Join the conversation on Discord!
May 17, 2022

S4E4 - The Corporate Culture (cultlike corporate practices)

Cult or Just Weird

Wanna chat about the episode? Or just hang out?

Come join us on discord!

 

---

We here at Cult or Just Weird like to call ourselves a family.

Kayla & Chris deep dive into a recent article outlining the cult-like criteria present in an area of life where most of us toil away.

---

*Search Categories*

Business

---

*Topic Spoiler*

"Company or Cult?" article from The Economist

---

*Further Reading*

https://www.economist.com/business/2022/03/05/company-or-cult

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/15/technology/metamates-meta-facebook.html

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/tripping-through-ibms-astonishingly-insane-1937-corporate-songbook/

https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SSRN-id2994394.pdf

---

*Patreon Credits*

Michaela Evans, Heather Aunspach, Annika Ramen, Zero Serres, Alyssa Ottum, David Whiteside, Jade A, amy sarah marshall, Martina Dobson

<<>>

Jenny Lamb, Matthew Walden, Rebecca Kirsch, Pam Westergard, Ryan Quinn, Paul Sweeney, Erin Bratu, Liz T, Lianne Cole, Samantha Bayliff, Katie Larimer, Fio H, Jessica Senk, Proper Gander, Kelly Smith Upton, Nancy Carlson, Carly Westergard-Dobson, banana, Megan Blackburn, ISeeSpidersWhereThereAreNone, Instantly Joy, Athena of CaveSystem

Transcript
1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:54,080
Kayla: The 1937 edition of the Songbook is a 54 page monument to glassy eyed corporate inhumanity, with every page overflowing with trite praise to the company with capitals, and it's men with capitals. The booklet. The booklet reads like a terrible parody of a hymnal, one that praises not the traditional christian trinity, but the new corporate triumvirate of IBM, the father, Thomas J. Watson, the Son, and american entrepreneurship as the Holy Spirit. Chris. Kayla, have you ever been in a cult?

2
00:00:55,460 --> 00:00:56,100
Chris: Probably.

3
00:00:56,180 --> 00:00:57,860
Kayla: I mean, actually, wait, I should frame.

4
00:00:57,900 --> 00:00:59,756
Chris: This question based on what we've talked about on this show.

5
00:00:59,788 --> 00:01:04,964
Kayla: Yes. I should frame this question in a better way. Have you ever worked for a cult?

6
00:01:05,132 --> 00:01:18,068
Chris: I almost joined Cutco. I worked at Disney very briefly. I worked at. I mean, yes. Have I worked then? Yes. Companies are cults.

7
00:01:18,204 --> 00:01:20,524
Kayla: Oh, is that. You're claiming that right now?

8
00:01:20,572 --> 00:01:24,018
Chris: That's my final answer. I haven't worked for a tea company, if that's what you're asking.

9
00:01:24,074 --> 00:01:38,870
Kayla: No, you haven't worked for a tea company. We have talked on the show before about how there are some aspects of corporate culture and even capitalism itself that really lends themselves to being candidates on this show. But a recent article in the Economist took this idea a step further.

10
00:01:39,410 --> 00:01:41,474
Chris: An article in the Economist, you say?

11
00:01:41,562 --> 00:01:45,626
Kayla: But before we get to that, I'm Kayla. I am a television writer.

12
00:01:45,738 --> 00:01:48,234
Chris: I'm Chris. I'm a data scientist and game designer.

13
00:01:48,282 --> 00:01:50,826
Kayla: And this is the podcast cult or just weird?

14
00:01:50,898 --> 00:01:51,868
Chris: Welcome to the show.

15
00:01:51,994 --> 00:01:54,240
Kayla: That's it. I don't have any other rent or business, actually.

16
00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:59,640
Chris: Sorry. We do have quick one. Quick business is that there are two more patrons that have joined us.

17
00:01:59,680 --> 00:02:00,280
Kayla: Oh, yay.

18
00:02:00,400 --> 00:02:07,776
Chris: In the past two weeks. And of course, as part of the benefit for signing up for our Patreon, you get a shout out on the.

19
00:02:07,808 --> 00:02:10,112
Kayla: Show or a sing out.

20
00:02:10,136 --> 00:02:15,624
Chris: Apparently it's a sing out. And also, we put you on our show notes.

21
00:02:15,752 --> 00:02:16,432
Kayla: Beautiful.

22
00:02:16,536 --> 00:02:20,558
Chris: Thank you. That's my budding musical career as of right now.

23
00:02:20,664 --> 00:02:21,994
Kayla: Who are our new patrons?

24
00:02:22,042 --> 00:02:47,554
Chris: They are Athena of cavesystem, sort of a longtime friend of the show. At least we've corresponded before. I believe Athena is a tulpa, and they have a system. I forget how many. But anyway, they are now supporting us on Patreon as well, and we are very appreciative. And we also have recently been supported by one Amy Sarah Marshall. Thank you so much to Athena Cavesystem and Amy Sarah Marshall for your support. We really appreciate it.

25
00:02:47,602 --> 00:02:48,812
Kayla: Welcome to the patreon.

26
00:02:48,946 --> 00:02:52,192
Chris: Welcome to our cult. Oh, we're so clever.

27
00:02:52,256 --> 00:02:53,040
Kayla: Get out of here.

28
00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:58,200
Chris: You know, remember how we cleverly named our Patreon levels after, like, there's, like, initiate and cultist and.

29
00:02:58,240 --> 00:03:00,360
Kayla: Yeah, yeah, we thought about changing those.

30
00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:00,880
Chris: So lame.

31
00:03:00,920 --> 00:03:01,480
Kayla: I don't know.

32
00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:01,848
Chris: I know.

33
00:03:01,864 --> 00:03:03,072
Kayla: I I'm uncomfortable now.

34
00:03:03,136 --> 00:03:04,104
Chris: I know I argued against it.

35
00:03:04,112 --> 00:03:06,008
Kayla: We both, our own naming system.

36
00:03:06,184 --> 00:03:07,264
Chris: I liked the lameness.

37
00:03:07,352 --> 00:03:12,880
Kayla: Yeah, it's not that it's lame. I just worry that it's trivializing. But what are you gonna do?

38
00:03:13,656 --> 00:03:15,058
Chris: We're gonna keep doing it.

39
00:03:15,074 --> 00:03:21,426
Kayla: We're gonna keep doing it, and we're gonna keep doing the show. I want to get back to what were talking about before we introduced ourselves. The economists.

40
00:03:21,498 --> 00:03:26,426
Chris: Yeah. You were promising to read me an article directly from the Economist that is.

41
00:03:26,458 --> 00:03:45,040
Kayla: Basically, this episode is a deep dive into one article today from the Economist. I'm basically just gonna read it verbatim. I am not exactly an avid reader of the Economist. Like, I generally have a view of it. It's an overall decent news source in terms of, like, truth telling. Yddeme the facts are probably right.

42
00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:46,744
Chris: I believe they still do journalism.

43
00:03:46,832 --> 00:04:09,016
Kayla: They still do journalism. It also has a noted dedication to a radical, centrist political viewpoint. So it's not really a bias that I jive with, but overall, it's generally considered to have good, rigorous fact checking, which is good, but it's got a high price point, which makes it really only accessible to the wealthy. So that's not good.

44
00:04:09,128 --> 00:04:11,496
Chris: As subscriptions go, it's pretty expensive.

45
00:04:11,568 --> 00:04:12,374
Kayla: How much is it?

46
00:04:12,472 --> 00:04:14,930
Chris: I don't know. It's like, isn't it like $100 something a year?

47
00:04:14,970 --> 00:04:15,666
Kayla: Ew.

48
00:04:15,858 --> 00:04:23,482
Chris: Hang on. Let me check. Oh, actually, sorry. I just looked it up. I was wrong. It's $200 a year digitally.

49
00:04:23,546 --> 00:04:24,954
Kayla: Holy shit.

50
00:04:25,082 --> 00:04:27,710
Chris: It's even more than that if you do digital plus print.

51
00:04:28,330 --> 00:04:53,422
Kayla: Okay, well, that's only accessible to a small portion of the population, so, you know, maybe that's not so good. But clearly they are using some of that wealth that they have acquired to get some pretty decent ad algorithms because I happened to be scrolling our Instagram account one day, and I was met with this. Do you work for a cult company? Take this test to find out.

52
00:04:53,566 --> 00:05:02,558
Chris: There's a test? Was it our criteria? Did they steal it? Because if they did and they charge $200 a year, that means we have, like, a big fat lump of money that we can sue from them.

53
00:05:02,654 --> 00:05:03,694
Kayla: There is criteria.

54
00:05:03,782 --> 00:05:05,806
Chris: There's criteria. It's art. Oh, I'm suing.

55
00:05:05,878 --> 00:05:06,610
Kayla: We'll get.

56
00:05:07,030 --> 00:05:07,566
Chris: Okay.

57
00:05:07,638 --> 00:05:29,606
Kayla: This copy was paired with an image of a red background and a businessman figure in the foreground sitting in cross legged or lotus position, wearing business casual dress. He was seemingly levitating above the ground, and his head is stylized as, like, the all seeing eye. So that quintessential illuminati symbol. You think of the top of the pyramid in the american dollar bill, the.

58
00:05:29,638 --> 00:05:30,670
Chris: W in our logo.

59
00:05:30,750 --> 00:05:34,190
Kayla: It's used to quickly connote cultishness, which is why we used it.

60
00:05:34,270 --> 00:05:34,870
Chris: Right?

61
00:05:35,030 --> 00:05:41,960
Kayla: I don't click ads. I clicked this one so fast, my fingers got whiplashed. This was made for us.

62
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,224
Chris: Finally, the algorithm finally got Kayla.

63
00:05:44,312 --> 00:06:10,446
Kayla: I was hoping it would be, like, a Buzzfeed style quiz, like, you know, ten signs you're in a. Your company is a cult, and it would just have, like, gifs from Parks and Rec. It wasn't that. It was. It was a little bit better, I guess. Instead, this is an entire article dedicated to pinpointing the telltale signs of a workplace that has slid into cult behavior, focusing largely on a set of criteria. Criteria. Hey, the article is written.

64
00:06:10,478 --> 00:06:16,502
Chris: Wait, could we seriously sue them? Probably not, man, because that's, like. That's how we monetize this podcast, finally.

65
00:06:16,566 --> 00:06:24,302
Kayla: No, I don't think we will be able to sue, because, in general, I don't think. I don't think you can sue over lists.

66
00:06:24,406 --> 00:06:26,830
Chris: But how else are we gonna monetize the podcast, Kayla?

67
00:06:26,950 --> 00:06:27,422
Kayla: Don't know.

