S5E10 - The Secret Knowledge (Theosophy)

1
00:00:15,080 --> 00:00:22,810
Chris: We're on our way, headed to downtown LA. That rhymed downtown LA stuff. Say what it is.

2
00:00:23,270 --> 00:00:24,890
Kayla: Am I supposed to know what it is?

3
00:00:26,150 --> 00:00:27,254
Chris: You know what it is.

4
00:00:27,382 --> 00:00:36,122
Kayla: We're going to a building that was built in 1927, just a stone's throw from USC, if you know Los Angeles at all.

5
00:00:36,146 --> 00:00:36,354
Chris: So.

6
00:00:36,402 --> 00:00:51,226
Kayla: Right. Just outside the heart of downtown, we're getting to go and visit something that is, like, part of old Los Angeles. Like, this is. It's. It's both, like, route experience and route content. So. Very excited.

7
00:00:51,338 --> 00:00:55,418
Chris: Yeah. Plus, it's, like, technically a class. I guess we're going to talk about stuff. So it's.

8
00:00:55,554 --> 00:00:56,990
Kayla: Are we going to get graded?

9
00:00:57,850 --> 00:00:59,730
Chris: I certainly hope so.

10
00:00:59,890 --> 00:01:08,210
Kayla: I'm just going to say it again. I'm so excited. This is. This is the. This is the kind of thing that I love and I'm probably gonna have joined it by the end of this episode.

11
00:01:34,630 --> 00:01:39,666
Chris: Welcome to Culture. Just weird. I'm Chris. I'm a game designer and data scientist.

12
00:01:39,818 --> 00:01:45,210
Kayla: I'm Kayla. I'm a tv writer. And I am also welcoming you to cult or just weird.

13
00:01:45,370 --> 00:01:54,150
Chris: Thanks for joining us again. So it's been a while since you've been to a class. Right? How was it? How was it going back to class?

14
00:01:54,730 --> 00:01:57,630
Kayla: Two things. Two initial thoughts.

15
00:01:58,010 --> 00:01:58,658
Chris: Okay.

16
00:01:58,754 --> 00:02:02,536
Kayla: Very disappointed that I wasn't graded at the end of it.

17
00:02:02,698 --> 00:02:04,548
Chris: I know, class. I know.

18
00:02:04,724 --> 00:02:08,836
Kayla: Smass class. Smass class. Smass.

19
00:02:09,027 --> 00:02:09,924
Chris: What the hell is that?

20
00:02:09,972 --> 00:02:10,467
Kayla: Like.

21
00:02:10,604 --> 00:02:17,988
Chris: Oh, like pish posh. Oh, okay. Yeah. Well, I mean, it was barely class. Like, it wasn't like a lecture hall.

22
00:02:18,004 --> 00:02:18,588
Kayla: It was not.

23
00:02:18,684 --> 00:02:19,540
Chris: It was a round table.

24
00:02:19,620 --> 00:02:54,594
Kayla: Yeah, I disagree that it was barely a class. I think it was actually quite probably one of the more informative classes I've taken in recent memory because this was literally somebody who was personally schooled in the teachings that were learning about and was then bringing those learnings to a larger group. And this is very esoteric knowledge. This is knowledge that is. This is information that's not common in western thought, you know, outside of theosophy circles, esoteric circles, occultist circles.

25
00:02:54,682 --> 00:03:08,192
Chris: Yeah. And the discussion leader was more like, he definitely took the bulk of the speaking time, but, like, not in a bad way and more of like a teacher sort of way. Like he was. He was instructing on the concepts.

26
00:03:08,256 --> 00:03:10,384
Kayla: So to, you know, I just don't.

27
00:03:10,392 --> 00:03:12,664
Chris: Want people to think that were in, like, a lecture hall.

28
00:03:12,712 --> 00:03:22,976
Kayla: We were not in a lecture hall. We were in, like you said, like sitting in the round. We're all sitting around a table. So this class was called. It was called a weekly study group. Not really a class. It's called a study group.

29
00:03:23,008 --> 00:03:24,104
Chris: So I was right.

30
00:03:24,152 --> 00:03:34,446
Kayla: Yeah. It was titled the pearls of Wisdom from the secret doctrine, Jogchin and Vedanta. And this is what went to today. And so the way it was.

31
00:03:34,638 --> 00:03:35,890
Chris: I got some pearls.

32
00:03:36,350 --> 00:03:49,190
Kayla: I definitely got pearls. The way it was set up was that there were three specific readings that were pulled from sacred texts in this school of knowledge and related schools of knowledge.

33
00:03:49,350 --> 00:04:42,822
Chris: Well, you did say the name of the class, which I don't even know if that gives it away. So the problem with this topic or not the problem, the thing that makes it a little bit challenging is that it's so broad, it cuts such a broad scope in terms of, like, the topics it covers. And the other, in fact, that's one of the key defining features I would actually say about this topic, is that it is supposed to be sort of like, all encompassing of religious knowledge, traditions. But let's just cut to the chase and say what it is. Topic is theosophy. And Kayla and I today went down to the old theosophy hall, the United Lodge of Theosophists in downtown LA, founded in 1927.

34
00:04:42,926 --> 00:04:46,526
Kayla: This building was amazing.

35
00:04:46,598 --> 00:04:47,374
Chris: It was haunted.

36
00:04:47,462 --> 00:04:49,582
Kayla: It was definitely haunted. It's almost a hundred years, for sure.

37
00:04:49,646 --> 00:04:50,110
Chris: Haunted.

38
00:04:50,190 --> 00:04:56,622
Kayla: Almost 100 years old. And I want to get into a description of the building. I just want to quickly finish my description of the class.

39
00:04:56,686 --> 00:05:01,576
Chris: Oh, yeah, please do. I just. I was interrupting just to, like. We should probably just tell everyone what we're talking about.

40
00:05:01,608 --> 00:05:21,248
Kayla: It's theosophy, guys. You know, we've talked about the. We've talked, I think probably the first time we talked about theosophy and its founder, Madame Blavatsky, was in season one, when we talked about tulpas. That was probably the first time we talked about theosophy. And it has come up multiple times since then, because DNA is kind of.

41
00:05:21,264 --> 00:05:21,976
Chris: In a lot of things.

42
00:05:22,048 --> 00:05:27,846
Kayla: Yeah, yeah. And so it's kind of cool to go to the source in a lot of ways.

43
00:05:27,918 --> 00:05:57,732
Chris: Yeah. Well, what's weird about it is, and we'll get to this, because we have this weird format today. We went to this class, this discussion group, before doing, like the. Before really doing the bulk of the research on the founding and the history and the yada, all that context stuff we normally do first. We're actually doing that second this time. So there's definitely an element of. We'll get to that for our own purposes, even from our own perspective this time.

44
00:05:57,916 --> 00:06:40,594
Kayla: So this class that went to, this study group that went to, there were three readings that were pulled from various texts, and essentially, the study group was a close reading of these three related texts where all of us read them together. The teacher of the class, the leader of the class, who has more training, gave kind of his understanding of the close reading, and then it was opened up to discussion amongst all of the other students, because it seemed like the idea was that everybody here are students, including the person leading the class. So we're all here to learn from each other and give our interpretations and, like, find that wisdom and that intuition within that. So much of this school of thought is centered around.

45
00:06:40,682 --> 00:06:57,974
Chris: Yeah. This particular branch of theosophical movement, from what I understand is that is another one of their sort of core themes, is, like, everybody's kind of a student. There's no real. There's no leader, per se. There's just, like, a bunch of people studying the thing, which I think is kind of cool, actually.

46
00:06:58,142 --> 00:07:05,290
Kayla: Obviously, everybody listening will want a description and understanding of what theosophy is.

47
00:07:05,990 --> 00:07:07,170
Chris: We'll get to that.

48
00:07:07,710 --> 00:07:18,930
Kayla: Can you give a little. Just a little summary, just so people who maybe have never listened to our other episodes have an understanding? I can give my layperson summary, but you're kind of the shepherd of this episode.

49
00:07:19,390 --> 00:07:21,050
Chris: I'm the shepherd. Sode.

50
00:07:21,710 --> 00:07:24,586
Kayla: You have some literature with you that you could.

51
00:07:24,758 --> 00:08:17,004
Chris: What else do you want me to skip? Because we picked up. Sorry, I have to do that. There we go. We picked up a couple of little pamphlets. This one says theosophy. Simply stated, kayla, I'm not just gonna read a pamphlet on the podcast, but I think I can give a summary. Like, it the problem or the. Again, the challenge with this, as I said previously, is that it cuts this broad scope. So it's like, because of that, it's kind of hard to pin down, like, exactly what it is. At its core, it seems like it's just people who are truth seekers, and I know that's a bit of a loaded word these days. Not truth seekers like you might see on a twitter profile, but more people who are interested in the study of knowledge. It's very close to just philosophy.

52
00:08:17,172 --> 00:08:27,858
Chris: In fact, I. I kind of think it basically is just a philosophical discussion group, but it has this esoteric eastern knowledge flavor to it.

53
00:08:27,914 --> 00:08:28,586
Kayla: Right.

54
00:08:28,778 --> 00:08:50,771
Chris: And I will get into, like I said, I'll get into more details about, like, where it was founded and who founded it and schisms and yada, yada. But that's kind of. At the core of what it is. And that's why it's a little hard to pin down, because it's not like it's these people in this place with these beliefs. It's like. It's loosely a bunch of people that are interested in philosophy, but they call it theosophy.

55
00:08:50,915 --> 00:08:54,691
Kayla: We are talking about an organization that's been around for, what, 150 years?

56
00:08:54,755 --> 00:08:56,675
Chris: Yeah, a little less than 150, I think.

57
00:08:56,707 --> 00:09:14,872
Kayla: So that's why truth seekers comes with a different connotation. This is people who. They're not trying to figure out what's in your vaccine. They're trying to figure out what is the true spiritual nature of, like, existence. Right, right.

58
00:09:14,976 --> 00:09:15,776
Chris: But I also can't say.

59
00:09:15,808 --> 00:09:19,488
Kayla: Not even existence, but, like, existence in the universe.

60
00:09:19,584 --> 00:09:26,820
Chris: Yeah, yeah. And I also can't say for sure, like, there probably are anti vaxxers. I have no idea. Like, that's kind of the thing is that it's like, it's very.

61
00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:28,248
Kayla: That's not the core of the.

62
00:09:28,264 --> 00:09:33,512
Chris: It's very open. Like, you know how some of our groups have high dogma? This is like anti dogma.

63
00:09:33,576 --> 00:09:48,720
Kayla: It's like that was talked about in the class today. Yeah, that was actually. I don't want to jump ahead. What I want to do is I would really like to just kind of set the setting because this building felt different.

64
00:09:49,100 --> 00:09:49,724
Chris: Oh, yeah.

65
00:09:49,772 --> 00:10:44,428
Kayla: Than other buildings that I've been in. And again, this building is almost 100 years old. And you felt that when you were walking in. It is in a part of Los Angeles that at the time, it's very different now. It's kind of a more disenfranchised area. Again, it's the USC area. It's a more disenfranchised area. So it's very interesting to have this heart of a philosophical movement seated in this area. So it was cool to pull up. And in an area where there's a lot of homeless folks, where there's a lot of closed businesses, where there are not a lot of people walking around or shops to pull up to a building that says theosophy Lodge in a big old looking sign. And then, yeah, you walk up to the entrance, and the entrance is all ornately carved.

66
00:10:44,524 --> 00:11:13,480
Chris: I think that was the thing that was such a tone setter for me, that stone arch entrance. And it had their motto, which I haven't said yet, but their motto is, there is no religion higher than truth. So that's like in stone as you're walking through. And I'm like, I don't even remember the last building in Los Angeles that I walked into that had a stone, even aetherius and some of these other sort of more ornate places. It's not stone. There's something about stone. I don't know, maybe I'm obsessed with stone. It just felt different.

67
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:48,674
Kayla: And then the, like, the writing on the door felt vintage and then the interior felt vintage. And it. I'm not going to be able to accurately describe the, like, the vibe of this place, but it did feel like walking into what you want a masonic temple to feel like what you want a place with secret knowledge to feel like you've never seen this show. But I was just having such flashes of. There's this show that I watched called Lodge 49.

68
00:11:48,842 --> 00:11:49,910
Chris: Oh, yeah.

69
00:11:50,450 --> 00:12:14,114
Kayla: Wonderful, fantastic show about essentially like a masonic lodge of secret knowledge, like, you know, contrasted against the bizarre realities of everyday life. Very good show. Go watch it. But this is what that felt like. It felt like somebody wrote this. To be the platonic, like, lodge is the best.

70
00:12:14,282 --> 00:12:27,914
Chris: The platonic cult. Like I said to you when were walking down the hall, I was like, now, this is how you host a cult, because it was just very. But I know it's not. It's different. It's not quite cult. It's more like fraternal order.

71
00:12:28,002 --> 00:12:30,026
Kayla: It felt very fraternal order. It felt very like.

72
00:12:30,058 --> 00:12:31,106
Chris: And I think that's because of the.

73
00:12:31,178 --> 00:12:36,124
Kayla: Somebody who wants and craves knowledge. You walk in here and you feel like, this is where I'm going to get it.

74
00:12:36,172 --> 00:12:42,476
Chris: Yeah. So I think just to describe it for our audience, if you're doing, close your eyes and imagine, especially if you're.

75
00:12:42,508 --> 00:12:44,760
Kayla: Driving, don't close your eyes if you're driving.

76
00:12:45,820 --> 00:12:59,188
Chris: It's like the floor, even the hallway floors are carpeted, so everything has this sort of aura of silence. And the air seems. The air feels old. It wasn't dusty and dust.

77
00:12:59,204 --> 00:13:00,572
Kayla: No, it didn't feel dirty or musty.

78
00:13:00,676 --> 00:13:03,832
Chris: But it felt like stale air, almost.

79
00:13:03,996 --> 00:13:23,860
Kayla: Even though stale is the right word. It felt like heavy. Like this air has been here and will be here. Stale, I feel like, has a connotation that I didn't feel like I was coming into this. And it was like my bread's hard. It felt like an institution.

80
00:13:24,720 --> 00:13:50,672
Chris: Yeah. Yeah. So the air felt heavy. It was silent. And there was a lot of wood. You know, there was a lot of, like, wood paneling and like. Like mahogany type stuff. And there were like a bunch of different rooms. Like, some rooms were like, oh, yeah, that's the kitchen. And some rooms were like, the room were in was just, like, a meeting room, but then there was, like, a couple, like, office rooms where I'm like, I don't even know what the hell this room's for. There's, like, a bunch of books in there and, like, a device. I'm not sure what it does.

81
00:13:50,736 --> 00:14:07,870
Kayla: It looks like maybe they were set aside for different kinds of meetings. Like, there was one room that had a whole bunch of chairs all in a circle. There was another room that looked like somebody's and office where they would hold court to, like, people listening to what they had to say. Like, they didn't all look the same, but they looked like maybe they were for different purposes.

82
00:14:07,950 --> 00:14:21,246
Chris: Yeah, it had an old timey vibe overall. And then we also checked out. We checked out their auditorium, which we couldn't find the light to. So it was, like, not quite pitch black, but it was pretty dark in there. Like, to the point we couldn't really.

83
00:14:21,278 --> 00:14:26,840
Kayla: See anything after we had been told that it was haunted, explicitly, like, oh, yeah, no, this is haunted.

84
00:14:26,950 --> 00:14:45,836
Chris: Like, yeah, it's haunted in there. And we get in there, and it's like, when I say, like, the air was heavy elsewhere. The air was light elsewhere compared to this. This was, like, just utter eerie silence in this auditorium, and it was totally dark. Could not find the light. It was like, I don't believe in ghosts, except for in that room.

85
00:14:45,948 --> 00:14:57,388
Kayla: I'm sure it's just the. The way we constructed buildings 100 years ago is different than the way we construct buildings now. Like, for example, it was 89 degrees today in Los Angeles, and I was not hot in this building, and I'm hot everywhere.

86
00:14:57,444 --> 00:14:58,920
Chris: I was not hot in this building.

87
00:14:59,540 --> 00:15:16,388
Kayla: And I was especially not hot in that auditorium. And I think it's just, you know, it's probably related to the way that we constructed back in the day, but it just was. I made you, like, stop moving around. I was like, just stop and listen, and you can't hear shit.

88
00:15:16,524 --> 00:15:17,812
Chris: Stop. Hammer time.

89
00:15:17,876 --> 00:15:22,000
Kayla: Hammer time. And it was a cool space to be in.

90
00:15:22,830 --> 00:15:47,676
Chris: And when were walking, when were trying to find the room, before we got to the room and saw that there were, like, six or seven other people there might have been nobody there, like, walking in and going down the halls of this place, were like, are we the only people that have been here since 1927? It had that feel to it. But then we get into the room that actually hosted the discussion room, and then there were people there who were very welcoming.

91
00:15:47,798 --> 00:16:03,280
Kayla: They were very welcoming. This was. It did not feel like this knowledge was being gatekept in any way, or this information was being gatekeeped in any way. It felt like they were really trying to do kind of the opposite of that. As difficult as it was to figure out how to attend a class, that was probably not intentional.

92
00:16:03,320 --> 00:16:08,384
Chris: Yeah, I don't think that was intentional. I think that was just, like the folks in this class jumping through the hoops.

93
00:16:08,472 --> 00:16:15,626
Kayla: The folks in this class had been together for a long time and were very welcoming to you and I, who are incredibly new to what were talking about.

94
00:16:15,658 --> 00:16:30,586
Chris: And I'll also say it was simulcast, simul meetingd, whatever, simul discussion on Zoom. So there was a zoom room in addition to the physical, in person room that were in. And the zoom room had, what would you say, like, twelve ish people?

95
00:16:30,698 --> 00:16:31,186
Kayla: I think so.

96
00:16:31,218 --> 00:16:51,934
Chris: 15 people, something like that. And they were international. There were, like, some french people, there were some german people. I think there were people in other countries. So it was pretty cool. I don't know. Like, were in this, like, it was a small discussion group, but then also there were people from all over the world. Even though it was small, it was. It was interesting.

97
00:16:52,102 --> 00:16:58,070
Kayla: What. What would you say that this class was about today? What would you say that were talking about?

98
00:16:58,230 --> 00:17:18,127
Chris: Well, I took notes. I know you took notes, too. We did some readings, actually, before we did the readings, we started with a. Well, actually, it did start with a reading. It did start with, like, a statement that we did not close read, but was more of just like a. Like a vibe statement.

99
00:17:18,263 --> 00:17:19,480
Kayla: It was something to meditate on.

100
00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:26,160
Chris: Something to meditate on. And then we had, like, what was it? Like, five minutes or so of silence, of silent meditation, five to ten.

101
00:17:26,200 --> 00:17:52,034
Kayla: There was some light guidance from the instructor. And then, yeah, were just in the space thinking on themes of that reading, which were inaccessible to me. It was clearly esoteric and maybe accessible to somebody who is more learned in these ideas. But, you know, I even wrote down some thoughts afterwards because it did bring some things up for me.

102
00:17:52,162 --> 00:18:29,966
Chris: I know we've said this several times now on the show, especially this season, but it did kind of feel like church. You know, like, it kind of felt like I was sitting there and I was like. Aside from, like, the physical space didn't really feel like church, aside from the oldness and the mahogany. But, you know, round. You don't go to a round table church. But the idea of, like, meeting with some folks on a Sunday morning to, like, meditate and then go over the readings with somebody who's like, more versed in it. That's very church like. That is church. I got that. I got that vibe from it. And my favorite part, I think, was that initial meditation. I really liked that we kicked off that way because it just kind of, like, set a tone.

103
00:18:30,038 --> 00:19:28,864
Kayla: Yes, absolutely. And I agree with you that it feels like church, but I guess it's not even a but. And why I think I find myself responding to Sunday mornings more like this or more like at the ISKCON temple versus going to Catholic Church or going to a service at the Ethereus society. Is there really is a difference for me as somebody who, like, okay, yes, skeptic, but is thinking about, like, the nature of reality and consciousness, it is much. And somebody with ADHD, it is much easier. It is much easier, accessible to have these conversations in an interactive way and by, you know, loose meaning of conversation, to have these engagements in an interactive way versus sitting and simply listening to somebody with more knowledge tell me the stuff.

104
00:19:29,032 --> 00:20:17,770
Kayla: And yes, this was a teacher giving his interpretation of the close reading, but everything was opened up to discussion. Everything was opened up to specifically calling for doubts, calling for questions, calling for alternative interpretations. And it was even clear that this study group that we walked into has been meeting from. For years. It seems like these folks all together, and one of these students who was not leading the class made it clear, like, oh, yeah. Well, my interpretation of this is actually quite different from our teachers. Let's talk about that for a second. And so that was cool to see, like, oh, hey, he's got a completely different, like, a kind of a diametrically opposed idea here that is still welcome and is still part of the discussion. And that kind of thing feels more like I'm going to keep coming back to that.

105
00:20:17,890 --> 00:20:27,950
Kayla: I'm not going to keep coming back to. To etherea society or more traditional church. It doesn't engage me in the same way, but, like, kirtan hell yeah. This. Absolutely.

106
00:20:28,030 --> 00:21:19,514
Chris: Yeah. I think church with a different flavor that's, like, more palatable to you or to me. Right. Like, when I say church, I mean, like a community meditation on a Sunday morning followed by some sort of discussion. Right. It had that. I don't know, I just noticed. I just noticed that parallels, I think especially. Cause it was Sunday morning too. Right. That made it particularly, like, noticeable, but yeah. And I also liked the combination of the ritual meditation and discussion. I feel like maybe that's the other thing that made it feel churchy, is that I don't feel like you really get that so much. I don't know where else you really get that. I don't know where else you get that combination. It's like you either go for a lecture or you go for, like, meditation. You never really go for, like, meditation.

