S3E12 - The Virtuous Cycle (Pleistocene Park)

1
00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:14,734
Chris: Yeah, we're started. Okay. Yeah, let's. Let's start talking here. Do you have anything you want to talk about? You don't want to banter about how you beat Animal Crossing? I didn't even know that was. I didn't even know that was possible.

2
00:00:14,822 --> 00:00:18,670
Kayla: It's not that you beat it. It's that you can't beat it. So they just have to shove a point and win.

3
00:00:18,750 --> 00:00:20,150
Chris: Jam the credits in there somewhere.

4
00:00:20,230 --> 00:00:25,798
Kayla: It's like, oh, a thing happened. This is a good time. I need to show you who made this game, which. Yeah, you should show me who made the game.

5
00:00:25,854 --> 00:00:31,160
Chris: Yeah. No, the credits are important. I was always excited to see my credit on all of our Blizzard games.

6
00:00:31,660 --> 00:00:38,924
Kayla: The real problem with video games these days, not enough of them still say and you at the end of the credits.

7
00:00:39,052 --> 00:00:43,508
Chris: That's true. I think that would actually probably turn our whole civilization around.

8
00:00:43,644 --> 00:00:45,120
Kayla: I like the acknowledgement.

9
00:00:45,460 --> 00:00:51,252
Chris: I'm excited about today's topic. I have been for a while. This is one I've been wanting to do for a long time. Are you excited?

10
00:00:51,356 --> 00:00:53,916
Kayla: I'm excited because this is the big.

11
00:00:53,948 --> 00:00:55,026
Chris: Grin on my face.

12
00:00:55,148 --> 00:01:02,930
Kayla: No, that doesn't make me excited. What makes me excited is that our Patreon patrons voted for this.

13
00:01:03,230 --> 00:01:03,838
Chris: Oh, yeah.

14
00:01:03,894 --> 00:01:04,837
Kayla: Topic. Correct.

15
00:01:04,934 --> 00:01:05,934
Chris: I forgot about that.

16
00:01:05,982 --> 00:01:06,270
Kayla: I did.

17
00:01:06,310 --> 00:01:16,190
Chris: Yes. Well, it was tied, so I forget my other two options that didn't make the cut, but the top two tied were what we're gonna be talking about today.

18
00:01:16,270 --> 00:01:16,918
Kayla: Okay.

19
00:01:17,054 --> 00:01:40,942
Chris: And objectivism, which is the philosophy of Ayn Rand. And I chose this one. Yeah, I flipped a coin, picked this one, and it's. I've just. I've been excited about this one for a long time, even before the poll. So I'm like, I'm really glad that it won or died. But thank you, Patreon followers, for helping us decide. They have also decided your next topic.

20
00:01:41,006 --> 00:01:41,462
Kayla: They have.

21
00:01:41,526 --> 00:01:49,406
Chris: So that's pretty cool. And just while we're talking about Patreon, I really liked your bonus content for the last episode. I thought that was really cool.

22
00:01:49,518 --> 00:01:52,020
Kayla: You liked my guided meditation?

23
00:01:52,100 --> 00:01:52,836
Chris: Yeah, it was good.

24
00:01:52,908 --> 00:01:53,908
Kayla: It was pretty good.

25
00:01:54,044 --> 00:01:55,436
Chris: I meditated to it.

26
00:01:55,508 --> 00:01:58,796
Kayla: Nobody used it. Nobody gained superpowers, though, which is kind of the bummer.

27
00:01:58,988 --> 00:02:00,652
Chris: Well, I stopped breathing.

28
00:02:00,796 --> 00:02:04,092
Kayla: That's. You probably shouldn't have done that. Yeah, that's not good for you.

29
00:02:04,116 --> 00:02:05,520
Chris: Remember the emergency room visit?

30
00:02:06,540 --> 00:02:19,080
Kayla: Actually, I did, kind of. I was thinking of something the other day when I was thinking about the episode about Kriya yoga and the self realization fellowship. First of all, I texted you today because I drove by another location.

31
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:19,976
Chris: You texted me.

32
00:02:20,008 --> 00:02:20,600
Kayla: I texted you.

33
00:02:20,640 --> 00:02:21,456
Chris: I did not get that text.

34
00:02:21,488 --> 00:03:00,752
Kayla: Well, I texted you. Maybe I didn't. I don't know. Maybe I thought to text you and then I didn't. I drove. I was driving by. I was with some friends and we drove by the famed Scientology center in Los Angeles that happens to be on a street called L. Ron Harper Drive. Apparently no coincidence. You can't go more than 5ft without hitting Scientology in this town. But apparently one of the friends I'd with had never seen this location before and was freaking out about like, there's a street named after a cult leader. There's a cult right here. And I was like, yep, this is how it is. Drove. Maybe two more seconds passed right by a self realization fellowship center.

35
00:03:00,856 --> 00:03:01,424
Chris: Perfect.

36
00:03:01,552 --> 00:03:03,200
Kayla: Right next door. Right next door.

37
00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:14,028
Chris: The thing is, Los Angeles has a very high cult density, clearly, as cities go. Also, there's probably a lot of streets named after cult leaders, now that I.

38
00:03:14,044 --> 00:03:59,216
Kayla: Think about it, maybe most. Who knows? Anyway, what I was going to say, last two episodes, we talked about Kriya Yoga and how, you know, whether or not it is or is not a science. And I think something that I wanted to say is like, I maybe didn't give enough benefit of the doubt in that this group is calling this practice a science when we very much know that it is not a science. Maybe there was just not as much of an understanding of that term. And then I kind of think that, no, we have a very. We have a very serious understanding of the term science at the turn of the century, the turn of the 19 hundreds. So I was like, maybe I should say something on the podcast about like, I should have been less of a jerk.

39
00:03:59,248 --> 00:04:05,512
Kayla: And then I went, nah. So this is me saying I shouldn't have been less of a jerk.

40
00:04:05,616 --> 00:04:15,234
Chris: I feel like I have that thought for every episode, that I should be less than a jerk. A huge jerk. And no, actually, no, that was fine. Yeah, you just should be less of a jerk in general.

41
00:04:15,322 --> 00:04:16,269
Kayla: This is true.

42
00:04:17,490 --> 00:04:21,026
Chris: We're gonna change gears a bit for this episode.

43
00:04:21,098 --> 00:04:21,850
Kayla: How so?

44
00:04:22,010 --> 00:04:39,142
Chris: But I did want to say that our just bringing up Patreon again real quick. Our patron, Anna Krasner, had a really great answer because we asked a poll of our patrons, what is science? And I put like a lot of crazy stuff in there. And she had like a really good explanation for what it is.

45
00:04:39,206 --> 00:04:40,006
Chris: Sort of like a.

46
00:04:40,078 --> 00:04:49,710
Chris: It's a process for removing or identifying, like, bad information and discarding it. It's not necessarily a process for, like, approaching some platonic ideal of truth.

47
00:04:49,750 --> 00:04:50,046
Kayla: Right.

48
00:04:50,118 --> 00:05:03,366
Chris: It's a way of. So anyway, just want to say that I really like that. Before I get to the topic, I also had to address the fact that several episodes ago now was the one I did about throw Aliena.

49
00:05:03,428 --> 00:05:03,970
Kayla: Correct.

50
00:05:04,090 --> 00:05:16,578
Chris: And I did promise that I would sort of keep track of what's going on with those communities. So just a real quick update of what's going on with throw alien and the successor community r, we come in peace.