68
00:06:27,446 --> 00:06:34,334
Chris: That is the best monetization strategy. In fact, I've ever. All this, like, oh, advertisers. Fuck that. Sue the Economist.

69
00:06:34,382 --> 00:06:51,958
Kayla: Sue the Economist. The article is written for the Bartleby column, which journalists write for anonymously. I even reached out to the Economist several times to try and track down, like, the actual author of the article, but they did not respond. Like, I think that's a. I think they don't respond to me because who the fuck am I? B. I think it's part of, like.

70
00:06:52,014 --> 00:06:54,550
Chris: Cult or just weird. The people that are gonna sue you.

71
00:06:54,590 --> 00:07:02,014
Kayla: I think that's, like, the purpose of the Bartleby column is that, like, journalists can do their jobs better by being anonymous.

72
00:07:02,142 --> 00:07:02,876
Chris: Okay.

73
00:07:02,998 --> 00:07:16,696
Kayla: I think. Actually, I don't. I think that might be, like, an economist principle. I don't know. Whatever. The article is titled, company or cult, the dividing line between firm and sect is often thin. How to tell them apart.

74
00:07:16,888 --> 00:07:19,420
Chris: Yeah, it's tough to tell apart all the different sects.

75
00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:51,632
Kayla: It really is in this day and age. So, for this episode, I wanted to dive into the content of this article as we go along. I'm sure our own experiences are going to come up, and maybe we'll recognize some of what we've gone through in our careers as we dive into the article. Before we jump in, I do want to clarify that we're not talking about clearly identifiable cult companies like MLMs or celestial seasonings and other cult founded endeavors like that would be way too easy. Today we are talking about regular old corporate life in today's economic system.

76
00:07:51,816 --> 00:07:54,660
Chris: Cult or just weird?

77
00:07:55,040 --> 00:08:21,630
Kayla: Let's go. The article starts here are some common characteristics of cults. They have hierarchical structures. They prize charismatic leaders and expect loyalty. They see the world as a hostile place. They have their own jargon, rituals, and beliefs. They have a sense of mission. They are stuffed with weirdos. If this sounds a bit familiar, that is because companies share so many of these traits. End quote.

78
00:08:21,930 --> 00:08:23,186
Chris: Somebody's listened to our podcast.

79
00:08:23,218 --> 00:08:33,590
Kayla: I'm sorry. The writer posits that some cult companies are super easy to identify and, like, literally, basically go like, cough, anything run by Elon Musk. Cough, cough.

80
00:08:34,130 --> 00:08:35,169
Chris: Internet weirdos.

81
00:08:35,250 --> 00:09:13,350
Kayla: Yeah. But as we know with cults, the easy to identify ones are sometimes the least insidious in some ways. Like, okay, at least less insidious. Like, still insidious, but insidious the way that, like, Pennywise the clown is insidious. Were like, yeah, it's scary, but you can see it come from a mile away. I was like, that's bad. But some real danger also lies with the companies that use cult like tactics and continue to fly under the radar. I don't know, like a, like, bozo. They're more like, who's probably, I bet you bozo the clown is the source of more people's fear of clowns than Pennywise.

82
00:09:13,510 --> 00:09:16,670
Chris: Just because more people have more access to Bozo and.

83
00:09:16,750 --> 00:09:23,822
Kayla: Yeah, that's what I. And he doesn't. Look, he's not supposed to be scary, so he's being brought into your life as, like, this isn't a scary thing. This isn't a cult.

84
00:09:23,926 --> 00:09:33,492
Chris: So just so I'm clear here, the metaphor here is Pennywise the clown from. And that's for those of you who aren't Stephen King fans. That's the scary clown from it.

85
00:09:33,556 --> 00:09:33,916
Kayla: Yeah.

86
00:09:33,988 --> 00:09:36,020
Chris: He's gonna stab you or something, right? Stabs kids.

87
00:09:36,060 --> 00:09:36,612
Kayla: Stab you.

88
00:09:36,676 --> 00:09:39,068
Chris: Stabs kids. I don't know. Whatever. I've actually never seen it.

89
00:09:39,124 --> 00:09:39,676
Kayla: Oh, man.

90
00:09:39,748 --> 00:09:48,044
Chris: But seen it. Capital it. I've never seen it. That's where Pennywise the clown is from. He's a scary clown. Bozo the clown is from.

91
00:09:48,212 --> 00:09:49,292
Kayla: Kids show Bozo the clown.

92
00:09:49,316 --> 00:09:54,772
Chris: Bozo the clown. And you're saying that Pennywise is, like, the amway of clowns?

93
00:09:54,876 --> 00:09:55,366
Kayla: Yeah.

94
00:09:55,468 --> 00:09:57,450
Chris: And Bozo is like, no, no.

95
00:09:57,490 --> 00:09:59,290
Kayla: I'm saying, like, Pennywise is like.

96
00:09:59,370 --> 00:10:00,826
Chris: Like, yeah, you can see it coming a mile away.

97
00:10:00,858 --> 00:10:01,074
Kayla: Yeah. Okay.

98
00:10:01,082 --> 00:10:02,242
Chris: Yeah, it's super nuts.

99
00:10:02,306 --> 00:10:02,642
Kayla: Yes.

100
00:10:02,706 --> 00:10:06,042
Chris: And then Bozo is, what? Like, the.

101
00:10:06,186 --> 00:10:07,906
Kayla: He's friendly, like the Google of clown.

102
00:10:07,978 --> 00:10:19,650
Chris: The Google of clowns, where it's like, come sit in our nap pods and eat dinner on campus and never leave campus, because you can do your laundry here and you can live here.

103
00:10:19,810 --> 00:10:23,110
Kayla: Thank you for clarifying that analogy. You actually.

104
00:10:23,610 --> 00:10:27,550
Chris: All the money that we're gonna sue away from the economist. Google's gonna come sue from us.

105
00:10:27,990 --> 00:10:55,290
Kayla: So the economist has put together a list of traits or criteria to help you identify if you work for a cult company. And we're going to go through these number one workforce nicknames. I feel like this is something we're seeing more and more of, especially in the tech world. I also feel like it's something that. That's not one of our specific criteria, obviously. But, like, workforce nicknames definitely falls under categories that we have. Criteria that we have.

106
00:10:55,330 --> 00:10:57,354
Chris: Like, is this where you get a nickname at work?

107
00:10:57,442 --> 00:11:02,418
Kayla: No, no. I mean. Okay, so this specifically is calling out things like calling people that work at Google. Googlers.

108
00:11:02,474 --> 00:11:03,738
Chris: Oh, I hate that.

109
00:11:03,794 --> 00:11:12,258
Kayla: Microsofties or pinployees. Bainies. Like, I've also heard that folks who worked at Yahoo were called Yahoos. Amazon.

110
00:11:12,354 --> 00:11:13,322
Chris: Okay, that one makes sense.

111
00:11:13,386 --> 00:11:14,634
Kayla: Called Amazonians.

112
00:11:14,762 --> 00:11:16,154
Chris: Amazon. Yeah. Yeah.

113
00:11:16,242 --> 00:11:25,360
Kayla: Facebook employees used to be called facebookers, but when the company changed its name to Meta, it also ruled out a new worker bean nickname.

114
00:11:26,300 --> 00:11:29,800
Chris: Please don't. I don't want to know.

115
00:11:30,140 --> 00:11:33,948
Kayla: Metamates. Metamates.

116
00:11:34,124 --> 00:11:38,140
Chris: I refuse. I refuse to use that word.

117
00:11:38,220 --> 00:11:43,228
Kayla: By rolled out, I mean, it was a big thing. Like, I found a New York Times article written by.

118
00:11:43,244 --> 00:11:47,766
Chris: Wait, it's not just like, casual, like colloquial, no. Groundswell type thing?

119
00:11:47,798 --> 00:11:50,050
Kayla: No, they, like, had a whole big thing about it.

120
00:11:51,150 --> 00:11:52,278
Chris: I hate this.

121
00:11:52,454 --> 00:11:53,550
Kayla: I found a New York Times.

122
00:11:53,590 --> 00:11:54,846
Chris: I did not know I was gonna hate this much.

123
00:11:54,878 --> 00:11:55,542
Kayla: I'm sorry. No, it's really.

124
00:11:55,566 --> 00:11:56,534
Chris: I'm sorry. I really hate this much.

125
00:11:56,542 --> 00:11:56,782
Kayla: I know.

126
00:11:56,806 --> 00:11:58,750
Chris: I hate it so much I wanna barf.

127
00:11:58,790 --> 00:12:03,542
Kayla: And I think that these things. I wanna say that this would fall under our ritual. This would be ritual for us.

128
00:12:03,566 --> 00:12:04,718
Chris: Oh. Oh, yeah.

129
00:12:04,814 --> 00:12:29,190
Kayla: Yeah. Okay, so this New York Times article, it's written by journalists named Mike Isaac and Shira Frankel. And they described a company meeting in February of 2022 in which Mark Zuckerberg announced the new name for his employees. And this new name paired with new corporate values, shifting from things like be bold to now live in the future. Build awesome things. And my favorite metamates, me.

130
00:12:31,330 --> 00:12:38,630
Chris: Is that from Silicon Valley, the tv show? It's like, again, beyond parody. You cannot parody this.

131
00:12:39,130 --> 00:12:51,216
Kayla: Also, it's just like, you're not saying anything with any of that. Be bold. Fuck off. Build awesome things. Oh, yeah. I'm sure that there's no company out there that doesn't have build awesome things is, like, one of their core values.

132
00:12:51,248 --> 00:12:57,936
Chris: Build shitty things, actually, is what you want to do. Yeah. Oh, my God. What happened to movefast and break things? What happened to that?

133
00:12:57,968 --> 00:12:58,672
Kayla: That's old, baby.

134
00:12:58,696 --> 00:12:59,088
Chris: That's old.

135
00:12:59,144 --> 00:13:02,296
Kayla: That's web 2.0. We're on 3.0. We're in the metaverse.

136
00:13:02,408 --> 00:13:04,352
Chris: Oh, shit. I'm way behind.

137
00:13:04,496 --> 00:13:14,184
Kayla: The Economist article also points out these nicknames can get even more and more specific, particularly when it comes to job titles and functions within tech companies in particular.

138
00:13:14,352 --> 00:13:19,388
Chris: Okay, so I can feel me hating what you're about to say. I know I'm gonna hate it.

139
00:13:19,444 --> 00:13:38,196
Kayla: Oh, there's a tongue in. You are gonna relate to this so hard. There is a tongue in cheek call out of the fact that, quote, if you work in the finance team and are known as one of the apostles of the thrice tab spreadsheet, you have already lost your grip on reality. Tell me you have not worked at a company where, like, you could have heard that be thrown around.