107
00:21:19,562 --> 00:21:20,234
Chris: Then lecture.

108
00:21:20,322 --> 00:21:20,882
Kayla: Right.

109
00:21:21,026 --> 00:21:23,714
Chris: And I just. Yeah, I don't know. I feel like it did a good job.

110
00:21:23,762 --> 00:21:25,186
Kayla: Maybe like, world religion class.

111
00:21:25,258 --> 00:21:42,868
Chris: Like, yeah, and like you said, even with, you know, the meditation aspect of regular, of christian church followed by the discussion is not really discussion. It's. It's one way lecture. It's not the sort of two way or multi way discussion that this was.

112
00:21:42,884 --> 00:21:47,020
Kayla: The sermon is not inherently interactive in this way.

113
00:21:47,140 --> 00:22:22,126
Chris: Yeah. So we did a close reading. I'm gonna go ahead. Since they gave us a handout, I'm just gonna go ahead and read it because I think I want our audience to kind of get the same feeling, the same picture we did. I'm specifically thinking of the comment you made a few minutes ago about, like, yeah, we read this thing and were like, what? Cause it is to a layman, to a newbie, to a neophyte like ourselves, not super parsable.

114
00:22:22,238 --> 00:22:44,522
Kayla: This needs. This requires guidance. My closest experience to this is reading Nathaniel Hawthorne in high school english class and then being like, what? And then the english teacher explaining it and then, oh, okay. Like, it's literally, it was that.

115
00:22:44,586 --> 00:22:56,682
Chris: It was very similar to that, actually. One of the. This wasn't the teacher today, but one of the members was an english teacher. And I was like, wow, that totally tracks, because, like, that's exactly what I did in English. In high school English.

116
00:22:56,746 --> 00:23:23,392
Kayla: There were also ties. I don't want to say any specifics because these are people's private lives. But there were also ties to. To manly P. Hall in this class, which I was very excited about, if you'll remember. Manly P. Hall was talked about in our first episode of this season because he founded the philosophical Research Society. So I just. Something that I've, you know, side notes, something that I've loved about this season and kind of focusing on the groups that are available to us in our geographical area is that they're all connected.

117
00:23:23,496 --> 00:23:24,128
Chris: Yeah.

118
00:23:24,264 --> 00:23:25,592
Kayla: Every single one of them is connected.

119
00:23:25,696 --> 00:24:23,220
Chris: Yeah. Mainly Pl. He's also considered, if you recall, he's also considered the father of american esotericism. That's hard to say. But anyway, let me get back to this passage that we read. It's relatively short, so you guys kind of get a picture of what we're talking about here. The pristine consciousness of the originally pure essence is present. Like, pure space. The pristine consciousness of the naturally perfect nature is present like planets and stars reflected on the surface of a calm ocean, and the pristine consciousness of all pervasive compassion is present like a flawless gem. Those are the intrinsic characteristics of the pristine consciousness present in that way. The essence is present as Kaya's. The nature is present as light, and compassion is present as continuous.

120
00:24:23,850 --> 00:25:01,408
Chris: Since the basis that arises through the aspect of compassion is present as unceasing, it is the pristine consciousness that pervades all. The nature is present as luminosity, because it is clear. Compassion is present as the pristine consciousness of Vidya, though manifesting individually. Since there is no cessation in the aspect of omniscience, it is neither an agent nor an action. As such, the aspect of omniscience is present as the trio of pristine consciousness that are present in the basis. So, you know, obviously.

121
00:25:01,464 --> 00:25:02,280
Kayla: Yeah, duh.

122
00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:03,624
Chris: I mean, I say this every day.

123
00:25:03,672 --> 00:25:52,152
Kayla: I say this every day. Yeah, I felt. I'm not gonna lie, I felt like a dumbass after he read this, because I was like, I don't know at all what we're talking about. And then as the class talked about it became clear why I don't know what we're talking about. All of those words, even though it's like, I know those words, all of those words mean something specific in either theosophy or jog chen vocab. So, like, when somebody says luminous mind, like, yeah, I know what that means in English, but I don't know what that means in these traditions. So having somebody who's able to spell out, like, what does pure consciousness or pure awareness or kayas or luminous luminosity, like, what do those mean in the context of these spiritual walks?

124
00:25:52,176 --> 00:26:33,842
Kayla: And I don't know if we've said it yet, but jog Chen is a very esoteric form of Tibetan Buddhism. I don't know if we talked about it in the tulpas episode, but it is related. The school of beliefs that gave rise to tulpas as a concept in Tibetan Buddhism are similar in the schools of thought around Jog Chen, which we might be pronouncing incorrectly, but who knows? How do we spell it in English? It's spelled dzogchen. And it zhogchen kind of means, like, you know, the utmost, like ultimate yoga kind of thing, like the highest spiritual path, most esoteric.

125
00:26:33,946 --> 00:26:40,522
Chris: So you got Tibetan Buddhism, which is already pretty spiritual, and then this is, like, super secret Tibetan Buddhism.

126
00:26:40,586 --> 00:26:41,346
Kayla: That's my understanding.

127
00:26:41,378 --> 00:26:42,298
Chris: Just super spiritual.

128
00:26:42,354 --> 00:26:45,074
Kayla: And so that's specifically what were talking about today.

129
00:26:45,162 --> 00:27:10,480
Chris: Right, right. And. Yeah. And I just remember, like, getting to the end of that passage and being like, that was word salad. And then, like, immediately after I had that thought, the discussion leader, I don't want to call him. He didn't want to call himself teacher. They wanted to be called students, which I think is super cool. He said something like, wow, wasn't that just so profound? And I was like, oh, it was. Oh, sweet. I had no idea.

130
00:27:12,290 --> 00:27:22,234
Kayla: So I don't want to sit here and do just, like, let's do our own close reading, because, again, we're not students. This is our first. Like, this is our first dipping our toe into the water.

131
00:27:22,282 --> 00:27:23,074
Chris: We're all students.

132
00:27:23,162 --> 00:27:26,370
Kayla: We're all students. But we don't. We're not well versed in this stuff yet.

133
00:27:26,410 --> 00:27:29,746
Chris: This is literally very green, students. Like, bright green.

134
00:27:29,818 --> 00:28:17,278
Kayla: We're just repeating what we learned today. What. There's a lot. Okay. My biggest takeaway was there was a lot to take away from here. There was a lot in terms of teachings here, stuff that we're not even gonna get into. But my biggest takeaway was that this was explaining kind of like a foundational belief in theosophy, in jog Chen, in this study group, of this idea of. I think it was referred to as three wisdoms. So there's primordial purity, which, from my understanding, is like a dharma datu, the ultimate source. It is the source from which, like, everything. The source from which everything rests upon. So it's the source that exists outside of our material world.

135
00:28:17,334 --> 00:28:22,734
Chris: It's like an ontological possibility space, if that makes any sense. And if it doesn't, we'll get into it a little bit.

136
00:28:22,822 --> 00:28:35,174
Kayla: Then there is spontaneous presence, which I think refers to the piece of the universe waking up to itself. It's us. Existing is spontaneous presence.

137
00:28:35,262 --> 00:28:40,556
Chris: Now, is that synonymous with pristine consciousness?

138
00:28:40,748 --> 00:28:43,732
Kayla: I don't know. I think the goal is to, like.

139
00:28:43,756 --> 00:28:44,724
Chris: You get that guy here.

140
00:28:44,852 --> 00:28:50,868
Kayla: Get back to that. I did write spontaneous presence, and then I put a little arrow to naturally perfect nature.

141
00:28:51,044 --> 00:29:04,036
Chris: Okay? Because a lot of what we talked about and a lot of what is in the close reading or not, a lot of what is in the passage that I just read is about this pristine consciousness. But you were on number two. So what was number three in the.

142
00:29:04,148 --> 00:29:52,660
Kayla: Number three is compassion, which was explained to us as, like, this is beyond the desire to do good for others. This is, like, the kind of the ultimate form of wisdom that will generally lead to one behaving in the path of lovingkindness. But compassion is kind of synonymous with wisdom. And the overarching kind of theme that we talked about, I felt the conversation was going back to many times, was describing reality in this visual of primordial purity. Picture it as like a black disc. Picture spontaneous presence as like a white disc resting upon it, and then this compassion, this wisdom, as a smaller black disk within that white disk. So I think to me, if I.

143
00:29:52,660 --> 00:30:12,250
Chris: Could interrupt here, that particular imagery is from the secret doctrines, which we will get to when we talk about what is theosophy, actually. So the secret doctrines is a piece of literature written by HP Blavatsky, Theosophys founder.

144
00:30:13,230 --> 00:31:04,322
Kayla: Interesting. Okay, so my big takeaway was that it kind of felt like there is an inherent source underlying all of existence. Spontaneous presence can manifest from or on that source, and that tends to be us. And then kind of our goal as sentient beings is to get back to that, a place of pure consciousness, pure awareness. So that's kind of like there's the black background, the white circle, and then the black circle within. And that, to me, represented, like, the source us, and the little piece of source that we're trying to get back to within us. I don't know if that's the correct interpretation, but that's kind of like what it felt like were talking about.

145
00:31:04,516 --> 00:31:37,816
Chris: Yeah. I also got a lot of. I sort of mentioned this a second ago, but the pristine consciousness kept coming up, which, for the layman, I think you just kind of think of that as a soul. Right? It's this true you, this true self that existed before you were born will exist after you die and has always existed. And that's kind of the thing that we're trying. One of the things we're trying to access, like you were just saying, is we're trying to get back to that. That pristine self, that sort of soul.

146
00:31:37,888 --> 00:31:48,368
Kayla: Of a self, gets clouded by, I think, what they refer to as ignorance. So, like, our memories, our experiences, our labels, our identities, the kind grasping is.

147
00:31:48,384 --> 00:32:14,080
Chris: A thing that they constantly grasp many times. So when I say grasp, yeah, it's like, it's the attachment. Like what we call worldly attachments. A lot of times, I think, in these sort of traditions is when they say grasping, they mean those, like worldly attachments, having desires or having things you dislike. They kept saying likes and dislikes is sort of like a shorthand for the grasping or for the worldliness.

148
00:32:14,380 --> 00:32:25,036
Kayla: And so I think the enlightenment is disconnecting from those things and reconnecting to this soul state, this pure awareness, this pure consciousness.

149
00:32:25,148 --> 00:33:25,210
Chris: Yeah. They also used a metaphor that I liked a lot, involving fluid versus solid. So they seem to have a predilection for things being fluid or changing. And that's more of a thing in its fluid form, is it's more true self than a thing in its frozen form. And so they were basically saying, your true self, your what I might say soul, your pristine consciousness, is sort of like water, and then it crystallizes into this solid form. It freezes into the solid form. When you are born into this world and become a physical human being. And what you're trying to do, maybe a little bit, is melt yourself back down into that fluid form, because that's the more true nature of a person and especially vis a vis outside the self. So when I think of, like, Kayla is.

150
00:33:25,990 --> 00:34:12,110
Chris: I have this sort of frozen picture. I have this. I think of her in terms of labels and identities and likes and dislikes and all of these things that are sort of like, we consider to be static, when, in fact, Kayla is much more like and any human, by extension, much more dynamic than that. Like, Kayla likes Mac and cheese today, but tomorrow she likes Mac and cheese with broccoli, and her dislikes also change. And her identities are also fluid, and everything is sort of fluid in that manner. And so I think one of the things that they were also talking about with that metaphor was, like, seeking to unfreeze our concepts in regards to how we view things outside of ourself, but especially other human beings.

151
00:34:12,929 --> 00:35:05,920
Kayla: Yes. And there's two specific tools that were talked about in order to achieve this goal of enlightenment or resting in this kind of, like, pure knowledge. There was tretcho, which was to cut through, to release. So, like, cutting through the veils of the mind and the self. And there was Togol, which is a specific kind of meditation where you need, like, a teacher to teach it to you. This is not something you can learn on an online course. This is like a teacher to student practice. And that means, like, crossing over or clearing away shadows in the mind. So those were two, like, specific tools that they talked about to reach this state where you go from ice to water. There's a lot. There's a lot more here, you guys. Like, I'm literally looking at my notes, and it's like.

152
00:35:06,820 --> 00:35:31,932
Kayla: And I do want to point out one thing that I wrote here, because I think it's important and will be important at the end of the show. This was a quote from the teacher. He was talking about this process of becoming the water. Again, the goal is not to fall into rigidity and dogmatic thought. And I thought that was really important, that's kind of, like, part of this belief system is kind of what you mentioned, the anti dogma.

153
00:35:32,076 --> 00:36:02,556
Chris: Yeah, I actually wrote that specifically. Theosophy seems to be anti dogmatism, anti rigidity. And I think that was probably. I wrote that at the same time you did when he was taught, because it was actually in reference to achieving the thing that you want to achieve. Like, he was. That that particular statement by him was saying, like, I think he was saying, like, if you achieve. If you access this pristine consciousness without being, like, prepared in some way, then you run the risk of being too dogmatic about that, even.

154
00:36:02,668 --> 00:36:03,084
Kayla: Right.

155
00:36:03,172 --> 00:36:20,650
Chris: Which I thought was, like, an interesting, like, self check and spoke to me to be like, this is like, of all of the cults or maybe weirds that we've talked about, this is definitely one of, like, the least dogma and actually anti dogma. It feels like dogma is antithetical to this.

156
00:36:21,070 --> 00:37:04,716
Kayla: Yeah. The class would not have been what it was if when that other student went. Well, my interpretation of this, like, the way I operate in this faith, is diametrically opposed to what is being taught here, but I am still learning, and the teacher, the quote unquote teacher is still learning from me, and we are having a valuable conversation with each other, and we are engaging with each other. I mean, the person who had this diametrically opposed idea was also married to another theosophist student in the class who had a different belief system, and that's people who are together living in the same house. It seems like the anti dogma is not only necessary, but, like, almost celebrated in a way. At least that was what I took away from this class.

157
00:37:04,858 --> 00:37:10,376
Chris: Yeah. And we could go on, like. Like I said, it was. It was a. How long was it? It was, like, two and a half hours.

158
00:37:10,408 --> 00:37:11,280
Kayla: It was two and a half hours.

159
00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:16,952
Chris: It wasn't all close reading of that one passage. We also did close reading of another passage. There was also the meditation.

160
00:37:17,136 --> 00:37:18,360
Kayla: There was two other passages.

161
00:37:18,520 --> 00:37:19,816
Chris: There were two other passages.

162
00:37:20,008 --> 00:37:28,552
Kayla: There was a passage from a larger passage from the secret doctrine, and then there was a very short passage that was kind of just, like, closed it up like food for thought.

163
00:37:28,656 --> 00:38:16,940
Chris: Yeah. Yeah. That was only, like, one sentence, so we could go into a lot more of the close reading, but I think that kind of gives you a taste of the things that we talked about. And specifically, I'll sort of summarize that taste. Theosophy, at least from our one experience, feels like it's very much about this study, this trying to parse these writings, these statements. There's writings from Blavatsky, but I think they also do close readings of other works from other wise masters, as they might call them. So, like, they like Ralph Waldo Emerson, too, for example. So it's not just from Tibetan Buddhism or from Blavatsky. It's from anyone they might consider a wise master.

164
00:38:16,980 --> 00:38:25,966
Chris: But this is what they do, is they kind of take these things and see if they can read them and interpret them in a way to get nuggets of wisdom.

165
00:38:26,038 --> 00:38:53,536
Kayla: I mean, the Bible came up multiple times, and not in a, like, just in a very fluid way. The Bible was quoted just as easily as HP. Blavatsky's writings were quoted like it was, you know, I wrote together my kind of summation of a lot of what we're talking about was literally from the Bible to be in the world, but not be of it, which is an idea in the Bible, but it inherently related to what they were talking about in theosophy.

166
00:38:53,688 --> 00:38:57,664
Chris: Yeah, so I I wrote, like, I.

167
00:38:57,672 --> 00:38:58,296
Kayla: Wrote a lot of notes.

168
00:38:58,328 --> 00:39:42,668
Chris: I wrote a lot of notes. Like, some of, like, half of my notes are just kind of, like, trying to record what was being said about the content, and then half of them are, like, me just sort of musing, like, as to what theosophy is, because I just kept having these, like, musings about that. So, like, one of these things I wrote, one of the notes I wrote down is like, theosophy is kind of like, let's confuse ourselves and then try to sort it out. It's like, it kind of feels like there's this weird element of, like, let's read something that to a layperson, to anybody without insider knowledge on this, let's read something that makes very little sense. And then if we, like, sort that out, the process of sorting it out is sort of like the point.

169
00:39:42,724 --> 00:39:56,066
Chris: And then I also wrote, like, a tabletop puzzle. You know, it's like, let's take this perfectly good picture, and then let's break it up into a million pieces, and then let's go through the process of putting those pieces back together. And the point is kind of like doing that.

170
00:39:56,178 --> 00:39:56,890
Kayla: Yeah, that's true.

171
00:39:56,930 --> 00:40:39,730
Chris: Seeking baby so it kind of felt like that. It's like, let's confuse ourselves and then try to figure that out. And I think that makes sense because the stuff they're studying is not. You know, I made this. This note, too. Like, it's very much like the self. It's very much like the wisdom of the self. Like, they're not studying chemistry. They're not studying biology. They're not studying sociology or economics. They're studying, how do I be a wise person? And so there's this. I think that's almost like, how you have to go about it is to do this weird breakdown, build up sort of process, because how else you're not gonna run an experiment on yourself, or maybe that is running an experiment on yourself. I don't know.

172
00:40:39,770 --> 00:41:19,486
Kayla: I mean, that sounds very similar to this process, because this is all about doing as much reading as you can and learning and then kind of figuring out how to incorporate it into yourself or access it within yourself so that you don't need. There is this process of gathering and then breaking down and gathering and breaking down the goal. You have to read all of this. You have to read all of these texts, and you have to learn about all of this stuff in order to no longer need it in order to access the wisdom inherently within you. And that was a really interesting concept.

173
00:41:19,598 --> 00:42:09,412
Chris: Yeah. And I also think that there's some, like. And maybe this is just my interpretation, but there's some, like, agnosticism toward exactly what it is you're even reading. Like, you know, I don't think it necessarily matters if you're reading, you know, Buddha's writing or Blavatsky's writing or whatever. And I know I already said this, but, like, the other note I took here is, like, it's also, like, kind of a to reading entrails or tarot card reading, where it kind of doesn't matter whether it's chicken guts or cards or words from some wise book. The point is the words themselves. The point is my interpretation of this will reveal some sort of wisdom here. The words themselves. And maybe it's just. That might just be me, too, because, like, I had the, like, oh, my God, this is the word salad.

174
00:42:09,436 --> 00:42:33,214
Chris: I don't know what any of these words mean, but it definitely felt like there was some element there where, like, you could kind of interpret these words in different ways. And the way you interpret it reveals what it needs to reveal about yourself and about, like, the wisdom about yourself. Does that make any sense at all? Yeah, I think, like, the analogy to, like, tarot reading, like, it's not about the cards. It's about the, like, interaction.

175
00:42:33,332 --> 00:42:48,234
Kayla: Yeah, I think the cards are, like, a tool that are intentionally built and that's important. And the interpretation of the reader is as important using those tools.

176
00:42:48,362 --> 00:43:19,198
Chris: Right, right, yeah, I think tool is a good word. Like, it gives you a token to kind of like, focus on as, like this is, you know, like a deafening rod or something. Right. Like, this is like a thing that allows me to focus, but I'm actually using, like, my intuition. Maybe I shouldn't say differenting Rod because I'm, like, saying these bullshit things, but what I'm trying to get at is just the idea of having a token that allows you to focus your thinking in a certain way. And it almost feels like even philosophical writings are kind of like that in a way.

177
00:43:19,294 --> 00:43:24,110
Kayla: Sure. I mean, it's just like reading the Bible. Like, you sit down, you read the Bible, and you can.

178
00:43:24,150 --> 00:43:25,486
Chris: Yeah. Especially something like psalms.

179
00:43:25,598 --> 00:43:35,374
Kayla: You can be like, this means what it says on the tin, or you can spend your entire life trying to interpret it, which, like, that is religion.

180
00:43:35,462 --> 00:44:05,646
Chris: And there's different parts of the Bible. I'm sure there's different parts of the readings that we did today, too. But some parts of the Bible are, like, Steve did X and then he did y, and then God did this to Steve, and David was the king from x year to y year, and blah, blah. And then there's other parts of the bible, kind of like psalms that are more wisdom oriented, that aren't clear. Like, we've talked about this before, like mythos versus logos. Right. They're not really about like a character, a plot, or a setting. They're more of about a vibe.

181
00:44:05,758 --> 00:44:06,294
Kayla: Right.

182
00:44:06,422 --> 00:44:35,618
Chris: And a vibe is intentionally sort of like, intended to be a mirror. I think that's where they did talk about reflection today a lot. And I think that's where that, to me, hits home, is that a lot of these writings and the tools that we're talking about are kind of like mirrors, and they reflect back to, if we put some effort towards them, they kind of just reflect our own image back. But, like, how else are you going to see your own self without a mirror, right?

183
00:44:35,674 --> 00:44:57,336
Kayla: Because the whole thing is that their whole thing is that all the knowledge that you need, all the wisdom that you need, is already inside of you. You are born with it. It is there. But how do you access it without, like, what you're saying? How do we access that knowledge? And this is a tool to do so? Yeah, it's a really good analogy.