51
00:05:16,714 --> 00:05:21,666
Kayla: Did the aliens make themselves known on it?

52
00:05:21,858 --> 00:05:31,196
Chris: For people who haven't listened to that episode, that's July 18. Did you not. Are you not still here on Earth? Did you see any aliens?

53
00:05:31,228 --> 00:05:32,772
Kayla: You're here to give the update? I'm just asking questions.

54
00:05:32,796 --> 00:06:05,622
Chris: The update is on the community. Obviously, aliens didn't land on July 18. I think we all pretty much know that based on our continued existence here on Earth. Throwawalien has. It's kind of died down. Like, it hasn't really gotten, like, toxic or anything. There's just, like, a lot fewer posts, fewer and far between. There's definitely some weird stuff that I've seen get posted there, but in general, it's just. It's more of like a. It's simmered down rather than toxified, I guess, if that makes sense to you. On we come in peace. For the most part, I've seen.

55
00:06:05,686 --> 00:06:06,470
Kayla: Which is the new.

56
00:06:06,550 --> 00:06:21,638
Chris: That's the new one. My understanding is that they're mostly running on their own now. Lemuffin is not as involved as he was, but he put some moderators in charge there that are. That he trusts a lot. So I've seen, like, that is active. Like, the last post there was a few hours ago.

57
00:06:21,814 --> 00:06:23,856
Kayla: I'm in there. I see it all the time.

58
00:06:23,958 --> 00:06:42,148
Chris: Yeah. And it's a lot of the same sort of vibes. Right. Which is good. It's like, there's a lot of, like, just, like, meme sharing and, like, hey, I heard this thing. One thing I did want to bring up is that I had, like, right after July 18 and nothing happened. I did see some memes that were, like, sort of, like, addicted to the date thing.

59
00:06:42,244 --> 00:06:44,052
Chris: Like, people were like, they were sad.

60
00:06:44,076 --> 00:06:54,448
Chris: That they didn't have the date thing going forward towards. Right. So there was, like, a meme, for example, that was like that Dave Chappelle meme where he's, like, playing the crackhead, and he's like, y'all got any more of those? And the fill in here was dates.

61
00:06:54,544 --> 00:06:55,180
Kayla: Right?

62
00:06:55,800 --> 00:07:37,442
Chris: So it's, you know, just to sort of illustrate the fact that, like, people were like, man, I really liked having the date to look forward to. I'm sad now. Which, again, that makes sense. A lot of what we talked about in that episode was, you know, having that date sort of, like, provides hope, and hope really fuels people. I do want to say that there was also a post that I saw that was just a few days ago that I really liked and gave me some good vibes for their subreddit, which was a user, a Reddit user by the name grapefruitfizzies made a post that says, my love letter to the sub. And the post is just a picture of Scully and Mulder and says, you're the Scully to my Mulder.

63
00:07:37,506 --> 00:07:37,874
Kayla: Aw.

64
00:07:37,962 --> 00:08:12,390
Chris: And then the second part of the post was grapefruit fizzy, saying that some days on the sub are just scully looking at Mulder and saying, Mulder says aliens. And Scully says, no. But then every day on the sub is that whole. I don't know if you saw that meme that's like the, you know, the perfect love story wasn't twilight, it was this. And it's just a picture of Mulder and Scully, which when that's used as a reference for this particular subreddit, tells me that there's like the. That the love story is between, like, skeptics and believers, which I think is kind of nice.

65
00:08:12,430 --> 00:08:14,268
Kayla: Yeah, it is nice. That's really nice.

66
00:08:14,444 --> 00:08:23,604
Chris: So that's my update for throw alien. Since I promised it, if anything crazy comes up on either of these subreddits, I will bring it up in the shell. You know, if there's like an alien qanon or something.

67
00:08:23,652 --> 00:08:25,280
Kayla: Perfect. I will hold you to it.

68
00:08:25,660 --> 00:08:29,396
Chris: But we should probably get today's topic.

69
00:08:29,468 --> 00:08:30,348
Kayla: Yes, please.

70
00:08:30,524 --> 00:08:39,022
Chris: Before we do, I haven't introduced ourselves yet, so I'm Chris and I am a game designer and a data scientist.

71
00:08:39,155 --> 00:08:39,785
Kayla: I'm Kayla.

72
00:08:39,818 --> 00:08:43,409
Chris: I'm a tv writer and we're both interested in cults.

73
00:08:43,490 --> 00:08:45,110
Kayla: And this is cult or just weird?

74
00:08:45,890 --> 00:08:48,230
Chris: All right, my esteemed co host.

75
00:08:48,850 --> 00:08:52,310
Kayla: I don't think I'm very esteemed. Ow.

76
00:08:52,770 --> 00:08:53,866
Chris: Ooh. What was that?

77
00:08:53,938 --> 00:08:55,030
Kayla: Don't do that again.

78
00:08:55,530 --> 00:08:56,946
Chris: What was that awful sound?

79
00:08:57,018 --> 00:08:57,666
Kayla: Horrible.

80
00:08:57,778 --> 00:08:58,570
Chris: Do you know what that was?

81
00:08:58,610 --> 00:09:00,122
Kayla: No. I really didn't like it.

82
00:09:00,266 --> 00:09:08,250
Chris: We must have been having a problem with the microphone. That's weird that I'm like, nothing. Editing that out of the final cut of the episode.

83
00:09:08,290 --> 00:09:09,058
Kayla: What are you doing?

84
00:09:09,194 --> 00:09:16,722
Chris: Normally, I would be very diligent about editing stuff out, but, like, specifically, what was that sound?

85
00:09:16,906 --> 00:09:18,510
Kayla: It's microphone feedback.

86
00:09:19,410 --> 00:09:24,790
Chris: Yes, that was microphone feedback. Do you know what causes that sound?

87
00:09:25,930 --> 00:09:30,186
Kayla: Tell me so that I can make it stop. Because if I never hear that again, it'll be a good day.

88
00:09:30,338 --> 00:09:37,316
Chris: Well, obviously, that was, like, false, because we don't really have a system set up here that would cause microphone feedback.

89
00:09:37,388 --> 00:09:40,372
Kayla: Oh, no, you're duping audience.

90
00:09:40,436 --> 00:09:53,548
Chris: I know. So the reason that's not what happened here is because we don't have any sort of output. Right. There's no speaker that's playing what I'm saying. If you've ever heard that sound, say when, like watching a band warm up on stage.

91
00:09:53,684 --> 00:09:54,788
Kayla: I hate that sound.

92
00:09:54,884 --> 00:10:13,342
Chris: Yeah. And, you know, that's what happens on the microphone. Input receives output from its own speakers. The microphone's input gets amplified, becomes the speaker's output, and then inputs back into the microphone, where it gets amplified again, out to the speakers again, and so on and on.

93
00:10:13,406 --> 00:10:14,142
Kayla: Horrible.

94
00:10:14,286 --> 00:11:05,066
Chris: That cycle can rapidly turn even the tiniest disturbance into a loud and high pitched whine. Don't point your microphones at your speakers. Microphone feedback, though, is only one example of a type of feedback. It appears actually kind of everywhere. The only ingredient necessary for a feedback system is for the output of the system to be fed back into the input, like with the microphone and the speaker, because that system amplifies the input to the output. We call it a positive feedback system. Colloquially, we also say things like positive feedback loop or vicious cycle, but it's all the same thing. For what it's worth, there are also negative feedback systems, and that's where the output is reduced from the input. So instead of, like, the microphone, you know, amplifying out to the speakers and then getting worse and worse.