140
00:13:38,348 --> 00:13:42,732
Chris: Oh, definitely can think of specific cases, actually.

141
00:13:42,796 --> 00:13:52,872
Kayla: I just remember the word evangelist being used. I feel like we talked about tech companies now where you're like, that's a way of describing a job function.

142
00:13:53,016 --> 00:13:59,200
Chris: Oh, yeah. I mean, that was actually, like, part of my job function was like, we talked about that being like, oh, you were the apostle.

143
00:13:59,280 --> 00:13:59,872
Kayla: Thrice tab.

144
00:13:59,936 --> 00:14:01,568
Chris: Data. No. Data evangelist.

145
00:14:01,584 --> 00:14:02,120
Kayla: Data evangelist.

146
00:14:02,200 --> 00:14:03,120
Chris: Data evangelist.

147
00:14:03,160 --> 00:14:04,440
Kayla: I remember that word being thrown around.

148
00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:23,010
Chris: And, yeah, I kind of want to barf now. But, you know, like, back when you asked me the question at the beginning of this episode of, like, did you ever work for a cult? Like, part of the answer to that question is, like, we've all done some stuff in our past where we all killed a man.

149
00:14:23,050 --> 00:14:24,386
Kayla: We've used to watch him die.

150
00:14:24,538 --> 00:14:27,754
Chris: Yeah, no, I've done much worse things, like work in data science.

151
00:14:27,882 --> 00:14:30,090
Kayla: Like, use the phrase data evangelist.

152
00:14:30,170 --> 00:14:40,602
Chris: Yeah. And, like, I don't, it's not the worst thing ever, but it's just kind of cringe, and I don't know, we're always evolving as people. That's really what I'm trying to say here.

153
00:14:40,666 --> 00:14:47,946
Kayla: And when you're in it's different than when you're looking. You can be on my judgy high horse out here.

154
00:14:48,018 --> 00:15:09,372
Chris: I know. I think I saw friends from the business intelligence team at Blizzard where I worked, listening to this podcast. So I just want to say I don't think any of the stuff we did was lame, but I think maybe if I ever called myself data evangelists that I owe you a beer or you should backhand me or something. I don't know. Not that data is great. Just the title is just. Is kind of stupid. It's kind of cringe.

155
00:15:09,436 --> 00:15:35,076
Kayla: I do wonder if these kinds of nicknames and this focusing on pithy corporate values and whatnot are specific to what I, and I'm sure others perceive to be a rise of jargon. Like a rise in jargon. When it comes to corporate culture, there's always been jargon, obviously, but it seems to be at least getting called out more, which makes it seem like there's more. I mean, we've all heard don't be evil.

156
00:15:35,148 --> 00:15:43,056
Chris: Yeah, that was Google's slogan early on, and then they couldn't handle it, and they stopped. They're like, don't be evil. I guess we have to be evil. I don't know.

157
00:15:43,088 --> 00:15:52,544
Kayla: Be super evil. Move fast, and break things. Like, those are the slogans, and you're hearing jargon like, let me download this, which I hate.

158
00:15:52,672 --> 00:15:53,616
Chris: Let me circle back.

159
00:15:53,688 --> 00:16:02,768
Kayla: Let's circle back. Let's sync up whatever. People make fun of it all the time. I don't need to get into it. But what I heard recently on TikTok was, let's double click into this.

160
00:16:02,864 --> 00:16:03,540
Chris: Ew.

161
00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:06,340
Kayla: Can you think of anything worse than that?

162
00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:08,672
Chris: But I also totally get it.

163
00:16:08,696 --> 00:16:09,388
Kayla: I get it.

164
00:16:09,504 --> 00:16:10,236
Chris: Totally get it.

165
00:16:10,268 --> 00:16:30,628
Kayla: I actually. I should try and find this TikTok that I was watching because it was talking about how corporate, this, like, rising corporate jargon has actually, like, sapped our words of all meaning. When we just. When everything is replaced with jargon, it's actually becoming more and more difficult to communicate with each other. And I kind of can see that. I kind of can see that. Yeah.

166
00:16:30,644 --> 00:16:32,524
Chris: Let's circle back on the deliverables after we.

167
00:16:32,572 --> 00:16:33,084
Kayla: Oh, God.

168
00:16:33,172 --> 00:16:42,624
Chris: Explore some of the synergies here. Now, are you. Are you responsible, or are you accountable for this project? Do you know what a racy matrix is, Kayla?

169
00:16:42,792 --> 00:16:47,888
Kayla: I feel like two weeks ago, I was yelling at you about how much I hate the term deliverables.

170
00:16:47,984 --> 00:16:58,216
Chris: Yeah, I actually don't hate deliverables. That's, like, one of the ones I don't hate, because it's like, that's a word that cuts through some of the bullshit to say, like, okay, what am I actually doing here?

171
00:16:58,248 --> 00:16:59,208
Kayla: Right, right.

172
00:16:59,384 --> 00:17:09,162
Chris: Here's a big email thread. A bunch of people are sort of, like, expressing some vague desires into the ethereum. What is the deliverable? What is the piece of paper I'm putting on your fucking desk?

173
00:17:09,226 --> 00:17:12,945
Kayla: Deliverables is good. I just have seen it abused so badly.

174
00:17:12,978 --> 00:17:14,874
Chris: Oh, yeah. Have you heard of Rac matrix?

175
00:17:14,922 --> 00:17:15,490
Kayla: No.

176
00:17:15,650 --> 00:17:16,762
Chris: Raci.

177
00:17:16,906 --> 00:17:17,425
Kayla: No.

178
00:17:17,538 --> 00:17:40,272
Chris: Responsible. Accountable. Consulted. Consulted. What's the I? I forget what the I is ignored. Oh, informed. Yeah, actually, yes. So if you're responsible, it means you're actually responsible for. That's like, you're doing the labor. Accountable means you're, like, the project sponsor. So, like, if it goes wrong, you're the person that you yell at. Yeah.

179
00:17:40,336 --> 00:17:41,448
Kayla: The person's the boss.

180
00:17:41,544 --> 00:17:41,872
Chris: Right.

181
00:17:41,936 --> 00:17:44,080
Kayla: Person's the peon, sort of.

182
00:17:44,160 --> 00:18:03,272
Chris: And then c is consulted. And that means, like, hey, I need some help on how to do this code. Can you tell me how to do it? And then informed is like, hey, Steve, we're doing this thing. Just so you're aware, that's, like, a whole thing. Racy matrix. It's to, like, help figure out, like, who the stakeholders in a project are.

183
00:18:03,336 --> 00:18:04,580
Kayla: I hope it's helpful.

184
00:18:05,230 --> 00:18:06,926
Chris: Does that even relate back to the show?

185
00:18:07,038 --> 00:18:07,422
Kayla: Yes.

186
00:18:07,486 --> 00:18:08,526
Chris: Oh, because you were talking about jargon.

187
00:18:08,558 --> 00:18:08,766
Kayla: Yes.

188
00:18:08,798 --> 00:18:09,654
Chris: Yeah, yeah.

189
00:18:09,822 --> 00:18:32,850
Kayla: Yes. No, you were talking about jargon. And for the jargon, like, you're trying to facilitate communication. Right. And for the nicknames, you're trying to facilitate, like, a shared identity. Right, right. It sounds nice. You want to have a shared identity. It also sounds culty.

190
00:18:33,190 --> 00:18:35,926
Chris: What would we call ourselves? Culters? Weirders.

191
00:18:35,958 --> 00:18:37,342
Kayla: I don't think we should call ourselves anything.

192
00:18:37,406 --> 00:18:38,078
Chris: Cudgel woo words.

193
00:18:38,094 --> 00:18:48,910
Kayla: I don't think that we should. Not. To me, it's culty to say, you're a googler. You're not a googler. You're an employee. You're a person with an identity outside of your job.

194
00:18:49,030 --> 00:18:50,214
Chris: Kayla, we're a family.

195
00:18:50,302 --> 00:19:00,312
Kayla: No. Hold that thought. Trying to conflate your employees whole identity with their job function feels kind of weird and messed up when you think about it.

196
00:19:00,416 --> 00:19:03,584
Chris: Yeah, I don't even have to think about it very hard. That feels very messed up.

197
00:19:03,632 --> 00:19:28,976
Kayla: As the economist article points out, it could be a red flag that you are working at a cult company to double click into the issue of nicknames, similar trope stripping workers of their identities. The New York Times reported that some Facebook employees reacted to the new metamates name and coinciding corporate value slogans as having, quote unquote, military inspiration or making workers feel like, quote, a cog in the machine. So.

198
00:19:29,048 --> 00:19:35,368
Chris: Yeah, yeah. You know what's funny? Like, we're talking about all the companies we're mentioning here are like tech companies.

199
00:19:35,504 --> 00:19:35,928
Kayla: Yeah.

200
00:19:35,984 --> 00:19:37,592
Chris: They're like all Silicon Valley companies.

201
00:19:37,696 --> 00:19:38,408
Kayla: Yeah.

202
00:19:38,584 --> 00:19:46,900
Chris: We've talked about doing just like a whole episode on Silicon Valley specific. I guess this is sort of like heavily Venn diagrams into that, though.

203
00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:49,152
Kayla: Yeah, this is that episode.

204
00:19:49,216 --> 00:19:53,416
Chris: Yeah. Cause it has so much influence on the rest of corporate culture.

205
00:19:53,488 --> 00:20:13,520
Kayla: This is that episode. We'll talk about it a little bit. Like, why that is. But yeah, this is. I don't, I hate to conflate, like, all of jobs are tech. Cause they're. Cause they're not. But that's kind of where we're at. The next criteria in the Economist article was corporate symbols.

206
00:20:15,340 --> 00:20:21,388
Chris: Actually, you know what that makes me reminds me of is our, was our third episode on the Irvine company.

207
00:20:21,404 --> 00:20:23,280
Kayla: The Irvine company. Oh, don't worry.

208
00:20:23,740 --> 00:20:29,220
Chris: Cause that was like, the question I think that our music producer asked me was like, what made you think Irvine? I'm like, honestly, it was the logo.

209
00:20:29,880 --> 00:21:05,040
Kayla: Yeah, I had a little bit of a tougher time with this one in my head. I was like, what are they talking about? And then I was like, oh, like logos. Because, yeah, we have talked about logos as symbols and as parts of ritual in past episodes. Like when we talked about the Irvine company. And this article states that, of course, things like uniforms are symbols for certain jobs, but, like, make sense for some jobs and don't necessarily carry an air of cultiness. Like, of course a firefighter is going to dress like a firefighter. You need to dress like that for the safety. Of course a referee is going to dress like a referee. Like, they need the visibility.