184
00:44:57,408 --> 00:45:51,808
Chris: I also made a note of, like, this sort of reminded me of philosophy. Who needs it? Because we talked about that work from Ayn Rand earlier. This season just in that. That essay is about, like, it's good to think about thinking. Like, it's good to have an intentional philosophy. And that's kind of sort of like, the Venn diagram isn't, like, you know, super overlappy there, but there's definitely. There was definitely a flavor of, like, we are here to think about thinking. We are here to intentionally select, to intentionally ponder the way that our brains work and not just go through every week without thinking about that kind of thing. I also wrote that it was theosophy as sort of, like, I just have all these. Theosophy as this, theosophy as that, theosophy as sense making of a nonsensical situation, which is consciousness.

185
00:45:51,984 --> 00:45:59,936
Chris: Because, like, a lot of the things that they talked about were. I don't know. What was the first thing in the trio that you mentioned earlier?

186
00:46:00,048 --> 00:46:01,200
Kayla: Primordial purity.

187
00:46:01,280 --> 00:46:04,496
Chris: Primordial purity. And what was it called again? It was like, dharma.

188
00:46:04,648 --> 00:46:05,560
Kayla: Dharma Datu.

189
00:46:05,640 --> 00:47:07,808
Chris: Dharma Datu. Right. And the way they described that was like, it's everything, but it's not everything physically. It's, like, everything conceptually. Or it's like this. This base space for all things. Not all things as they are, but all things as possibilities as they could be. So talking about stuff like that makes me kind of go like, that definitely sounds to me consciousness is trying to grasp at. I have woken up in this bizarre circumstance where I can see things and I can imagine things that don't exist. Probably unlike other animals, I have this imagination thing, and it's mad confusing to be conscious and sentient in that way. And so it kind of feels like it was. And it's not just theosophy. It's like, anything that deals with metaphysical and epistemological questions. It's kind of us going like, I'm awake.

190
00:47:07,904 --> 00:47:10,792
Chris: What the hell is going on? How do I even.

191
00:47:10,856 --> 00:47:13,112
Kayla: You wake up from a nap and you're like, what the fuck?

192
00:47:13,216 --> 00:47:22,852
Chris: Yeah, like, how do I know what I know? How do I know that anything is anything like it? Just. I don't know. I got that vibe from it, too.

193
00:47:23,036 --> 00:47:51,400
Kayla: I think that's why I love this kind of stuff. I love what we got to do today. I love that this is, like, work that people are doing in these small groups of, like, trying to make sense of something that inherently feels nonsensical. And when you think about it, like, is fucking nonsensical. Like, what the hell is going on? What is, I don't know, piece of the universe that has woken up to itself. What I'm sorry.

194
00:47:51,820 --> 00:47:52,772
Chris: Or maybe not.

195
00:47:52,836 --> 00:47:54,436
Kayla: There's a neutron star.

196
00:47:54,548 --> 00:47:56,320
Chris: Consciousness may be fake too.

197
00:47:56,780 --> 00:48:25,412
Kayla: Simulation. And there's a black hole somewhere. This is nourishment that a part of your mind body needs. I don't know what part of it is, but it is human nature to think about this shit. That's why religion has been around for so long. That's why. That's why we have a show. It's literally why we have a show. Because everything that we, almost everything that we talk about in this show is a version of people doing this.

198
00:48:25,516 --> 00:49:12,370
Chris: Yeah. And similar to other spiritual traditions, but definitely trying to sort out the unsortable, right? They talked about ineffability and things that are eternal versus things that evolve and change, come and go. Feels a lot to me. Like, I mean, these are philosophical questions that we still don't really and may never have answers to. Like the question of prime causality, right? Like, okay, like, why am I doing a podcast? Well, because blah blah and then that. Because blah blah and then that. Because blah blah. And then where does the chain of causality end? Like, there is no real good answer to that. Because even if you go back to the big bang, then you say, like, what caused the big bang? Oh, I don't know. Maybe there was something before that.

199
00:49:13,090 --> 00:49:48,900
Chris: Even in modern sort of like philosophical sciences and philosophical research, that's a question that everybody still deals with, is like eternity versus not eternity. Like finite versus infinite. Was there a prime cause for everything? Can anything be traced back to a prime cause? Or is there just an infinite regress to chain of causality? Like, these are sort of the questions that they seem like they're trying to answer in theosophy.

200
00:49:49,880 --> 00:49:52,784
Kayla: So are we done? Is that it, or no?

201
00:49:52,832 --> 00:50:02,928
Chris: Because I have to get. We have to do the cultures weird thing where I give you context. I have to tell you about how they were founded and all the scandals. I'm just speculating. I haven't.

202
00:50:03,064 --> 00:50:04,600
Kayla: We just assume that there's scandals.

203
00:50:04,640 --> 00:50:08,816
Chris: I'm assuming they're scandals because they're scandals with everything, man. What I haven't done my research yet.

204
00:50:08,888 --> 00:50:57,298
Kayla: What I've learned these days is that there's always going to be scandals. And I think just a lot of life is learning to take what you like and leave the rest when it's applicable. And I'm hoping that's applicable here because I really enjoyed the work that we did today. I really enjoyed the conversations that we had. I really enjoyed learning about this stuff. And like, I hope to do more. There's other classes that they have. I'm excited to sit in on them. I'm excited to return to this class. I have a similar feeling as I did after leaving the ISKCon temple. And unfortunately, this is a similar setup where went and visited, and then we learned about some of the stuff that's gone on since then or during. But take what you like and leave the rest is what I hope we can.

205
00:50:57,394 --> 00:51:09,388
Chris: Maybe we'll call this episode take what you like and leave the rest. Also, Kayla, I don't want you to think that I'm going off the new age deep end here, either personally, and I think that this is off the.

206
00:51:09,404 --> 00:51:10,420
Kayla: Deep end for both of us.

207
00:51:10,540 --> 00:51:22,708
Chris: Yeah, I know you will. From what I understand. I think that I am still welcome in theosophy as a materialist rationalist, from my understanding.

208
00:51:22,764 --> 00:52:08,398
Kayla: I think I already said this to you, but I'll say it on the podcast. The first place that I learned about Jog Chen, the Tibetan Buddhism esoterica, was not from today's class. It was not from learning about theosophy. It was from infamous skeptic and atheist Sam Harris, who prides himself on being a materialist and also is super into Jog Chen and has even, I believe he studied specifically with a teacher, a well regarded teacher in this school of belief. So, like, if Sam Harris is allowed, like, if Sam Harris. If Sam Harris gets to do it, he's way more of a materialist than I am.

209
00:52:08,574 --> 00:52:36,468
Chris: Yeah. My interpretation, first interpretation of the class today was maybe also indicative of my bias. Right. Because, like, if I'm sitting here going like, well, I don't believe that there is actually an existence of a soul or of a yemenite pristine consciousness, then sort of necessarily, if I'm going to participate and get something out of it has to be sort of like, well, I'm interpreting it in this way.

210
00:52:36,524 --> 00:52:39,620
Kayla: Yeah, it gets to be a metaphor. That means what you need it to mean.

211
00:52:39,700 --> 00:52:39,988
Chris: Right.

212
00:52:40,044 --> 00:53:23,016
Kayla: That's how I've engaged with, like, christian theology. That's how I've engaged with other theologies that we've talked about on the show. And, you know, there's something interesting about religion and particularly a school of philosophy or thought like this in that it is both a personal experience and a group experience. And it's kind of fun to figure out, like, how you can have these conversations in a classroom setting, in this, like, round robin setting, while also having your own personal relationship to it. And that was demonstrated in our class today. So I feel like if you need metaphors to make it work for you. Then. And then that's what works for you.

213
00:53:23,128 --> 00:53:26,140
Chris: The white circle on a black background. That's real, though.

214
00:53:26,560 --> 00:53:28,056
Kayla: Well, I mean, what's not real about it?

215
00:53:28,088 --> 00:53:28,920
Chris: That's not a metaphor.

216
00:53:29,000 --> 00:53:31,620
Kayla: What's not real about it? What's real about it? What is real?

217
00:53:33,280 --> 00:53:34,660
Chris: I was making a joke.

218
00:53:35,800 --> 00:53:39,900
Kayla: I'm not. Tell me what is real? What is the nature of reality?

219
00:53:41,880 --> 00:53:58,120
Chris: All right, so the next thing that we're gonna do here is I'm gonna do a little more research into, well, what is theosophy? Where did it come from? Blah, blah. And then we'll come back to the studio, and I'll. I'll give you the download, and then we can talk about whether this is a cult or just weird.

220
00:53:58,780 --> 00:54:00,080
Kayla: Sounds good to me.

221
00:55:16,590 --> 00:55:46,522
Chris: All right, y'all are probably coming back from, like, some pensive music or something, because I wasn't really sure how to. How to transition between, like. Because we're doing it backwards this time, right? Like, we discussed the class went to, the two classes went to, and now we're doing the context in history and whatnot. So there's not really, like, a. We went to class in between. Like, there's no audio for that. So I think I will have just put, like, one of those, like, long, pensive, radio labby type musical tracks.

222
00:55:46,586 --> 00:55:47,730
Kayla: That's why we have it.

223
00:55:47,850 --> 00:55:48,218
Chris: Yeah.

224
00:55:48,274 --> 00:55:57,410
Kayla: I do also want to say that we. In addition to the two classes that we talked about last time, in between that recording and this recording, went to another Zoom class.

225
00:55:57,530 --> 00:55:58,018
Chris: We did.

226
00:55:58,074 --> 00:56:00,482
Kayla: So I think we're getting sucked in, my friends.

227
00:56:00,546 --> 00:56:04,906
Chris: We've been to a third zoo. Yeah. Three is a charm. It's. It. Now we're a theosophists. Oh, God.

228
00:56:04,978 --> 00:56:13,640
Kayla: And that class was led by a llama. And when I say that, I mean the same title that is in Dalai Lama.

229
00:56:13,680 --> 00:56:14,952
Chris: Dalai Lama, not animal.

230
00:56:15,016 --> 00:56:25,968
Kayla: Yeah. This was led by someone named Lama Karma, who has studied this stuff for many years and is now sharing those pearls of wisdom with the likes of you and me.

231
00:56:26,104 --> 00:56:32,992
Chris: It was actually super cool, and they had somebody there to kind of help translate because, like, parse it for. Parse it.

232
00:56:33,056 --> 00:56:34,088
Kayla: Noobs like you and me.

233
00:56:34,184 --> 00:56:50,544
Chris: Yeah. For us, noobs. Really fascinating stuff. But this isn't about the classes. This is about theosophy more generally. So you guys have context of what it is? I don't know. I don't really know what it is. So you know this. You won't. I won't be able to tell you what it is.

234
00:56:50,592 --> 00:57:10,772
Kayla: I mean, honestly, I usually do this the opposite way, but I kind of appreciate that we're doing it this way, because I feel like this is the more common experience, at least for me, of, like, oh, I get really into something, and then, like, later I look it up and find out that there's, like, I don't know, something bad. I find that there's a controversy section on Wikipedia. So this is us going and now finding the controversy section on Wikipedia.

235
00:57:10,836 --> 00:57:31,012
Chris: Yeah. You guys are getting the more authentic experience. I think it's also more authentic to theosophy because it's more like they. Well, we'll get into this, but their belief is in, like, divine revelation versus, like, observational evidence. So I feel like that's kind of what we did. We're like, let's just go get the personal experience before we do any sort of, like, research.

236
00:57:31,116 --> 00:57:31,760
Kayla: Right.

237
00:57:32,190 --> 00:57:33,710
Chris: Anyway, Kayla.

238
00:57:33,830 --> 00:57:34,570
Kayla: Yes.

239
00:57:34,950 --> 00:57:42,170
Chris: Can you do me a favor and no. Oh, okay. All right. Well, then let me just skip ahead in the script here.

240
00:57:42,510 --> 00:57:43,558
Kayla: What favorite can I do for you?

241
00:57:43,574 --> 00:57:44,118
Chris: Oh, you can do?

242
00:57:44,134 --> 00:57:44,734
Kayla: Okay.

243
00:57:44,902 --> 00:57:50,294
Chris: Can you tell me about a few things you are seeing around you right now?

244
00:57:50,342 --> 00:57:51,206
Kayla: I see you.

245
00:57:51,358 --> 00:57:53,730
Chris: You see me very grateful for that. Okay.

246
00:57:54,310 --> 00:58:01,862
Kayla: We have our computers, we have our soundproofing, whatever the hell you want to call this thing. What is it?

247
00:58:02,006 --> 00:58:02,486
Chris: I don't know.

248
00:58:02,518 --> 00:58:09,934
Kayla: Soundproof wall or, like, soundproof wall. That's very frustrating to deal with. There's a bed in our spare room. I can keep going, but it's not enough.

249
00:58:09,942 --> 00:58:18,090
Chris: No, that's enough. That's enough. Because now I have an entirely separate question. Can you describe a few things that are around you right now?

250
00:58:20,190 --> 00:58:26,022
Kayla: Okay. You emphasized that sentence differently. It's the same words, but you emphasized it differently.

251
00:58:26,166 --> 00:58:33,094
Chris: I actually didn't quite use the same words. The first sentence I said, can you tell me about the things you are seeing?

252
00:58:33,182 --> 00:58:33,574
Kayla: Okay.

253
00:58:33,622 --> 00:58:39,662
Chris: In the second sentence, I said, can you describe a few things that are around you right now?

254
00:58:39,846 --> 00:58:48,726
Kayla: It sounds like you're using are in a very active way. Why are you saying are like that? Are you a pirate? Is this a pirate theme?

255
00:58:48,878 --> 00:58:50,550
Chris: Yeah. So theosophists are pirates.

256
00:58:50,630 --> 00:58:51,818
Kayla: That's extremely.

257
00:58:52,014 --> 00:59:11,010
Chris: Now, the difference I'm trying to highlight with these two questions is that the product of our senses, and our senses are only tools for interacting with the universe around us. The product of our senses is not the same as the actual thing. So the first question I asked you was, what are you seeing?

258
00:59:11,170 --> 00:59:11,538
Kayla: Right.

259
00:59:11,594 --> 00:59:24,184
Chris: I specifically phrased it that way to say, like, okay, what are the things that your brain is telling you that your eyesight is blah, blah, whatever. I didn't ask you what is around us. What are the things that are around us?

260
00:59:24,272 --> 00:59:28,420
Kayla: So you're saying one is like a subjective experience versus an objective experience?

261
00:59:29,440 --> 00:59:33,560
Chris: Almost exactly that, but it's kind of, like, philosophically relevant.

262
00:59:33,640 --> 00:59:38,104
Kayla: See, this is where my brain. My brain doesn't work good like this.

263
00:59:38,272 --> 00:59:50,190
Chris: Well, your brain is kind of what I'm talking about here, too. Our senses interact with the universe, and that produces some effect in our brains that then becomes our interpretation of the world.

264
00:59:50,690 --> 00:59:52,390
Kayla: You know what it sounds like you're doing?

265
00:59:53,050 --> 00:59:57,666
Chris: I'm trying to, like, break down your capacity to reason so I can recruit you into a cult.

266
00:59:57,738 --> 01:00:02,914
Kayla: Sounds like a, yes, b, it sounds like you're about to start quanting. Quanting.

267
01:00:02,962 --> 01:00:04,794
Chris: I'm about to start quanting over here.

268
01:00:04,882 --> 01:00:08,946
Kayla: Sounds like you're going to start quanting. You're about to start spouting some quantum flap doodle.

269
01:00:08,978 --> 01:00:59,126
Chris: Some quantum flap. That's the thing with quantum flapdoodle, is, like, it's very close. Like, especially if you're not a physicist. It's very close to actual quantum physics, so it's really tough. But you're right. I do sound like that. Maybe I am. I don't know. But our senses interact with the universe. They produce some effect in our brains that then becomes our interpretation of the world. And crucially, there isn't really, like, a raw reality, air quotes I'm doing right now. Raw reality that we can check that work against. Right? Like, I can't check my visual cortex interpretive image of the computer I'm looking at right now against the. I don't know, quote unquote real computer, because what would I use to check that work? I would just be using my senses again to do that. Right?

270
01:00:59,198 --> 01:01:04,766
Kayla: I'm so angry at you, and I know we've talked about this on the show before. I'm so. I'm never gonna get over this.

271
01:01:04,838 --> 01:01:06,342
Chris: Prepare to be even more angry.

272
01:01:06,406 --> 01:01:19,698
Kayla: I'm never gonna get over the fact that when you and I first started dating, we got in a big fight over web or not. You can, like, prove that reality exists. And you were like, you're an idiot. Reality exists. And I was like, but how do you know? And now you're sitting here being like.

273
01:01:19,794 --> 01:01:33,434
Chris: Oh, well, the quantum physicists say, no, I didn't say. And you're the one that brought up quantum physicists, first of all. Second of all, I was in the Ayn Rand cult at the time. Third of all, that's not exactly what I'm saying, although all these things are kind of that.

274
01:01:33,522 --> 01:01:41,842
Kayla: I'm very grateful that one of our big early fights was about whether reality. Don't show me that. Don't show me that. Get it away from me.

275
01:01:41,866 --> 01:01:42,450
Chris: Do you remember this?

276
01:01:42,490 --> 01:01:55,270
Kayla: Please stop. Yes. Right now. Chris has turned his computer around, and in the middle of his script, smack dab in the middle of his script, is a picture that I never want to see again. It is a picture of the dress. Do y'all remember the dress?

277
01:01:55,690 --> 01:02:03,674
Chris: Infamous dress. For those of you that don't remember the dress was an Internet phenomenon back in what, like, 20, 1514?

278
01:02:03,762 --> 01:02:04,450
Kayla: Sounds about right.

279
01:02:04,490 --> 01:02:15,210
Chris: One of those where half of all humans thought that this dress was colored blue and black, and half of the rest of humans thought that it was white and gold.

280
01:02:15,290 --> 01:02:36,800
Kayla: And like, those are two wildly different. Like, it's not like, oh, that looks blue and black versus that looks like purple and brown. It's like, those are two very different colors. Opposite spectrum of color palettes. And the people who thought blue and black were like, there's absolutely no way this isn't blue and black. And the people who thought white and gold were like, there is no way this isn't white and gold.

281
01:02:37,340 --> 01:02:45,132
Chris: Yeah. So aside from the obvious fact that it. That it's blue and black, have you ever seen it, this again, the actual dress?

282
01:02:45,236 --> 01:02:49,428
Kayla: No, I'm sorry. Have you ever been able to get it to look white and gold for.

283
01:02:49,444 --> 01:03:44,688
Chris: Yourself with great effort? Yes. And then it relatively easily goes back to blue and black for me. I know this whole part of the script is about how ambiguous it is. And even then, as I'm looking at it's so hard. It's so hard for me to get it to look white and gold. It's really difficult. But again, this illustrates that there's a difference between the real object and the product of my brain processing visual information. Depending on whether my brain interprets this scene as brightly or dimly lit and what color the light is, it will tell me with certainty what color the dress actually is, and your brain will do the same and give you a different answer because you assumed a different lighting scenario. But we're both looking at the exact same picture. Hey, check out this image.

284
01:03:44,744 --> 01:03:51,192
Chris: And before you ask, it's just a regular jpeg. It's not animated Gif. Gif.

285
01:03:51,256 --> 01:03:52,672
Kayla: Are you doing some color theory shit.

286
01:03:52,696 --> 01:03:53,728
Chris: On me or some such.

287
01:03:53,824 --> 01:03:57,418
Kayla: Okay, I see it. Yes.

288
01:03:57,514 --> 01:03:58,910
Chris: You see that moving image?

289
01:03:59,610 --> 01:04:04,202
Kayla: I'm not gonna lie. It doesn't look like it's moving at all to me. Let me see it again.

290
01:04:04,226 --> 01:04:04,898
Chris: You're keeping that.

291
01:04:04,954 --> 01:04:05,762
Kayla: Hold on. Let me see it again.

292
01:04:05,786 --> 01:04:18,594
Chris: Cause I picked that one. Cause to me, there's so many of these optical illusions that are like, it's not moving even though it looks like it is. And I picked this one. Cause I'm like, man, that one really looks like it's moving, but for you, it doesn't. That's so funny.

293
01:04:18,642 --> 01:04:25,256
Kayla: If I move my eyes, it looks like it's moving. I see it. I see what you're talking about.

294
01:04:25,328 --> 01:04:26,280
Chris: We'll put these on Instagram.

295
01:04:26,320 --> 01:04:32,056
Kayla: That is very clearly, movement can be seen, can be detected.

296
01:04:32,128 --> 01:05:22,756
Chris: Well, yeah, we'll put a few optical illusions like this one on our instagram for the show. But there are dozens of them. There are dozens of such optical, illusory effects. The one that we're talking about right now, because we're an audio program, is it looks like a weird, sort of, like, purple and red spiral, but it's set up in such a way that your eye, like, your rapid eye movements will cause it to look like it's actually rotating, even though it's totally not rotating. Again, just another thing to kind of illustrate, like, what our brain is producing isn't necessarily exactly what is there. Did you know that it takes 80 milliseconds for your brain to process visual input? So what you are seeing always has happened at least a little bit in the past.

297
01:05:22,908 --> 01:05:25,092
Kayla: I do know this. Can I tell you why?

298
01:05:25,276 --> 01:05:26,040
Chris: Yeah.

299
01:05:26,500 --> 01:06:07,290
Kayla: Because back when I was a teenager, I was into some stuff. I was very into the beats, the beat culture, like those guys, and they were very into some of this stuff. And they had a whole thing about how, like, particularly, I remember Neil Cassidy talking about this, of, like, we are always visually. And then I think, other sensory inputs, we're always just a little bit behind, processing it. Like, just. We're processing it after it's happened just a tiny little bit. So one of their goals was to get as close, to close that gap as much as possible. Close that gap with experience and reality as much as possible.

300
01:06:07,630 --> 01:06:09,262
Chris: How did they do that? Drugs.

301
01:06:09,366 --> 01:06:12,290
Kayla: Drugs. Writing poetry. Driving really fast in a bus.

