There's part of it that feels weird.

648
01:30:52,392 --> 01:31:10,500
Kayla: It feels weird that's such a priority, the preservation rather than the interest in philosophical thought and some sort of give and take. But that, again, kind of goes back to this idea of, well, this is mine and I made it. This is what I say. There's no outside influence. It's not a conversation. This is what I'm saying.

649
01:31:10,580 --> 01:31:20,460
Chris: Right. And that feels weird to me. For a philosophical system, especially one that's being actively promoted by an institution versus. I wrote a book, and I don't want you to change the words.

650
01:31:20,540 --> 01:31:25,740
Kayla: There's something different between an artistic endeavor and a philosophical endeavor.

651
01:31:25,820 --> 01:31:32,432
Chris: Yeah. And what I've ultimately. But I think it's like they're nothing like. That Venn diagram certainly overlaps. I think.

652
01:31:32,536 --> 01:31:38,728
Kayla: I can't just get up and say, like, oh, well, Aristotle said this, and this is what we should take from Aristotle. I mean, I can say that.

653
01:31:38,784 --> 01:31:39,072
Chris: Right.

654
01:31:39,136 --> 01:31:48,080
Kayla: But I can't say dogs go to church on Wednesdays. And that's what Aristotle said, and it's aristotelian philosophical beliefs. I can't.

655
01:31:48,120 --> 01:31:49,840
Chris: Are you saying that dogs don't go to church on Wednesday?

656
01:31:49,880 --> 01:31:53,344
Kayla: I don't think they do. I think that they're a Thursday dog.

657
01:31:53,472 --> 01:32:39,636
Chris: It's like the twice a year dog. Cathy. Anyway. Yeah. Where I've landed on it is like, I actually think that the person that it hurts the most to be orthodox is rand herself or Ari themselves. Because, like, yeah, you can say it's not open for discussion or change or evolution, and that is absolutely your right. You have every right to say that. But then as soon as you say that, it becomes tremendously less useful. And you encourage people to say, like, well, I'm gonna pick and choose some stuff. And if those people that pick and choose stuff, if you, like, don't have dialogue with them because they're not saying it the right way or whatever, then what do you even do? Like, you're just. You're only shooting yourself in the foot, I feel like.

658
01:32:39,708 --> 01:32:40,320
Kayla: Right.

659
01:32:41,060 --> 01:32:47,600
Chris: Anyway, let's get back to Miss Rand. So here we are. Fifties, sixties. Things are going great, right?

660
01:32:48,020 --> 01:32:50,716
Kayla: I mean, I guess flying high.

661
01:32:50,748 --> 01:32:52,092
Chris: She's got the book sales going.

662
01:32:52,156 --> 01:32:52,908
Kayla: What happened?

663
01:32:53,084 --> 01:33:12,900
Chris: Intellectual air going. But, like the greek tragedies that objectivists recommend, that heady flight up to the sun sometimes leads to something of a fall. So, is there anything else, Kayla, that you think that, like, feels weird about Ayn Rand's relationship with Mister Brandon?

664
01:33:13,060 --> 01:33:16,214
Kayla: I will answer your question by asking you a question.

665
01:33:16,332 --> 01:33:17,030
Chris: Yeah.

666
01:33:17,610 --> 01:33:18,450
Kayla: I'm a writer.

667
01:33:18,570 --> 01:33:18,914
Chris: Yeah.

668
01:33:18,962 --> 01:33:19,794
Kayla: If I wrote something.

669
01:33:19,882 --> 01:33:20,314
Chris: Yeah.

670
01:33:20,402 --> 01:33:22,426
Kayla: And then I dedicated it to you.

671
01:33:22,538 --> 01:33:23,130
Chris: Yeah.

672
01:33:23,250 --> 01:33:29,010
Kayla: And my 20 year old male protege, how would that make you feel?

673
01:33:29,090 --> 01:33:30,786
Chris: I wouldn't feel super great about it.

674
01:33:30,818 --> 01:33:54,998
Kayla: Would you at least, like, I would probably raise some concerns. Even if you believed the relationship to be totally academic or platonic or whatever, you would at least go, it's interesting that my. And I'm putting words in your mouth also. I'll phrase this a question. Would you at least go, I find it interesting, and raises some red flags for me, that my wife would put me and this guy on the same level in, like, her magnum opus.

675
01:33:55,134 --> 01:33:58,654
Chris: Well, first of all, I don't think you've dedicated any of your scripts to me, so.

676
01:33:58,702 --> 01:33:59,398
Kayla: No, I have not.

677
01:33:59,454 --> 01:34:05,814
Chris: I'm already like, I'm a bad person to ask because I don't know who you're dedicating them to. What little 20 year old you have running around.

678
01:34:05,862 --> 01:34:08,536
Kayla: All my 20 year old friends are your little hottie.

679
01:34:08,718 --> 01:34:10,364
Chris: 20 year old sycophants. I know.

680
01:34:10,452 --> 01:34:11,560
Kayla: Got a lot of those.

681
01:34:12,260 --> 01:34:16,716
Chris: So Nathaniel and Ein had indeed been having a sexual affair.

682
01:34:16,788 --> 01:34:20,560
Kayla: Yeah, I would have. I would have thought so.

683
01:34:20,980 --> 01:34:23,020
Chris: Lasting roughly ten years.

684
01:34:23,060 --> 01:34:24,236
Kayla: That's a long time.

685
01:34:24,388 --> 01:34:27,812
Chris: And this affair was the most Ayn Rand thing.

686
01:34:27,876 --> 01:34:28,980
Kayla: I don't wanna hear about it.

687
01:34:29,060 --> 01:34:31,028
Chris: That you can possibly describe. See this?

688
01:34:31,044 --> 01:34:47,530
Kayla: Is it very serious? Well, it just feels like everything is so fucking serious with these guys. Yeah, that's what I mean about the lack joy, is that it's because even when you're talking about happiness, it's not like, woohoo. It's like serious.

689
01:34:48,470 --> 01:35:13,532
Chris: I am very happy and reverent right now. I am fulfilled. Ideal man. Okay, so the following is paraphrased from Barbara Brandon, later writing on this topic. Barbara being Nathaniel's wife at the time, she wrote a bio memoir called the passion of Ayn Rand, which was also made into a movie with Helen Mirren playing Rand, no less.