210
00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:10,072
Chris: But does the firefighter really have to have the exposed midriff with the six pack?

211
00:21:10,136 --> 00:21:12,336
Kayla: What's the point of being a firefighter if not that?

212
00:21:12,408 --> 00:21:13,460
Chris: I guess you're right.

213
00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:33,720
Kayla: The article also makes a good point that many companies, especially, again, modern tech or finance companies go overboard with this. So, like, think about things like corporate merchandise that are intended for employee consumption. So mugs, hoodies, t shirts, totes. Hats, pins. Like, how many corporate hoodies do you own?

214
00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:36,888
Chris: Lizard swag. I have so much Amazon swag.

215
00:21:36,944 --> 00:21:38,200
Kayla: Corporate swoody is what I said.

216
00:21:38,240 --> 00:21:40,480
Chris: Sorry, it's a sweaty.

217
00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:46,592
Kayla: You own swag hoodie. Corporate swag hoodies. Like you. I know from like places you haven't even worked actually.

218
00:21:46,616 --> 00:21:48,096
Chris: I have a Facebook hoodie just from like.

219
00:21:48,128 --> 00:21:50,120
Kayla: Yeah, you have a Facebook hoodie. You have an Amazon going and touring.

220
00:21:50,160 --> 00:21:51,088
Chris: Facebook with some friends.

221
00:21:51,144 --> 00:21:54,732
Kayla: You have an Amazon one that I stole a bunch of sort of work with.

222
00:21:54,796 --> 00:21:56,212
Chris: We worked. We partnered with Amazon.

223
00:21:56,236 --> 00:22:01,360
Kayla: I'm just saying you have a lot of corporate swag hoodies. Yeah. Yeah.

224
00:22:01,980 --> 00:22:10,940
Chris: And I think from Blizzard I have what, like five or six at least. There's like a couple from the dev teams. There's like one that's business intelligence specifically. Then there's like a blizzard one.

225
00:22:11,020 --> 00:22:13,040
Kayla: Did you ever wear them to work?

226
00:22:14,860 --> 00:22:15,680
Chris: Yes.

227
00:22:16,420 --> 00:22:30,220
Kayla: Yeah, I mean, that's kind of where I feel like it gets culty. Like, if you're working at Google and like a bunch of people around you, a bunch of googlers around you are wearing Google branded merch. Like, that's kind of weird. I don't think it's kind of weird.

228
00:22:30,380 --> 00:22:31,468
Chris: It is weird, Caleb.

229
00:22:31,524 --> 00:22:32,188
Kayla: It's really weird.

230
00:22:32,244 --> 00:22:35,756
Chris: What are you gonna do? You're gonna go search up on bing, find some new.

231
00:22:35,868 --> 00:22:41,540
Kayla: Find a bing branded hoodie? Yeah, you should wear a bing branded hoodie to your job at Google.

232
00:22:41,580 --> 00:22:42,788
Chris: That'd be baller as fuck.

233
00:22:42,884 --> 00:22:48,332
Kayla: Anyway, it goes back to the quote, like, your job. This is me quoting myself. This is me.

234
00:22:48,436 --> 00:22:50,276
Chris: This is not even great, Caitlyn.

235
00:22:50,348 --> 00:22:57,400
Kayla: I don't mean me quoting myself. I mean, like I was about to say quote, but this is just air quotes. You know, your job is the defining thing about your identity.

236
00:22:57,480 --> 00:22:58,056
Chris: Right. Right.

237
00:22:58,128 --> 00:23:16,344
Kayla: Your job is your identity. Like, I'm sure the argument from corporate relates again to the idea of shared community or, like, feeling like you're a part of something, but it feels like the flip side of that is the flattening identity and the removal of the self in favor of the Persona of worker.

238
00:23:16,472 --> 00:23:22,784
Chris: Yeah, it is a hard line toe because, like, you do want people to feel like they're deriving meaning from their work.

239
00:23:22,832 --> 00:23:23,472
Kayla: Right.

240
00:23:23,656 --> 00:23:29,216
Chris: But I. I don't know. I feel like Silicon Valley frequently takes advantage of that rather than fostering it.

241
00:23:29,248 --> 00:23:29,704
Kayla: Sure.

242
00:23:29,832 --> 00:23:50,312
Chris: You know, like, in the old world, it was like, you worked for IBM for 30 years and like, your. Your identity and meaning came from the fact that you, like, worked on, like, oh, I worked on three different projects that were super important and I've been there for 30 years and now it's like, that's not gonna happen anymore. So you kind of have to, like, force it by saying, like, you're a googler, have a t shirt.

243
00:23:50,376 --> 00:23:51,096
Kayla: Right, right.

244
00:23:51,168 --> 00:23:56,148
Chris: And you're a millennial, so you want to make a difference. Let's go make a difference. That's why all these companies are like, let's make a difference.

245
00:23:56,204 --> 00:24:02,612
Kayla: And also companies. I mean, I can't speak for every Silicon Valley company, but the time of the era of the pension is over.

246
00:24:02,756 --> 00:24:03,588
Chris: What's a pension?

247
00:24:03,644 --> 00:24:10,796
Kayla: Yeah, exactly. So, like, you can't. How do you foster loyalty from your employees when you're not going to take care of them in the long term?

248
00:24:10,868 --> 00:24:11,388
Chris: Right.

249
00:24:11,524 --> 00:24:14,080
Kayla: You. You give them a hoodie.

250
00:24:14,460 --> 00:24:15,020
Chris: Yay.

251
00:24:15,100 --> 00:24:29,080
Kayla: Hoodies make you foster a culture in which the identity is so important that it subsumes everything else. Or as the economist points out, warning signs include pulling on a company branded hoodie at the weekend.

252
00:24:29,940 --> 00:24:31,052
Chris: I've done that, too.

253
00:24:31,116 --> 00:24:33,564
Kayla: Oh, my God. I wear your Amazon hoodie all the time.

254
00:24:33,732 --> 00:24:37,916
Chris: Are we just like, why don't you guys just go watch severance, actually.

255
00:24:38,108 --> 00:24:42,100
Kayla: Oh, we will get to that, my friend.

256
00:24:42,220 --> 00:24:44,920
Chris: Okay. Brought to you by Apple.

257
00:24:47,040 --> 00:25:15,358
Kayla: How different is any of this from the shared community of alike clothing in high control groups like Heaven's Gate with their tracksuit and Nikes or the red robes or the Rajneeshis or the plain dress of the Amish? We can make a comparison in these groups. It's easy to argue that the similar clothing mandated by the group serves critically. We can stand here and go, that serves to strip the followers of individual identities in favor of being part of the shared identity of the community. It's a control tactic.

258
00:25:15,454 --> 00:25:16,110
Chris: Yeah.

259
00:25:16,270 --> 00:25:20,210
Kayla: Is it a control tactic, then, to hand out Amazon hats to your Amazonians?

260
00:25:20,750 --> 00:25:23,170
Chris: Definitely. So, definitely.

261
00:25:23,710 --> 00:25:25,054
Kayla: That's number two.

262
00:25:25,222 --> 00:25:41,816
Chris: I mean, people that come on the show, I send them a gift. We give them those thermoses, those branded cult or just weird thermoses. And yes, it's a gift, but part of it's like, ooh, that's gonna make them remember us fondly, and maybe they'll drink it at work. Their place of everything's a cult.

263
00:25:41,848 --> 00:25:44,460
Kayla: You can't give somebody a gift or else it's a cult.

264
00:25:45,480 --> 00:26:03,408
Chris: That's not what I'm saying, kayla. What I'm saying is there is a. It's not like I'm sending them like a meat basket from Omaha steaks or something, right? Like, I'm sending them branded swag for the podcast, which there is an element of self serving there. There really is. Just to admit it.

265
00:26:03,584 --> 00:26:38,670
Kayla: Here's something we don't do. This is number three on the list on the criteria. Listen, surveillance. This is something that I think has gotten worse for some jobs during the pandemic, especially office jobs that turned into work from home. Surveillance is kind of an extreme form of micromanaging. So it's keeping track of your employees every move. Some corporations use tools like mouse and keyboard trackers and alerts the boss if there hasn't been a tap on the keyboard or on the mouse for an allotted amount of time. Or there is screenshotting software that takes random shots of employees computer screens throughout the day and sends them to management.

266
00:26:40,000 --> 00:26:43,656
Chris: Fuck whoever built that, literally, you're going to hell.

267
00:26:43,728 --> 00:26:57,176
Kayla: Those are like hard surveillance. There's also softer surveillance of just status monitoring that comes when a company uses a system like slack. So slack has a color coded icon to kind of show if someone is.

268
00:26:57,288 --> 00:26:58,376
Chris: How idle they've been.

269
00:26:58,448 --> 00:27:04,580
Kayla: Yeah, if you've been idle, your circle is yellow. If you're at your computer, if you're at slack, your circle is greenhouse.

270
00:27:05,870 --> 00:27:09,542
Chris: This is giving me anxiety, as you know. I'm sorry. I'm, like, freaking out here.

271
00:27:09,566 --> 00:27:37,006
Kayla: Now, many office workers have talked about this, like, soft surveillance phenomenon during the work from home period of the pandemic in which managers will hound them about their status colors throughout the day, letting it like, oh, why were you yellow for an hour and a half during lunch? Your lunch is an hour. Like that kind of thing, which serves to communicate to the employee, like, you are constantly being watched. My job as a manager is simply to watch you do your job even when you are not in the office.

272
00:27:37,118 --> 00:28:18,980
Chris: Can't even tell you how much I hate that. I viscerally hate that. And you know what else is fucked up? And maybe you're gonna mention something about this, but, like, we, most of us are knowledge workers. Like, we're not working in a coal mine where it's like, you mine x amount of coal per hour. Therefore, we want you down there for 7 hours. This is like knowledge work. It comes in fits and starts and, you know, there's points when you're in flow and points when you're not. And so, like, I just, I don't understand. Like, it's just such a mismatch between, like, management style, which is, like, the most positive way I can refer to that mismatch of management style when it. You know what it really should be about Kayla? Deliverables.

273
00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:44,240
Kayla: Okay, I'm gonna skip right past that and say it feels like the extreme micro management of. Of non office jobs coming into the office. So it makes me think of, like, how Amazon drivers, like, are having every mile monitored and, like, cannot stop because they. To even go pee because they're, you know, the package. The amount of packages are, like, constantly logged and monitored.

274
00:28:44,320 --> 00:28:48,440
Chris: Kayla, if you want to pee, you can get this Amazon swag colostomy bag. Okay.