302
01:06:12,870 --> 01:06:17,534
Chris: Driving really fast. I guess that makes a weird sort of, like, very tangible sense.

303
01:06:17,622 --> 01:06:21,262
Kayla: Anyway, that's, I think, the first place that I learned about this concept.

304
01:06:21,446 --> 01:06:58,930
Chris: Did you know that according to a study in 2022 last year, our brains don't actually give us even the moment to moment snapshots that our eyes retina takes? And if it did, we'd perceive reality as a dizzying blur that's already perceived as the dia. Yeah. When I read this, I was like, yeah, I think mine's broken because that's what mine is. Our visual processing averages out and smooths out the images that we receive from our eyes. Do you know how far in the past they found that our brains take visual data in for this smoothing process?

305
01:07:00,590 --> 01:07:01,628
Kayla: I don't know.

306
01:07:01,774 --> 01:07:05,744
Chris: Up to 15 seconds.

307
01:07:05,832 --> 01:07:08,384
Kayla: No, I don't believe that. I refuse.

308
01:07:08,472 --> 01:07:09,336
Chris: 15 seconds.

309
01:07:09,368 --> 01:07:10,400
Kayla: No, no.

310
01:07:10,520 --> 01:07:12,136
Chris: That's the horrifying thing I've ever heard.

311
01:07:12,208 --> 01:07:13,344
Kayla: Please, I don't want to talk this anymore.

312
01:07:13,392 --> 01:07:19,912
Chris: That you are seeing in your field of vision right now. Maybe from up to 15 seconds ago.

313
01:07:19,976 --> 01:07:25,460
Kayla: I feel sick. I don't like that. I don't like it.

314
01:07:28,000 --> 01:07:29,312
Chris: I don't like it either, frankly.

315
01:07:29,376 --> 01:07:43,624
Kayla: I don't care for that. And, like, I'm grateful for it because, like, I prefer the reality to not look like a dizzying blur. Like, you know, I prefer watching a movie that looks like a movie and not these, like, newfangled, like, high frame speed movies where it's like one of.

316
01:07:43,632 --> 01:07:47,392
Chris: Those goddamn food tiktoks where it's just like, image, image.

317
01:07:47,416 --> 01:07:53,982
Kayla: Not image. That's a different thing. But yes, that, or like when Peter Jackson did the Hobbit in, like, the.

318
01:07:54,086 --> 01:07:57,830
Chris: Like, oh, I know what you're talking about. Yeah, it looks.

319
01:07:57,870 --> 01:07:58,694
Kayla: And I don't want to look at it.

320
01:07:58,702 --> 01:08:01,438
Chris: I like the motion smoothing on my parents tv.

321
01:08:01,534 --> 01:08:02,614
Kayla: Yes, I don't like that thing.

322
01:08:02,622 --> 01:08:03,902
Chris: Oh, God, it looks so weird.

323
01:08:03,966 --> 01:08:11,230
Kayla: I'm grateful for my brain trying to give me a more pleasant experience of visual reality, but I'm gonna be sick. I really don't feel good about that.

324
01:08:11,310 --> 01:08:17,685
Chris: Oh, God. The trade off for that is existential horror. But that's okay. How can I. Oh, it's better to see stuff good, right?

325
01:08:17,758 --> 01:08:18,451
Kayla: Sure.

326
01:08:18,645 --> 01:08:41,799
Chris: Now let me pump the brakes here and sort of channel my old argumentative with you self. I'm not as sense as our fundamentally unreliable guy. I'm not even sure that I'm, like, a reality is fundamentally unknowable guy. After all, when I say the product of our senses is not the same as the actual thing, what the hell do I mean by actual thing?

327
01:08:41,879 --> 01:08:43,502
Kayla: I would like to also know.

328
01:08:43,671 --> 01:08:59,520
Chris: I don't have access to an actual thing, quote unquote. Neither do you. We only have our observations. So to posit that there is somehow a reality underneath, even though it makes sense in a way, it also kind of lacks meaning.

329
01:09:00,020 --> 01:09:02,844
Kayla: If a tree falls in the forest and there's no one around here.

330
01:09:02,932 --> 01:09:03,276
Chris: Exactly.

331
01:09:03,308 --> 01:09:04,652
Kayla: Does it make a sound? Oh.

332
01:09:04,716 --> 01:09:04,932
Chris: Oh.

333
01:09:04,956 --> 01:09:07,060
Kayla: That really kind of hurts my face right now.

334
01:09:07,180 --> 01:09:59,200
Chris: Right. It's not that it doesn't. It comes down to what we think of as actually existing. Can something exist? If I'm just saying, like, it probably does, even though you can't detect it. I'm scared that which is undetectable might as well not exist. Now, note I've changed my vocabulary slightly here. I've gone from, like, sensory input to observation to talking about detection. We have many more tools for interacting with the universe now than just our eyeballs or even just our six senses. Experiments that probe the inner workings of atoms don't correspond to any of our built in senses. And we have to do work to translate the results of those experiments into readouts on computer screens that our eyes can read in English. So do experiments such as this debunk the idea that reality is unknowable? Do you think we've crossed that barrier?

335
01:10:00,540 --> 01:10:01,420
Kayla: I don't know.

336
01:10:01,500 --> 01:10:02,164
Chris: I don't know either.

337
01:10:02,212 --> 01:10:19,530
Kayla: Look, okay, I just want to. Okay. When I was a kid, one of the scariest thoughts that I could think of, I still don't know why, one of the scariest things I could imagine was a telephone ringing in an empty house.

338
01:10:20,190 --> 01:10:23,694
Chris: And I think, especially when it's coming from inside the house, especially when the.

339
01:10:23,702 --> 01:10:48,762
Kayla: Gulf inside the house, that was the second serious thing. And I think it was kind of butting up against this idea of, like, how can something be ringing if there's no one there to hear it? Who is doing the hearing, then what is. What is hearing? And if there is nothing hearing, then what is the sound? What is going on? I think I felt like, ooh, ghosts. But in. In my brain, I think my brain was grappling with some of what we're talking about right now with better words.

340
01:10:48,866 --> 01:11:34,874
Chris: Yeah. And some of these experiments, I'm talking about quantum level experiments of observing the very tiny, and I use observe loosely here, but some of those feel like they are kind of doing what Neil Cassidy was trying to do and just get closer and closer to, quote, unquote, this, what we will call platonic ideal, the real. And that brings us to what this is called. The name for this idea comes from one of its earliest philosophers, Plato. It's called platonic realism. And it's the idea that there is, like, a really for reality underneath the one we can perceive or detect. And all were able to grasp of that reality is just the shadows, the metaphorical shadows. It casts.

341
01:11:34,922 --> 01:11:36,682
Kayla: Is that what the hell Plato's cave was talking about?

342
01:11:36,706 --> 01:12:06,596
Chris: Yes, this is Plato's cave. That's what Plato's cave is about. Plato's cave is about. It's a metaphor for the fact that we live. We all live in Plato's cave, baby, and all we can see is shadows, and we can only interpret the shadows and try to figure out what the objects are. So if you've ever heard of the platonic ideal of something, that's why it's called the platonic ideal is because it exists in this, like, immutable form that we can only grasp at knowing.

343
01:12:06,748 --> 01:12:08,444
Kayla: I'm sorry, I'm having.

344
01:12:08,612 --> 01:12:16,172
Chris: Are you having a problem? Is your brain updating your knowledge of what Plato's cave means? Yes, because it's been memed to death. So you don't.

345
01:12:16,276 --> 01:12:29,628
Kayla: It's been memed to death. A and all of the Plato's cave memes are hilarious. But the only time I've never had Plato's cave explained to me in any other scenario other than english class and film class. And those are very different. Interesting utilizations.

346
01:12:29,724 --> 01:12:32,216
Chris: What's film class like? What if you're watching a movie in a cave?

347
01:12:32,348 --> 01:12:55,576
Kayla: Yeah, which I would love to do. No, just the idea of, like, I don't know. I'm not an english teacher. English class and film class are, like, pretty much the same thing. But thinking about it in a way that's more like about society versus about reality or about, like, art versus about reality. And so to change, it's an extensible metaphor. Yeah, yeah, of course it's about reality, but it's just. I'm having a. I need a second.

348
01:12:55,728 --> 01:13:01,532
Chris: No, I mean, those are all valid interpretations, right? It's. It's a really. It's a powerful metaphor.

349
01:13:01,596 --> 01:13:24,020
Kayla: I mean, it's why I think a lot of Qanoners and people of that ilk also gravitate towards this metaphor because there's a lot of feeling of like, oh, we are all living in Plato's cave because of what the media is showing us. The media is showing us the shadows, and we need to get outside of the media. Mainstream media. I think probably flat earthers like it too. We need to get outside of what the mainstream media is showing us and get to the reality. Get to the truth.

350
01:13:24,100 --> 01:14:20,126
Chris: Yeah. Now, I kind of mentioned this already, but personally, I'm not really a platonic realist. I think that a quote unquote reality kind of just doesn't make sense. It feels like make believe to me. Again, if something is undetectable. And when I say that, I include senses, but also experiments and direct observations, like, you know, if I can see this planet move, then that means that there's probably another thing next to it. Or, oh, we know dark matter exists because otherwise galaxies would fly apart. I count that as well. That's true. That's how we knew it exists. First they would fling themselves apart. But I count all that when I say detectable, right? I don't just mean shit I can see in front of me. But if it's undetectable by any means, then it's not meaningful. And meaning is synonymous with reality to me.

351
01:14:20,298 --> 01:14:38,410
Chris: If I can posit a reality or a piece of it, thats undetectable. Whats the difference between that and positing the supernatural? Whats the difference between me saying, theres a heaven you cant detect, theres a magic you cant detect, or theres a layer of reality that exists beyond detection?

352
01:14:39,070 --> 01:14:58,816
Kayla: Yeah, I guess when you think about it, like, if a tree falls in the forest, does it make a sound if theres no one around to hear it? Just because there's nobody around to hear it with their ears doesn't mean that there's not indirect methods of observation to understand. If the tree fell, if it made a sound, there's other ways to figure that out.

353
01:14:58,848 --> 01:15:21,814
Chris: Like the metaphor, whatever the metaphorical Neil Cassidy in that situation would be like, yeah, but if I push closer, maybe I could detect it this way. Or if I push closer, maybe I could hear it. Or if I push closer, maybe I could put a microscope on it. Or if I push closer, I could use an experiment that's designed to, like, indirectly observe subatomic particles or whatever.

354
01:15:21,862 --> 01:15:38,830
Kayla: I mean, this is what Marconi was trying to do. He thought that sound waves never disappeared, and so you could go back and hear whatever forever. So he would say, yes, it does make a sound because I think that we can observe it. Obviously he was wrong, but he was on that track, right?

355
01:15:39,170 --> 01:15:49,722
Chris: So that's why it's like, even though it sounded like I was sort of contradicting myself in a weird way, and it's still a little bit mystical because, like, I don't know if there's a reality anywhere anymore.

356
01:15:49,746 --> 01:15:50,790
Kayla: What does that even mean?

357
01:15:51,410 --> 01:16:09,440
Chris: That's my position is like, what does reality mean? It feels a little bit silly to say, but it's also like the position of a lot of philosophers and theosophers. We're here to discuss theosophy, of course. What's so funny?

358
01:16:10,460 --> 01:16:13,280
Kayla: Context. We always just have so much context.

359
01:16:14,500 --> 01:16:47,978
Chris: It's because we're always trying to come up with some clever way to start them. Like, remember the dress. Anyway, that's like theosophy. Like many other systems of thought and spiritualism, theosophy is heavily concerned with the quote, unquote, true nature of reality, if such a thing exists, which your mileage may vary, but theosophy motto is as there is no religion higher than the truth. So they are truth seekers. And that certainly was evident, I think, from the class went to and the zoom discussions that we participated in.

360
01:16:48,114 --> 01:16:48,830
Kayla: Yeah.

361
01:16:49,570 --> 01:17:06,586
Chris: Now, if you're wondering. Okay, you know, I know their motto. There's no religion higher than the truth. And I also know they're concerned with, like, metaphysics, nature of reality, and epistemology, the knowability of reality. I kind of know what they're about, but what are they? Are they a club?

362
01:17:06,778 --> 01:17:07,370
Kayla: What is it?

363
01:17:07,410 --> 01:17:10,110
Chris: Religion? A cult? Just weird.

364
01:17:10,530 --> 01:17:11,938
Kayla: That's what we're here to do, baby.

365
01:17:11,994 --> 01:18:02,318
Chris: Well, we'll get to some of that, but overall, this is actually kind of a hard answer to pin down as precisely as other groups we've covered on the show. I think we mentioned this a little bit in our discussion of the classes, but. But at its most core, theosophy is what its name translates to, divine knowledge. It's a synthesis between spirituality and knowledge, and that knowledge is gained internally, not externally. That is, via meditative and introspective practices rather than empiricism and observation. Theosophy as, like, whether it's a group or what, though, is hard to pin down. As I've been doing the research for this episode, I've sort of thought of it, like, halfway between something with well defined borders, like, let's say, like Scientology, and then something that's more, like, diffuse and difficult to define, like empty spaces.

366
01:18:02,454 --> 01:18:22,848
Chris: It's kind of like halfway between that. Like, it's not really a group, certainly not a single group. But there are theosophical groups. It's also a movement, a set of ideas and practices that are tied together by certain themes. But on the other hand, these themes and ideas have been around for a long time, going by different names, and they're still around again, going by even different names.

367
01:18:22,904 --> 01:18:38,376
Kayla: It kind of seemed like in the group that went to, yes, there were maybe agreed upon interpretations, but also it was open to other interpretations as well. So even the dictionary of terms is fluid and interchangeable.

368
01:18:38,528 --> 01:19:36,636
Chris: And it's because theosophy by design encompasses so much. They are well aware of the pedigree of their movement, the fact that they have so many things that they draw from. In fact, one of the key defining features of theosophy is that they seek to universalize the experience and teachings of all and any prior wisdom traditions. So wisdom traditions, quote unquote, being a phrase that's deliberately casting a broad net to catch everything from religious wisdom traditions like the five wisdom books in the Old Testament, which, if you're curious, are job proverbs, ecclesiastes, ecclesiasticus, and wisdom, to shamanistic practices, to secular wisdom teachers, even to science and so on. So theosophy is basically saying, like, okay, we encompass all of that stuff, and we're trying to find the threads of truth by studying all of these guys. And they do have favorite guys.

369
01:19:36,748 --> 01:19:38,628
Kayla: Who are their favorite guys? I love guys.

370
01:19:38,724 --> 01:19:39,548
Chris: Theosophy.

371
01:19:39,684 --> 01:19:43,840
Kayla: Theosophy is what guys under your supervision.

372
01:19:44,980 --> 01:19:58,196
Chris: Theosophy is not really like a wisdom primary source. They're like a wisdom tradition aggregator. They're like a podcast for spiritualism, basically. But again, they do have favorite sources. So Plato, as we discussed.

373
01:19:58,268 --> 01:20:01,212
Kayla: No. Why is everybody so into Plato kind.

374
01:20:01,236 --> 01:20:03,052
Chris: Of explained that just because of the cave.

375
01:20:03,236 --> 01:20:04,980
Kayla: Did he do anything besides cave?

376
01:20:05,060 --> 01:20:34,418
Chris: He did a lot of stuff. Yeah, I mean, he had political ideas that he wrote about. He had all sorts of philosophy that he wrote about. And I think that they're interested in all of it, but they're particularly interested in the cave. So they're interested in Buddhism, they're interested in Hinduism. They have a healthy serving of kabbalism and hermeticism with fresh hot cup of gnosticism to wash it all down.

377
01:20:34,524 --> 01:20:41,758
Kayla: And all of those things are my favorite things. All of those things are. You know how like, Oprah has her favorite things?

378
01:20:41,814 --> 01:20:42,610
Chris: Huh.

379
01:20:42,910 --> 01:20:44,270
Kayla: These would be my favorite things.

380
01:20:44,350 --> 01:20:46,430
Chris: Is that like, if you had to sing the favorite things song?

381
01:20:46,510 --> 01:20:52,970
Kayla: Yeah, like agnosticism, kabbalah, trees of life, and hermetic traditions.

382
01:20:54,510 --> 01:20:56,170
Chris: I wonder if they're into festivus.

383
01:20:56,710 --> 01:20:59,214
Kayla: I'm sure if it got you closer to the truth, they'd be into it.

384
01:20:59,262 --> 01:21:38,850
Chris: Actually, I guess they're into everything. Now, we've talked a lot about how much we liked the classes we took, and I personally am always down for good philosophical discussion. I liked the classes, but I do have to say that this universalizing idea of theirs is one of the things that I do want to call out. Just personally rubs me the wrong way. You and I were kind of talking about this the other day off podcasts, but like, there's something, God, I wish I had like, a good word for it. But there's something that just bothers me about, like, I don't have any problem with trying to parse the widest variety of sources. I think that's fine.

385
01:21:39,190 --> 01:22:05,456
Chris: I think it's more that there's this sort of notion, and maybe not from the lodge went to and maybe not from theosophists today, but we'll get into it a little bit from some of the early theosophists. There's this notion that it's, like, above everything, there's this notion that it's like, it's deeper than the deepest truths. It's like, you know, this idea that it encompasses everything just feels arrogant to me.

386
01:22:05,568 --> 01:22:48,140
Kayla: Yeah, I think if you're saying. I think it's one thing. If you're saying, like, we study everything so that we can, like, get the closest to it versus our approach is the best approach. Like, those are two slightly different. You don't have to say, like, our approach is the best approach to be, like, we study everything. They don't. It doesn't have to be. And I do agree with you that, like, I didn't get the sense from the classes that went to that this was, like, looking down on any other methodologies for, quote, unquote, finding the truth, like, other religions and things like that, because we talked to people that were attending the class that were like, oh, I got to this through these other, like, I got to this through, like, studying Joseph Campbell or I got to this through studying, like, christian mysticism.

387
01:22:48,260 --> 01:22:58,042
Kayla: And now I'm here. This is, like, this means the most to me. Not, this is the. This is more important than those other things. Just this one has mean the most to me, and I feel like that's fine.

388
01:22:58,146 --> 01:22:58,522
Chris: Yeah.

389
01:22:58,586 --> 01:23:09,722
Kayla: I don't necessarily think that. And you know more than I do, but I don't necessarily think that, like, the original leaders of these groups had that mentality. I think there was maybe a little more of this, like, arrogance that you're talking about.

390
01:23:09,746 --> 01:23:26,186
Chris: It's a bit different. Yeah, for sure. Which we'll get to that, I think. Yeah. Like, the students that we met felt like theosophy was a step on their journey, and it didn't feel like it was like, well, if you go off of this, if you go off theosophy path, you're just missing out.

391
01:23:26,258 --> 01:23:26,870
Kayla: Right.

392
01:23:27,570 --> 01:23:36,970
Chris: And I don't even know if, like, the notion is that it's the best. It's more of. It's like, the notion of, like, everything.

393
01:23:37,010 --> 01:23:39,114
Kayla: Is right, but we're everything is part of us. Yeah.

394
01:23:39,202 --> 01:24:33,100
Chris: Yeah, right. Like, everything's not part of you. You're also. You're part of reality. Like, in fact, in, like, this weird sort of, like, meta way, it feels like theosophy, at least from some of its earliest founders, has this idea that it's separate from reality in this platonic sense. The philosophy itself, the movement itself, is the platonic real thing that all the world's religions are just grasping at. And I think that's why I take issue with it. I don't think that exists. I think that theosophy is part of the discourse, part of everything else. And, in fact, they. So just as an example of this, theosophists insist that they are not a religion. And I think, again, this is not talking about the class went to or the people we've been interacting with. I think that they're much more chill than this.

395
01:24:33,220 --> 01:24:56,448
Chris: But the early theosophists insisted that they were not a religion, although one of its founders, its most important founder, HP Blavatsky, who we mentioned earlier, did refer to it as the modern transmission of the once universal religion that she said existed deep into the human past. So it's not a religion, except it is, but it's a revival of ancient proto religion.

396
01:24:56,504 --> 01:25:34,376
Kayla: I guess this idea that there was one true ancient religion, and then we lost our way and split up into all these kind of false religions that are just a shadow of their former selves, and then here we come along, we have access to in the 18 hundreds. And I'm like, you guys, I'm gonna aggregate everything that I learned through all these other religions and say that this stuff that I've come up with, which a lot of it is probably, like, you know, lifted or plagiarized, this is the true religion that was, like, before all these other guys, which it's like, it's not before all these other guys. It's. You're an amalgamation of all these other guys. And it's cool if you get to, like, one unified thing, but I get what you're saying.

397
01:25:34,448 --> 01:26:21,270
Chris: I think that's what you're saying right now is ultimately my. My issue with it. Generally, those early members were really averse to calling it a religion, and members themselves are adherents to all sorts of other religions. You can be jewish or christian or buddhist or even an atheist and be a member of theosophy, and that's certainly true today. But in terms of what is theosophy, they really didn't like it being called a religion. However, religious scholars seem to be mostly universally in agreement of calling it a religion or a religious movement or a new religious movement. I wanted to mention this adjacent to the discussion about the universalizing nature of it, because it kind of feels like the same impulse to me, the same impulse to be above the religious fray, to be deeper than anyone else's deep truth.

398
01:26:21,850 --> 01:26:38,372
Chris: I kind of felt like the whole, like, we're not a religion thing is illustrative of that. Let's talk now a little bit about where theosophy comes from, and I do mean a little bit. Once again, you're not going to tell.

399
01:26:38,396 --> 01:26:47,212
Kayla: Us the ancient or the one true unifying religion that encompasses everything pre early man had that we don't have access to anymore. You're not going to tell us about that?

400
01:26:47,276 --> 01:26:57,440
Chris: Yeah, that's the thing. We could spill so much pixel ink covering the influences on theosophy, because it's sort of, by its very nature, is like, wants to study everything. So.