95
00:11:05,258 --> 00:11:09,058
Chris: If it reduced the sound, then it would actually get lower and lower.

96
00:11:09,194 --> 00:11:13,338
Kayla: That sounds like a nice kind of. I like that kind. Sounds like it would be quiet.

97
00:11:13,434 --> 00:11:25,358
Chris: So those types of systems stabilize. So, yeah, they may make things more quiet, but that's, like, also not as fun as a positive feedback loop. Positive feedback loops, well, explode, actually.

98
00:11:25,454 --> 00:11:25,974
Kayla: What?

99
00:11:26,102 --> 00:12:11,496
Chris: That's literally what happens when you see a chemical explosion, for example. Roughly speaking, the speed of the chemical reaction happening there depends on heat, and then it also gives off more heat, so it gives off more heat, which makes the reaction faster, which gives off even more heat, and then it runs away. Feedback loop and explosion. Anywhere you see something you might call explosive, actually, you can pretty much be assured that there's a feedback loop lurking somewhere. Covid's explosive growth feedback loop. The more cases there are today, the faster the case count will grow tomorrow. The faster the case count grows tomorrow, the more cases there are the next day, and so on and so forth. The output case count feeds back into how fast the virus will spread. Formula.

100
00:12:11,688 --> 00:12:41,362
Chris: There's even feedback loops and things like software development which can blow things up with your programming if they're not accounted for. So feedback loops sound shitty, I know, but hear me out. Their power works both ways. Covid may grow explosively, but that also means that blocking only a single transmission could prevent dozens, hundreds, even thousands of downstream infections. So if you've been vaccinated and masking. Yeah, literally. You may have saved a large number of lives.

101
00:12:41,546 --> 00:12:44,106
Kayla: Are you doing another vaccine episode here?

102
00:12:44,218 --> 00:12:46,386
Chris: We've already done the vaccine episode.

103
00:12:46,458 --> 00:12:47,802
Kayla: We did. We did. Two of them.

104
00:12:47,826 --> 00:12:58,892
Chris: This isn't that. That's right. 5 hours. This isn't that episode. Fun aside because we have a tradition on cult or just weird talking about Jurassic park every episode, we haven't done.

105
00:12:58,916 --> 00:12:59,764
Kayla: It in a minute.

106
00:12:59,892 --> 00:13:31,592
Chris: Feedback loops are also the hallmarks of mathematically chaotic systems. The feedback is what gives rise to the sensitivity to initial conditions in those systems. The butterfly effect is what we usually call that. Like sensitivity to initial conditions. The butterfly effect is real because the end state of today's weather feeds into the initial state of tomorrow's weather. So small effects can become large quickly. And Doctor Ian Malcolm was a mathematician studying chaos theory.

107
00:13:31,696 --> 00:13:34,736
Kayla: Yeah. What the hell does that have to do with Jurassic. Why did they bring him along?

108
00:13:34,808 --> 00:13:39,648
Chris: So there you go, JP reference. Like, why did they bring him along? Or why was he in the book?

109
00:13:39,824 --> 00:13:46,392
Kayla: Not why he was in the book? Because the book is different. Why the hell was he. Why did they talk about chaos theory in the movie at all? Did it really?

110
00:13:46,416 --> 00:13:49,208
Chris: It was much more evident in the book. Yes, we'll get to that.

111
00:13:49,264 --> 00:13:51,920
Kayla: Okay. Wait, really? We're gonna talk more about Jurassic park later?

112
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:52,904
Chris: I mean, if you want.

113
00:13:52,992 --> 00:13:54,784
Kayla: I always wanna talk about Jurassic park.

114
00:13:54,872 --> 00:13:55,808
Chris: Maybe we'll get to that.

115
00:13:55,864 --> 00:13:56,384
Kayla: Okay.

116
00:13:56,472 --> 00:14:06,560
Chris: Anyway, there you go. JP reference. Nice. So, vaccines and Jurassic park aside, why am I starting today's episode talking about feedback loops?

117
00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:07,400
Kayla: Yes. Why?

118
00:14:07,560 --> 00:14:19,686
Chris: You see, our topic for today has to do with one of, if not the most important issue of our time. Something I've been wanting to talk about on the show for a while now, as I mentioned. And that's the climate crisis.

119
00:14:19,798 --> 00:14:20,702
Kayla: Oh, no.

120
00:14:20,886 --> 00:14:21,810
Chris: Hooray.

121
00:14:22,830 --> 00:14:24,730
Kayla: Are we sure we have to do that?

122
00:14:25,830 --> 00:14:28,614
Chris: I already did a lot of research and work on this, so.

123
00:14:28,702 --> 00:14:31,730
Kayla: Yes, thank you for taking that bullet.

124
00:14:32,270 --> 00:15:10,404
Chris: More accurately, it's about one very specific part of the climate crisis. You see, our planet's ecosphere and climate also involve plenty of feedback mechanisms. In climate science, they frequently refer to them as like breakpoints to reflect the fact that they have the potential to sort of explosively accelerate the warming of the planet if those things come to pass. You may have heard of some, like the frequently cited Gulf stream problem. It's thought that melting glaciers could disrupt the Gulf Stream and other ocean currents, which would further contribute to planetary warming, which would melt glaciers faster and disrupt the currents further. You kind of see where we're going with that.

125
00:15:10,452 --> 00:15:11,080
Kayla: Yes.

126
00:15:11,420 --> 00:15:15,292
Chris: You and I have actually physically witnessed another one of these break points.

127
00:15:15,396 --> 00:15:17,196
Kayla: Oh, we have.

128
00:15:17,388 --> 00:15:20,356
Chris: Remember our trip to Alaska? It was like five or six years ago.

129
00:15:20,428 --> 00:15:21,160
Kayla: I do.

130
00:15:21,500 --> 00:15:41,230
Chris: Well, in Denali National park, we got to see some areas of permafrost. Permafrost is basically what it says, permanent frost in the ground layer. Permafrost covers vast tracts of the earth's colder land masses, and by vast tracts, I mean, like 24% of the total surface of Earth's landmass.

131
00:15:41,310 --> 00:15:41,902
Kayla: Wow.

132
00:15:42,046 --> 00:15:50,730
Chris: Yeah. So that's one fourth of all the land on Earth is permafrost in some way. Permafrost is super cool. Get it?

133
00:15:51,110 --> 00:15:53,478
Kayla: Okay, I'm out. Get me out of here.

134
00:15:53,574 --> 00:16:43,780
Chris: And we're done. Cancel the podcast. I deserve to be canceled for that. I have a few more cancelable jokes coming up. But it's super cool because, among other things, it traps greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane. When plants and animals die, if they get trapped under a layer of something, in this case, whatever, makes soil typically more dead plant and animal matter, then that actually reduces the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, because all of that matter gets locked away underground. And specifically in the case of permafrost, the fact that the ground is frozen permanently means that all of that trapped carbon, methane and material that can decay into both of those things, all of that is trapped by being, again, literally frozen. However, here's where the feedback mechanism exists in all of this.

135
00:16:44,400 --> 00:16:58,452
Chris: Once the climate warms enough to where permafrost melts, now those greenhouse gases get released, which warm the planet further, which melts more permafrost, which releases more greenhouse gas. You get the picture.