690
01:35:13,636 --> 01:35:14,532
Kayla: Okay, I want to watch that.

691
01:35:14,556 --> 01:36:04,530
Chris: So we need to like, watch that for the show. I know, but this is a paraphrase from that memoir and it's actually secondhand from Shermer's. Is it a cult essay? But the falling in love was not planned, but it was ultimately reasonable since the two of them were de facto the two greatest humans on the planet. By the total logic, this is a quote again from Rand. Quote. By the total logic of who we are. By the total logic of what love and sex mean, we had to love each other, Rand told Barbara Brandon and her own husband, Frank O'Connor. It was a classic display of a brilliant mind intellectualizing a purely emotional response, and another example of reason carried to absurd heights. Whatever the two of you may be feeling, rand rationalized. I know your intelligence.

692
01:36:04,690 --> 01:36:40,080
Chris: I know you recognize the rationality of what we feel for each other and that you hold no value higher than reason. This is her speaking to Barbara and Frank. Unbelievably, both Barbara and Frank accepted the affair and agreed to allow Aine and Nathaniel an afternoon and evening of sex and love once a week. And so, Barbara explained, we all careened towards disaster. The rational justification and its consequences continued year after year as the tale of interpersonal and group deceit grew broader and deeper. End quote.

693
01:36:40,580 --> 01:37:08,796
Kayla: Look, man, people can have all different kinds of relationships in all different kinds of ways, and I am not going to sit here and judge anybody for having different kinds of arrangements with their various friends and lovers and committed partners. That being said, I'm genuinely horrified by that level of gaslighting and manipulation coming out of her mouth.

694
01:37:08,868 --> 01:37:11,812
Chris: But I think she believed it, though, is the thing. I don't care.

695
01:37:11,836 --> 01:37:14,012
Kayla: That doesn't make it not gaslighting and manipulation.

696
01:37:14,076 --> 01:37:59,832
Chris: No, I know that. I know that. But this is definitely a drink, her own Kool Aid thing, because I've definitely read other quotes from her where she's talking to someone about the affair. Maybe it's Brandon, maybe it's Barbara. I don't know who. But I've definitely read quotes where she's like, this is right. There's definitely the same thing going on with this affair that goes on with the philosophy itself, which is like, well, this is okay because it is derived from the facts of reality, and it's objectively correct, because we are the two most important people on the planet. And of course, we would fall in love with each other. And so therefore, you guys should be totally okay with it, which in, like, some weird sort of gaslighty way, they. I don't know if they were okay with it, but they allowed it.

697
01:37:59,896 --> 01:38:01,144
Chris: Well, it's like you permitted it.

698
01:38:01,192 --> 01:38:03,540
Kayla: Clearly, you have to let them do this, or else you lose them.

699
01:38:04,080 --> 01:38:04,624
Chris: Yeah.

700
01:38:04,712 --> 01:38:23,448
Kayla: And it's just horrifying to. I don't think that you should think you're the most important person on the planet. Like, are they saying that in a. Like, I'm more important than other people because I'm making this philosophy, or, we are the most important people on the planet in the way that any individual is the most important person in their own world?

701
01:38:23,504 --> 01:38:28,260
Chris: I mean, like, I think that it's. I think that Ayn Rand definitely had an inflated opinion of herself.

702
01:38:29,320 --> 01:39:03,790
Kayla: I also think that maybe don't get married if you're Ayn. I'm serious. If you're Ayn Rand and you hold your philosophies to such a close degree that you seem to live your entire life, every action of your life is defined by this philosophy. It does feel like getting married is incompatible with that. I mean, if you want. It turns out, if you don't want your selfishness to also be injurious, then I don't know if you can get married and not be immoral.

703
01:39:03,870 --> 01:39:15,698
Chris: Yeah, but Kayla, in her philosophy, it shouldn't have been injurious, because Frank and Barbara should have looked at it and gone like, oh, yeah, they are two titans of intellectual thought. And that makes sense. So I'm not even upset.

704
01:39:15,774 --> 01:39:17,810
Kayla: Okay, well, would you. How would you feel?

705
01:39:17,930 --> 01:39:19,258
Chris: Dude, I'm.

706
01:39:19,314 --> 01:39:24,562
Kayla: If I was saying, look, man, I gotta fuck this guy, because he and I are the most important people on the planet. Why are you even married?

707
01:39:24,626 --> 01:39:27,474
Chris: Because it's logically justified by the facts of reality.

708
01:39:27,522 --> 01:39:35,218
Kayla: But, like, why stay married to this schmuck over here? Like, why not just get married to the most important, if he's the most important person on the planet? What are you getting from your husband? I don't understand?

709
01:39:35,354 --> 01:39:50,922
Chris: I don't know. And obviously, I'm the most important person on the planet, so I don't know what she was thinking with this Brandon guy. But anyway, this isn't alive at the time. Doesn't mean it wasn't important back then. Right? I was going to be alive. Somebody predicted that.

710
01:39:51,026 --> 01:40:08,226
Kayla: Literally. Literally. That is whether or not she believes it, that sentiment holds. So is, like, so overlapping with so many things thought and believed by so many other cult leaders.

711
01:40:08,258 --> 01:40:09,170
Chris: Other cult leaders? Yeah.

712
01:40:09,210 --> 01:40:21,080
Kayla: Like father. Like Father Yoda would absolutely say something like, you don't understand to be having an affair, because we are. Like, we're on a miss soul bonded, must be together. Twin flames universe.

713
01:40:21,620 --> 01:40:28,500
Chris: Right? And I am, like, literally maybe God on earth. So, like, I'm doing you a favor when you have sex with me like I.

714
01:40:28,580 --> 01:40:28,724
Kayla: Do.

715
01:40:28,732 --> 01:40:34,412
Chris: You remember that lady that. That was interviewed on that documentary about David Koresh and the Branch Davidians?

716
01:40:34,476 --> 01:40:34,724
Kayla: Yeah.

717
01:40:34,772 --> 01:40:36,372
Chris: Do you remember how she talked about having sex with her?

718
01:40:36,396 --> 01:40:38,990
Kayla: Having sex with him. Washington was being close to God.