401
01:26:57,520 --> 01:27:19,800
Kayla: Which is cool, which I get. But I will say that since we've gone to these classes and I've started looking into this stuff on my own, it's like, oh, yeah, I would like to learn more about this stuff. Anytime I, like, crack open a book or start reading about a concept, it just feels like, oh, I need to read another thing so that I have context for this. And then I go to read that, and it's like, oh, I need to read another thing so that I have context for this. It feels like turtles all the way down.

402
01:27:19,880 --> 01:27:23,656
Chris: Yeah, it's like a Wikipedia binge where you're like, ooh, click on that link. Ooh, click on that link.

403
01:27:23,688 --> 01:27:30,438
Kayla: But it's like, click on that link so that I can. Like, I tried to. I cracked into an Aleister Crowley book, and I was like, I can't parse this. And then I googled it, and I.

404
01:27:30,454 --> 01:27:31,390
Chris: Read like, well, he was on drugs.

405
01:27:31,430 --> 01:27:55,056
Kayla: Well, he was on drugs. But this particular book, the Internet's consensus was like, oh, yeah, if you don't have an understanding of, like, the hermetic kabbalah tree of life and, like, maybe some gematria, it's like, this is gonna be useless to you. And I'm like, okay, I thought that I was going back to the store. I thought I was going back to like, okay, I'll Shukarli. That's like, very, like, og. Right? And, nope, you need a lot more stuff before that. So now I'm on a quest to understand the tree of life. That's my next goal.

406
01:27:55,158 --> 01:28:15,388
Chris: I certainly think that theosophy students we met kind of already gave us that sense. Gave me that sense because a lot of what they were talking about, especially the guy that was sort of like in charge of the meeting, he definitely gave the impression of, like, you know, we're trying to uncover these ancient wisdoms. And to get there takes a lot of work.

407
01:28:15,524 --> 01:28:15,868
Kayla: Right?

408
01:28:15,924 --> 01:28:43,446
Chris: And you have to, like, peel back the layers. And at the time, I was kind of like, I don't really know what you're talking about, man, but cool. Sounds fun. But as you started doing that a little more just on your own, I think that might have been what he was talking about, which is like, okay, I want to understand this thing, but if I don't understand this other thing, then I can't understand that. But to understand that thing, I have to understand. So there's this chain of things.

409
01:28:43,518 --> 01:28:52,330
Kayla: Yeah, I learned that. The tree of life. So when we say the tree of life, we're talking about the symbol that you've all seen before, where it's like ten nodes, kind of on a map.

410
01:28:53,360 --> 01:28:56,928
Chris: It's like geometric looking. You might not have seen it actually.

411
01:28:57,104 --> 01:28:58,136
Kayla: You've probably seen it somewhere.

412
01:28:58,168 --> 01:29:01,220
Chris: It's a mysticism thing. You've seen it if you've seen an evangelion.

413
01:29:02,760 --> 01:29:35,814
Kayla: I thought that its origins were in jewish kabbalah, which is the origins for western esoteric kabbalah, christian kabbalah, and hermetic kabbalah. But apparently jewish kabbalah may have also taken it from an earlier religion. It may be somewhat syncretized. So it does feel like you can never quite zero in the. On a true origin point here. And that's because at the end of the day, it does feel like most, if not all, religious endeavors draw from their predecessors and other sources.

414
01:29:35,902 --> 01:30:22,562
Chris: It's almost like people have always questioned the nature of their reality and how knowable it is. And that has translated into different things in different cultures, but it's always the same sort of quest, right? And in fact, that's. That's why I led with the whole optical illusion thing, because it was the only thing that felt broad enough to underpin any of this. It's not really about any one specific cultural context. It's about this relationship between our consciousness and reality that gives rise to all these different things, of which theosophy is one of them. So it's impossible, in a succinct way, to discuss all of the predecessors and influences on theosophy. But what I can do is list a few of them and talk about what they have in common.

415
01:30:22,746 --> 01:31:14,298
Chris: In fact, I already listed their faves and we've already discussed some of these common themes. And you were just talking about kabbalah. But still, let's summarize a little bit. So theosophy is heavily influenced by wisdom traditions and in particular, wisdom traditions that allegedly harbor some sort of secret or esoteric knowledge. In fact, the dictionary definition for esoteric is intended for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest. So they're really into that secret knowledge kind of shit. So am I. Yeah, I'm like, I get it. Secret knowledge is like intellectual heroin. These wisdom traditions that theosophy draws from also typically feature divine revelation as a preferred path to knowledge. Here's a quote from Encyclopedia Britannica.

416
01:31:14,474 --> 01:31:48,642
Chris: Theosophical writers hold that there is a deeper spiritual reality and that direct contact with that reality can be established through intuition, meditation, revelation, or some other state transcending normal human consciousness. Again, very evident from just our few interactions with it. So the forebears of theosophy are also traditions that feature the esoteric secret knowledge type thing and also some sort of divine revelation. So, like neoplatonism. Neoplatonism.

417
01:31:48,706 --> 01:31:50,450
Kayla: I don't know how to pronounce neoplatonism.

418
01:31:50,610 --> 01:31:51,842
Chris: Neoplatonism.

419
01:31:52,026 --> 01:31:53,834
Kayla: That's a really good name. Neoplatonism.

420
01:31:53,882 --> 01:32:18,376
Chris: Neoplatonism. So Plato, but new neoplatonism. So that, for example, has those features. And I have to give credit here, by the way. It's actually super logically consistent that if you believe in a reality that is fundamentally undetectable or inaccessible via observation, then the only way to gain knowledge about such a reality is through revelation.

421
01:32:18,488 --> 01:32:31,586
Kayla: Right. Just a quick question for you. In this context, are the words like divine revelation and enlightenment kind of synonymous, or those poking at two different ideas?

422
01:32:31,778 --> 01:33:02,794
Chris: I think they're synonymous, but I'm also not a llama. You know what I mean? I'm not 100% sure. And a lot of these ideas hinge on some pretty specific nuances, as evidenced by when we took that third class. I remember when the guy was talking about how they had to debate the meaning, how to translate this particular word from Sanskrit that was like, didn't really have a good translation in English, so they had to kind of come up with their own. And it was very particular.

423
01:33:02,922 --> 01:33:06,230
Kayla: Yeah, the word they landed on was relaxed equipoise.

424
01:33:06,570 --> 01:33:55,368
Chris: Yeah, relaxed equipoise. Which was like he said, it was like the fourth or fifth thing that they landed on. Like, they're like, well, first we discussed maybe it's this, and then it's that. And then finally we landed on relaxed equipoise. So it was like, obviously they did, like, a lot of effort to, like, get to something that meant something very specific. So, anyway, I'm just saying that because, like, I don't know exactly. What I can say is, when I say divine revelation, what I mean is revelation through some means that involves, a, it's internal, it's introspective, it's God giving you, and b, it's spiritual in some way. It's some sort of, like, non materialist way. Okay, like, I have intuited this truth about the universe, and maybe it's God, right?

425
01:33:55,424 --> 01:34:07,440
Kayla: But it's not just like, oh, you're walking down the street one day, and then suddenly somebody shoots a lightning bolt into your head, and it's like, oh, it is revealed to me now. It's more like you have to. You do internal work to achieve a state of enlightenment or revelation.

426
01:34:07,520 --> 01:35:05,734
Chris: Right, exactly. But again, could be God. It's just not in this. Not in theosophus case. In theosophys case, it's like, no, it's via, you know, accessing this pristine awareness that they talked about. Gotcha. Anyway, they also have a ton of other influences that share these characteristics to more or less a degree. Gnosticism, rosicrucianism, Buddhism, especially of the tibetan variety, Hinduism and kabbalah, just to name a few. And just to give a sense of the common thread here, this is what Britannica has to say about Kabbalah. Esoteric Kabbalah is also tradition inasmuch as it lays claim to secret knowledge of the unwritten Torah. Divine revelation that was communicated by God to Moses and Adam, end quote. Which is cool as shit because it's basically saying, like, there's secret knowledge that most people don't know about, like, within this ancient tradition, this jewish tradition, right?

427
01:35:05,862 --> 01:35:17,750
Chris: And it comes from this divine. So in this case, it is from God, right? Like, there's this divine revelation that happened to Moses and Adam, and we're trying to, like, get access to this secret, divinely revealed knowledge, which is dope.

428
01:35:17,830 --> 01:35:19,290
Kayla: Can I tell you a side story?

429
01:35:19,630 --> 01:35:21,638
Chris: Can you tell our audience a side story?

430
01:35:21,734 --> 01:35:51,902
Kayla: Tell whoever's listening this is divine revelation to the audience, divinely revealing. Yes. There is a jewish Kabbalah center not too far from here, like, kind of maybe 20 minutes away in a predominantly jewish neighborhood. And it is apparently, like, I read articles about it, likening it to in the amount of money and pizazz involved, likening it to, like, mega churches or Scientology.

431
01:35:52,006 --> 01:35:52,830
Chris: No way.

432
01:35:52,950 --> 01:36:07,950
Kayla: Apparently. And I plan for you and I to go to the Kabbalah center, just like, personally. Cause we gotta go. But it's the Kabbalah center, especially for zazz. Many, many celebrities have been involved. Like Madonna was famously.

433
01:36:08,030 --> 01:36:09,118
Chris: Celebrities are involved in Kabbalah?

434
01:36:09,134 --> 01:36:31,768
Kayla: Yeah, Demi Moore was into it. Many, many famous celebrities have been involved at the Kabbalah center. So therefore, it has a shit ton of money. And rather than kind of having the atmosphere of theosophilage that you and I went to, where it was, like, old and, like, old shaft of light.

435
01:36:31,824 --> 01:36:33,912
Chris: Coming through the window and illuminating the.

436
01:36:33,936 --> 01:36:51,038
Kayla: Dust in the room, it wasn't trying to be flashy or grab you with, like, ooh, there's a lot of money. This is clean, this is pristine. It was grabbing you with the fact that, like, this is old and this is well worn and this is a place to come and, like, you know, read your book about the knowledge. No, the kabbalah center is like, you go, tell me.

437
01:36:51,054 --> 01:36:52,942
Chris: It's like neon signs and, like, go girls.

438
01:36:52,966 --> 01:37:04,302
Kayla: There's like, club music playing and it's like, wait, seriously? It's. Yeah, it's not go girls, but it's more like. It's more like, from what I've under, from what I understand, it's more similar to, like, a mega church experience.

439
01:37:04,486 --> 01:37:04,966
Chris: Wow.

440
01:37:05,038 --> 01:37:06,646
Kayla: Than like, you know, some of those.

441
01:37:06,678 --> 01:37:09,366
Chris: Megachurch experiences are very entertaining.

442
01:37:09,438 --> 01:37:22,014
Kayla: They're attracting followers with money and flash and also this access to secret knowledge. But it's like secret knowledge with my veneer teeth versus secret knowledge with my corn cob pipe.

443
01:37:22,182 --> 01:37:34,494
Chris: Right. Interesting. I cannot wait to go. But anyway, that's about the most concise I can be with Theosophy's roots without starting a religious studies department at the University of Cult is just weird.

444
01:37:34,542 --> 01:37:35,814
Kayla: Which is next season.

445
01:37:35,942 --> 01:38:04,498
Chris: Right. But what about the actual founding of the movement? Is it just a word to describe thinking about esotericism and divine revelation? Or is it, like, a thing? And you might guess the answer to that is, yes, it's a thing. Otherwise, why would there be a hundred year old lodge in south central La? And yes, it is a thing. And we already mentioned its most prominent and important founder, 19th century spiritualist and maybe world traveler hp Blavatsky.

446
01:38:04,554 --> 01:38:06,362
Kayla: I don't like it when you say maybe like that.

447
01:38:06,546 --> 01:38:12,226
Chris: So this season is apparently our russian immigrant comes to America and starts a cult season.

448
01:38:12,338 --> 01:38:18,098
Kayla: I was going to ask if there were similarities between Ayn Rand and Hp Blavatsky, which feels kind of, like sexist.

449
01:38:18,154 --> 01:38:41,032
Chris: But I don't know those two things. For starters, russian immigrant comes to America and starts a cult. But rather than being born into and growing up in revolutionary Russia, which, like, completely explains Rand's writings and philosophy, Blavatsky was born into the russian empire in the mid 18 hundreds when spiritualism was big. Kind of everywhere, which explains her writings and philosophy.

450
01:38:41,096 --> 01:38:47,976
Kayla: And I think it's particularly big. There's something about Russia where some of this stuff is very big there.

451
01:38:48,128 --> 01:38:49,136
Chris: Could because of her.

452
01:38:49,208 --> 01:38:51,280
Kayla: Like, ISkCon is big there?

453
01:38:51,400 --> 01:39:40,234
Chris: Yeah, I don't know. Could because of her. I didn't encounter that myself. But she is russian. Specifically. She was born. Well, actually, I guess. Well, let me be clear. Born in 1831 in what is now Ukraine, what was part of the russian empire at the time, during a cholera epidemic, into an aristocratic and military family. The father was in the military. The military part of the equation meant that she moved around a lot as a kid. And now I'm going to skip, like a ton of her. Like, her family went here and there, and then she did this at this age, blah, blah. And I'm just gonna get straight to the fun, disputed stuff. Starting in her early controversy section on Wikipedia, pretty much starting in her early adulthood, she traveled around the world, probably. Or, well, probably not.

454
01:39:40,362 --> 01:39:47,270
Kayla: Wait, really? Because maybe this is where we first learned about tulpas. Was her going there and learning about emanation bodies, her going to Tibet?

455
01:39:48,130 --> 01:39:48,882
Chris: We're not sure.

456
01:39:48,946 --> 01:39:49,750
Kayla: Oh, no.

457
01:39:50,810 --> 01:40:25,830
Chris: Quoting from Nicholas Goodrich Clark's Helena Blavatsky biography, she did not keep a diary at the time and was not accompanied by relatives who could verify her activities. Public knowledge of these travels rests upon her own largely uncorroborated accounts, which are marred by being occasionally conflicting in their chronology. End quote. These world travels were also supposedly where she meth the masters. Totally uncorroborated. Blavatsky claimed to have the best, goodest secret knowledge bestowed upon her by these masters.

458
01:40:25,910 --> 01:40:27,918
Kayla: Why can't anything cool ever happen to me?

459
01:40:28,014 --> 01:41:10,436
Chris: Who she definitely met, definitely aren't out of town living with their parents this summer in Canada. But, like, you'll meet her really soon, guys, I swear. And she's really pretty and she's great. Older than me, and she likes comic books. She's real. Sorry, I mean, the masters. The masters are real. Here's a quote from her Wikipedia summary as presented by Blavatsky. Theosophy teaches that there is ancient and secretive brotherhood of spiritual adepts known as the Masters, who, although found around the world, are centered in Tibet. These masters are alleged by Blavatsky to have cultivated great wisdom and supernatural powers, and theosophists believe it was they who initiated the modern theosophical movement.

460
01:41:10,578 --> 01:42:12,124
Chris: Through disseminating their teachings via Blavatsky, they believe that these masters are attempting to revive knowledge of ancient religion once found all around the world, and which will again come to eclipse the existing world religions. End quote. So there we are again with the whole, like, theosophy sitting on a perch above everything else, universalizing thing. And speaking of the masters and how definitely real they are, according to Blavatsky, these masters had superpowers, including clairvoyance, clairaudience, telepathy, the ability to control another's consciousness. So, like, mind control, the ability to dematerialize and rematerialize physical objects, and the ability to astrally project their bodies, giving the appearance of being in two places at once and making dolpas, all real things that people can do. As for her visits to Tibet, it's possible, but unlikely that she was there.

461
01:42:12,252 --> 01:42:12,920
Kayla: Why?

462
01:42:14,020 --> 01:42:31,390
Chris: Critics and biographers have expressed doubt about the veracity of Blavatsky's claims regarding her visits to Tibet, which rely entirely on her own claims. Lacking any credible, independent testimony, it has also been highlighted that during the 19th century, Tibet was closed to Europeans.

463
01:42:31,810 --> 01:42:45,354
Kayla: I remember reading about that, and I remember reading, but maybe it wasn't her. But I remember reading about people at the time, westerners smuggling themselves in various ways.

464
01:42:45,522 --> 01:43:04,122
Chris: Yeah. So that's actually my very next thing. No, that's good. People can test that and say the exact same thing. Like, westerners smuggle themselves in. Tibet was open to western traders, so she might have entered that way. So it's definitely not impossible.

465
01:43:04,266 --> 01:43:04,666
Kayla: Right?

466
01:43:04,738 --> 01:43:40,376
Chris: Like, it's not impossible for her to have gotten into Tibet. It's just like, it would have been hard, very difficult. There was also. I didn't include this, but people have also questioned, like, her physical constitution and ability to do so. At the time, she claimed to do it, okay? Because it was, like, very remote, and it's not like they were wanting her there, so it's not like they were sending out sherpas to help her up the mountain. So if she was gonna get in, it was gonna be, like, physically very taxing, which was something that, at the time, she didn't seem like she would be capable of.

467
01:43:40,408 --> 01:43:41,440
Kayla: That says who?

468
01:43:41,520 --> 01:43:43,512
Chris: Not impossible. Not impossible.

469
01:43:43,576 --> 01:43:47,088
Kayla: I feel very protective, but there's a.

470
01:43:47,104 --> 01:43:49,540
Chris: Lot of reasons to doubt this.

471
01:43:49,920 --> 01:43:50,760
Kayla: I don't like that doubt.

472
01:43:50,800 --> 01:43:54,076
Chris: And without corroborating evidence, that's a better doubt.

473
01:43:54,128 --> 01:43:58,884
Kayla: I don't like the doubt of, like, I don't think she could have done it, because she didn't look like she could have done it.

474
01:43:59,012 --> 01:44:23,458
Chris: Well, that's. Yeah, I. It's not as good of a doubt, but it's. I think it's worthy of mentioning. Anyway, back to the masters. These guys, aside from the secret ones that Blavatsky claimed she was in contact with, they were like the usual suspects from history, right? It's like, oh, well, Jesus was one, Buddha was one, Confucius was one.

475
01:44:23,554 --> 01:44:27,306
Kayla: These aren't guys she met. You're just saying these guys were all masters.

476
01:44:27,418 --> 01:44:49,896
Chris: These guys were all masters of the past. Okay, past masters, pastors. But she did say that she met the ones of today. And then I will also caveat that by saying one of the superpowers was like, they could extend their lives, like, an extreme way. So it's very possible that she was like, yeah, I met Plato. Yeah, he's one of the masters. He's still living in Tibet.

477
01:44:49,928 --> 01:44:51,000
Kayla: He's hanging out in Tibet.

478
01:44:51,080 --> 01:45:03,920
Chris: Very possible she thought that. But again, all of that is basically in line with currently a theosophical idea aggregating this ancient philosophy. Right? It's like we have ideas from Jesus and Buddha and Plato, which we've seen.

479
01:45:03,960 --> 01:45:09,180
Kayla: In self realization fellowship, which we've seen in ISKCON, which we've seen in this and that and the other.

480
01:45:09,600 --> 01:45:45,546
Chris: I'll also note here how similar her claims about the masters are and were to spirit channelers. Like a single person makes a claim to having divine knowledge, which you must trust because it comes from a superlative source. In the case of Jay Z Knight, that superlative source is the ancient lemurian warrior spirit Ramtha. In the case of other channelers, its other super duper spirits. In the case of Catholicism, its priests channeling Jesus. In the case of Blavatsky, its these master, they just happen to be like live people rather than spirits. But the structure is the same.

481
01:45:45,658 --> 01:45:50,910
Kayla: It's soul phone, but you don't have to call the afterlife. You just have to call some really old guys.

482
01:45:51,650 --> 01:46:36,632
Chris: And in case you were wondering, her claims about these masters and other various paranormal phenomena that she witnessed or produced were disputed even in her own time. Obviously, skeptical rationalists such as myself are going to be extremely skeptical of a lot of her evidence free claims about supernatural stuff. But even potential believers, we haven't ruled this out type people. I'm pretty much ruling this out type person. But there's like, we haven't ruled this out, but we're investigating it. Even some of those folks contested her claims at the time. Specifically, I'm talking, there was this whole controversy from a group called the Society for Psychical Research, basically, where they had someone study her claims and as a result of that study, debunked them.

483
01:46:36,816 --> 01:46:47,104
Chris: Now, I say controversy because this study was based on information provided by someone who had a prior disagreement with Madame Blavatsky, which is important context.

484
01:46:47,192 --> 01:46:47,944
Kayla: Yes, it is.

485
01:46:48,032 --> 01:47:34,830
Chris: Now, we're also getting very much into, like he said this, she said that, like this person that had a conflict with Blavatsky, you can also argue that the conflict itself was about fraudulent claims. So it was like, did the fraudulent claims create the conflict and then led to the next thing where it got debunked? Or is it that this person just hated Madame Blavatsky and therefore gave these biased accounts? Pro Blavatsky theosophists claim that the psychical research expose on her was a hit piece based on biased sources. Anti Blavatsky, pro realists claim that the expose was legitimate regardless of motives. Take from it what you will. But she did have a lot of other critics, though. For example, like Carl Jung apparently really hated her.

486
01:47:35,140 --> 01:47:40,040
Kayla: That is very interesting to hear because of some stuff I've read recently about Carl Jung.

487
01:47:40,980 --> 01:48:15,190
Chris: Yeah, that's why I mentioned his name. There's some other names that I don't think people would be familiar with because I wasn't. But I definitely wanted to mention him because it's sort of in the same wheelhouse. Carl Jung is the collective unconscious guy, which is a big deal in theosophical newage, all of this spiritual stuff world. So they're kind of like, they're basically adjacent. So I'm kind of highlighting that she had critics even within her own sort of spiritualism area of focus.