136
00:16:58,516 --> 00:17:00,268
Kayla: I'm sensing a feedback loop.

137
00:17:00,364 --> 00:17:02,548
Chris: It is, as we say, not good.

138
00:17:02,644 --> 00:17:03,520
Kayla: Not good.

139
00:17:03,940 --> 00:17:20,680
Chris: Permafrost is a ticking time bomb, and the clock has started. Permafrost is already melting, and there's little we can do about it. Or is there? Ooh, Kayla. And dear listeners, I know I painted a chilling picture about permafrost.

140
00:17:20,720 --> 00:17:21,520
Kayla: Very, yeah, bleak.

141
00:17:21,560 --> 00:17:24,503
Chris: Bleak is f. You didn't get the chilling vint.

142
00:17:24,672 --> 00:17:27,432
Kayla: I'm choosing to ignore you, is the thing.

143
00:17:27,616 --> 00:17:32,448
Chris: I know I painted a chilling picture of permafrost here in the cold open of our show.

144
00:17:32,504 --> 00:17:33,300
Kayla: Come out.

145
00:17:34,120 --> 00:18:12,470
Chris: But now that you're aware of the stakes, you know how scary the villain of the story is. Now that all hope seems lost, it's time to talk about the heroes. Welcome to Pleistocene park. Actually, I have you scooped me. I was gonna do that. What I literally see next thing in the script says, jurassic park. Humming. Can we do that? We can hum music. Right. Without. Without paying a license for it.

146
00:18:15,250 --> 00:18:18,722
Kayla: You just said the words fair use. Any idea?

147
00:18:18,826 --> 00:18:20,426
Chris: I know. I know law things.

148
00:18:20,458 --> 00:18:21,386
Kayla: What's fair use? Law.

149
00:18:21,458 --> 00:18:22,130
Chris: I know law thing.

150
00:18:22,170 --> 00:18:22,874
Kayla: What is fair use?

151
00:18:22,922 --> 00:18:24,842
Chris: It's you can use things fairly.

152
00:18:25,026 --> 00:18:26,338
Kayla: What things? Under what circumstances?

153
00:18:26,394 --> 00:18:32,756
Chris: You can use things when you can. It's protection for people to use other people's ip when they're using it satirical purposes.

154
00:18:32,898 --> 00:18:34,176
Kayla: That's not satirical.

155
00:18:34,328 --> 00:19:00,574
Chris: It totally was satirical. No, it's. Regardless, we will get to exactly what Pleistocene park is after I do the traditional culture. Just weird ritual of naming the sources. For today's episode, I consulted Wikipedia, which, you know, I kind of think we need to maybe stop listing this because it's like listing. It goes without saying, like, it's like listing bowl for a baking recipe. It's like, yeah, I know. We need the bowl.

156
00:19:00,752 --> 00:19:04,130
Kayla: Where else are you gonna start? Like, literally, where else will you start?

157
00:19:04,290 --> 00:19:05,818
Chris: It's like saying I googled things.

158
00:19:05,874 --> 00:19:06,510
Kayla: Yeah.

159
00:19:07,450 --> 00:19:26,754
Chris: Pleistocene Park Ru, their official website, a nice long article from the Atlantic. Very thorough, very good. PBS, new atlas.com, national Geographic, the New Yorker, CB's newsweek, the Economist, something called researchgate.net.

160
00:19:26,802 --> 00:19:27,058
Kayla: What?

161
00:19:27,114 --> 00:19:39,850
Chris: Something called carbonbrief.org, dot, some publications from Yale, some shit from Propublica, a short documentary film simply called Mammoth. A dash of my own mathematical knowledge and background.

162
00:19:40,010 --> 00:19:43,794
Kayla: Okay, you can't get on here and be like, I'm citing myself as a source.

163
00:19:43,962 --> 00:19:53,316
Chris: Well, I'm just saying that some of the mathematical. Like, some of the chaos theory stuff here is based on my own knowledge, not on any research that I've done on the topic.

164
00:19:53,378 --> 00:19:54,200
Kayla: Mm.

165
00:19:54,360 --> 00:20:02,248
Chris: That's all I'm trying to say. Anyway, also, a particularly popular TED talk, something called the Savory Institute.

166
00:20:02,344 --> 00:20:04,384
Kayla: What? The savory institute, which is.

167
00:20:04,432 --> 00:20:25,572
Chris: I want to go there, sadly, has nothing to do with food. What I know it's super disappointing. And finally, but most importantly, I got some help from the guy who enlightened me to the existence of today's topic. I have to say, Kayla, one of the cool things about having a podcast is that it has the power to sort of, like, legitimize you as a stalker.

168
00:20:25,636 --> 00:20:27,228
Kayla: Oh, yeah. It forces people to talk to you.

169
00:20:27,284 --> 00:20:29,852
Chris: Yeah. And I definitely took advantage of that in this case.

170
00:20:29,956 --> 00:20:33,172
Kayla: Oh, yeah. I want to talk to you for my podcast. Not because I'm obsessed with you.

171
00:20:33,236 --> 00:21:18,192
Chris: Right, exactly. And that's totally what happened here, as you know. But our listeners may not. I'm a huge fan of a YouTube channel that goes by the name Atlas Pro. Yes, you are literally one of my favorite science communicators out there right now, on par with other youtubers like Matt O'Dowd and PBS Spacetime or Ann Reardon's how to cook that science and futurism with Isaac Arthur. You get the idea. Atlas Pro has great production value. Interesting topics. A few of my favorites have been videos about the geography of Mars and one that asks the question of, is there an optimal temperature range for human civilization? It's like really cool hypotheticals like that. He also does a great job of not just researching and understanding the data and evidence for his topics, but presenting them as well.

172
00:21:18,296 --> 00:21:27,328
Chris: And as you know, science communication is more important now than it has been probably ever in human history. Anyway, we got him on the show.

173
00:21:27,464 --> 00:21:29,180
Kayla: Amazing. Oh, my God.

174
00:21:29,480 --> 00:21:40,288
Chris: His Pleistocene park video was the thing that, like I said, turned me onto this topic. And I knew right away, like, immediately after watching the video months ago, that I wanted to do a cult or just weird episode on it.

175
00:21:40,344 --> 00:21:41,640
Kayla: Those are the best topics when you're.

176
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:50,950
Chris: Like, yep, that's doing that one. So before we get into the meat of what Pleistocene park is, I asked him about the same thing that we began the episode with.

177
00:21:54,250 --> 00:22:02,510
Chris: First obligatory question that I always have to ask is, who am I talking today? And if you could tell us a little bit about your credentials.

178
00:22:03,530 --> 00:22:38,010
AtlasPro: Sure. So, my name is Kaylin. I run the YouTube channel Atlas Pro, which I guess that might have some weight or it might not, depending on who Youtland. But what I do is I mostly talk about geography, the environment, geology, biology, and ecology, all sort of wrapping together because they all touch ins at a certain point. And my education is in environmental science, and it basically taught me the foundational level of what I talk about. And everything after that is research and discovery on your own.

179
00:22:38,180 --> 00:22:44,534
Chris: Okay, so you said, you don't know how much weight that'll carry. By this point in the podcast, I will have already gushed.

180
00:22:44,702 --> 00:22:45,438
Chris: So.

181
00:22:45,614 --> 00:22:46,382
AtlasPro: Okay.

182
00:22:46,526 --> 00:22:48,166
Chris: By this point in the episode, it'll.