719
01:40:39,070 --> 01:41:06,568
Chris: Being close to God. It was. He was deigning to have sex with her. And she felt so grateful that this godlike being would have sex with her. Now, I don't think Ayn Rand is quite at that level, of course. But it's like the same type of thing, right, where it's like, well, I mean, of course you want to have sex with me because I am the biggest brain of all time, right? So, like, of course that I'm kind of doing it a favor for.

720
01:41:06,624 --> 01:41:20,248
Kayla: Calm down for a second. Like, most people, all of these people we talk about, like, if they just took a breather, if they just went, wait, hold on. Time out. Let me take a step back. It might help a lot of things. Cause just calm down.

721
01:41:20,304 --> 01:41:39,270
Chris: Just. And as you mentioned before, at this point in time, there's also an age differential. I think when they started up, Ayn was 49 and Nathaniel was 24, half her age, which, I don't know, 24 is kind of getting to the point where it's like, whatever, but it is half is a lot. I don't know, it's a bit.

722
01:41:39,310 --> 01:42:00,416
Kayla: It's also a lot to be like, this is the most important person on the planet, this 24 year old. Like, I'm sorry, right? I felt very important. Our 24 year olds are incredibly important. But to be 49 and saying this is like, an intellectual titan that is the most important person in the world is maybe discounting the importance of wisdom on intellect.

723
01:42:00,568 --> 01:42:02,704
Chris: Maybe he just said, really awesome tits.

724
01:42:02,832 --> 01:42:03,540
Kayla: Maybe.

725
01:42:04,640 --> 01:42:17,940
Chris: So their affair eventually did trail off. According to him, she became somewhat depressed after Atlas Shrugged was published in 1957. And then that kind of just naturally ended things, sort of.

726
01:42:18,400 --> 01:42:21,590
Kayla: It's not super hot when your book doesn't do well.

727
01:42:21,760 --> 01:42:50,576
Chris: Yeah, so it was. I don't think anybody knows, like exactly when they started boning, but they met in 1950, so like a maximum of seven years, but probably a few less. I know I said ten earlier, but that was like the. That was more the time period. Excuse me. So maximum seven years that they could have been actually boning. Okay. By the way, can you imagine how intolerably cringe their sex must have been? Oh, not to like sex shame or kink shame or anything like, whatever kink you're into is cool. It's just funny to think about like, there particular kink.

728
01:42:50,728 --> 01:42:52,880
Kayla: I'm so important. I'm so important.

729
01:42:53,000 --> 01:43:06,256
Chris: This is. You're so. This is the most rational sex I've ever had. This fulfills my veneration for your ideal man. And I'm never going to culminates with my philosophy. Oh, I'm coming. Selfish. Oh, coming.

730
01:43:06,368 --> 01:43:07,020
Kayla: Stop.

731
01:43:08,600 --> 01:43:12,496
Chris: A few years later, Rand did try to resume the affair with him.

732
01:43:12,568 --> 01:43:13,904
Kayla: Aw. She loved him.

733
01:43:13,992 --> 01:43:21,140
Chris: But by that time, he was already on to his next affair with a younger model named Patricia Scott.

734
01:43:21,520 --> 01:43:22,552
Kayla: Oh, no.

735
01:43:22,736 --> 01:43:24,248
Chris: So he was uninterested.

736
01:43:24,344 --> 01:43:27,580
Kayla: So he was just cheating on his wife. Cause he liked to cheat on his wife.

737
01:43:28,080 --> 01:43:33,688
Chris: So this new affair was finally the nail in the coffin with his marriage with Barbara. So they got separated.

738
01:43:33,824 --> 01:43:34,688
Kayla: Good job, Barbara.

739
01:43:34,744 --> 01:43:41,940
Chris: Even at that time, both Barbara and Nathaniel agreed. Let's not tell Ayn about this because she's gonna go ape shit.

740
01:43:42,400 --> 01:43:46,326
Kayla: That, see, that's. There's problems here. That's a problematic thing to happen.

741
01:43:46,358 --> 01:44:02,942
Chris: Probably seemed wise at the time, but, and this goes to what you're saying about problematic lies do incur a debt to the truth. And in 1968, Ayn Rand did indeed find out about Nathaniel's relationship with Patricia from Barbara herself, who apparently changed her mind.

742
01:44:03,006 --> 01:44:07,534
Kayla: Barbara, get it. I like that.

743
01:44:07,662 --> 01:44:53,450
Chris: And I know I really want to watch the passion of Ayn rand now. And that revelation finally led to the fall of objectivist Olympus. This all transpired pretty differently depending on who you want to believe. Whether you want to believe, like the Brandons themselves and their memoirs and interviews, or whether you want to believe Peekaf and Ari, which basically, like, totally dismiss their point of view, or the spectrum of her followers and other objectivists who range from believing the Brandon's accounts all the way to defending here, to the point of, like, infallibility, which is the vibe I get from Ari. In the interest of trying to be objective about this, I did trace through sourcing on the Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica articles on this subject.

744
01:44:53,950 --> 01:45:43,224
Chris: And while the two Brandon's accounts are cited in both places, and I think, contribute, like, a lot to this tale, there are also plenty of other primary sources from which the articles draw information, which is important. So, as a side note, in the interview with Michael Shermer, your own brook basically dismissed some of the culty claims from the Brandon, saying, oh, well, that's one source, and it's a biased source. I'm not saying that all of what they're saying is incorrect, but there's parts I don't like. There's motivation there. So you can't necessarily treat that as, like, the only source. But I don't think it is the only source, at least based on me tracing where these encyclopedia articles took their various bits of information.

745
01:45:43,312 --> 01:46:24,016
Chris: There were other bios, other memoirs written, and, you know, letters from Ayn Rand, blah, blah, that they're citing as their sources. So it's not just the Brandon's. So here's some accounts of what went on. First, the Wiki articles on Ayn Rand and Nathaniel Brandon. Quote, she published an article in the object. So this is after, by the way, after finding out about this affair that had been going on for a while, and she hadn't been having her affair with. With Brandon for like, eight years or something. Quote, she published an article in the Objectivist repudiating Nathaniel Brandon for dishonesty and other, quote, irrational behavior in his private life. End quote.