275
00:28:48,480 --> 00:29:32,264
Kayla: It's branded this Amazon water bottle that serves as a water bottle. And then your bathroom. Or again, to talk about Amazon, the warehouse floor workers are heavily monitored. Like, you cannot take bathroom breaks. You cannot do x, y, and z. I've heard the bathroom breaks thing come up a lot in talking about warehouse work or food services where managers are monitoring how long employees are going to the bathroom. And it's like that. So it's taking that extreme micromanagement and moving it into and adapting it for a work from home job, which I don't know who thinks any of these are good ideas? People are dying on Amazon warehouse floors because of these practices.

276
00:29:32,432 --> 00:29:34,336
Chris: You didn't tell me I was gonna need a stress ball for this episode.

277
00:29:34,368 --> 00:29:45,204
Kayla: Sorry. I did the research. It's funny that you are, like, sitting there stressed out because the next thing I say is, this level of surveillance is crazy making.

278
00:29:45,392 --> 00:29:46,200
Chris: Yeah.

279
00:29:46,580 --> 00:30:24,278
Kayla: How can somebody feel like they are being trusted to do their job if there's somebody constantly looking over your shoulder? How can you feel safe and secure in your life if every trip to the bathroom might be met with somebody standing out there with a stopwatch being like, where are you? Either sending you a message or being like, TikTok. TikTok. This is simply a high control tactic. It's not good management. It breeds paranoia. It makes me think about the peer monitoring system that was present in things like twin flames universe, where members were encouraged to observe and snitch on other members if they were doing the wrong things.

280
00:30:24,414 --> 00:30:31,758
Chris: Yeah. If you're on social media during company time, that's theft and you should report it.

281
00:30:31,854 --> 00:30:37,030
Kayla: Even though time theft from employees is a way bigger problem.

282
00:30:37,150 --> 00:30:39,090
Chris: Oh, yeah, way huge.

283
00:30:39,590 --> 00:30:40,410
Kayla: Huge.

284
00:30:40,910 --> 00:30:45,046
Chris: You know, I just. I get very, and by definitely mean.

285
00:30:45,078 --> 00:30:48,718
Kayla: Not paying workers, like, overtime that they are duly owed.

286
00:30:48,774 --> 00:31:06,726
Chris: Right. The thing that really grinds my. The thing that really boils my pickle about this whole thing is that I don't like who thinks the research is done. Like, yeah, there's tons of literature out there.

287
00:31:06,758 --> 00:31:08,286
Kayla: Like, this is not good for anyone.

288
00:31:08,358 --> 00:31:28,224
Chris: Literally, this is a known. Like, this is a studied thing. Like, we have heavily studied this because people really do give a shit about productivity. And, like, everything points to, like, people need agency and autonomy, and they need to feel invested in their. Like, all of this is, like, literally counterproductive, like, in the most literal sense of that word.

289
00:31:28,272 --> 00:31:28,860
Kayla: Right.

290
00:31:30,520 --> 00:31:33,160
Chris: It just. I don't. I don't get it.

291
00:31:33,240 --> 00:32:22,562
Kayla: I don't get it. But that's why. I mean, I. Here's me going out on a limb and saying, like, did not common sense. Like, the being counter to sense and common sense is kind of what makes it feel cult adjacent, because it's like, it's in that arena of, like, applied insanity. Like, you're. We say we want high productivity, and then we actively employ managers or empower managers who are encouraged to use tactics that stifle productivity, let alone the morality of it, let alone the morality of working warehouse employees to the bone and not letting servers take longer than five minutes in the bathroom or having somebody literally monitoring your slack away symbol. I don't know.

292
00:32:22,666 --> 00:32:23,954
Chris: It's very puzzling.

293
00:32:24,042 --> 00:32:24,810
Kayla: It's very puzzling.

294
00:32:24,850 --> 00:32:32,340
Chris: But you're right. I think that part of it that also makes it feel cultier is the. Like, this isn't even good for you.

295
00:32:32,760 --> 00:33:02,200
Kayla: Well, it feels like the importance is put on instilling fear in the employee. And that's what makes me think of the fear of being watched like a hawk. And every move that you make is observed and can and will be used against you. We see that in twin flames universe. We see that in Scientology and NXivm and the Amish. And that can make it difficult for people to leave cult like groups. So maybe it's that installation of fear that becomes the priority.

296
00:33:02,500 --> 00:33:07,676
Chris: Yeah, right. Maybe it's less about the productivity and more about the chains, which is kind.

297
00:33:07,708 --> 00:33:54,820
Kayla: Of what backfired in the pandemic, specifically with these, what you refer to as knowledge jobs or office work or white collar jobs, where people have the ability to leave those jobs. When we're talking about the more exploited labor class and we're talking about retail food service, warehouse work, a lot of those folks are not empowered to move on to other jobs, whereas you go a class up to, you know, you and I sitting in our chairs at home, we can make the choice to go, you know what? Fuck this company. I'm going to go somewhere else. Like, this kind of surveillance feels like it can quickly lead to burnout and, like, create negative feelings and resentment towards your employer. Like, it's a good way to get people to quit. And we've seen that because now we're seeing headlines about, like, the great resignation.

298
00:33:55,310 --> 00:33:59,438
Kayla: And that's because people are fucking pissed off and fed up, because it's not a good way to work.

299
00:33:59,574 --> 00:34:12,510
Chris: Yeah. So you just reminded me of something that a friend of ours sent us a while back. This feels like its own little maybe Patreon topic. We'll see. But above the API versus below the API.

300
00:34:12,630 --> 00:34:13,254
Kayla: Ooh, interesting.

301
00:34:13,302 --> 00:34:13,893
Chris: Do you remember that?

302
00:34:13,942 --> 00:34:14,174
Kayla: No.

303
00:34:14,222 --> 00:34:29,882
Chris: That little article lit thing. Basically the idea, it comes from the entertainment speak of above the line. Below the line where above the line are like the actors and the director, and below the line are like your more labor intensive folks, the grip and.

304
00:34:29,906 --> 00:34:33,626
Kayla: The cinematographer and the electricians and the makeup and the hair.

305
00:34:33,737 --> 00:35:07,986
Chris: Yeah. So API is a programming term, means application programming interface. So it's basically just a way for, like, one program to talk to each other. To talk to another one. That's not really important for this. What's important is that it's above the API means you are essentially. What it breaks down to is, are you telling the computer what to do or is the computer telling you what to do? If you're telling the computer what to do, you're above the API and you're making bank and you're a knowledge worker that can move around like you were talking about and can afford to, you know, throw your weight around. If you're below the API, you're being told what to do by computers and you are a lot less marketable.

306
00:35:08,018 --> 00:35:15,190
Chris: And so there's this vast divide between, like, it basically means, like, are you coding or the coding? Or is the code telling you what to do?

307
00:35:16,170 --> 00:35:17,430
Kayla: Fuck the code.

308
00:35:17,850 --> 00:35:19,230
Chris: Fuck the algos.

309
00:35:19,680 --> 00:35:23,660
Kayla: Okay, the next one is a good one. Rituals.

310
00:35:24,480 --> 00:35:26,720
Chris: I've heard this criteria.

311
00:35:26,840 --> 00:35:52,520
Kayla: Companies will often create, encourage, and perpetuate rituals as forms of team building or morale boosting. And to do something called. Or what I'm referring to is corporate culture formation. Some examples cited in the article are, like, badges and awards handed out to employees for recognition of various forms of achievement. So think of, you know, employee of the month photos or when you got your sword from working at Blizzard for five years.

312
00:35:52,560 --> 00:35:53,608
Chris: I love my sword.

313
00:35:53,784 --> 00:35:56,368
Kayla: Your sword is. I can literally look at it right now and I love it so much.

314
00:35:56,424 --> 00:36:02,592
Chris: Literally. People, like, their career paths are altered by this fucking sword. And the shield. The shield. The ten year shield.

315
00:36:02,696 --> 00:36:03,080
Kayla: Right?

316
00:36:03,160 --> 00:36:11,720
Chris: Like people. Absolutely. I've heard multiple stories where people are like, well, I kind of want to look for another job, but I'm getting my sword in seven months, so I'm just gonna hang on for that.

317
00:36:11,800 --> 00:36:12,160
Kayla: Sure.

318
00:36:12,240 --> 00:36:20,024
Chris: And then I'm like, it's like seven months of, like, massive salary difference and change in your life's trajectory. But you're like, I want the sword.

319
00:36:20,112 --> 00:36:21,140
Kayla: Right? Right.

320
00:36:22,240 --> 00:36:27,048
Chris: And it's not even wrong. It's like, that's not a wrong choice, but it's really interesting.

321
00:36:27,184 --> 00:36:59,358
Kayla: Walmart has a company cheer that employees are supposed to yell or chant before they start their day and even think about doing things like birthday cakes for employee birthdays or when the ladies of selling sunset ring the big office bell when they sell a house. There's also companies that do company wide retreats, like the talent agency. CAA. I think it's CAA. They might all do it. I don't know. Historically have these big company retreats where they go and do team building exercises and have lectures and bond together, or there's family picnic days.

322
00:36:59,454 --> 00:37:00,438
Chris: Trust falls.

323
00:37:00,534 --> 00:37:08,530
Kayla: I don't mean to say that every activity a company might put together or encourage is a ritual, but also. Yeah, I kind of do. I kind of do mean that.

324
00:37:09,730 --> 00:37:15,546
Chris: The last two things you said, I kind of feel like company picnic is more or less fine, especially if it's optional.

325
00:37:15,578 --> 00:37:16,722
Kayla: Fine doesn't mean it's not a ritual.

326
00:37:16,786 --> 00:37:17,842
Chris: Especially if it's optional.

327
00:37:17,986 --> 00:37:19,610
Kayla: Fine doesn't mean it's a ritual.

328
00:37:19,770 --> 00:37:39,324
Chris: But I think. Okay, so I'd say that's. That's, like, low ritual content, whereas the. Like, these retreats, I feel like, tend to be very high ritual content because you get these, like, that's where you get the motivational speakers on the workshops and the Kohl's and the. And that's, like, literally every time you see a documentary about this bullshit, they always have this, like, wework had that.

329
00:37:39,402 --> 00:37:43,120
Kayla: Beyond CM had that. And then you, like, have to stab a nail through your hand.

330
00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:44,560
Chris: Right. All the mlms have that.

331
00:37:44,600 --> 00:37:45,280
Kayla: You can handle it.

332
00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:46,300
Chris: Yeah. Yeah.

333
00:37:46,920 --> 00:38:08,210
Kayla: I mean, we know that from doing this show that rituals are everywhere. And, like, almost any activity can really tip over into that bucket, given the right context. So, I mean, I love a good weekly happy hour or bagel Friday, or, like, a company outing to the movies or axe throwing or bowling, but, like, in the right context, axe throwing.