183
00:22:48,198 --> 00:22:51,502
Chris: Be like, oh, my God, that guy. So just.

184
00:22:51,566 --> 00:22:52,070
Chris: Yeah.

185
00:22:52,190 --> 00:22:53,022
Chris: Yeah, not.

186
00:22:53,046 --> 00:22:59,022
AtlasPro: Not to brag, but I did. Maybe two or three days ago, I hit 900,000 subscribers. So that's.

187
00:22:59,046 --> 00:22:59,750
Chris: I saw that.

188
00:22:59,870 --> 00:23:01,222
AtlasPro: I'm impressed by that.

189
00:23:01,326 --> 00:23:20,958
Chris: Hear that, listeners? If we can get a few you guys over to his channel, then we. We'll get him to break a million, which is well worth it. I mean, so you. I mean, you are one of my favorite science communicators on YouTube. So, you know, there's a few people that I really dig, and. And you're one of them. How long have you been doing the. The YouTube thing? Like, what got you into that?

190
00:23:21,134 --> 00:23:30,530
AtlasPro: If you watch YouTube, like, I watched YouTube. That's what got me into it. You know, I watched people like, wendover real life or CGP Grey, real engineering. I watched all those guys as a kid.

191
00:23:31,070 --> 00:23:31,850
Chris: Funny.

192
00:23:32,350 --> 00:23:36,090
Chris: Other ones I was talking about were, like, that. You just listed, like, half of them, so.

193
00:23:36,190 --> 00:24:10,720
AtlasPro: Yeah, yeah, exactly. Like, there's whole. There's one community, and I watched them for as long as I've known about YouTube, really? And that's what really gave me the idea, is I'd watch their videos and just be like, man, like, I could make that video. As long as I just teach myself a lot and work really hard every day. One day I'll be able to do what they do. So I think it's been, like, three or four years, but, like, probably the first two years, I had, like, maybe 500 subscribers, you know, like, that's. It was very, like, low for the vast majority of the early time of the channel.

194
00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:12,552
Chris: What do you think turned the corner on that?

195
00:24:12,576 --> 00:24:42,246
AtlasPro: For you, it's just YouTube. YouTube's own algorithm. Really? I hit 10,000. Like, the struggle to 10,000 was real. Like, that took me years, but the second I hit 10,000, like, the week after I hit 10,000, I hit 100,000. So, like, you can see it took two years to get to 10,000. Took one week to get to 100,000. For whatever reason, YouTube just hits you once you get 10,000. It's a good pat on the back. I guess it must be like that. They trust your channel. It's not like some weird thing or something. I don't know.

196
00:24:42,398 --> 00:24:59,650
Chris: I was watching a veritasium video the other day where he was talking a little bit about some of the feedback mechanisms. Sometimes that once a video gets better, whatever algorithm rating, then it gets shown to more people, which increases its algorithm rating. So there's a bit of a feedback that goes. Maybe some of that's at play.

197
00:24:59,980 --> 00:25:28,462
AtlasPro: It's hard to, like, understand because it's just, it's all behind closed doors at YouTube. You can feel it, like as a person who makes videos, you feel the algorithm, but you don't actually get to see it. You know, you don't get to actually see what it's doing or why. But half the battle, like, you know, they give you all these analytics and it's just like scrolling through every single view just to figure out like, where these are even coming from. Like, what website is directing people here, like, how is it working?

198
00:25:28,636 --> 00:25:32,146
Chris: That's interesting. We'll check out this segue, though.

199
00:25:32,298 --> 00:25:33,202
Chris: This just came to me.

200
00:25:33,226 --> 00:25:35,458
Chris: So we just talked about feedback mechanisms.

201
00:25:35,554 --> 00:25:36,898
AtlasPro: Oh, wow. Damn. Wow.

202
00:25:36,954 --> 00:25:55,954
Chris: So what about feedback mechanisms in our ecology? That was one of the more interesting things that I will get to the exact video that interested me in talking to you. But first, yeah, if you could talk about like, what is a feedback mechanism in the planet's climate, like, and why do we hear about climate tipping points.

203
00:25:56,002 --> 00:26:48,806
AtlasPro: And things like that? It's like there's so many. In maybe like half of my videos, I'll show the same graph where it's just a feedback loop. You know, one thing leads to another, which leads to another, and it increases the cycle infinitely within limits of, you know, whatever biology has. But there's so many different systems within the earth system. If you view the earth as a single system, there's things that interact and interplay with one another to such a complex degree that there's just, there's relationships abound. That's what ecology is pretty much. That's like the idea behind that one field. And just because everything is so tied to everything else, affecting one part of the world or one aspect of an environment can have drastic effects everywhere. And that's one of the things that you love learning about when you love the environment, right?

204
00:26:48,838 --> 00:27:12,800
AtlasPro: It's just like understanding that it all rolls into each other. And once you know that, the situation becomes more dire, it lends more gravity. It's not like one isolated thing is happening, and then that's all that happens. It's like one thing happens and that'll start another thing happening and that'll start a whole chain reaction that just feeds into itself over and over again until we end up with a radically different environment.

205
00:27:13,340 --> 00:27:14,880
Chris: Can you give some examples.

206
00:27:15,780 --> 00:28:07,166
AtlasPro: It all starts with carbon in the atmosphere. And as soon as we increase the carbon, that's one small act, is increasing the carbon concentration in the atmosphere. It traps a little bit more heat. That's factor number two. More heat is trapped. More heat leads to more things melting the permafrost or the ice caps. Whatever it is, something happens because there's more heat being trapped. Permafrost melting, that releases carbon, methane, whatever. And methane, as you might be aware, is a radically stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. So when methane is released, it's like an accelerator of the problem. Like, if the original problem was carbon dioxide and that causes methane to be released, that only speeds up the problem. So once methane is released, now we have even more warming, and we're back to square one.

207
00:28:07,198 --> 00:28:20,930
AtlasPro: We have more warming, more melting, more gases in the atmosphere again. So it runs away with it after a while. And if you don't stop it before it starts, how do you stop something that just feeds into itself like that, right?

208
00:28:21,910 --> 00:28:22,470
Chris: Just about.

209
00:28:22,510 --> 00:28:28,990
Chris: I think a lot of our listeners will know what permafrost is, but not all of them. Can you explain what exactly permafrost is?

210
00:28:29,070 --> 00:28:47,700
AtlasPro: Yeah, sure. So in, like, the. The polar regions of the earth, more so in the north and in the south, because there's more land in the north, but all soil has water in it. There are some parts of the earth that are just so cold that even in the summer, the water stays frozen underneath the ground. It's permafrost. It's permanent frost.

211
00:28:48,360 --> 00:28:48,952
Chris: Good name.

212
00:28:49,016 --> 00:29:33,150
AtlasPro: And over hundreds of thousands of years, with soil built on top of each other, this builds up layers and layers of ice. And within those layers, there's gas bubbles. There's decaying organic matter that, as time progresses, becomes methane or whatever gases are released by the decomposers that are in those natural materials. And eventually, what that ends up doing is storing all this carbon dioxide, methane, whatever. It stores it all underground. And the permafrost keeps it locked up. It's frozen inside of the permafrost. But the second that starts to melt, ice underneath the ground starts to melt. All that gas that's frozen with the permafrost gets released.