746
01:46:24,168 --> 01:46:25,408
Kayla: I can't listen to any more of this.

747
01:46:25,424 --> 01:46:26,488
Chris: In subsequent years.

748
01:46:26,624 --> 01:46:28,936
Kayla: I can't. I'm honestly, I can't do this.

749
01:46:29,008 --> 01:46:38,304
Chris: And subsequent years, Rand and several more of her closest associates parted company, end quote. Why can't. Why not? Does this make you not like the fountainhead more? Is this like.

750
01:46:38,352 --> 01:46:40,980
Kayla: No, I've already got plenty of reason to not like it. It's fine.

751
01:46:41,680 --> 01:46:44,784
Chris: It's just like how you can't watch Annie hall now.

752
01:46:44,912 --> 01:46:50,064
Kayla: Upsetting. This dynamic is just so upsetting and awful.

753
01:46:50,112 --> 01:46:51,368
Chris: But isn't it juicy, though?

754
01:46:51,464 --> 01:46:52,568
Kayla: Oh, it's extraordinarily juicy.

755
01:46:52,584 --> 01:46:53,808
Chris: It's the juiciest thing.

756
01:46:53,904 --> 01:46:58,040
Kayla: It would better if it weren't, like, you know, a charismatic leader.

757
01:46:58,340 --> 01:46:59,212
Chris: It would be.

758
01:46:59,316 --> 01:47:02,308
Kayla: But orchestrating and manipulating their sycophants that are much younger than them.

759
01:47:02,324 --> 01:47:04,660
Chris: Yes, I cannot agree more.

760
01:47:04,740 --> 01:47:12,388
Kayla: But just you guys. You guys, all of you are so predictable.

761
01:47:12,524 --> 01:47:13,156
Chris: Yeah, I know.

762
01:47:13,188 --> 01:47:14,140
Kayla: It's so tropey.

763
01:47:14,220 --> 01:47:15,044
Chris: It's so tropey.

764
01:47:15,092 --> 01:47:18,884
Kayla: Oh, he had an affair with a hot young model instead of you, and then you dipped it.

765
01:47:18,892 --> 01:47:22,146
Chris: And then basically, this is the best part, is that. But it's like the.

766
01:47:22,178 --> 01:47:25,474
Kayla: Like, he's irrational in his personal life and therefore he must be repeated.

767
01:47:25,642 --> 01:48:04,270
Chris: It ties so closely to her, like, way of thinking and philosophy or whatever. It's like, if this were like a video game, like, we'd call it ludonarrative design. We call it Ludo narrative cohesion. I just love the cohesion between how the affair happened and how her fucking books are. Cause in her books, by the way, like, you know this from Fountainhead, maybe, but in Atlas Shrugged, Dagny Taggart, she's going through guys and she's going through the world's best guys. She's going through. First she dates the steel magnate, and then she dates this generations mining guy from.

768
01:48:04,310 --> 01:48:05,910
Kayla: She's a railroad magnate, right?

769
01:48:05,990 --> 01:48:14,050
Chris: Yeah, she's a railroad magnate herself. And then at the end, of course, she dates Jon Galt. So she's just going through all the best guys in the entire world.

770
01:48:14,710 --> 01:48:20,542
Kayla: And I also gotta say, this guy. This guy is getting y'all.

771
01:48:20,726 --> 01:48:22,638
Chris: I don't know, he might have been cute.

772
01:48:22,694 --> 01:48:29,358
Kayla: I'm not saying he's not, but I'm just saying, like, you're writing your books about Dagney, Taggart, Dayton, John Galton. Then you're like, I like Brandon, and.

773
01:48:29,374 --> 01:48:30,566
Chris: I like this 24 year old.

774
01:48:30,598 --> 01:48:38,086
Kayla: It's not even like Andrew Carnegie or somebody, you know, it's not like a Ken, he's not a Kennedy, but he.

775
01:48:38,118 --> 01:48:49,528
Chris: Has the key thing that ultimately I think she wanted, which is pole models, which is he was absolutely enthralled by her. Right. And her philosophy.

776
01:48:49,584 --> 01:48:58,192
Kayla: And then the second he does something that shows he can be enthralled by another, that's very threatening, that completely shatters it. Yeah. God, it's so even if you haven't.

777
01:48:58,216 --> 01:48:59,448
Chris: Been in an affair for eight years.

778
01:48:59,504 --> 01:49:00,100
Kayla: Right?

779
01:49:00,400 --> 01:49:13,666
Chris: And the Brandon Wiki article, quote, says, in response, rand morally condemned the Brandons and disassociated herself from them in an article for her journal, the Objectivist, which, without revealing the existence of her romantic involvement with Brandon.

780
01:49:13,738 --> 01:49:17,042
Kayla: Oh, but he's dishonest. Accused, she's not irrationally disposed.

781
01:49:17,066 --> 01:49:23,370
Chris: Accused him of deliberate deception and financial misdeelings in their business partnership.

782
01:49:23,450 --> 01:49:24,098
Kayla: Okay.

783
01:49:24,234 --> 01:50:10,556
Chris: End quote. Now let's hear from Botanica. Accusing him of betray, quote, accusing him of betraying objectivist principles. She stripped him of his partnership in the objectivist and demanded that he surrender control of NBI, which was soon dissolved. The closing of the institute freed various self described objectivists to publicly develop their own interpretations of Rand's philosophy, all of which, however, she rejected as perversions or plagiarism of her ideas. She was especially incensed at the use of objectivist vocabulary by young libertarians, whom she accused of disregarding morality and flirting with anarchism. Meanwhile, Brandon's status as Rand's favorite disciple was assumed by Leonard Peekoff, an original member of the collective, whom she would eventually designate as her intellectual and legal heir.

784
01:50:10,628 --> 01:50:15,308
Kayla: How does it feel to be sloppy seconds, Leonard? I want to say one thing.

785
01:50:15,324 --> 01:50:17,924
Chris: I wish that I could ask him, but he's got the hair, so maybe.

786
01:50:17,972 --> 01:50:27,916
Kayla: His hair is pretty great. I like that she. It's not that she's incensed that he would be with another woman because he was married to another woman.