488
01:48:15,310 --> 01:48:32,332
Kayla: He was also super into gnosticism, which the Venn diagram of gnosticism theosophy. That middle part is way bigger than the outside circle. There's so much overlap. So it's interesting to hear that he was super into gnosticism, but not into this particular person.

489
01:48:32,436 --> 01:48:57,298
Chris: Exactly. And then there's definitely some stuff in theosophy that smells really funny. She has a whole ass cosmology, which for the most part, is pretty fun to read about. It's the usual primordial order from chaos kind of stuff, but then it gets into the evolution of humanity, and humanity races.

490
01:48:57,434 --> 01:49:02,870
Kayla: Oh, I don't know anything about this. I just know that this exists. And. Ick.

491
01:49:03,570 --> 01:49:18,722
Chris: She had this idea of quote unquote root races that all humans were ultimately derived from. And she gets, like, really specific. There are seven of them, and they also have their own sub races, which I'm not even gonna get into any of that.

492
01:49:18,746 --> 01:49:21,682
Kayla: Oh, no. Oh, I don't feel protective anymore. This is gross.

493
01:49:21,746 --> 01:49:33,298
Chris: So there are seven root races, and their appearance on earth is in chronological form from, like, super ancient to modern day, starting with the polarian root race.

494
01:49:33,394 --> 01:49:34,130
Kayla: Okay?

495
01:49:34,290 --> 01:49:39,890
Chris: They were, by the way, they were non corporeal and they reproduced by dividing. Like amoeba museum.

496
01:49:40,010 --> 01:49:41,510
Kayla: Wait, people did this?

497
01:49:42,810 --> 01:49:45,310
Chris: The polarian root race did this.

498
01:49:45,610 --> 01:49:46,626
Kayla: So, okay.

499
01:49:46,658 --> 01:50:26,928
Chris: Which I think that the root. The fact that they're a root race, them human, it's not super clear to me. I think they were just humans that were, like, balls of energy that split, like amoeba. I don't know, man. They're called Polarians. Following that were the hyperboreans. I think they looked more human like, with skin and stuff. Like, they were more like corporeal. They were colored golden yellow, apparently. Then next comes the Lemurians. Hey, Lemuria. We just shouted out Ramtha, too. What are the odds of then? Number four. We're onto number four. Now is the Atlanteans, because you have to have the. Obviously the.

500
01:50:26,944 --> 01:50:28,912
Kayla: If you have Lemurians, you got to have the Atlanteans.

501
01:50:29,016 --> 01:50:38,200
Chris: Yeah, exactly. Like. And plus, like, Atlanteans is kind of like. I feel like that's table stakes for this kind of stuff, you know? Like, you have to, like, you kind of start with the Atlanteans and go from there.

502
01:50:38,240 --> 01:50:42,512
Kayla: I know. I just side eye Atlanteans now. Ever since we learned about the Atlantis nazi connection.

503
01:50:42,616 --> 01:51:09,340
Chris: Don't worry about that, because the fifth group is the Aryans, okay? Which encompasses the modern era and, I think, all of known history. Now, again, this is 18 hundreds. Okay? So this is pre Aryans becoming a big thing in the second world war with Nazi Germany. But this is some of the fertile ground, maybe, where that comes from. I haven't done a lot of research into that sort of.

504
01:51:09,460 --> 01:51:10,668
Kayla: That connection.

505
01:51:10,764 --> 01:51:30,694
Chris: That connection. At some point I want to, but it's like, I've poked into it before, and it's the same kind of thing where it's like one link leads to another link, and it's like, I'm not sure if Aryans, as a cultural group of people ever existed. There's Aryans thought to have lived in.

506
01:51:30,782 --> 01:51:31,998
Kayla: The Caucus mountains, right?

507
01:51:32,054 --> 01:51:50,830
Chris: Yeah. In more of the indian subcontinent region, or maybe the Caucus mountains or maybe Germany, or maybe they moved from one place to the other. All I'm saying is I don't know that much about it. All I know is that the Aryans, for her, were the fifth root race of which our current manifestation of humans belong to.

508
01:51:50,990 --> 01:51:52,370
Kayla: That, okay.

509
01:51:54,350 --> 01:51:59,478
Chris: Then there's the 6th root race, which there doesn't seem to be a name for these guys.

510
01:51:59,654 --> 01:52:00,726
Kayla: They're just guys.

511
01:52:00,878 --> 01:52:02,254
Chris: They're coming in the future.

512
01:52:02,422 --> 01:52:03,030
Kayla: Oh.

513
01:52:03,150 --> 01:52:17,388
Chris: And I can't possibly summarize this, so here's what CW leadbeater, another theosophist. This is one of theosophy schism guys. I want to make that clear. Like, this particular thing that I'm about to read is from him.

514
01:52:17,524 --> 01:52:19,172
Kayla: So it's from. Not from Blavatsky.

515
01:52:19,196 --> 01:52:19,908
Chris: Not from Blavatsky.

516
01:52:19,924 --> 01:52:21,788
Kayla: It's from somebody who schismed off of Blavatsky.

517
01:52:21,844 --> 01:52:29,868
Chris: Someone who schismed off and wrote his own stuff about the seven root races. Okay, here's what he has to say.

518
01:52:29,924 --> 01:52:31,520
Kayla: I don't think this is gonna be good.

519
01:52:31,860 --> 01:52:49,010
Chris: According to CW Leadbeater, a colony will be established in Baja California by theosophical Society under the guidance of the masters of the ancient wisdom in the 28th century for the intensive, selective eugenic breeding of the 6th root race.

520
01:52:49,790 --> 01:52:51,318
Kayla: Sounds like your antia stuff.

521
01:52:51,414 --> 01:53:08,670
Chris: Oh. The master Moria will physically incarnate in order to be the manu or progenitor of this new root race. By that time, the world will be powered by nuclear power, and there will be a single world government led by a person who will be the reincarnation of Julius Caesar.

522
01:53:08,830 --> 01:53:12,046
Kayla: This is a. This is a mish mash.

523
01:53:12,198 --> 01:53:31,238
Chris: That's why I couldn't summarize it. Tens of thousands of years in the future, a new continent will arise in the Pacific Ocean that will be the future home of the 6th root race. California, west of the San Andreas fault, will break off from the mainland of North America and become the island of California off the eastern coast of the new continent. I don't know why that last part is relevant. End quote.

524
01:53:31,294 --> 01:53:36,562
Kayla: Because he really likes California. I've got to say, I don't think any of that's gonna happen.

525
01:53:36,706 --> 01:53:37,578
Chris: Probably not.

526
01:53:37,634 --> 01:53:38,458
Kayla: I just don't.

527
01:53:38,514 --> 01:53:43,602
Chris: You don't think Julius Caesar's gonna reincarnate and then leave the nuclear power master?

528
01:53:43,746 --> 01:53:48,306
Kayla: The nuclear power master rate? I don't think it's good. And I think that people need to.

529
01:53:48,418 --> 01:53:49,170
Chris: Drugs, Kayla.

530
01:53:49,210 --> 01:53:51,674
Kayla: I think people need to step away from the eugenics.

531
01:53:51,802 --> 01:53:55,290
Chris: Yeah, just step away from the eugenics. Go home, sir. You're eugenics.

532
01:53:55,410 --> 01:54:04,672
Kayla: Like, it's just. It just always comes up and it's like, what are you doing, Urantia? What are you doing? Celestial seasonings? You doing theosophists?

533
01:54:04,776 --> 01:54:18,080
Chris: To be fair, this is when eugenics was, like, kind of popular everywhere, right? This was early 20th century. So, like, unfortunately, everybody was like, yay, eugenics is cool. At that time.

534
01:54:18,160 --> 01:54:40,778
Kayla: It's kind of like when went and saw that, like, spirit photography exhibit or spirit photography presentation, the guy was like, technology influences, like, the beliefs of that time or the evidence of that time. Like, kind of. Yeah, the society influences the weird ass beliefs all the time. Your spirituality is still going to be shaped by your societal shit.

535
01:54:40,874 --> 01:54:56,250
Chris: I mean, we said that with blavatsky and with Ayn Rand, too, right? Their beliefs are shaped by their experiences. Anyway, then that 6th root race will eventually produce the 7th root race, which is the final one.

536
01:54:56,910 --> 01:55:02,930
Kayla: Wait, so this is. So the Julius Caesar group is going to eugenics, their own race, and they're going to make a new one?

537
01:55:03,630 --> 01:55:27,542
Chris: Yes. Well, okay. So I think Julius Caesar is actually one of the last arian folks before the 6th root race comes into being. It's not super clear because all this stuff is made up, but there's the 6th root race, who we don't have a name for. Or maybe they did, and I just couldn't find it. And then they will give rise to the 7th and final root race.

538
01:55:27,606 --> 01:55:28,358
Kayla: Okay.

539
01:55:28,494 --> 01:55:33,942
Chris: Which will be a. They'll be sexless spirit beings of pure energy.

540
01:55:34,046 --> 01:55:34,810
Kayla: Cool.

541
01:55:35,110 --> 01:55:43,810
Chris: And then I assume they go on to become antagonists on an episode of Star Trek or something. Kayla, your thoughts on root races.

542
01:55:44,950 --> 01:56:06,160
Kayla: Get him out of here. I think that spiritual leaders and thinkers betray their bigoted thoughts through their cosmology, and it's a real bummer.

543
01:56:06,740 --> 01:56:26,814
Chris: Yeah, I think once you get into, like, once you start trying to apply any of this crap to, like, to humans, to, like, to sociology, it's kind of like trying to apply it to, like, quantum mechanics and other sciences. Like, when you try to apply it to sociology as a science, this is what you get when you try to apply it to quantum mechanics. You get quantum flapdoodle when you try to apply it to, like, anthropology.

544
01:56:26,942 --> 01:56:27,542
Kayla: Right?

545
01:56:27,686 --> 01:56:29,574
Chris: You get this, like, really racist shit.

546
01:56:29,622 --> 01:57:01,730
Kayla: Yeah, well, yeah. And if you have. You're living in victorian times and you have eugenicist beliefs, and then you're going to be like, oh, here's my cosmology. And then it's just going to reflect the, like, crappy, bigoted eugenics of your time. That doesn't seem enlightened to me. That doesn't. That doesn't seem. If I were to say, like, what pieces of wisdom were actually divinely revealed to HP Blavatsky, I would not consider this to be part of it. This does not seem like divine enlightenment at all. This seems very low vibration. It does.

547
01:57:02,430 --> 01:57:22,018
Chris: You're here first, guys. Culture, just weird. It's calling it low vibration. It's funny that you mentioned. It's funny that you mentioned these leaders doing a disservice to their own movements, because that's my very next note here is Blavatsky, and certainly ledbeater don't speak for all theosophists, even back then.

548
01:57:22,194 --> 01:57:32,458
Kayla: I don't get to think that this is important to the body of belief and knowledge in modern day theosophy.

549
01:57:32,594 --> 01:57:56,142
Chris: I don't either. But then again, I don't know. There are people in the class we took where they're really into UFO's, so who knows? They could be like, yeah, Lemuria and Atlantis. Yeah. But they also could be into Lemuria and Atlantis in the more sort of, like, naive, benign way that doesn't get into the whole, like, well, you see, there was a master race that once lived here. They could be doing it in a more, like, I don't know. Okay. Way.

550
01:57:56,246 --> 01:57:56,890
Kayla: Right.

551
01:57:57,710 --> 01:58:27,392
Chris: So we're talking about some of these, like, other leaders, other founders of Theosophy, and we specifically talked about here, HC leadbeater, the schism guy. Important to mention that. Yeah. The reason he schismed was because he was extremely controversial. They didn't really care for the whole eugenics thing. And larger theosophy. He was also accused of some. Sorry, this makes an appearance in every episode now. But sexual abuse of minors.

552
01:58:27,496 --> 01:58:28,504
Kayla: God damn.

553
01:58:28,632 --> 01:58:32,144
Chris: So all that stuff got him expelled from mainstream theosophy.

554
01:58:32,192 --> 01:58:33,000
Kayla: So that's good.

555
01:58:33,080 --> 01:58:44,008
Chris: Good on them for that. But theosophy has a surprisingly large number of schisms, considering that it's anti dogmatic and doesn't really have membership requirements. And it kind of says it encompasses everything.

556
01:58:44,104 --> 01:58:44,576
Kayla: Right.

557
01:58:44,688 --> 01:58:53,792
Chris: So there's another excerpt that I have to take from one of the many encyclopedias that I read that I really love because of how deliciously chaotic it is.

558
01:58:53,856 --> 01:58:55,056
Kayla: Oh, God. Okay.

559
01:58:55,208 --> 01:59:07,548
Chris: And how much it illustrates the problems inherent with, like, I'm in contact with the secret, infallible guy. Like, problems that are so inherent that they even present problems within the group that believes in that kind of stuff.

560
01:59:07,604 --> 01:59:08,060
Kayla: Right.

561
01:59:08,180 --> 01:59:45,640
Chris: So to appreciate this expert, though, I gotta list out a few people first. And again, this is like the really quick and dirty version. Each of these people are more than historical footnotes in their own right, but in 2023 and culture, just weird. They just get a bullet point, I guess. All right, first, Henry Alcott. Henry Alcott was one of the three co founders of theosophical Society in New York City in 1875. And then next we have William Kwan, judge, WQ judge. He's the third co founder of the New York City Theosophical Society, along with the aforementioned Alcott, Anne Blavatsky herself.

562
01:59:45,720 --> 01:59:47,976
Kayla: And we definitely talked about him in one of the classes.

563
01:59:48,168 --> 02:00:45,140
Chris: And then we have Annie Besant, who became the head of a theosophical society founded in Adyar, India. She's a great example of someone who's fascinating in her own right. She was involved in women's rights, indian independence, socialist causes. She was also a freemason. And despite being a leading figure in theosophy, she was publicly an atheist and scientific materialist, which I don't know if we've really said it explicitly yet, but theosophy is kind of antithetical to scientific materialism. Belief in divine revelation is pretty opposed scientific materialism, which holds that you need to gain knowledge through empirical observation. So she's like a really fascinating figure in her own right, but she was also one of these three sort of theosophy drama. Let me just read you this excerpt. So again, co founders Henry Alcott, WQ judge, and movement leader Annie Besant.

564
02:00:47,280 --> 02:01:11,914
Chris: During her lifetime, Blavatsky had suggested to many different people that they would be her successor. Three of the most prominent. So if you're wondering why there's schisms, that's why. Three of the most prominent candidates, Olcott, Judge, and Besant, all met in London shortly after her death to discuss the situation. Judge said that he, too, was in contact with the masters and that they had convenient.

565
02:01:12,042 --> 02:01:12,658
Kayla: Wow.

566
02:01:12,794 --> 02:01:54,432
Chris: And that they had provided him with a message instructing him to co delegate the society's esoteric section with Besant. Okay, so we see, like, a little mexican standoff going here. We have, like, three people, right? And now, like, judge and saying, like, oh, I'm on Passant's team. Alcott, however, suspected that the notes from the masters which judge was producing were forged, exacerbating the tensions between them. I know you're not supposed to question that stuff unless you're in a power struggle, passant then attempted to act as a bridge between the two Mendez. While Judge informed her that the masters had revealed to him a plot that Alcott was orchestrating to kill her.

567
02:01:54,496 --> 02:01:55,180
Kayla: Ooh.

568
02:01:55,840 --> 02:02:10,584
Chris: In 1893, Besant came down on Alcott's side, actually, in the argument, and backed the internal proceedings that Alcott raised against judge. So again, judge was saying, oh, the masters told me that Alcott is scheming to kill you.

569
02:02:10,632 --> 02:02:10,912
Kayla: Right?

570
02:02:10,976 --> 02:02:29,346
Chris: And then she was like, I'm not so sure about that. I'm gonna side with the other guy. A two stage inquiry took place, which concluded that because the society took no official stance on whether the masters existed or not, which is true, Judge could not be considered guilty of forgery and would be allowed to retain his position.

571
02:02:29,458 --> 02:02:30,270
Kayla: Okay.

572
02:02:30,730 --> 02:02:58,522
Chris: Judge then announced that the masters had informed him that he should take sole control of the esoteric section deposing Besant, which she rejected. Amid calls from Alcott that Judge should stand down. And April 1895, the american section voted to secede from the main society, end quote. And there's more to that. But I just like the whole triumvirate there, right? It's like Caesar, Mark Antony, and third guy was the third guy.

573
02:02:58,626 --> 02:02:59,330
Kayla: I don't know.

574
02:02:59,410 --> 02:02:59,762
Chris: I don't know.

575
02:02:59,786 --> 02:03:28,696
Kayla: The knife. It was the knife. I can't even say, like, well, you really should just have, like, a very clear lineage of succession if you're one of these. Like Blavatsky's if you're one of these leaders. But Rla Prabhupada did that and didn't fix it. He was like, we're gonna. Before I die, I'm gonna set up all these systems, and it's gonna be like a whole system so that there's no questions and problems here. And then instead, it seemed like he just kind of empowered eleven of these guys.

576
02:03:28,848 --> 02:03:31,928
Chris: Well, he didn't really get schismed, though. He just.

577
02:03:31,984 --> 02:03:35,272
Kayla: Yes, he did. Yes, he did. The new Vrindravan guy was like, I.

578
02:03:35,296 --> 02:03:52,180
Chris: Am the guy in West Virginia. Yeah. I don't know. Either way, Logan Roy could have benefited from learning from these examples, I'm sure. One of these schisms, though, occurred right here in Los Angeles, and, in fact, is the group that you and I participated in.

579
02:03:52,220 --> 02:03:55,780
Kayla: Okay, wait, so the group that went to is schismed off from Blavatsky?

580
02:03:55,820 --> 02:04:07,174
Chris: Schismed off from the main group, yes, from Blavatsky's group. That would be the United Lodge of Theosophists, founded here in LA in 1909.

581
02:04:07,262 --> 02:04:07,966
Kayla: Ooh.

582
02:04:08,118 --> 02:04:16,150
Chris: And they are somewhat centered around that WQ judge character from the previous schism story. So that's probably why he came up in the readings that we did.

583
02:04:16,230 --> 02:04:16,942
Kayla: He did.

584
02:04:17,086 --> 02:04:23,166
Chris: And don't forget, he was the guy that was like, I'm totally in contact with the masters, you guys. Now that Blavatsky's gone.

585
02:04:23,238 --> 02:04:27,366
Kayla: Wait, did we go to a good place or a bad place? I liked it. I don't care. I liked it.

586
02:04:27,398 --> 02:04:53,796
Chris: Good. I think. But I don't know. We said this at the time. There's a lot of b's here. I'm sorry. Here are their main tenets that set them apart from other theosophical movement pieces, whatever you want to call them. First of all, recognition of WQ judge as HP Blavatsky's colleague and co worker from the beginning, and hence one of the original founders of theosophical movement.

587
02:04:53,908 --> 02:04:54,540
Kayla: Okay.

588
02:04:54,660 --> 02:05:10,516
Chris: Two, exclusive adherence to the unaltered works of HP Blavatsky and WQ judge, along with only those other works that are philosophically in consonance with the aforementioned. So there's some, like, I don't know what that means. That's schism control. That's like, these are the true works.

589
02:05:10,548 --> 02:05:12,396
Kayla: We have schismed often. You cannot schism again.

590
02:05:12,468 --> 02:05:23,388
Chris: And none of the other schisms are the right works. Only our schism plus blavatsky are the correct works, which, considering the other schism with the eugenics thing, not a bad idea.

591
02:05:23,444 --> 02:05:24,040
Kayla: Yeah.

592
02:05:24,430 --> 02:05:48,422
Chris: Three, rejection of any other authorities in the form of, quote, unquote, leaders or teachers, and reference to all of its associates as students with emphasis on self reliance. So again, schism control. None of these other leaders are valid. And then referring to ourselves as students, which we totally. I got that. They all said they were students at the place went.

593
02:05:48,486 --> 02:05:51,810
Kayla: Schism control is. We'll have to keep that one for later.

594
02:05:52,510 --> 02:05:55,902
Chris: Yeah, we'll put that on a t shirt, too. But I like the student thing.

595
02:05:55,966 --> 02:05:56,610
Kayla: Yeah.

596
02:05:56,950 --> 02:06:07,726
Chris: Number four, absence of organizational elements such as constitution, bylaws or officers, and complete reliance on the similarity of aim, purpose, and teaching as the only basis of unity.

597
02:06:07,878 --> 02:06:31,628
Kayla: Oh, man, that's, like, both so good and so bad. Because I have been a part of so many groups that were, like, just rendered impotent because of the over reliance on ground constitutions and bylaws and those kinds of things. And so it makes me go like, well, fuck that. Everything should just be, like, anarchist, and we all just, like, decide. And, you know, there's problems there, too.

598
02:06:31,804 --> 02:06:55,000
Chris: Well, these guys are. That. These guys are the anarchists on that side these days. I think. I think that it kind of depends on the situation, too. And I think that if your situation is like, we're a bunch of people trying to, like, become enlightened via the truth, that seems much more amenable to me than something else. Like, that seems very amenable to the chaotic, ground up, self reliance sort of thing.

599
02:06:55,120 --> 02:07:00,140
Kayla: The problem then becomes, though, you don't have protocol for dealing with bad actors.

600
02:07:00,520 --> 02:07:00,928
Chris: You don't.

601
02:07:00,944 --> 02:07:05,648
Kayla: So it's like if somebody is an abuser or if somebody is trying to gain power or somebody is trying to take the group in a bad way.

602
02:07:05,664 --> 02:07:27,744
Chris: But there's, like, there's no power to gain. Right. Like, there's no leadership, sure. But, like. And then it also gives you plausible deniability. Like, if somebody turns out to be an abuser in, you know, the Chicago, sorry, Chicago theosophical Society, then, you know, the La branch can just be like, well, we all do our own thing, so we have nothing to do with that.