213
00:29:36,170 --> 00:29:48,154
Chris: Since this is an audio program, I want to take a minute to paint a mental picture for you. Close your eyes if you like. Especially if you're listening to this while you're driving, by the way. Definitely close your eyes, then.

214
00:29:48,202 --> 00:29:49,306
Kayla: It's perfectly safe.

215
00:29:49,378 --> 00:30:39,898
Chris: Yeah. You are taking a nice hike in the siberian wilderness. Beneath your feet and as far as the eye can see in all directions, a thin layer of green moss, pale green against an even paler blue sky. It is summer, so you don't even really need your jacket that you brought. It's a brisk 20 degrees celsius, 68 fahrenheit. You squat and reach down and feel that the ground beneath your feet, the soil under the moss, is damp. The ground is thawing. It thaws every summer, though part of the seasonal cycle. You begin to question, however, whether the summer thawing you can feel in the wet soil is outpacing the winter freezing of that same patch of ground. As you walk and ponder this question, you're jolted back to the present moment when you stumble upon an embankment to a gray, silty looking river.

216
00:30:40,034 --> 00:31:29,806
Chris: It's not wide. You can see easily to the other side. And the answer to your musings sits there right in front of you, impossible to ignore or mistake. You observe a gigantic gash in the flesh of the terrain, bleeding brownish gray soil into the river before you, as if Paul Bunyan took a pickaxe directly to the land in a particular spot where it meets the river. Around it is more flat, green moss, but not for long. The scene I just described is called permafrost slump, and it's a sign of permafrost melt that anyone with eyes simply cannot miss. When areas of permafrost on or near hills, lakes, and rivers consistently have summer thaws that exceeddeze winter freezes, the structural integrity that the ground ice provides is no longer there. There are slumps like these occurring all throughout the Arctic.

217
00:31:29,838 --> 00:31:41,370
Chris: Now, I say this not to frighten, but rather to paint a scene and a setting in your mind for the rest of the show. So I asked Kalin if there are any strategies in play to prevent more of this or turn it around.

218
00:31:43,534 --> 00:31:44,958
Chris: So that doesn't sound great.

219
00:31:45,134 --> 00:31:46,382
AtlasPro: Yeah, no, it's not the best.

220
00:31:46,486 --> 00:32:00,374
Chris: And you mentioned, you know, what do you do when there is a feedback mechanism like that can run away with itself? So is there answer to that? Are there strategies for saving the permafrost? Can we use that in reverse?

221
00:32:00,502 --> 00:32:11,006
AtlasPro: People have tried lots of different things. What we're talking about today is one main strategy. But I've seen countries roll out these white plastic tarps and just put them over the ground.

222
00:32:11,078 --> 00:32:11,730
Chris: Wow.

223
00:32:12,150 --> 00:32:56,800
AtlasPro: Yeah. Because it's not just about air temperature, it's also about sun hitting the ground. Right. If it's darker, the ground wobs were more heat. But if you can block that just with a white reflective layer. But there really any good way to stop permafrost from melting? If it's going to. There's ways to, like, slow it down or prevent it, but that's the thing, is, it's just a natural system. And the area that permafrost is in is just huge. It's half of Russia, it's half of Canada, and, like, Alaska. And it's just these vast areas that, on a human scale, there's no. There's no actual act that we can do. It has to be a greater act. And that's why we get ideas like Pleistocene park.

224
00:32:58,860 --> 00:33:37,840
Chris: Real quick. Before we keep listening to Cailin, there's a theme that I want to communicate more than anything in this episode, and that is that feedback systems work both ways. Breaking a cycle is as powerful as creating one. Small changes lead to big effects in feedback systems. So if you're feeling shitty, which prompts you to stay in bed, which prompts you to keep feeling shitty, something like taking a simple 15 minutes walk outdoors can actually have an outsized impact. A nuclear chain reaction can be halted by just a block of cadmium microphone. Feedback can be silenced by a slight positional adjustment. Don't forget this.

225
00:33:39,960 --> 00:33:41,620
Chris: What is pleistocene park?

226
00:33:41,920 --> 00:34:34,148
AtlasPro: So we know the importance that permafrost plays in keeping our planet from heating up too quickly or too disastrously. We know that protecting permafrost is important, but we don't really know great ways to do it. And one way that we have figured out, or that one specific man in Siberia has figured out, is that there's natural systems that protect permafrost that we don't have to just do this alone, by the might of man, right. We can recruit these natural forces to protect permafrost. And one system that this man, I think, is Sergey, he recognizes that when animals trample snow, the snow insulates the ground less so when the air temperature is, like, negative 40 degrees. But there's a big layer of snow on top of the ground.

227
00:34:34,204 --> 00:35:13,804
AtlasPro: The ground might only reach, like, negative five degrees because there's all this air and whatever that just insulates the ground in snow. But when animals trample on the snow, that brings the insulation factor down by an astounding degree. So negative 40 degrees without snow can be -30 degrees in the ground. And what this does is more than preventing it from melting. This lets it regrow and strengthen. We can't really prevent it from melting in the summer. It's always going to get hot in the summer. There's no animals or anything that we can do other than white tarps, I guess, to protect it. But the real time that we have to make use out of is the winter, when it's growing and when it's solidifying.

228
00:35:13,852 --> 00:35:49,570
AtlasPro: And that's what he figured out is if he can just bring these animals back to where they used to be, they can once again trample the snow and alter the environment to this point where it better protects the permafrost. That's Pleistocene park in a nutshell, is bringing back animals that used to be here that were pushed out thanks to climate change and or human hunters back in, like the, you know, I guess the Pleistocene era. Right. Returning them to this environment so that their impact on the environment returns as well.

229
00:35:49,950 --> 00:35:59,908
Chris: So that was my. That was my next question is why? Why is it called Pleistocene park? So it's because they're trying to revive a. Like an ecology, a biome from that. That era.

230
00:35:59,964 --> 00:36:41,556
AtlasPro: Yeah. Pleistocene is just a few thousand years ago. We're in the holocene now. And the Pleistocene was what we would really consider to be the ice age. We're still in the ice age, but the ice ages go through cycles. The glacier interglacier. So we're in the interglacial period where there's not a lot of ice, but there is still a ton of ice. There's a whole of Antarctica, all of Greenland are covered in ice. That's how, you know, we're in an ice age. But in the glacial period, the period of the Pleistocene, glaciers literally came down from the tops and the bottoms of the earth and covered most of Europe, most of Russia, most of North America, and, you know, some of South America. So that's where the idea of Pleistocene park comes from.

231
00:36:41,588 --> 00:36:50,240
AtlasPro: It comes from bringing back the environment of the ice age, bringing back the animals, animal communities of the ice age of the Pleistocene epoch.

232
00:36:50,700 --> 00:36:55,420
Chris: So you see, you mentioned, Sergey Zimov, is the guy behind this, the mad scientist here.

233
00:36:55,460 --> 00:36:55,684
Chris: Right.

234
00:36:55,732 --> 00:36:58,856
Chris: So did he. And you mentioned, is that.

235
00:36:58,928 --> 00:36:59,528
Chris: Has he done that?

236
00:36:59,544 --> 00:37:02,900
Chris: Has he brought some of these animals back and. And how, if.