787
01:50:28,028 --> 01:50:28,612
Chris: Right?

788
01:50:28,756 --> 01:50:31,784
Kayla: It's that he would have an affair with another woman, right?

789
01:50:31,972 --> 01:50:32,600
Chris: Yeah.

790
01:50:32,720 --> 01:50:44,000
Kayla: And I guess, yeah, that would make you crazy if it's like you thought. Especially, like, because it's like somebody having. I could see the twisted logic of, like, oh, somebody having an affair with you. That makes you special in some way, but if he just has affairs, you're not special.

791
01:50:44,040 --> 01:50:52,968
Chris: And also, they kept it secret. Right. So, like, there's definitely like a chicken egg there of like, why didn't you tell me this? It's like, because we knew you'd react this way. I'm only reacting this way because you didn't tell me.

792
01:50:53,024 --> 01:50:53,240
Kayla: Right.

793
01:50:53,280 --> 01:51:16,946
Chris: There's definitely some. Some aspect of that, I think, going on. Let's go back to the skeptic article by Mister Shermer, because he calls together some of my favorite tidbits. In this first quote here, he'll be giving Barbara's account of how Ayn Rand took the news that Nathaniel was having an affair with someone other than her. According to Barbara, Ein said, get that bastard down here.

794
01:51:17,058 --> 01:51:18,218
Kayla: Okay. I love her. I love her.

795
01:51:18,234 --> 01:51:22,146
Chris: Again, Rand screamed upon hearing the news. Or I'll drag him here myself.

796
01:51:22,218 --> 01:51:23,732
Kayla: I'm back on board.

797
01:51:23,836 --> 01:52:05,900
Chris: Nathaniel, according to Barbara, slunk into Rand's apartment to face the judgment day. It's finished. Your whole act, she told him. I'll tear down your facade as I built it up. I'll denounce you publicly. I'll destroy you as I created you. I don't even care what it does to me. You won't have the career I gave you, or the name, or the wealth or the prestige, you'll have nothing. The barrage continued on for several minutes, until she pronounced her final curse. If you have an ounce of morality left in you, an ounce of psychological health, you'll be impotent for the next 20 years. End quote. So that's an account from Barbara. Okay. Did it happen? I don't know. I like to think that it did. Cause it's pretty cool.

798
01:52:10,720 --> 01:52:13,020
Kayla: Don't people realize how goofy they are?

799
01:52:14,000 --> 01:52:54,554
Chris: Like, come on, let me read this last bit. Because the skeptic article also pulls from Rand's public response, which, while less juicy and fun than get that bastard down here, is equally damning for the way in which she frames everything. In a six page open letter to her followers in the publication of the Objectivist, May 1968, Rand writes, quote, about two months ago, Mister Brandon presented me with a written statement which was so irrational and so offensive to me that I had to break my personal association with him. And then he says, without so much as a hint of the nature of the offense, Rand continued. About two months later, Mister Brandon suddenly confessed that Mister Brandon had been. This is her writing. Oh, sorry.

800
01:52:54,602 --> 01:53:07,110
Chris: About two months later, Misses Brandon suddenly confessed that Mister Brandon had been concealing from me certain ugly actions and irrational behavior in his private life, which was grossly contradictory to objectivist morality.

801
01:53:07,410 --> 01:53:17,060
Kayla: I really am. It's. Honestly, it's causing fear in my body. The way that she's using the word irrational. It's really scary. And she continues, not good.

802
01:53:17,360 --> 01:53:22,320
Chris: Because Nathaniel Brandon and Barbara Brandon, in a series of actions, have betrayed fundamental.

803
01:53:22,360 --> 01:53:25,620
Kayla: Principles of objectivism, like not fucking me.

804
01:53:26,880 --> 01:53:34,576
Chris: We condemn and repudiate these two persons irrevocably and have terminated all association with them, end quote.

805
01:53:34,648 --> 01:53:36,990
Kayla: Very rational, very logical.

806
01:53:37,370 --> 01:54:06,260
Chris: So you can see kind of the, like, problem here. Oh, where there's a problem here, there's a massive conflation happening between, like, what she thinks is objective, what she thinks is part of the philosophy, how she conducts her own life, what is actually objective versus subjective. Again, these last bits are from the Brandons themselves, so maybe a biased source. Well, actually, the last. Sorry. The last thing that I read was from Ayn Rand herself.

807
01:54:06,380 --> 01:54:07,556
Kayla: That was Miss Rand.

808
01:54:07,628 --> 01:54:17,180
Chris: So that was, you know, that was her saying, not, I was upset that he was fucking someone else. That was her saying, like, he's betrayed the principles and is thus excommunicated.

809
01:54:17,300 --> 01:54:24,668
Kayla: That's so culty and terrifying. That's so, like. Yeah, that's really. That is an unsafe exit, my friend.

810
01:54:24,844 --> 01:54:31,030
Chris: It is very unsafe. Anyway, thus ended the relationship between Ayn Rand and the Brandons.

811
01:54:31,110 --> 01:54:34,662
Kayla: I would feel really bad if. I feel really bad for Leonard Peekoff right now. I really do.

812
01:54:34,686 --> 01:54:36,846
Chris: I know. I've always felt bad for him.

813
01:54:36,918 --> 01:54:37,502
Kayla: So bad for him.

814
01:54:37,526 --> 01:54:40,330
Chris: I know. I know, dude. I know. I know.

815
01:54:40,990 --> 01:54:44,930
Kayla: This is the most important man in my life. I guess maybe he's this guy.

816
01:54:45,790 --> 01:55:00,588
Chris: And also, it kind of makes me. It recolors all of the dedication that he's had to promoting these ideals. It's kind of like, well, of course you're dedicated. You have to prove this out. You have to prove out that you were the correct heir. You have to be the most dedicated.

817
01:55:00,684 --> 01:55:06,804
Kayla: And if you theoretically step out of line, Ayn Rand's gonna come back from the dead and, like, repudiate you.

818
01:55:06,892 --> 01:55:07,260
Chris: Right.

819
01:55:07,340 --> 01:55:10,020
Kayla: Because of your lack of rationality.

820
01:55:10,180 --> 01:55:15,556
Chris: So Nathaniel went on to become a clinical psychologist and the, quote, father of the self esteem movement.