603
02:07:27,832 --> 02:07:32,208
Kayla: Yeah, I'm more on the side of this than the bylaws.

604
02:07:32,264 --> 02:07:36,848
Chris: Yeah. And then it also allows you to go, like, well, I don't know about some of that stuff Blavatsky said.

605
02:07:36,944 --> 02:07:37,984
Kayla: Right, right.

606
02:07:38,152 --> 02:07:46,784
Chris: Anyway, number five, anonymity of living persons who write on behalf of ult United Lodge of theosophists to protect against exaltation of personalities.

607
02:07:46,912 --> 02:07:48,352
Kayla: I am so into that.

608
02:07:48,376 --> 02:07:50,256
Chris: And self advertising. Oh, boy.

609
02:07:50,328 --> 02:07:53,664
Kayla: Oh, boy. That is a good one. I like that one.

610
02:07:53,792 --> 02:08:01,824
Chris: That is a very good one. You can kind of tell from these tenets of theirs, kind of like what they're trying to fix about what happens.

611
02:08:01,872 --> 02:08:03,820
Kayla: I know. I'm super into this.

612
02:08:05,290 --> 02:08:44,200
Chris: All right, now, we've talked in the show about this already, but it really bears mentioning. Again, theosophy has been hugely influential, huge y o o g in the spiritualist movement in the 20th century, and it essentially gave birth to the modern new age movement, which itself now has many of its own children. So here's another reading from Botanica. In 1970, american theosophist David Spangler moved to the Findhorn foundation, where he developed the fundamental idea of the new age movement. So there you go, right there. Theosophist David Spangler invented new age.

613
02:08:44,280 --> 02:08:44,880
Kayla: All right.

614
02:08:45,000 --> 02:09:14,160
Chris: I know it's more like organic than that. It's not like one guy suddenly came up with it. But to the extent that we can kind of, like, point to an origin point, that's the origin point we kind of point to. He believed that the release of new waves of spiritual energy signals by certain astrological changes for the movement of earth into a new cycle known as the Age of Aquarius, had initiated the coming of the new age. He further suggested that people use this new energy to make manifest the new age.

615
02:09:14,540 --> 02:09:16,132
Kayla: Like Roko's basilisk.

616
02:09:16,276 --> 02:09:45,256
Chris: Exactly. And this terminology of new age comes from none other than Blavatsky herself, who, quote, announced a coming of a new age. She believed that theosophists who embraced buddhist and brahmanic notions such as reincarnation, should assist in the evolution of the human race. End quote. So if you want to know where all this stuff comes from that we've been talking about on the show, it comes from Theosophy, which we have mentioned. But just to. Just to say it, just to hammer.

617
02:09:45,288 --> 02:09:54,140
Kayla: That home, I think that we need to remember this when we get to the criteria.

618
02:09:54,440 --> 02:09:54,912
Chris: Yeah.

619
02:09:54,976 --> 02:10:12,992
Kayla: Because this seems like an inherently very niche group, and it is just not at all. It is the backbone of current western mystery thought and clearly new age belief. And that's everywhere.

620
02:10:13,056 --> 02:10:58,604
Chris: Yeah. That influences niche in terms of members today, but in terms of its influence, it's definitely not. It's that and actually the membership. It's interesting there's such a contrast between the membership and the influence. The membership really took a hit because of a lot of these controversies around Blavatsky and around some of the following schisms and members and power struggles and guy who likes Eugenics and blah, blah. So that really made it take a hit. But then it had enough staying power. And again, is it theosophy that has the staying power, or is it the universal quest of human beings to understand their place in the universe of which theosophy and many other things are? One, is that the staying power?

621
02:10:58,692 --> 02:11:09,100
Chris: I don't know, but if you have to trace a line to it from one named thing to another named thing, you can trace one from theosophy directly to new age.

622
02:11:09,180 --> 02:11:45,912
Kayla: I think that theosophy just did a very good job of tapping into an inherent human desire, drive, need, whatever you want to call it, and, like, whatever metaphors they drummed up to describe our human experience of, like, knowing that we are in reality and there is a reality beyond the senses. They were able to put a map on it that you and I and people were able to, like, cling on to and go like, this makeshi sense. This makes more sense than the panic I feel in my soul over the.

623
02:11:45,936 --> 02:11:47,448
Chris: 15 seconds of delay you have.

624
02:11:47,504 --> 02:11:48,100
Kayla: Yes.

625
02:11:50,600 --> 02:12:03,840
Chris: And there's so many connections. It casts such a wide net. It comes from so many spiritual predecessors, and it has, via new age, a lot of spiritual successors as well. Remember the etherea society?

626
02:12:03,960 --> 02:12:05,020
Kayla: Oh, do I?

627
02:12:05,360 --> 02:12:14,862
Chris: Their Wikipedia page starts with the following statement, and theology of the etherea society is regarded as firmly based in theosophy.

628
02:12:14,926 --> 02:12:17,726
Kayla: That makes sense. Yep. That guy was definitely a theosophist. Yep.

629
02:12:17,758 --> 02:12:20,262
Chris: With, like, six sided sources for that statement.

630
02:12:20,366 --> 02:12:22,782
Kayla: Abs fucking lutely. That makes so much sense.

631
02:12:22,886 --> 02:12:30,110
Chris: Do you remember their belief in being able to essentially, like, pray or meditate good vibes in the direction of world crises to help make the crises better?

632
02:12:30,150 --> 02:12:31,126
Kayla: That was their whole thing.

633
02:12:31,278 --> 02:12:39,974
Chris: That is a new age belief traceable directly to theosophy with gasoline poured on it by the idea of the hundredth monkey effect.

634
02:12:40,062 --> 02:12:41,050
Kayla: Oh, geez.

635
02:12:41,350 --> 02:12:42,718
Chris: Have you heard of the hundredth monkey?

636
02:12:42,774 --> 02:12:50,494
Kayla: I have heard of the hunter, yeah. Yes. There was a book that I really liked when I was a teenager that was about nuclear disarmament.

637
02:12:50,582 --> 02:13:46,544
Chris: I almost certainly came across that book title when I was doing this research. Yeah, the hundredth monkey effect. So there was this research that was done by a biologist or ecologist or something. I believe it was in Japan earlier in the 20th century. And basically it found that if you teach enough monkeys something, then I think it was like washing their food or something like that, in this case. So if you teach enough monkeys something, then that idea will spread. And the original research didn't make any sort of claims as to whether or how or whatever. How does this idea spread? There's a lot of controversy surrounding now that experiment and things about it have maybe been debunked, but it went on to take a much greater meaning because it was interpreted as meaning the ideas will spread magically.

638
02:13:46,672 --> 02:13:53,712
Kayla: Yeah. If 100 monkeys over here learned it, then 100 monkeys on another island will also learn it even without interacting.

639
02:13:53,736 --> 02:13:55,760
Chris: Well, eventually all of them will eventually.

640
02:13:55,800 --> 02:13:58,308
Kayla: Learn without having to interact with the original group.

641
02:13:58,364 --> 02:14:06,940
Chris: Exactly. So the normal way of interpreting that is like, oh, yeah, you teach enough monkeys something, and then eventually it'll spread via regular social contact.

642
02:14:07,020 --> 02:14:07,640
Kayla: Right.

643
02:14:08,420 --> 02:14:46,046
Chris: But somehow via, like, I don't know why this particular research got glommed onto or which aspects of it lent itself to misinterpretation in this way. I read some stuff basically saying that, like, the research really wasn't at fault, it was really just the later interpretations. Can't say for sure, but, yeah, the interpretation ended up being the dominant interpretation. It got spread in. It got spread in our culture. Was that if you teach enough monkeys something, then it will just supernaturally, paranormally would have you invisibly spread to other monkeys.

644
02:14:46,118 --> 02:14:51,130
Kayla: I literally remember reading that in this book, and as, like, a 14 year old, I was like, wow.

645
02:14:51,250 --> 02:14:53,146
Chris: Yeah, that's so cool. Mind blowing.

646
02:14:53,218 --> 02:14:58,122
Kayla: And then a couple years later being like, I'm sorry, that doesn't make any fucking sense. What are you talking about?

647
02:14:58,266 --> 02:15:02,150
Chris: Does it sound similar to anything that we just talked about?

648
02:15:03,210 --> 02:15:04,030
Kayla: Probably.

649
02:15:04,330 --> 02:15:06,186
Chris: That's what the etherea society does.

650
02:15:06,258 --> 02:15:11,930
Kayla: Oh, that's their whole thing of, like, we can. Yeah. Raise the vibration. We can help people by just thinking in their direction.

651
02:15:12,010 --> 02:15:47,774
Chris: So that's when I said, like, gasoline poured on it. So there's this new age belief that via enough good vibes, that we can bring about this age of Aquarius, this new spiritual age just by you and I going to live in the commune with all the other cool hippies that are putting out all the good vibes. And as soon as we get 100 monkeys, or in this case, humans, as soon as we get enough, it'll have this transformative effect that will transmit everywhere without us having to actually go talk to anybody, because that's totally what happened with these monkeys. That's not what happened with these monkeys, but that's what they thought happened with these monkeys.

652
02:15:47,822 --> 02:15:54,230
Kayla: And I think, unfortunately, I think that's a pretty insidious belief.

653
02:15:54,350 --> 02:15:57,342
Chris: Yeah, I don't care. It doesn't sound great when, like, when you.

654
02:15:57,446 --> 02:16:39,896
Kayla: I think most groups. I do think most groups marry their idea of, like, we must do good works with meditating nicely at people and doing, like, physical material, like, go out and feed and clothe people. I think most groups that are like, yay, good works do both. But I think that the outsized importance on, like, the real work, the real good work that you're gonna do, follower of this new belief, whatever, whichever one it is meditating good at people. I don't think that's the way to enlightenment and the way to materially help others.

655
02:16:40,088 --> 02:16:44,407
Chris: Yeah, I think an over reliance on that is damaging.

656
02:16:44,464 --> 02:16:56,432
Kayla: I think at worst, it can lead people away from reaching out, helping, being helped, and actually becomes a very isolating, deactivating.

657
02:16:56,575 --> 02:17:02,384
Chris: Yeah. What's funny is we also. I was talking about this with Kayla the other day. I feel like such a podcast when.

658
02:17:02,392 --> 02:17:08,647
Kayla: I say that, well, we are married, and we do live in the same house, and we do fucking pontificate all the goddamn time.

659
02:17:08,784 --> 02:17:41,495
Chris: That's mainly the caffeine's fault. I was gonna blame it on you, but it's really the caffeine were talking about, how that's also a common thread in religious history is the dichotomy between faith and good works that exists in Christianity, too. That's one of the main differentiating factors between Catholicism and Protestantism is works like what gets you into heaven, good works or faith. So it's interesting that exists in other wisdom, religious traditions as well.

660
02:17:41,566 --> 02:17:44,058
Kayla: It's just so clearly good works, you guys.

661
02:17:44,718 --> 02:18:01,808
Chris: Well, you should be Catholic then. One more thing before I ask you a question, and I promised I would talk about this when were discussing the class, is that it was really. It was really tough for me to, like, get us into those classes in the first place.

662
02:18:04,189 --> 02:18:06,501
Kayla: This is just a brief little secret knowledge.

663
02:18:06,605 --> 02:18:43,116
Chris: Yeah, super secret knowledge. Like, how did it go? It was like, so first I went to their website and tried to contact them that way because they have a contact form on their website. And then the contact form, I got an email from someone, and it didn't say, like. Like, the email wasn't saying who they were with or what. It was like, I only found out later that it was because I submitted a contact form, and it was like, you should call so and so, or maybe call this other person so and so. And it was like, that's all the email said. It wasn't signed. It didn't say, like, blah, blah from theosophical Society. It said those two sentences, and that's it.

664
02:18:43,188 --> 02:18:52,520
Kayla: And then you said, great, thank you. Just checking. Like, is this in regards to the inquiry I sent on the united logic of theosophist website? And the person responded with, I don't know.

665
02:18:54,089 --> 02:18:58,728
Chris: I was like, okay, I'm just gonna go ahead and assume that it was.

666
02:18:58,888 --> 02:19:00,880
Kayla: I'm sorry, this is my favorite quest.

667
02:19:01,065 --> 02:19:06,441
Chris: And then I called, and I called one of the numbers, and it was out of order.

668
02:19:06,584 --> 02:19:07,112
Kayla: Yep.

669
02:19:07,200 --> 02:19:37,536
Chris: And then I called the other number, and it was. I think that was when I got the full mailbox, maybe. But then, like, someone called me back, and then I had. I have to. There's, like, a little bit of a phone tag with that. Cause, like, I wasn't around, and then I had to call them back. Anyway, I finally did get in touch with this person who was just, like, some random guy. Like, none of these are like, you know how this is like, a very ground up type thing were talking about? Like, it's very. Just sort of like, oh, this is people. There's no organization to it. Never more evident than when talking to these people on the phone.

670
02:19:37,647 --> 02:20:17,140
Chris: Literally, I was just talking to some dude who was, like, about to go pick up his kids from practice or something, and he just sort of said, like, yeah, well, you know, we talk about this. We have some zoom meetings, and, you know, sometimes we meet on Tuesdays, and here's where you can get some more information. Blah, blah. Very kind gentleman, very nice guy. So then I followed his instructions to go to the website, but then the website led me to another one of their websites, which I later found, like, the original. The initial website was, like, not supposed to be in service anymore, but it was still up for some reason. And then the new one just directed me back to the old one.

671
02:20:17,330 --> 02:20:54,930
Chris: And then finally I emailed him again, and I was like, I don't know how to get the zoom link for these classes that you're talking about. And then he's like, oh, you have to click this button and submit a form. And so I'm like, okay, I have to submit a form again. That didn't really work last time, but I guess I'll do it again. And then I submitted another form, and I had to say which classes I was interested in and why or whatever. And then once I submitted that, I got an email from somebody else, and then I corresponded with this guy on email for a while, and. Wait, no, he was. Sorry. Two things happened. One is, I got another phone number. As confusing as this sounds right now, it was more confusing at the time. I got another phone number.

672
02:20:54,970 --> 02:21:02,018
Chris: I spoke with somebody else. He said he like, do you have ten minutes to talk? And then he talked my ear off for, like, an hour. An hour and ten minutes.

673
02:21:02,034 --> 02:21:03,554
Kayla: This is just signing up for a class.

674
02:21:03,602 --> 02:21:19,158
Chris: This is just signing up for. This was just to get into the class. So I spoke with him for, like, an hour with him. I was talking with him long enough that I was able to talk about, like, hey, you, this is for a podcast. What do you think? Once heard the title of the podcast, he was not interested. He did not like the name of the title of the podcast.

675
02:21:19,254 --> 02:21:20,014
Kayla: Fair enough.

676
02:21:20,142 --> 02:21:41,740
Chris: And so that was kind of a dead end. And then I finally got links to the Zoom classes from another person that replied to the form, and that was the guy that was running the meeting that went to physically on Sunday, and that's how we finally got zoom links to classes.

677
02:21:42,800 --> 02:21:45,776
Kayla: So, anyway, the pursuit of secret knowledge, you went on your own journey.

678
02:21:45,848 --> 02:21:59,848
Chris: Absolutely. Was an odyssey in pursuit of secret knowledge. Kayla, I want to turn it over to you, because as an obsessed person, you have not been able to keep your claws off of theosophical research.

679
02:21:59,944 --> 02:22:06,672
Kayla: I didn't google anything about theosophy. I just googled everything around theosophy, which is theosophy, which is apparently theosophy, which.

680
02:22:06,696 --> 02:22:08,230
Chris: Apparently is the same.

681
02:22:09,130 --> 02:22:13,590
Kayla: But I didn't really know that. So unfortunately, I learned a lot of things.

682
02:22:15,450 --> 02:22:16,618
Chris: Tell us some things.

683
02:22:16,754 --> 02:22:51,478
Kayla: I just want to say one thing of, like, if any theosophists are listening, I just. I think that especially the name of our podcast and some of the things that we do where we, like, talk about the controversies that I think is important for you and I and for our listeners as part of our own truth seeking, as part of our own search for what is the truth and what do we believe and what do we listen to. And I think it's also a big position of this show that take what you like and leave the rest is generally valid. And there's a lot of stuff that.

684
02:22:51,494 --> 02:22:54,330
Chris: I have learned, but it was a blue and black dress.

685
02:22:54,990 --> 02:23:46,010
Kayla: It's definitely a blue and black dress. There's a lot of stuff that I have learned from these classes and from listening to you and from doing my own tangential research, which, I'm sorry, overlapped with yours. There is a lot that I am taking away from that. I am very excited and grateful to have learned, and I'm looking forward to going back to some of these classes and sitting on these zooms and learning about stuff that I have no footing in. I just want to make that clear because we're talking about a specific group, and we really enjoyed and liked and found a lot of. Of value and benefit in what we've gone and done. And also, it's important for you and I to have the full picture and talk about very human stories that are often parts of spiritual, philosophical, religious movements.

686
02:23:46,350 --> 02:23:47,494
Kayla: There's my little soapbox.

687
02:23:47,582 --> 02:24:26,694
Chris: Understandably, our title puts off people, which I get because there's usually negative connotations with the word cult and with the word weird. Even you have to listen to our show or already be in agreement with us. That weird is good to know that. So I don't blame people for saying, I don't like the title of your show. Fuck off. I totally get that. And I also don't want to, like you were just saying, the folks that we've actually met through this via the classes and even the people I talked to in my confusing odyssey to try to get to one of these classes. Super nice people.

688
02:24:26,742 --> 02:24:28,566
Kayla: Yeah, some of the most gracious and welcoming.

689
02:24:28,638 --> 02:24:39,470
Chris: Yeah, super nice. Like, did not have to talk to me, but, like, didn't have any idea who I was. Took time out of their day to chat with me for either ten minutes for the first guy, or an hour and ten minutes for the second guy.

690
02:24:39,550 --> 02:24:58,950
Kayla: Like, the class went to on Zoom in between the two recordings, there was somebody in that class who was private messaging me throughout the entire class with, like, supplemental information because they were like, oh, well, you're new. You don't know. You don't have the context for this. You don't have the contact for this, like, helping guide us through the class totally out of the goodness of their heart.

691
02:24:59,650 --> 02:25:10,666
Chris: And I'll also, actually, I'll say one more thing. The quantum flap doodle. They had a little bit of quantum flapdoodle, but of all the quantum flap doodle I've heard, really. Not that it was actually very close to.

692
02:25:10,738 --> 02:25:11,354
Kayla: Close to reality.

693
02:25:11,402 --> 02:25:11,986
Chris: Close to reality.

694
02:25:12,018 --> 02:25:12,554
Kayla: Yeah. It wasn't.

695
02:25:12,602 --> 02:25:19,242
Chris: I will give them credit for their flap doodle. It's barely doodle. So I have a physics degree, so that's why I'm able to say this.

696
02:25:19,266 --> 02:25:37,046
Kayla: That's why you're talking about that. Okay, so you're turning it over to me because. Yeah. Yes. Once went to these classes, it kicked off a little bit of a hyper fixation for me. And I will say a lot of this stuff I have an inherent interest in, and inherent fascination in. I keep talking about when I was a teenager.

697
02:25:37,118 --> 02:25:38,166
Chris: Don't say.

698
02:25:38,358 --> 02:26:03,860
Kayla: This was a lot of stuff that I was very interested in as a teenager, and that's always gonna be a part of me. This always is gonna be a part of me. So when we start talking about this stuff, I'm like, yes, I wanna be a theosophist. Yes, I wanna. I want to be a hermetic kabbalist. Yes, I need to learn everything about this. I know I have uncovered every school and group in the greater Los Angeles area that talks about this shit. And I'm dragging you to all of them, because I'm very excited.

699
02:26:05,160 --> 02:26:07,264
Chris: Secret knowledge journey.

700
02:26:07,392 --> 02:26:17,570
Kayla: Secret knowledge is there. But part of what I discovered as I was reading about specifically hermeticism, kabbalah, and gnosticism.

701
02:26:18,430 --> 02:26:19,318
Chris: Okay.

702
02:26:19,494 --> 02:26:32,970
Kayla: And a little bit of theosophy, because, again, it's gonna go in theosophy, much like it is the backbone of, like, new ageism. It's also, like, kind of a backbone of Los Angeles.

703
02:26:33,350 --> 02:26:38,406
Chris: Really? Well, because the group that went to was founded here.

704
02:26:38,518 --> 02:26:52,038
Kayla: Correct. So you said they were founded in 1909, and then there was that big building in 1927. So one of the biggest destinations in Los Angeles is the Hollywood bowl, which is an outdoor concert venue in Hollywood.

705
02:26:52,134 --> 02:26:55,926
Chris: It's like one of the two or three. If you're going to a concert here. It's like one of the two or three boys.

706
02:26:55,958 --> 02:27:03,342
Kayla: You're going to the bowl. It was built by theosophists. It was built by a theosophist.

707
02:27:03,406 --> 02:27:08,454
Chris: Wait, so hold on. That's big. It's like he was just out there with a hammer and nail excuse.

708
02:27:08,462 --> 02:27:09,284
Kayla: He was a lady.

709
02:27:09,422 --> 02:27:20,080
Chris: I misgendered. I am sorry. So she was out there with a hammer and nail, single handedly building this venue that is not made of wood, now that I think about it.

710
02:27:20,120 --> 02:28:03,014
Kayla: Yep. No. So a wealthy heiress back in 1918, Christine Wetherill Stevenson was a Los Angeles Theosophical Society member and wanted to put on a play or a performance that was about the life of the Buddha and essentially funded the building of the original Hollywood bowl in order to put on this performance. And it was, like, such a smash hit success that the city of Los Angeles viewed theosophists as like, oh, we love those guys. Those are super cool guys. They put us on this cultural map, in a way.