237
00:37:03,440 --> 00:37:52,110
AtlasPro: So, his mission started in, like, the 1990s, I think it was like 96. And he started with just these horses, Yukushan horses, which they're still around. These horses are still in parts of Russia. Yakutia is like this really big. It's basically half of Siberia. And it's this place where the native people there have bred these horses from the wild stock that used to be there. And these horses are incredibly resilient to the cold they have, if you see them they have these, like, huge coats of fur on them. They look like completely different than regular horses. They're like stubby or too. They're like, chunky, you know? And that was the first thing he brought back. And it took a few years. He had to feed them at the beginning because there wasn't any grass, really. Like, he had to get the ball rolling.

238
00:37:52,230 --> 00:38:09,530
AtlasPro: But eventually he got a population and then he started introducing more animals. Now there's bisons, cows, all of them sourced from these different environments that have similar conditions. He's got like, musk ox from like the very tip of Canada and Greenland.

239
00:38:09,990 --> 00:38:10,446
Chris: Wow.

240
00:38:10,518 --> 00:39:00,044
AtlasPro: Half of them were just these siberian species that had abandoned these northern realms, these places where the steppe tundra had changed to just tundra. And he brought them all back. And what he has seen, like, I was very specific. I wasn't going to make the video if it wasn't actually successful. Like it was just an experiment gone awry. But, yeah, he's seen that trees have started to back off of the land, and the mosses of the tundra, even more than the trees, have started to recede, because just by animals being there, they trample on the moss. The moss can't take a horse stepping on it so many times every day. Right. And in their place, grasses are growing and that is. That's huge because the trees that are found that far north, and the mosses too, they aren't very good to eat for anything.

241
00:39:00,172 --> 00:39:20,570
AtlasPro: In environmental science, you'd say they don't provide the environment with resources. So grass. Grass is obviously edible to so many different grazing animals. But trees, no cow is going to eat a tree. So you get all these greater resources once you release animals. And that's what he's started to see.

242
00:39:21,270 --> 00:39:38,846
Chris: That's interesting because I usually think that, like, the resource has to be there already for the animal to consume it. But what you're saying is actually there's. And I think that this maybe goes back to what you're saying earlier about feedback loops, is that the animals actually affect their environment, which then, yeah, it's allow them.

243
00:39:38,918 --> 00:40:22,590
AtlasPro: It's all interconnected. That's. That's ecology right there. Like, the animals eat the food and they make sure that the food can grow and then the food feeds the animals, so the animals eat, and the grass has its environment open for it. It's a symbiotic relationship, and you have to have these two factors together. If the bison don't destroy the moss, then they won't have grass to eat. And then they'll die. This is a natural cycle where you need both in tandem. And once they're gone, though, hard to get back. And that's what we're dealing with now is that early into human history, we just swept through the siberian tundra and just, like, murdered all those animals, and they all disappeared from those areas.

244
00:40:22,930 --> 00:40:30,670
AtlasPro: So what we're doing now is just reintroducing them and hoping that those same relationships and the environment come back as well.

245
00:40:31,330 --> 00:40:54,070
Chris: You were saying about the animals and Pleistocene park that before you wanted to do your video, you wanted to see if it was like, if they were actually getting some good data back, which it sounds like they are, because you did do the video. Yeah, but what was Sergei Zimov's work? How was it received early on when he started his project by this larger scientific community?

246
00:40:55,010 --> 00:41:29,156
AtlasPro: I think it's like people don't really know what to think for a lot. He just looks like a crazy russian guy living in the middle of Siberia, just playing with animals. But the more I got into it, I found that the more it made sense. He wasn't some nut. He was a guy who was very passionate. And, like, that's. It's hard to. It's hard to distinguish those two. Sometimes people are just crazy. But the reason I was so convinced is because I listened to him talk. There's a great short movie about him. I think it's called math, and, yeah.

247
00:41:29,268 --> 00:41:30,116
Chris: You get to hear him.

248
00:41:30,188 --> 00:41:44,558
AtlasPro: Yeah, you get to hear him talk. And he does sound thoughtful, and he does have ideas, but I don't know if it's really caught on yet. That's what, again, another reason I made the video is because I wanted to bring the idea to more people. And more than anything else, I wanted.

249
00:41:44,614 --> 00:41:47,238
Chris: Success, at least for me. I mean, I didn't want Russia to.

250
00:41:47,254 --> 00:42:09,140
AtlasPro: Be the only ones. You know, I was like, oh, man, if I could just get one of us, get one of these in Alaska, too. You know? I do want to see it experimented with because there's so many factors, there's so much that we can still learn about this whole process. And I fully endorse it as just, like, a concept that might come back to bite me, but I think it shows promise at the very least.

251
00:42:11,560 --> 00:42:15,440
Chris: So Pleistocene park on board.

252
00:42:15,560 --> 00:42:21,224
Kayla: I'm on board, but little disappointed that it only goes back a few thousand years.

253
00:42:21,392 --> 00:42:25,740
Chris: Before we talk about any of those specifics, do you have any questions?

254
00:42:26,490 --> 00:42:29,210
Kayla: Why didn't someone come up with this earlier? That's my question.

255
00:42:29,330 --> 00:42:44,986
Chris: Well, early. It was pretty early, which. Which we'll get into 1996 is when the park, officially, boy, began that early. I mean, okay. For some of our listeners, Kayla, that's, like, before they were born. Now we are old.

256
00:42:45,058 --> 00:42:46,330
Kayla: I know it hurts, but do you.

257
00:42:46,330 --> 00:42:56,796
Chris: Have any questions about the science of it? Do you have any questions about. Because, you know, that was. There's some pretty, like, nitty gritty mechanical details that Kaylin talked about. So do you have any questions about.

258
00:42:56,988 --> 00:42:58,860
Chris: What exactly is happening with these animals.

259
00:42:58,900 --> 00:43:02,180
Chris: In this tundra, about the trampling of the ice and that sort of thing?

260
00:43:02,220 --> 00:43:09,724
Kayla: No, I think that makes sense. When he first said, oh, trampling the ice back to insulation, I went, huh? And then the two of you talked about it, and it made sense.

261
00:43:09,812 --> 00:43:14,828
Chris: Yeah. So, I mean, snow is an insulator is the thing. The reason snow is an insulator is because it has a lot of air in it.

262
00:43:14,884 --> 00:43:15,508
Kayla: Right?

263
00:43:15,684 --> 00:44:01,016
Chris: And air is a big insulator. Anything with. With a lot of air in it, air pockets, air bubbles, insulate. So that's. So. So snow does that. And essentially what's happening here with the pleistocene park idea is that all of these yakutian horses and bison and whatever, trampling all of the air out of the snow to make it like this, like, tightly packed, you know, compact. I've seen pictures of it. We'll. We'll put them on our instagram. But the sort of, like, tightly compact white ice that's mixed in with this, you know, the soil and allows for the cold during the winter to essentially just to penetrate further into the soil layer. Yes, I know. Thank you, Kayla. So that's what's happening here. That's why the action of. And that's why the presence of animals will, in theory.

264
00:44:01,168 --> 00:44:09,416
Chris: And like Caitlin said, this showed some promise from the data so far, prevent. Or it won't necessarily prevent it from melting in the summer.

265
00:44:09,448 --> 00:44:09,568
AtlasPro: Right.

266
00:44:09,584 --> 00:44:16,670
Chris: Because said, it'll still get hot in the summer, but more of it will refreeze in the winter. And we're just. We're looking for the average over the year.

267
00:44:16,710 --> 00:44:16,934
Kayla: Right.