334
00:38:08,250 --> 00:38:09,074
Chris: That sounds dangerous.

335
00:38:09,122 --> 00:38:12,658
Kayla: Yeah. And not axe bowling. Axe throwing and bowling.

336
00:38:12,834 --> 00:38:14,082
Chris: Did we just invent a new spirit?

337
00:38:14,106 --> 00:38:54,026
Kayla: Oh, my God. Were you throwing axe at the pins? I play that. Those can fall under the label of ritual, especially if their intent is to strengthen corporate culture at the sacrifice of the individual identity. I even found a research paper written by two Stanford researchers named F. Cursat Ozink and Margaret Hagen titled ritual crafting team rituals for meaningful organizational change. That claimed, quote, this research shows that organizational rituals are most desired for increasing creativity, resilience, and cohesion among team members. It also shows that a ritual design framework can allow for organic, democratic culture building.

338
00:38:54,218 --> 00:38:56,202
Chris: So it's like, should we be doing a culture?

339
00:38:56,226 --> 00:39:15,192
Kayla: Just weird ritual if we want to culture build democratically. Jargon, jargon. But does that make the presence of rituals at your company culty? Well, look, I mean, maybe not, but yes. If you worked at IBM in 1937, then definitely, yes.

340
00:39:15,296 --> 00:39:15,672
Chris: Sorry.

341
00:39:15,736 --> 00:39:19,392
Kayla: Because apparently IBM had a songbook, so.

342
00:39:19,416 --> 00:39:23,168
Chris: Wait, so IBM had their doors open in 1930. What did you say?

343
00:39:24,416 --> 00:39:26,564
Kayla: The company was founded in 1911.

344
00:39:26,752 --> 00:39:28,160
Chris: Get out of here.

345
00:39:28,500 --> 00:39:29,092
Kayla: I know.

346
00:39:29,156 --> 00:39:30,692
Chris: They hadn't invented computers then.

347
00:39:30,716 --> 00:39:34,836
Kayla: What, were building punch cards. And. They did a lot of punch cards and stuff like that. Punch cards.

348
00:39:35,028 --> 00:39:36,316
Chris: And then they became IBM.

349
00:39:36,388 --> 00:40:20,030
Kayla: Yeah. All right, so they had this songbook. It was published ten years before, so it was originally published in 1927. And I think it was around. I think it was around for a while. The copy I found online was from an updated 37 edition. And it opens with this for 37 years, which. That's not true. The gatherings and conventions of our IBM workers have expressed in happy songs the fine spirit of loyal cooperation and Good Fellowship, which has promoted the signal success of our great IBM Corporation in its truly international service for the betterment of business and benefit to mankind, an appreciation of the able and inspiring leadership of beloved President Mister Thomas J.

350
00:40:20,070 --> 00:40:41,190
Kayla: Watson, and our unmatchable staff of IBM executives, and in recognition of the noble aims and purposes of our international service and products, this 1937 edition of IBM Songs solicits your vocal approval by hearty cooperation in our songfests at our conventions and fellowship gatherings. End quote. Okay, so cold, cold.

351
00:40:41,310 --> 00:40:45,574
Chris: I can see why communism was making a lot of headway during this time.

352
00:40:45,662 --> 00:41:15,746
Kayla: Well, I read from. I read this ars technica article about it by writer Hutchinson, and he explained that this fierce loyalty probably had to do with the fact that this was during the Great Depression, and people actually were maybe very grateful for these jobs and actually did feel a really intense sense of loyalty, but, yeah, also communist. But, I mean, were super anti communist at the time. This was like the first. I guess I can't say it's the first red scare, but there was a red scare happening at the time.

353
00:41:15,898 --> 00:41:33,750
Chris: Yeah, I mean, but that's the thing. It's always like, there's. There's never like a. We were this, right? It's like there were people here that were kind of. There was an american communist party, and then there was like a communist scare party who was like the, you know, probably Republicans. I don't even remember. But it's always, you know, there's always multiple elements.

354
00:41:35,370 --> 00:42:13,326
Kayla: So this writer, Lee Hutcheson, describes the songbook like this. The 1937 edition of the songbook is a 54 page monument to glassy eyed corporate inhumanity, with every page overflowing with trite praise to the company with capitals and its men with capitals. The booklet. The booklet reads like a terrible parody of a hymnal, one that praises not the traditional christian trinity, but the new corporate triumvirate of IBM, the father, Thomas J. Watson, the son, and american entrepreneurship as the Holy Spirit. So remember how you mentioned severance earlier? Tell me this does not feel like severance. Because if you haven't watched severance yet, go watch severance on Apple TV.

355
00:42:13,358 --> 00:42:14,304
Chris: And also. Spoiler alert.

356
00:42:14,382 --> 00:42:37,740
Kayla: Spoiler alert. I mean, this. I'm not going to get into too much of a spoiler, but they treat the company handbook as if it is like religious text. Yeah, religious text, gospel text. Like that is what they treat it like. And this felt very similar. Obviously, this is not the company handbook. Yeah, but it is a company songbook. And like, when you go through it's. Okay. First of all, it starts with my country. Tis of thee and the Star Spangled Banner. Because.

357
00:42:37,860 --> 00:42:40,018
Chris: Yeah. Rah rah. Patriotism, naturally. Yeah.

358
00:42:40,164 --> 00:42:45,918
Kayla: And then it moves on to ever onward the IBM rally song. And I'm just gonna read you all of the lyrics.

359
00:42:45,974 --> 00:42:46,742
Chris: I don't think that.

360
00:42:46,766 --> 00:43:17,750
Kayla: A wish I knew. I wish I knew the tune. So this is ever onward IBM rally song written especially for the international Business Machines Corporation. There's a thrill in store for all for we're about toast the corporation that we represent. We're here to cheer each pioneer and also proudly boast of that man of men, our sterling president. The name of TJ Watson means a courage none can stem. And we feel honored to be here toast the IBM in the choruses.

361
00:43:17,870 --> 00:44:00,112
Kayla: Ever onward, ever onward that's the spirit that has brought us fame where big but bigger we will be we can't fail for all can see that to serve humanity has been our aim our products now are known in every zone our reputation sparkles like a gemdez we've fought our way through and new fields we're sure to conquer too for the ever onward IBM second chorus ever onward we're bound for the top to never fall right here and now we thankfully pledge sincerest loyalty to the corporation that's the best of all. To the best of all our leaders we revere. And while we're here, let's show the world just what we think of them. So let us sing men once or twice, then sing again for the ever onward.

362
00:44:00,256 --> 00:44:02,720
Chris: IBM, could you do, like, a rap version of that?

363
00:44:02,800 --> 00:44:03,752
Kayla: I could not.

364
00:44:03,896 --> 00:44:04,320
Chris: Okay.

365
00:44:04,360 --> 00:44:05,744
Kayla: But somebody maybe could.

366
00:44:05,832 --> 00:44:14,112
Chris: Somebody probably could, I'm sure. Yeah. And it definitely feels like it's not just the good book, it's also the reverence to the founder.

367
00:44:14,216 --> 00:44:16,152
Kayla: Oh, guess what happens after that.

368
00:44:16,176 --> 00:44:17,960
Chris: That is some weird ass shit, man.

369
00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:24,744
Kayla: After this song, there are half a dozen songs dedicated specifically to praising Thomas J. Watson himself.

370
00:44:24,872 --> 00:44:28,448
Chris: Like, that's literally what we do in church. Like, catholic church.

371
00:44:28,504 --> 00:45:09,058
Kayla: It's like he's a deity. And, like, they're set to tunes like auld lang syne, like other popular tunes, and it then continues in that fashion. So there's songs then praising various high level corporate officers in the company at the time, and then there's songs specifically praising the various departments of the company. Okay, so you've got gems like, Thomas Watson is our inspiration, head and soul of our splendid IBM. We are pledged to him in every nation. Our president and most beloved man. His wisdom has guided each division in service to all humanity. We have grown and broadened with his vision. None can match him or our great company. TJ Watson, we honor you. You're so big and so square and so true. We will follow and serve with you forever. All the world we must know.

372
00:45:09,114 --> 00:45:11,310
Kayla: All the world must know what IBM can do.

373
00:45:11,810 --> 00:45:22,522
Chris: Again, that literally sounds like a catholic hymn of praise. Yeah, that's. Why do they have this? Why does IBM have, I don't know, a hymnal?

374
00:45:22,586 --> 00:45:32,522
Kayla: It was a thing. And there's a lot of songs. I mean, it's 54 pages, and, like, I could go on and on and on again. Like, it's. It's intense.

375
00:45:32,586 --> 00:45:36,066
Chris: But, like, here's the bonus content. We are gonna sing one of these songs for you guys.

376
00:45:36,138 --> 00:45:54,850
Kayla: Oh, yeah. Because it tells you what tune the songs are. And I'm gonna link to the songbook and the Ars Technica article about the songbook so that you can go through and read this for yourself, because it is a lot. And this is a song. So this is for employees to get together and sing with each other at events and gatherings.

377
00:45:55,590 --> 00:45:59,326
Chris: I'm sure they spontaneously want to sing praise to the company founder.

378
00:45:59,398 --> 00:46:06,654
Kayla: As the economist article says, if you are regularly chanting, it becomes sinister. So, number five on the list.

379
00:46:06,822 --> 00:46:08,246
Chris: Sorry, what were the first four again?

380
00:46:08,358 --> 00:46:12,250
Kayla: I don't know, workforce nicknames?

381
00:46:12,390 --> 00:46:14,002
Chris: So that's, like, googlers and stuff.

382
00:46:14,106 --> 00:46:15,386
Kayla: Corporate symbols.

383
00:46:15,538 --> 00:46:17,346
Chris: Right? Okay. Logos and that. Okay.

384
00:46:17,418 --> 00:46:18,338
Kayla: Surveillance.

385
00:46:18,514 --> 00:46:19,730
Chris: Right. Surveillance. Right.

386
00:46:19,770 --> 00:46:20,482
Kayla: Rituals.

387
00:46:20,586 --> 00:46:21,690
Chris: That's the one we just talked about.

388
00:46:21,770 --> 00:46:40,418
Kayla: And now we are at doctrines, which we basically already covered when we had the discussion about workforce nicknames. Okay, so again, think about like, the updated metaverse company values, which Mark Zuckerberg called the company's cultural operating system. Like, quote, cultural operation system.

389
00:46:40,594 --> 00:46:41,298
Chris: Good God.

390
00:46:41,354 --> 00:46:42,362
Kayla: Cultural os.