821
01:55:15,628 --> 01:55:17,840
Kayla: Okay, what does that mean?

822
01:55:18,500 --> 01:55:24,216
Chris: He wrote, like, a bunch of books. He published a bunch of books about, like, self esteem. And, like, that was part of his practice.

823
01:55:24,288 --> 01:55:25,536
Kayla: What's his name? Nathaniel Brandon.

824
01:55:25,568 --> 01:55:33,680
Chris: Nathaniel Brandon, yeah. So I think for the most part, it's like, kind of how we're talking about, like, it can be healthy to have. Like, to treat, you know, to choose yourself first.

825
01:55:33,760 --> 01:55:34,192
Kayla: Right.

826
01:55:34,296 --> 01:55:53,672
Chris: I think that's kind of where he went with it a bit. I know that he disagreed on principle. Like, you know, at first he was like orthodoxy guy, but then he started disagreeing with things. One of them was like, the place of emotion. Like, he felt like emotion had a much higher place in humanity and conceptualizing of the world and making sense of things.

827
01:55:53,736 --> 01:55:54,272
Kayla: Okay.

828
01:55:54,376 --> 01:56:26,650
Chris: Than Rand did. Like, you know, with Ayn Rand, it's like, well, I guess emotion's there. Whereas he was like, no, it's important. Anyway, as for Miss Rand, after the dissolution of the collective and NBI, she kept publishing, although intermittently, with a bi weekly newsletter and a collection of philosophy articles that she wrote. But she was never quite the same, and by this point was getting to kind of be up there in age as well. Also, she was a ravenous smoker. And because she was Ayn Rand, it had to be like a thing. You know, it couldn't just be like, oh, she smoked. It was like a moral thing.

829
01:56:26,730 --> 01:56:27,834
Kayla: Shut the fuck up.

830
01:56:27,882 --> 01:56:38,410
Chris: Smoking is the spiritually fulfilling thing to do as an ideal human. Or there's like, this whole passage about it in Atlas Shrugged, about, like, it makes me think I can control fire or what it makes me.

831
01:56:38,450 --> 01:56:51,120
Kayla: I think that she should have literally taken a trip to Sedona and just got a little sound bath and just maybe had a little edible and just chilled out for a second.

832
01:56:52,220 --> 01:57:00,540
Chris: So, yeah, this, like, ideal human smokes. But on the other hand, she had to undergo surgery for lung cancer in 1974.

833
01:57:00,580 --> 01:57:17,940
Kayla: But it's morally the correct position. And I hate it. I hate all of this, because I hate all of this. I hate it, I hate it. I think that artists that are super serious and take themselves super seriously are extraordinarily compelling. I could not be more compelled by somebody like Marina Abramovich.

834
01:57:17,980 --> 01:57:19,516
Chris: I was just gonna say Marina Abramovich.

835
01:57:19,548 --> 01:57:33,212
Kayla: Marina Abramovich could come out and say, smoking is a moral imperative because it is man's control over fire. And I would go, fuck, yeah, it is. You fucking better believe it. I will follow you anywhere. But if Ayn Rand comes out and says that, I go, chill out, ladies.

836
01:57:33,236 --> 01:57:33,916
Chris: What a weirdo.

837
01:57:33,988 --> 01:57:35,320
Kayla: You should just chill.

838
01:57:36,190 --> 01:57:48,470
Chris: So in 1976, she retired from writing her newsletter, and after initial objections, allowed a social worker employed by her attorney to enroll her in Social Security and Medicare.

839
01:57:48,590 --> 01:57:49,890
Kayla: Oh, Ayn.

840
01:57:50,390 --> 01:57:52,134
Chris: Finally, in March of 1982.

841
01:57:52,182 --> 01:57:54,846
Kayla: This is the thing that. This is the only thing I really know about Ayn Rand's.

842
01:57:54,878 --> 01:58:27,744
Chris: Like, we'll talk about it in a sec, after I tie the bow. Because she died in 1982 of heart failure at her home in New York, and at her funeral, a six foot floral arrangement in the shape of a dollar sign was placed near her casket. And in her will, she named, of course, Leonard Peekaf as her heir. And as we've mentioned, for his part, he really did do quite a good job of carrying on her legacy. Like, he co founded the Ayn Rand Institute that we've mentioned several times. He does all those online classes, advocacy. It's all of its involvement in college clubs.

843
01:58:27,832 --> 01:58:29,580
Kayla: He's the real hero of this story.

844
01:58:30,080 --> 01:58:35,884
Chris: I know. If it weren't for the ominous parallels, I would just. I would have been a Peekaf fan instead of a rand fan.

845
01:58:35,932 --> 01:58:41,132
Kayla: Like, yeah, here's the thing. Like, as a character, I'm really digging him.

846
01:58:41,236 --> 01:58:41,540
Chris: Yeah.

847
01:58:41,580 --> 01:58:44,316
Kayla: As a human being, I journey out, but as a character.

848
01:58:44,348 --> 01:58:50,700
Chris: As a character in this story, in the passion of Ayn Rand. Yeah. Do you want to talk at all about the Social Security thing?

849
01:58:50,820 --> 01:59:33,892
Kayla: I mean, I was just gonna say that's the only thing. That's one of the few things that I know about her personal life. I didn't know, obviously, all these juicy bears. I just did know about what is often labeled by Ayn Rand detractors as, like, the hypocrisy of. Speaking of building an entire moral framework around if you need welfare, like, go die, and then needing and relying on it in later life. And I know that there are supporters that say, like, look, man, that was money that was stolen from her in the form of taxes. So she was just using her own money. And to that I want to say, how do you think welfare works? That is how welfare works. Welfare is generally, you pay into it and then you get it back.

850
01:59:33,956 --> 01:59:41,444
Kayla: Like when I go on unemployment insurance in between jobs, I'm not just taking money from somebody else. I've paid into that.

851
01:59:41,492 --> 01:59:50,076
Chris: I think part of the problem is that everybody always thinks, yeah, but what if I never have to pay into something like that? Or what if I never need health insurance? What if I never need that?

852
01:59:50,108 --> 01:59:51,252
Kayla: Then you are God.