711
02:28:03,162 --> 02:28:09,966
Chris: Wow. So, so that she was a member of theosophical, like, this. The. The ult. Like, the la.

712
02:28:10,158 --> 02:28:11,550
Kayla: It was Los Angeles specifically.

713
02:28:11,590 --> 02:28:21,678
Chris: Yeah. And then because she was a wealthy heiress, she was like, I can fund this thing. And then it was theosophy that was putting on the. The play or the. What was it play.

714
02:28:21,734 --> 02:28:25,374
Kayla: It was like a player performance, like a musical kind of thing. It was a play about.

715
02:28:25,422 --> 02:28:26,942
Chris: It was theosis that put it on.

716
02:28:27,046 --> 02:28:28,278
Kayla: It was her and other theosopher.

717
02:28:28,334 --> 02:28:28,748
Chris: Another theosophy.

718
02:28:28,774 --> 02:28:29,912
Kayla: Yes. But she founded.

719
02:28:29,976 --> 02:28:33,544
Chris: Wow. She funded the building, the house that theosophy built.

720
02:28:33,632 --> 02:28:37,648
Kayla: And it's interesting that you talked about Annie Besant.

721
02:28:37,784 --> 02:28:38,728
Chris: I did.

722
02:28:38,904 --> 02:28:47,048
Kayla: So there is another theosophy lodge in Los Angeles. Oh, that is not the United lodge of theosophists.

723
02:28:47,104 --> 02:28:49,848
Chris: See, it's these schisms, man. Is it the Annie Besant schism?

724
02:28:49,984 --> 02:29:00,606
Kayla: It is. I don't know what, who, when, where. All I know is that it is called the Besant Lodge, and it is up in Beechwood Canyon, which is kind of near the Hollywood sign.

725
02:29:00,718 --> 02:29:01,470
Chris: Okay.

726
02:29:01,630 --> 02:29:25,750
Kayla: And it's funny, because I have, like, a friend that lives right there, and I was like, oh, my God, I've driven by this lodge. But when I was looking up this lodge, which, again, is similar to ult, I think a lot, maybe smaller or, like, fewer classes, but similar in that it's like we're seeking the truth, blah, blah, I learned that it was part of something originally called Crotona. What have you heard of Crotona?

727
02:29:25,910 --> 02:29:26,542
Chris: What?

728
02:29:26,686 --> 02:29:46,846
Kayla: So Crotona was one of. This is. I'm reading from wikipedia now. Krotona, k r o t o n a, was one of three important theosophical centers in the United States during the early part of the 20th century. Originally built in Hollywood during 1912, the colony was eventually relocated to Ojai in 1926, where it operates today as the Kratona Institute of Theosophy.

729
02:29:46,918 --> 02:29:56,516
Chris: No shit. Ojai is just a little north of La. It's just a town. City, town, village place, resort village.

730
02:29:56,668 --> 02:30:12,412
Kayla: So, yeah, this colony, this was essentially a commune built in Hollywood in the early 1910s to house a bunch of theosophists and their events. And they called themselves Crotonians.

731
02:30:12,516 --> 02:30:13,268
Chris: Crotonians.

732
02:30:13,324 --> 02:30:15,652
Kayla: And then eventually they were like, ugh, Hollywood is suffering influential.

733
02:30:15,716 --> 02:30:22,190
Chris: Yeah, this is the thing. There's so many, like, threads. There's so many threads going into theosophy and so many coming out of it.

734
02:30:22,230 --> 02:30:45,180
Kayla: Right? And then I also found just related, just slightly related to the Besant Lodge. They put on lectures and events in conjunction with ecclesia gnostica, which is also up in that area and is a neo gnostic church.

735
02:30:46,240 --> 02:30:47,780
Chris: It's all part of it.

736
02:30:48,800 --> 02:31:28,650
Kayla: It's all the same stuff as theosophy. There's other stuff that I learned on this journey that we'll put into a bonus episode, or I'll scream about on the discord, if you haven't been on the discord yet. But it was just really interesting to learn about all of the different ways theosophy still exists in a city like Los Angeles. There's multiple theosophy lodges. There's gnostic churches. There's a hermetics school. There are different Aleister Crowley Thelema groups. Like, this stuff is very alive and well. My brain is full and is intrinsically tied to the foundations of the city.

737
02:31:29,310 --> 02:31:30,038
Chris: I love that.

738
02:31:30,094 --> 02:31:30,878
Kayla: Yeah, me too.

739
02:31:30,974 --> 02:31:38,086
Chris: Very interesting. And this whole time, we still haven't even talked about PSR. We still haven't even talked about the philosophical research society.

740
02:31:38,118 --> 02:31:38,670
Kayla: Oh, yeah.

741
02:31:38,790 --> 02:31:49,350
Chris: Manly P. Hall goes back, which all ties into that too. Like, some of the students that we met at the class on Sunday were interested in that kind of stuff too. I forget exactly what it was.

742
02:31:49,430 --> 02:31:51,502
Kayla: One of the people studied with Manly P. Hall.

743
02:31:51,526 --> 02:31:54,838
Chris: That's what it was. And like, yeah, like, directly contact.

744
02:31:54,974 --> 02:32:05,570
Kayla: If you read anything about, like, theosophy, you're gonna end up at Manly P. Hall, and then you're gonna end up at philosophical research society. And then it just becomes an ouroboros in a good way.

745
02:32:06,190 --> 02:32:40,220
Chris: All right, before I get, like, irretrievably confused here, let me just say what my sources were pretty succinct this time. Encyclopedias, wikipedia and Britannica, works of several Blavatsky biographers, including Nicholas Goodrich Clark, theosophyult.com, comma, altla.com. I think that last one is the one that's supposed to be not there anymore. And then, fittingly for the divine revelation episode, our own personal experiences. Okay, so is it a cult or just weird?

746
02:32:40,960 --> 02:32:41,940
Kayla: Mm mm.

747
02:32:42,840 --> 02:32:43,280
Chris: Okay.

748
02:32:43,320 --> 02:32:44,560
Kayla: Criteria me, baby.

749
02:32:44,720 --> 02:32:47,048
Chris: Charismatic. Hallieder.

750
02:32:47,224 --> 02:32:49,304
Kayla: I. Yeah.

751
02:32:49,352 --> 02:32:55,650
Chris: You know what we're gonna run into with this one again? Too many schisms, past and present. We're gonna be like, is it now versus when it was founded?

752
02:32:55,690 --> 02:32:57,938
Kayla: No. Okay. Yes, you're right. I shouldn't say that, because if we.

753
02:32:57,954 --> 02:33:10,554
Chris: Said now, if we said now, I'd be like, no. Especially if you talk about the United Lodge of theosophists. It's purposely leaderless, but if you go back to OG, it's like, oh, my God. Yeah. Madam Blavatsky, totally charismatic leader.

754
02:33:10,642 --> 02:33:24,180
Kayla: Yes. And in that class that we took, her books were. All her books were piled high on the table, and they kept referring back. Back to, essentially referring to the secret doctrine, which is a book that she wrote as kind of a foundational Bible.

755
02:33:24,260 --> 02:33:24,916
Chris: That's true.

756
02:33:25,028 --> 02:33:31,068
Kayla: I think that HP Blavatsky still fits the charismatic leader bill for me. I think she founded it.

757
02:33:31,124 --> 02:33:48,228
Chris: No, I think you make a good point. Just because she's not. Just because she's long dead and not the current leader of the movement, even the headless, leaderless version of that movement still pays a lot of reverence and knowledge, respect towards that person.

758
02:33:48,284 --> 02:33:51,388
Kayla: So feel free to correct us any theosophists who are listening, but I think.

759
02:33:51,404 --> 02:33:54,560
Chris: It is high and charismatic leader expected harm.

760
02:33:55,100 --> 02:33:58,360
Kayla: I don't get a sense of harm here.

761
02:33:58,820 --> 02:34:29,280
Chris: I'm gonna caveat that with, like, I don't know, the exact trace of things like root races and whatnot to, like, 20th century atrocities, but. And if I had to say, like, today, like, what should you expect to be harmed? If you, like, should you expect to, you know, have a group that, I don't know, doesn't feed you for three days and then does weird stuff and blah, I would say probably not. I don't. I don't get that at all.

762
02:34:29,320 --> 02:34:30,420
Kayla: I don't get that, either.

763
02:34:30,840 --> 02:34:31,896
Chris: Presence of ritual.

764
02:34:32,008 --> 02:34:33,608
Kayla: Hi. Yeah.

765
02:34:33,664 --> 02:35:04,784
Chris: In fact, one of the things that I liked the best about this class is that it was, like, this hybrid, like, meditation and then discussion, rather than just discussing or just meditating. It was like, first there was that ten minutes of let's read something, and then quietly, without saying anything, just sort of, like, enter a meditative state, reflect on it, pick your nose, do whatever you want, silently. And then after that, there was discussion. I really liked that. I thought that was a strength. So I'm gonna count that as a plus one for ritual.

766
02:35:04,872 --> 02:35:19,046
Kayla: I like a good hybrid. It's reminding me of an event coming up at ecclesiastica, which is a Yde discourse slash Halloween party. Discourse lecture Halloween party. And I'm like, yes. This people gets me. All of your parties are discourse party.

767
02:35:19,118 --> 02:35:20,246
Chris: Discourse parties.

768
02:35:20,398 --> 02:35:21,350
Kayla: Yeah, I agree with you.

769
02:35:21,430 --> 02:35:25,090
Chris: Niche within society. You said we're gonna talk about this one, right?

770
02:35:25,470 --> 02:35:27,502
Kayla: I think it's not. I would have, before learning this.

771
02:35:27,526 --> 02:35:28,038
Chris: Clearly not.

772
02:35:28,094 --> 02:35:33,902
Kayla: I would have said, like, oh, yeah, who knows about theosophy? But it's like, even if you don't know the word theosophy, you know about theosophy.

773
02:35:33,966 --> 02:35:34,422
Chris: Yeah.

774
02:35:34,526 --> 02:35:40,140
Kayla: You cannot escape new age culture, na niche, antifactuality.

775
02:35:41,920 --> 02:35:45,240
Chris: I'm sorry. So here. Okay.

776
02:35:45,320 --> 02:35:46,648
Kayla: It's high. By their own admission.

777
02:35:46,744 --> 02:35:51,600
Chris: Before we get into it, I will say that this season has been a weird season.

778
02:35:51,680 --> 02:35:52,340
Kayla: Yeah.

779
02:35:53,160 --> 02:36:05,550
Chris: Because going to things and interacting with the people there makes it a lot harder to then dispassionately say whether you agree with them or nothing publicly on a podcast.

780
02:36:05,670 --> 02:36:37,808
Kayla: Well, that's why I say, like, I think that this is high by their own admission. I think that if we. If we're. If we're saying. Okay, when we say factuality, when we say facts, we're talking about, like, the scientific method. We're talking about, can this be reproduced? Can this be peer reviewed? Whereas what their pursuit of truth is not based in, like, scientific fact. It's based one's internal experience. It's based one's pursuit of the interpretation of truth. I could be wrong, but I don't think that what the facts say is important here.

781
02:36:37,984 --> 02:37:19,716
Chris: Well, we didn't get into this, but when we talk about how theosophy, at least as originally formulated, is intended to encompass all world religions, it's also supposed to encompass sciences and all other methods to knowledge as well. So, like, first of all, talk about arrogant. It's not just religion that they're trying. It's, like, religion, wisdom, traditions, tribal, like, shamanistic practices, science, like, everything. So they do kind of have science as, like, one of their. Well, this is one of the traditions. This is one of the wisdom traditions is science. Science is part of it. And I think that's what gets you into trouble.

782
02:37:19,788 --> 02:37:27,042
Kayla: Yeah, I think it's anti factual. I don't say that in, like, a yemenite. You're telling people the wrong things. I just think that it's. It's my definition of.

783
02:37:27,066 --> 02:37:33,750
Chris: It's not based on empiricism. Yeah. It's not based on observation and empiricism. By definition. By definition, life consumption.

784
02:37:35,050 --> 02:37:36,954
Kayla: Okay, small.

785
02:37:37,122 --> 02:37:39,270
Chris: Small. But I mean, like, I.

786
02:37:39,690 --> 02:38:00,256
Kayla: This is hard, because I don't know how it can be small, because, again, I tried to read, like, one book, and I was like, I need to read, like, I need to be well versed in 40 other things before I can even parse this one book. And I think that's pretty common here. There's a lot to learn and draw from, and that can take over your life.

787
02:38:00,368 --> 02:38:03,264
Chris: But they're not, like, out there, like, saying, you have to come live on the compound.

788
02:38:03,312 --> 02:38:03,936
Kayla: They're not doing that.

789
02:38:03,968 --> 02:38:26,410
Chris: You have to polish theosophy yacht. But then again, we did meet that lady, that student who said that she had been doing this sort of research her whole life, but. But I don't know if that's life consumption. That's just life. Yeah. Like, we're all sort of. Yes. All of us are on spiritual journeys, whether we like it or not. You know, like, we're all kind of doing that all the time.

790
02:38:26,490 --> 02:38:44,900
Kayla: I'm gonna say medium, because I really do think that, like. And this is also based on, like, you know, hanging out in the subreddits around this stuff. It just seems like there's a lot of. If you wanna get a handle on this, you do have to dedicate a lot of time and energy to understanding it. So I think it's at least medium. Yeah.

791
02:38:45,400 --> 02:38:48,168
Chris: Dogmatic beliefs is our next criterion.

792
02:38:48,304 --> 02:38:51,304
Kayla: I don't think that applies here.

793
02:38:51,432 --> 02:39:00,816
Chris: I don't think so either. As much as there's some things in the thinkings of theosophists that are certainly common.

794
02:39:00,928 --> 02:39:01,200
Kayla: Sure.

795
02:39:01,240 --> 02:39:13,660
Chris: And there might be some things that they say they would disagree with, I think they would disagree with. Oh, well, materialism is also not the only means to knowledge. All that being said, they're, like, anti.

796
02:39:13,700 --> 02:39:21,204
Kayla: Dogmatic, especially in the classes we took. It was like, we do not want you to get to a place of dogma we want to actively work against.

797
02:39:21,372 --> 02:39:29,852
Chris: Yeah. There was definitely even one part where they were like, dogma can be dangerous. So I think it's one of the least dogmatic of the groups we've covered.

798
02:39:29,916 --> 02:39:37,212
Kayla: The class were in, literally made space for diametrically opposing beliefs and held them both as valid. So that was really indicative for me.

799
02:39:37,236 --> 02:39:40,692
Chris: In the, like, the all encompassing ness of the initial formulation of it. Yeah.

800
02:39:40,716 --> 02:39:42,120
Kayla: Dogmatic. And have this structure.

801
02:39:42,490 --> 02:39:47,962
Chris: Right. Chain of recruits slash victims. Chain of recruits.

802
02:39:48,066 --> 02:39:52,670
Kayla: I don't know. You tell me. It was really hard. It was really hard to get there.

803
02:39:53,010 --> 02:39:58,674
Chris: Yeah. Is this anti recruiting? Because, like, I was really trying to weasel my way in, and it was. It was tough.

804
02:39:58,802 --> 02:40:10,322
Kayla: I really. It feels like the recruiting that goes on here is people discovering it and coming to it themselves, which is not recruiting these people going out and, like, trying to get new folks.

805
02:40:10,506 --> 02:40:26,370
Chris: And we asked people. We pointedly did ask them at the end of the class, how did you get into it? And everybody sort of had a personal story of, like, well, I was doing this, and I discovered it this way. Nobody was like, this guy sold me hard on it. There wasn't any of that. So I would say low here. Safe or unsafe exit?

806
02:40:26,490 --> 02:40:27,550
Kayla: I think safe.

807
02:40:28,090 --> 02:40:38,840
Chris: I think safe. Except for, like, the masters apparently wanted to plot to kill Annie Baanjde, and that didn't seem safe. But also, the masters aren't real.

808
02:40:39,140 --> 02:40:48,180
Kayla: Right. Well, what is real? It's meaningless anyway. Seems safe. Yeah. I think that if I wanted to join theosophy, I could leave it anytime I wanted.

809
02:40:48,300 --> 02:40:57,360
Chris: Yeah. At this point, I would have to unsubscribe from a few email lists, which that's another thing that's very unsafe, by the way. Cause you have to click on subscribe. It's very small.

810
02:40:58,180 --> 02:41:31,418
Kayla: I do think it was as hard as it was to get into some of these classes, and some of these classes are only available by, like, going to a class and learning about it and getting on a mailing list. That while that feels like gatekeepery, it also feels in line with the traditions of learning directly from a guru or learning directly from a teacher. And, like, I think that's kind of cool that even though it's, you know, it's more difficult for you or I, we can't just, like, sign on to a flashy website and, like, click join the zoom link. Having to work at it a little bit and, like, actually get to know the people and be invited is. That's special in its own way.

811
02:41:31,514 --> 02:41:38,290
Chris: Yeah. But I would say safe exit. I don't think I'm gonna get bugged if I don't show up again.

812
02:41:38,370 --> 02:41:39,710
Kayla: No, I don't think so either.

813
02:41:40,090 --> 02:42:10,682
Chris: All right, so we got high charismatic leader. We got low expected harm with the caveat that we don't know that much about certain relationships between the original movement and bad stuff that happened later. Presence of ritual, high. Niche within society, very low. It's very present within society in many ways. Antifactuality, high life consumption, medium ish. Dogmatic beliefs, very low. Chain of victims, also very low. It's not very recruiting, safe exit.

814
02:42:10,866 --> 02:42:12,178
Kayla: So it's just weird.

815
02:42:12,314 --> 02:42:13,778
Chris: It's definitely just weird.

816
02:42:13,954 --> 02:42:15,546
Kayla: Like, could make an argument for religion.

817
02:42:15,578 --> 02:42:38,672
Chris: But, like, it could be religion, but too many other things are low. Right? Like, the only things that are high are charismatic leader, presence of ritual, antifactuality. The rest is low. I think if we had, like, one or two other things, we could make a case that it's in cult slash religion. And then the fact that it's not niche, clearly, to me, would put it in religion, not cult, but it just doesn't hit enough. So I think it's just weird.

818
02:42:38,736 --> 02:42:39,752
Kayla: It's just weird.

819
02:42:39,936 --> 02:42:48,190
Chris: And now that I think about it, that kind of makes sense, because, again, it's so all encompassing, it just doesn't really fit neatly into borders.

820
02:42:48,280 --> 02:42:48,770
Kayla: Yeah.

821
02:42:48,890 --> 02:42:54,514
Chris: So it's not really a thing. It's really hard to pin down, again, kind of like empty spaces in that regard.

822
02:42:54,602 --> 02:43:06,298
Kayla: The nebulousness is part of the attraction and the nebulousness. There's a paradox there. Yeah, I don't have more to say on that. Besides, there's a paradox.

823
02:43:06,354 --> 02:43:21,430
Chris: The closer you look at it, the more uncertain it is. Oh, my God. My own quantum flap doodle. Just for this episode. Thank you for going on all of these journeys around Los Angeles with me, Kayla, and uncovering all these. These weird societies around here. I can't wait to go to more of them.

824
02:43:21,470 --> 02:43:23,862
Kayla: Oh. Oh, thank you.

825
02:43:23,966 --> 02:43:25,590
Chris: I'm literally just getting started.

826
02:43:25,670 --> 02:43:42,046
Kayla: We are just. We've got Kabbalah center to go to. We've got the hermetic school to go to. We've got gnostic mass to go to. I'm going to buy myself. I'm going to buy myself some tarot cards. Like, we have a full play right now by the time we come back next season. And again, do we need to push.

827
02:43:42,078 --> 02:43:44,166
Chris: Off next season's theme to the followings?

828
02:43:44,278 --> 02:43:45,854
Kayla: We only have one more episode after this, don't we?

829
02:43:45,902 --> 02:43:47,254
Chris: We do. That's what I'm saying.

830
02:43:47,302 --> 02:43:49,102
Kayla: We're, like, the penultimate episode at the.

831
02:43:49,126 --> 02:43:52,302
Chris: End of our season. Like. And we have, like, 87 places to visit. Yeah.

832
02:43:52,326 --> 02:43:56,286
Kayla: We might just be doing some of that, like, for ourselves in life and.

833
02:43:56,318 --> 02:43:57,262
Chris: Not for the content.

834
02:43:57,366 --> 02:43:58,206
Kayla: Yeah, I know.

835
02:43:58,238 --> 02:44:04,286
Chris: What I don't understand that as a millennial, I don't get how to not, like, monetize every aspect of my life.

836
02:44:04,318 --> 02:44:11,334
Kayla: On Instagram by the time we come back to the next episode. And then, yeah, the season after that, I'm gonna be fully. I'm gonna be ascended. I'm gonna be a master.

837
02:44:11,462 --> 02:44:17,184
Chris: You're gonna be just one of those, like. Like, energy beings walking, sexless energy being that spawns themselves.

838
02:44:17,272 --> 02:44:17,984
Kayla: Hell, yeah.

839
02:44:18,112 --> 02:44:27,248
Chris: Oh, boy. Last but not least, if you want to discuss the episode, of course, go to our discord, which you will find a link to that in the show notes and also everywhere else that we are on social media.

840
02:44:27,344 --> 02:44:36,980
Kayla: And thank you to everybody who we interacted with on our journey to learn more about theosophy. Everybody who was in class with us, we really appreciate everything that you shared with us and making us feel so welcome.

841
02:44:38,570 --> 02:44:40,226
Chris: This is Kayla, and this is Chris.

842
02:44:40,298 --> 02:44:44,130
Kayla: And this has been cult or just everything?