391
00:46:42,506 --> 00:46:44,338
Chris: Mark, we know that you're not a human.

392
00:46:44,434 --> 00:46:52,226
Kayla: We know he's a robot lizard. Amazon has their 16 leadership principles, which include pee in bottles so you don't have to stop driving or working.

393
00:46:52,258 --> 00:46:52,914
Chris: It's a good leadership principle.

394
00:46:52,922 --> 00:47:03,538
Kayla: Or die on the floor. No, actually, sorry. Those are the applied company values. What they say their values are things like customer obsession or strive to be the earth's best employer.

395
00:47:03,634 --> 00:47:05,242
Chris: I've heard of customer obsession for them.

396
00:47:05,306 --> 00:47:19,130
Kayla: Leaders are right a lot. Like, that's one of them. It's technically, it's are right a lot because I think they realized you can't say leaders are right a lot, but it's are right a lot. And then when you read what it's about, it's like leaders are often right.

397
00:47:19,990 --> 00:47:20,890
Chris: Okay.

398
00:47:21,310 --> 00:47:27,450
Kayla: The Economist puts it succinctly. If values are treated like scripture, you are in cult territory.

399
00:47:29,350 --> 00:47:31,702
Chris: And Blizzard had eight core values.

400
00:47:31,806 --> 00:47:48,430
Kayla: I think that a lot of companies have this, and I don't think it's wrong, but I think, yeah, that one's tough. Kind of a red flag when you're Facebook and you have to roll out a whole big thing of, like, you're changing your corporate values. Like, who gives a fuck?

401
00:47:49,050 --> 00:47:49,546
Chris: Yeah.

402
00:47:49,618 --> 00:47:56,778
Kayla: And like, Amazon, like, what the. You're really saying that, like, you strive to be Earth's best employer when you're union busting. Like, it doesn't mean anything.

403
00:47:56,874 --> 00:47:57,370
Chris: Right?

404
00:47:57,490 --> 00:47:58,082
Kayla: It's cover.

405
00:47:58,146 --> 00:47:58,346
Chris: Right?

406
00:47:58,378 --> 00:48:01,610
Kayla: Like, you're providing cover for your shitty tactics.

407
00:48:01,690 --> 00:48:20,280
Chris: Yeah, I mean, Blizzard's run into some of that stuff too with, like, some of their values didn't necessarily align with what was going on. And I won't, like, go into all that now. But, you know, but then some of them were good too. Like, so I think that, you know, the one that was cited most often was the, you know, the first core value, which is gameplay first.

408
00:48:20,360 --> 00:48:20,912
Kayla: Right.

409
00:48:21,056 --> 00:48:48,058
Chris: And that was frequently cited as sort of like a justification for, you know, what we should be working on. What's the priority? Like, why is it important if we do X or Y? And, you know, if x meant better gameplay, then we would try to do X instead of Y. Right? So I think that in terms of, like, getting people on the same page about stuff, sure, maybe some of that's okay. But I also think we probably could have gotten away with just that one core value. Right.

410
00:48:48,154 --> 00:48:56,314
Kayla: So when you get to, like, eight and 16, I'm kind of like you guys. The scope is too big and not focused enough. And I don't even know what your company is anymore.

411
00:48:56,402 --> 00:49:17,192
Chris: Yeah, yeah. And, like, I could probably name, like, six or seven out of the eight now still, but, yeah. I don't know. I don't know. It's hard, I think, just to kind of go back to what I was saying. If it's something that it kind of helps people align on a goal, and that's probably not a bad idea, but then once it gets out of hand, then it starts becoming red flaggy.

412
00:49:17,296 --> 00:49:24,408
Kayla: I think that's the takeaway for most of these, is that when it starts to be, like. When it starts to be too much.

413
00:49:24,584 --> 00:49:24,920
Chris: Right.

414
00:49:24,960 --> 00:49:34,906
Kayla: Not good. So last but not least on this criteria, listen, I've got everyone's favorite word when it comes to the workplace, the f word. Family.

415
00:49:34,978 --> 00:49:35,830
Chris: Fuck off.

416
00:49:36,250 --> 00:49:47,394
Kayla: Family. Which, yeah, fuck off. Do I even need to expand on this? If your company constantly calls itself a family, or says, we treat each other like a family, or we're one big family, just be prepared for a shit show.

417
00:49:47,442 --> 00:49:49,330
Chris: Like, unless you're Dominic Toretto, then it's okay.

418
00:49:49,370 --> 00:49:51,466
Kayla: That's not a job. It's them pulling a job.

419
00:49:51,578 --> 00:49:52,882
Chris: Yeah, it's jobs every day.

420
00:49:52,906 --> 00:49:58,266
Kayla: But it's a family doing a job, not, I'm the boss of the store and you're my family.

421
00:49:58,378 --> 00:49:59,266
Chris: We're family.

422
00:49:59,418 --> 00:50:46,530
Kayla: It's my opinion, and I am not alone in this, that pulling the family card in a company setting means that employees can just look forward toxicity. Like, it is a way to emotionally manipulate underground workers to dedicate more of their precious time and mind space to an organization that's, like, probably underpaying them and, like, exploiting the fruit of that manipulation. So don't use it. Don't do it. The Economist also points out that it is a manipulation tactic to engender loyalty. Research conducted in 2019 into the motivations of whistleblowers found that loyalty to an organization was associated with people failing to report unethical behavior. And the defining characteristic of families is that you never leave, end quote. So it's like, if you're more like, this is a family, you might sweep things under the rug because.

423
00:50:46,650 --> 00:50:47,218
Chris: Right.

424
00:50:47,354 --> 00:51:12,950
Kayla: That complicates boundaries, and you may feel unable to extricate yourself, because, like, how do you leave a family? Now, think about how many cults have also used the word family like this. The Manson family, the australian doomsday cult. The family. The family International, a christian cult originally known as the children of God. There's many others. It's. It's. It's a bad sign.

425
00:51:13,410 --> 00:51:22,906
Chris: Yeah, it's not good. And, like, you know, I think even if you don't have family in your title, there's often, like, a brother and sister nomenclature within.

426
00:51:22,978 --> 00:51:24,346
Kayla: You know, like weird mom and dad.

427
00:51:24,378 --> 00:51:28,682
Chris: These are all my brothers. And I kind of think of the leader as sort of like our dad.

428
00:51:28,746 --> 00:52:19,882
Kayla: Yeah. Yeah, that's. Now, we've probably all worked for companies at one time or another that referred to themselves as families. And we've probably all got a handful of fucked up stories from working at those companies. So if you're an employer, stop calling your workplace a family. Especially if you require your employees to do, like, two jobs for the price of one. Or you want them to, like, be on call after work hours or cover shifts themselves, or at the last minute, or participate. Or participate in exploitive workplace events like weight loss challenges or potlucks. Like, if you're using the word family to get people to be more like, pliable to doing these things, fuck you. And if you work at the place like this, I'm sorry.

429
00:52:19,986 --> 00:52:26,870
Kayla: I hope you can find a new job soon where you have defined hours and can turn off your phone and hire managers who don't run things lean.

430
00:52:28,330 --> 00:52:32,914
Chris: I simply would recommend not emotionally manipulating the people that work for you.

431
00:52:32,962 --> 00:53:21,108
Kayla: That would be good. That would be good. The Economist article ends with a handy evaluation tool that goes like, if none of the above resonates, rest easy. You are not an occult, but you are unemployed. If you recognize your own situation and up to three items on this list, you are in an ordinary workplace. If you tick four or five boxes, you should worry, but not yet panic. You may just be working in technology or with Americans and losing your sense of self may be it for the stock options. If you recognize yourself in all six items, you need to plan an escape and then write a memoir. Now, of course, this article is somewhat tongue in cheek, but like, only somewhat. That little, like, bit at the end of like, you're just. You're. You're not.

432
00:53:21,124 --> 00:53:28,412
Kayla: You're unemployed or you work in an ordinary workplace, or you're working in tech or with Americans. Like, that's. Yes, it's tongue in cheek, but also, it's not.

433
00:53:28,556 --> 00:53:33,076
Chris: That's why it's that's why it's funny. It's funny because we're all like, that's me. Oh, God.

434
00:53:33,108 --> 00:53:34,182
Kayla: Right, right.

435
00:53:34,326 --> 00:53:37,238
Chris: Oh, but it's. It's actually not funny, is it?

436
00:53:37,254 --> 00:53:59,094
Kayla: It's funny. It's serious. As we talked about while going through this criteria, these things are all red flags that you're working for an organization employing tactics similar to high control groups. And the unfortunate reality is that companies like this are probably far more common than they're not. I'm saying probably just, like, cover my own ass. I would. Gun to my head, I would say way more companies are like this than are not.

437
00:53:59,182 --> 00:54:00,368
Chris: Yeah. Oh, yeah.

438
00:54:00,464 --> 00:54:45,956
Kayla: It just seems to be rampant in corporate culture these days. And you and I, you kind of hit on this earlier. Like, I'm saying, this is probably thanks to the outsized influence of the tech industry on corporate culture as a whole, because, like you said, they're so influential. And tech companies seem to be very prone to cult like operations, to a recruiting, like, cult prone people, and then creating a cult like environment. Maybe it's also a natural byproduct of just, like, entrepreneurship and capitalism. Like, it makes me think about when we. We've watched those. Those documentaries, like, the WeWork documentary or the inventor about Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, or even, like, the Fyre Fest documentaries. So much of what goes on in these stories, like, it presented as big and crazy and, like, holy shit.

439
00:54:45,988 --> 00:54:49,100
Kayla: Can you ever imagine, like, being asked to suck a dick to keep your job?

440
00:54:49,140 --> 00:54:56,640
Chris: Like, literally what happened in the Fyre Fest doc, by the way, I don't know actual reference, but when you really.

441
00:54:56,720 --> 00:55:16,376
Kayla: Drill down to what's going on, it's a charismatic leader building a dream based on promises, hoping that they can expand big enough to actually reach said dream before the paper house of promises they built under themselves collapses. That seems to be the story of so many legitimate companies or entrepreneurs that then succeed.

442
00:55:16,528 --> 00:55:32,306
Chris: Yeah, I mean, that's the thing. That's when were watching, and this is obviously, like, nothing new. Like, this was what the documentary was trying to communicate. But when were watching both Fyre Fest and the inventor, it was very clear that, like, this isn't, like, some crazy person. This is somebody following the formula.

443
00:55:32,338 --> 00:55:33,034
Kayla: Right, right.