853
01:59:51,356 --> 01:59:59,044
Chris: Right? But that's what I'm saying. You always think about that. You always think that way. If you're thinking that way until something happens.

854
01:59:59,132 --> 01:59:59,540
Kayla: Well, look.

855
01:59:59,580 --> 02:00:01,220
Chris: And then it's like, well, this is different.

856
02:00:01,340 --> 02:00:02,000
Kayla: Yeah.

857
02:00:02,500 --> 02:00:21,108
Chris: It's the same way with abortions. It's like, well, it's not those people. It's people that are just using it as contraception. And then something happens where for health reasons, because you have a corpse in your uterus, you have to get an abortion in month seven or whatever. And then you're like, well, but it's not that. It's the other people.

858
02:00:21,164 --> 02:00:50,990
Kayla: It's the other people. So I think that it's possible that detractors perch on this. Gotcha. Maybe a little bit too much. And also, I will say that it is definitely a very blatant, like, come on, you guys. Very blatant. Like, okay, you're gonna hold certain people to a certain standard, but that the charismatic leader is okay for doing this. Got it.

859
02:00:51,110 --> 02:00:52,894
Chris: Yeah. I will give her credit.

860
02:00:52,942 --> 02:00:59,150
Kayla: Cannot be. There's no way for the charismatic leader to do a wrong.

861
02:00:59,310 --> 02:01:13,784
Chris: Yeah. And that kind of feels like that's true with Ayn Rand, especially for Ari, the orthodoxy people, because I might mention this later, but nothing in their stuff about the Brandon's or about any other schism y type stuff.

862
02:01:13,942 --> 02:01:15,572
Kayla: Ooh, that would get people in.

863
02:01:15,716 --> 02:01:23,332
Chris: I know when I finally learned that, which was like, well, after I had read both of her novels and I finally did the Googles.

864
02:01:23,436 --> 02:01:24,340
Kayla: Right, right.

865
02:01:24,500 --> 02:01:26,116
Chris: I was like, whoa, that's interesting.

866
02:01:26,188 --> 02:01:29,156
Kayla: Yeah, that's sexy stuff.

867
02:01:29,188 --> 02:01:39,890
Chris: I wouldn't have thought that. I get why that is sort of suppressed, because that does call into question, like, the hypocrisy. As I said this at the top of the show, doesn't always walk the walk, right?

868
02:01:41,030 --> 02:01:59,582
Kayla: So terrifying ways. Like, it's really, it's not just being, like, misusing the word irrational or logical or whatever. It's like utilizing the, like, keywords of your philosophical framework in order to condemn somebody who's not fucking you, right?

869
02:01:59,726 --> 02:02:36,248
Chris: And I'll say about the Social Security thing, like, I think another counterargument to that is, like, you know, you'll. You'll see, like, you know, reverse the tables there, right? And, like, people on our side of the left right divide, people will be critical of people who are, like, in favor of socialism or pro communism or whatever. They'll say, like, oh, yeah, you're typing that on your iPhone and tweeting it on Twitter. Both private companies, right? Like, and I think that's, like, I don't know. I don't care for that either, because, like, we all have to live in a society. And so I think that's part of it. With Ayn Rand here, I kind of.

870
02:02:36,264 --> 02:02:37,664
Kayla: Say, like, make the argument, you do.

871
02:02:37,712 --> 02:02:45,944
Chris: Have to, you know, at the end of the day, you do have to take Social Security to live, right? Your ideology doesn't really compute with this.

872
02:02:46,032 --> 02:02:54,220
Kayla: Right? Exactly, exactly. But that said, get wrecked, Ayn Rand, for taking Social Security at the end of your life.

873
02:02:55,400 --> 02:03:44,220
Chris: So objectivism as it stands today is like, well, the inner circle, the collective is long gone, of course, died before its charismatic leader did. But objectivism itself is more popular than ever with all those tea party types and other right wing nincompoops. So theres that. And Ari does seem to be alive and well. They have a ton of material on their website, and they still have these guys writing, like, op eds and lecturing and whatnot. And theres also more objectivists out there than just the ARI orthodoxy. One notable example is the Atlas Society, or task of which was founded by objectivist David Kelly, although there's, like, a little more juicy interne drama here as well. So in the late eighties, he was with Ari himself. He was part of the organization. But then, well, here's how T's wiki article describes the situation.

874
02:03:45,040 --> 02:04:21,028
Chris: After disputes with ArI founder Leonard Peacock and board chairman Peter Schwartz, Ari cut ties with Kelly and warned others in the objectivist movement not to associate with him. In response, Kelly and former ARI advisor George Walsh co founded the Institute for Objectivist Studies in 1990. It was later renamed the Atlas Society, which is still around today. By the way, TAs positions itself as a more open and tolerant alternative to the orthodox ARI. ARI and TAs are the most prominent american organizations advocating for objectivism, although TAS is smaller and not as well funded as its rival.

875
02:04:21,124 --> 02:04:22,880
Kayla: TAS sounds like a better time.

876
02:04:23,900 --> 02:04:32,228
Chris: Yeah. And I just love that. It's like the whole excommunication thing. Like history repeated itself. The son acts like the mother.

877
02:04:32,404 --> 02:04:33,316
Kayla: Yep.

878
02:04:33,508 --> 02:04:37,164
Chris: And also, we know that objectivism has really made it because why?

879
02:04:37,332 --> 02:04:38,508
Kayla: There's a schism.

880
02:04:38,644 --> 02:05:21,840
Chris: Schism, baby. Yeah. So, yeah, I can confirm that Ari in particular doesn't really do any acknowledging of task, and they also don't really talk about Brandon either, or anything else that might pierce the veil. David Kelly, for his part, allegedly, that dispute was related to the orthodoxy itself. Like, he wanted to promote the idea that objectivism was an open system, which Peekaf, and by extension, the rest of Ari, was explicitly against. Calling it a closed system, which we talked about before, is what Ayn Rand herself wanted. Well, Kayla, that brings us to the end of our episode. Life and times of our charismatic leader, complete with the juicy dirty laundry. Thoughts.

881
02:05:22,660 --> 02:05:24,080
Kayla: I have a lot of them.

882
02:05:25,700 --> 02:05:30,556
Chris: I wish that our audience could see your face right now. You're like, your head's cocked to one side.

883
02:05:30,628 --> 02:05:35,360
Kayla: I'm doing a rock eyebrow. I think that.

884
02:05:37,380 --> 02:05:39,204
Chris: I think that. I want to watch passion of Ayn Rand.

885
02:05:39,252 --> 02:06:20,822
Kayla: I want to watch the passion of Ayn Rand right now. Fast nine. But now we're gonna go watch passion of Ayn Rand. I think that I have far more data points on certain aspects of our criteria than I did before. I will reserve total judgment until we get to the end of this journey. But I'm a little more disappointed in Ayn Rand the person now than I was before. And unfortunately, I think that trend is going to continue because I know that in future episodes, you're going to get into more specifics on, like. Like, positions that were maybe held and statements that were maybe made about certain things from her.

886
02:06:20,926 --> 02:06:21,334
Chris: Yeah.

887
02:06:21,422 --> 02:06:29,310
Kayla: So I'm just real. I'm not looking forward to the. I already was, like, not a fan of Ayn Rand the person, and this is not really helping.

888
02:06:29,350 --> 02:06:32,134
Chris: Yeah. We're gonna play a game called good take, bad take with Ayn Rand.

889
02:06:32,182 --> 02:06:40,414
Kayla: Okay. Okay. I think that. I think that I maybe know what I'm gonna call this at the end.

890
02:06:40,462 --> 02:06:54,474
Chris: Well, yeah, yeah. No spoilers, but I think that. Yeah, I get it. After hearing that and knowing that we're not exactly gonna be redeeming in the next episode, all the redemption was actually last episode where I was like, there's some good stuff.

891
02:06:54,602 --> 02:07:50,250
Kayla: There was some redemption here, though, in this episode of talking about. And granted, I don't think that she or her club would call it redemption, but explaining that there were some personal circumstances that Ayn Rand experienced as a young person that shaped her worldview, I think that's important context. Like, I think it's really important context for people, especially, who may not really agree with where she ended up philosophically, to at least know that it didn't come out of a vacuum, and it didn't come out of growing up in America. These are not like, obviously she had, she liked America and she wanted to come here and she wanted to live here. And her philosophies are very intrinsically tied to a lot of american philosophy philosophies. But her viewpoints grew out of living under a political system that took something away.

892
02:07:51,310 --> 02:08:11,832
Kayla: I'm going to use vague terms here and not try to use judgment terms. Took something away from her family, changed the way her family operated in their home country, forced moving around, and eventually separated her from her family. So those are very specific experiences that were probably negative, that came out of.

893
02:08:11,936 --> 02:08:16,736
Chris: They're very negative in her mind. I mean, like she said, like, she might have starved several times.

894
02:08:16,848 --> 02:08:29,736
Kayla: Starving is not good. And if a collectivist, if you perceive a collectivist culture as leading to you and your family's starvation, it makes sense that you would swing the other way on the pendulum a little bit.

895
02:08:29,808 --> 02:09:15,166
Chris: Right? And I'll give, I would like to say, like, I don't even know if I would use the word perceived there. I mean, it was the Bolsheviks at that point that did the nationalization. So that's not to say that there aren't also bad things that happen in capitalism, but certainly, I don't think what happened to her family was a good thing. And there is a clear chain of causality back to the Bolshevik government, also, 1917. Like, no matter who wins that, it's probably gonna be rough on some people when there's a revolution, right? So, like, maybe it would have been kind of, by definition, a different family if the Bolsheviks had lost. I don't know. But certainly, you know, in our world, they didn't. And that had its negative consequences on her.

896
02:09:15,278 --> 02:09:17,102
Kayla: And, well, that's often a trend, led.

897
02:09:17,126 --> 02:09:19,150
Chris: To her thinking certain ways.

898
02:09:19,230 --> 02:09:41,688
Kayla: That's often a wider trend in communist revolution and in communism in general when it, you know, comes to a country, is that often our. Our thoughts on communism in America are shaped by the fact that the people that communism harms the most tend to leave and then immigrate here.

899
02:09:41,824 --> 02:09:42,216
Chris: Right?

900
02:09:42,288 --> 02:10:03,428
Kayla: So, and that's something that's explicitly happened with Ayn Rand. Her particular family was harmed by this thing, and that brought here. And we see that a lot with, like, detractors of cuban communism. We see that with lots and lots and lots of different ways. So it's just interesting context and useful context.

901
02:10:03,524 --> 02:10:19,332
Chris: One more little bit of context, too. I don't know how important this is. I read it in one place that she, to finish the deadline for the fountainhead, took a bunch of stimulants. I forget exactly what drug it was.

902
02:10:19,516 --> 02:10:22,292
Kayla: But this is what I'm saying. They would be down with drug use.

903
02:10:22,356 --> 02:10:38,956
Chris: Yeah, well, she was. She was definitely down with productivity drug use. And this particular thing that I read alleged that, like, some people thought that maybe that's why she was a little bit volatile later in life. Get that bastard down here. And that kind of thing.

904
02:10:39,068 --> 02:10:40,204
Kayla: I think it was the.

905
02:10:40,292 --> 02:10:41,556
Chris: I don't know, just throwing that.

906
02:10:41,628 --> 02:10:48,820
Kayla: I think it was the power. Yeah, I think power does corrupt. I just don't want to come to that conclusion. But I'm coming to it.

907
02:10:48,900 --> 02:10:54,908
Chris: Yeah, I think power and then being irrationally rational, I think also, well, if.

908
02:10:54,924 --> 02:11:00,476
Kayla: You think that you're the best person in the entire world, then, yeah, that's akin to being like, well, I'm Jesus Christ.

909
02:11:00,668 --> 02:11:39,330
Chris: Right? So to recap our first episode on this topic, two weeks ago we talked about the orthodoxy that is objectivist beliefs. Today we talked about Ayn Rand, her life, and some of her key associates. Next time on cult are just weird. And our third and final episode on this topic will go more into how the larger popular and cultural reaction to her writings went down, including this podcast's own reaction as to whether it's a cult or not. Until then, I wish you reason and objectivity expressed in your own unique way. This is Chris, this is Kayla, and this has been cult or just weird? Collective edition?