444
00:55:33,082 --> 00:56:11,948
Chris: Like, Elizabeth Holmes was not like, yeah, maybe she was, like, a little more, like, echo than the average, but not really. Like, she's really was just very much following, like, the Silicon Valley model startup, you know, move fast and break things model, you know, fake it till you make it model. And. And that's what the. You know, it's so. It's not like. Like Theranos was. Yeah. They didn't have any of the science behind it. And yeah, a lot of venture capital companies did pass up on them. But. And that's a whole other thing is like private equity. That's a problem regardless. That's not like an outlier. That is the standard.

445
00:56:12,004 --> 00:56:44,400
Kayla: Right. And the. The whole thing that's presented with Theranos and Wework and all this stuff where it's like the leader is promising a bunch of crazy stuff that they don't actually have, but if they just could get. If they can get to a certain point, then they will have it and it will all be like, the story that they have told will come true. That's how Uber has the corner on the transportation market isn't because they were so good. It's because they literally did not make, quote unquote, make money. Like, they operated at a deficit. Is that what it's called?

446
00:56:44,440 --> 00:56:47,512
Chris: Oh, yeah. You are not. If you're making money now, you are doing it wrong.

447
00:56:47,576 --> 00:56:48,784
Kayla: Right. They just.

448
00:56:48,832 --> 00:56:55,776
Chris: They, like, literally. I'm not like, exaggerating. You go to a. You know, you go to investors now, nobody's gonna invest in you if you're showing revenue.

449
00:56:55,808 --> 00:56:56,392
Kayla: Right. Right.

450
00:56:56,456 --> 00:56:58,304
Chris: Like, that's. That is a thing of the past.

451
00:56:58,352 --> 00:56:58,752
Kayla: Right.

452
00:56:58,856 --> 00:57:16,058
Chris: You want to be losing money because if you're losing money, then that means that you are growing. And the model is grow, grow until you own everything. Until you are the only. Until Uber becomes the only transportation option. And then they have the monopoly. And then they charge monopoly prices and they own everything. And that's the model now.

453
00:57:16,114 --> 00:57:16,426
Kayla: Right.

454
00:57:16,498 --> 00:57:19,282
Chris: And it's fucking nuts because remember when.

455
00:57:19,306 --> 00:57:39,028
Kayla: Uber started, it was like, wow, how can they charge these prices? How can they charge such low prices, undercutting any other taxis or other rideshare service around me? Wow. How can Uber. They couldn't afford. They could not afford those prices. And now we're paying the price for that because now they're like two or three times more expensive than the remaining taxis that exist.

456
00:57:39,124 --> 00:57:41,716
Chris: Amazon lost money, famously lost money for decades.

457
00:57:41,748 --> 00:57:52,796
Kayla: Right? So when we go like, wow, it's crazy that, like, Elizabeth Holmes, and I'm not defending Elizabeth Holmes at all, and she ruined lives and she took people's money and she did a lot of bad stuff.

458
00:57:52,828 --> 00:57:54,084
Chris: Yeah. She was a grifter, to be sure.

459
00:57:54,132 --> 00:58:12,830
Kayla: She was telling a story and hoped that she could work hard enough, get other people to work hard enough and invest enough money in her so that she could make that story a reality. And that is what Billy McFarlane was doing, and that is what Adam Newman of Wework is doing. And they all exploded. But Uber succeeded. Steve jobs succeeded.

460
00:58:12,990 --> 00:58:15,598
Chris: Uber is. Jury's out a little bit.

461
00:58:15,654 --> 00:58:22,418
Kayla: Oh, is it really? I mean, I guess I haven't watched the new show about Uber with Joseph Gordon Levitt, so maybe I'll do it.

462
00:58:22,424 --> 00:58:37,042
Chris: I know. I know. I'm like. I don't know if I want to. I'm like, I've. Okay, that's the thing. It's like, I've seen theranos, doc. Do I want to watch the, like, theranos for cars, doc? I don't know. Like, obviously they're not theranos. Obviously, they, like, provide a real service that people have benefited from, myself included.

463
00:58:37,226 --> 00:58:41,030
Kayla: But they're also technically scabs.

464
00:58:41,410 --> 00:58:42,778
Chris: Oh, yeah. Yeah. They're huge.

465
00:58:42,834 --> 00:59:04,128
Kayla: The reason why they operated differently from cabs at the beginning is because they didn't have to have all of the regulation. Regulations that cabs have part of. Because of, like, the fact that regulations make our car safer and make our ride share drivers safer, and they are part of a union, and Uber came in to, like, undermine the union stuff, so.

466
00:59:04,224 --> 00:59:04,576
Chris: Right.

467
00:59:04,648 --> 00:59:06,296
Kayla: Fuck you guys. This type of.

468
00:59:06,328 --> 00:59:06,992
Chris: Fuck uber.

469
00:59:07,096 --> 00:59:14,872
Kayla: Fuck uber. This type of cultiness is just. It is all around. It's all around, and it's. It's probably not going away anywhere sometime soon.

470
00:59:14,936 --> 00:59:15,848
Chris: It's not going anywhere.

471
00:59:15,864 --> 00:59:50,596
Kayla: We are all experiencing this all of the time. And, in fact, I wanted to hear directly from some of our listeners if they have, like, what experiences they have had, what culty behavior have they encountered from companies they worked at? And shockingly, of course, people have had shitty experiences. Let's talk about a couple of them. A listener named Sam shared this experience after being overworked and underpaid. I quit a job. And when my direct supervisor found out, he told me how disappointed he was that I was leaving because he believed I would be the one to rise up and succeed despite how poorly he thought I was doing at the job.

472
00:59:50,708 --> 00:59:59,412
Kayla: This is the same guy who would simultaneously yell at me for messing stuff up and tell me I couldn't be trusted with harder stuff until I did better, when were always rushing on everything.

473
00:59:59,596 --> 01:00:01,772
Chris: It's like, literal abuse tactics, basically, yeah.

474
01:00:01,796 --> 01:00:16,452
Kayla: Can you think about, like, think about how fucked up it is and, like, how much of a mind warp it is to, like, yell at and berate an employee constantly while they work for you, and then, like, the second they stand up for themselves and their own life. You then pull a 180 and are like, oh, but you were the chosen one.

475
01:00:16,516 --> 01:00:23,320
Chris: That's why I'm saying it literally sounds like abuse where it's like you beat the shit out of someone and then they're like, I'm gonna leave. And you're like, I love you, baby.

476
01:00:24,180 --> 01:01:06,202
Kayla: Yeah. It's manipulation to the nth degree. Another listener named Britt shared this. They said, I don't know if I can explain in a tweet, but here goes the cult of western healthcare, where doctors are God, nurses are angels, and lab rats, which are texts, push buttons and get questioned, undermined by the docs and rns when our results don't make sense to them. I used God and angels as a metaphor for hierarchy, but I also had a teacher in lab school lecture us that doctors are God and they get what they want. So that felt pretty culty. So like feeling disempowered to criticize or like getting punished for criticizing higher ups, like toxic culty, referring to higher ups as literal gods culty.

477
01:01:06,346 --> 01:01:13,190
Chris: Also, aren't the lab tech supposed to be presenting unbiased data and results? And you have God saying, this is wrong?

478
01:01:14,530 --> 01:01:20,994
Kayla: That's pretty pathological brits experience. And it sounds like this is something that was being taught to their fellow classmates.

479
01:01:21,042 --> 01:01:21,682
Chris: Not good.

480
01:01:21,786 --> 01:01:59,784
Kayla: Not good. Finally, a listener named Claire shared this experience of working in academia. My first job out of college was in a research lab. It was pretty much immediately made clear to me after I started working there that members of this lab worked seven days a week. I started on a super legal. I started on a Tuesday and had worked nearly 60 hours by Sunday. I had to specifically request when we not schedule a procedure that took 8 hours and had to end at about 11:00 p.m. For incubation time reasons. On a Saturday, because I was moving apartments, I needed to have any time off at all. Another week. I came in at 10:00 p.m. On a Saturday because I had to handle some cultures but was hoping to avoid running into anyone else.

481
01:01:59,832 --> 01:02:35,360
Kayla: And one of the other employees was still there looking like he wasn't heading out anytime soon. All this to say that one day my boss asked me to speak to a prospective postdoc who was looking to join the lab. And when I came back and talked to her about this person, she was sort of laughingly like, sounds like she's really interested in the idea of a work life balance. So I don't think we have quite what she's looking for here. Laughing at the idea of work life. Like laughing at the idea of work life balance, laughing at it. When the underpaid people working for you are going on day seven of seven, working a back breaking gig, laughing at the idea of work.

482
01:02:36,180 --> 01:03:24,740
Chris: Yeah, man, I've been there. The video game industry is notorious for this. And I've definitely been in conversations where there was a, I won't say which companies and whatever, but there was a particular team at one company where part of the promise that they had been hired under was this work life balance. And so far that company had been, like, pretty good about providing that. But then when they were, like, partnered with another group were working with, that was more like more video game culture, let's say. Okay, like, there was like conversations, like, oh, those guys, like, man, they're so lazy. They can't keep up with the work and blah, blah. Oh, it's because they do like 40 hours weeks over there. Like, there was just like this sort of disdain amongst full gamer. Yeah. Amongst the video game folks.

483
01:03:24,860 --> 01:04:00,298
Kayla: Yeah, it just, I hate to hear that story. I hate to hear all these stories. It really sucks that most of us have stories like this. Like that. Almost anyone you talk to has been employed, who has been employed can share an experience that showcases the more toxic extremes of the criteria discussed in the Economist article, which, again, is about. Is your company a cult? I'm not really sure what's to be done about it. I think that unions are probably one of our best bets at empowering workers and rooting out toxic management and bosses at the source, or at least being able to fight against them.

484
01:04:00,474 --> 01:04:04,362
Chris: Starting a podcast and bitching about it, that's venting.

485
01:04:04,426 --> 01:04:08,274
Kayla: But I don't know if it's gonna change anything. I still think it's the unions.

486
01:04:08,362 --> 01:04:11,190
Chris: I think that, I guess they could help, too.

487
01:04:11,730 --> 01:04:56,680
Kayla: It's been heartening to see labor and pro union movements springing up across the country in so many sectors and many of them in the same sectors and fields and companies we've discussed, like the Amazon unions and like Starbucks unionization. So maybe, I don't know, join a union if you can, organize your coworkers if you can, and share your stories if you can. I appreciate this article calling out the cultiness of corporate culture so starkly. I think this is one of the circumstances in which dragging the truth into the light is one of our best defenses. So if you're being mistreated at your job, if you're experiencing these red flags, and if you're safe to do so, drag your stories into the light. And if you're not sure, take this mini test in the article and brace yourself.

488
01:04:58,780 --> 01:05:04,180
Chris: This is Chris, and this is Kayla. And this has been cult or just your workplace?