268
00:44:16,982 --> 00:44:36,900
Chris: Right. So over, on average, more of it will freeze than melt, which is what we want, because when it melts, we already talked about the problem with that feedback loop. All right, so this is the time in the show where I want to talk to you a little bit about our very charismatic leader of Pleistocene Park, Sergei Zimov.

269
00:44:37,520 --> 00:44:38,168
Kayla: Question.

270
00:44:38,304 --> 00:44:38,896
Chris: Yes.

271
00:44:39,008 --> 00:44:40,540
Kayla: So can we, like, go visit.

272
00:44:42,920 --> 00:44:56,180
Chris: I'm about to show you where Pleistocene park is on a map. I think you can, but it's not. It's. Don't think of it as a. It's a science experiment. It's not like amusement Park. I understand it just has a cutesy name.

273
00:44:56,800 --> 00:44:58,912
Kayla: But what I'm hearing is we can go visit.

274
00:44:58,976 --> 00:45:00,408
Chris: It's not impossible to go visit.

275
00:45:00,464 --> 00:45:09,286
Kayla: Can we, Peter? The horsies, little noseys. Cause I looked at pictures of them and they are very cute and chubby. I want touch their soft noseys.

276
00:45:09,438 --> 00:45:12,446
Chris: They're wild horsies. So they are still be my friend.

277
00:45:12,518 --> 00:45:20,450
Kayla: I've played breath of the wild. I know how to feed a horse a carrot and make it be your friend. You just jump on its back and ride it long enough, and it'll be your friend.

278
00:45:22,270 --> 00:46:11,232
Chris: Anyway, let's talk about Sergei Zimov. And actually, I think I would also, I would be remiss at this point if I didn't call him maybe the co charismatic leader with his son Nikita. I highly recommend the short documentary that we mentioned about the Zimoffs and Pleistocene park, and it's called mammoth. I will absolutely link it in our show notes. The production value on it is top notch. I think it actually won some filmmaking awards, and it really gets into the story in a much more grounded human way than we're really talking about right now in our dumb cult podcast. Sergey does have a Wikipedia bio, so let's hear from that real quick. Just a level set. Sergei. I can't pronounce his middle name. Zimov? No. Not even gonna try it is a russian scientist.

279
00:46:11,336 --> 00:46:59,220
Chris: He is a geophysicist, which specializes in arctic and subarctic ecology. He is the director of Northeast Scientific Station, a research institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, a senior research fellow of the Pacific Institute for Geography, and one of the founders of Pleistocene Park, a 160 square kilometer wildlife preserve and research substation of the northeast scientific station. He is best known for his work in advocating theory that human overhunting of large herbivores during the Pleistocene caused Siberias grassland steppe ecosystem to disappear, and for raising awareness as to the important roles permafrost and thermokarst lakes play in the global carbon cycle. According to a colleague, Sergey Zimov is the most cited russian earth scientist, end quote.

280
00:47:00,600 --> 00:47:01,200
Kayla: Question?

281
00:47:01,320 --> 00:47:02,016
Chris: Yes?

282
00:47:02,168 --> 00:47:06,024
Kayla: Is he a vegetarian? We get some good veg wrap?

283
00:47:06,112 --> 00:47:08,448
Chris: I'm not sure, actually. I kind of.

284
00:47:08,464 --> 00:47:09,408
Kayla: Not that he has to be.

285
00:47:09,424 --> 00:47:10,328
Chris: I doubt it.

286
00:47:10,464 --> 00:47:11,400
Kayla: Oh, interesting.

287
00:47:11,480 --> 00:47:13,928
Chris: But I don't know. I really don't know.

288
00:47:13,984 --> 00:47:23,966
Kayla: I just. It's interesting to have it. And I obviously don't know what he would say himself to have it phrased as, like, human overhunting is responsible for.

289
00:47:24,038 --> 00:47:26,254
Chris: This is just, well, we'll get to that.

290
00:47:26,302 --> 00:47:45,086
Kayla: You don't often hear our, you know, older, more. Yeah, you don't often hear our ancestors. Our old, old ancestors is like, they're responsible for. We have them be responsible for, like, social ills a lot, but not necessarily like, natural, ecological ills.

291
00:47:45,118 --> 00:47:59,154
Chris: Yeah, well, and especially when we're talking about this. And again, we'll get to this, but we're not talking like the Romans or even the Egyptians hunting. We're talking about, like, stone age, like, pre historical overhunting.

292
00:47:59,322 --> 00:48:02,378
Kayla: Oh, oh, we're talking about that far, long ago.

293
00:48:02,474 --> 00:48:32,090
Chris: Yeah. So it's actually, you're right. It's interesting. We don't, we usually sort of have this, like, idyllic picture of, you know, oh, well, prehistory humans, we're just at one with nature and that it was, it's only our sinful, you know, current technology that has destroyed the pristine, you know. But actually, as we'll find out in a minute, maybe not the case. And that's, he's one of the sort of, this guy, Sergey Zimoff is one of the leading proponents of that theory.

294
00:48:32,170 --> 00:48:34,946
Kayla: You know, it's nice to not be blamed for something for once.

295
00:48:35,098 --> 00:48:36,234
Chris: Well, it's still human's fault.

296
00:48:36,282 --> 00:48:40,264
Kayla: It is, but it's not my fault. It's not because I used a plastic straw.

297
00:48:40,352 --> 00:49:12,626
Chris: That's true. Yeah. That's a good point. Now, you and I and most of our audience probably already find this person compelling just from that bio that I snipped because were all excited by science and jurassic parks. But, oh, no, it does not end there. For the Zimoff story, my friend. Hardly. Just for a sec, I want you to picture in your head the stereotype for an older man living not just in Siberia, but, like, the Siberia of Siberia here. Do you want to see it on a map where pleistocene park is located?

298
00:49:12,658 --> 00:49:15,098
Kayla: I'm assuming it's, like, way off of one of them peninsulas.

299
00:49:15,194 --> 00:49:16,110
Chris: Take a look.

300
00:49:18,370 --> 00:49:21,550
Kayla: Is anybody else there?

301
00:49:21,890 --> 00:49:23,730
Chris: Like four or five people?

302
00:49:23,850 --> 00:49:24,946
Kayla: Like, literally four or five people.

303
00:49:24,978 --> 00:49:30,186
Chris: I think they have a manned presence at the research station. That's like six people. Totally.

304
00:49:30,218 --> 00:49:31,190
Kayla: Why is it there?

305
00:49:33,180 --> 00:49:59,642
Chris: Why did they locate Pleistocene park there? Yeah, because the rewilding that they are trying to do that, we talked about introducing the animals. This is where the permafrost is that can melt. And there's a combination of other factors, too. Like, you know, it's far from any, like, human productive land that he would have to consider. And there's some other biome considerations that. That we will talk more about in just a minute.

306
00:49:59,706 --> 00:50:14,234
Kayla: I mean, we'll get to that. To be clear for our audience, this is nowhere near the Europe side of Russia. It is on the complete opposite end from where Europe is. This is closer to Alaska, probably, than it is to Europe, to Moscow.

307
00:50:14,282 --> 00:50:15,098
Chris: Yeah, probably.

308
00:50:15,234 --> 00:50:15,554
Kayla: Actually.

309
00:50:15,602 --> 00:50:16,390
Chris: Definitely.

310
00:50:16,890 --> 00:50:28,596
Kayla: It's very northern. It is very isolated. And like you said, there's about five people there. So it's as isolated can get while still being on land.

311
00:50:28,748 --> 00:50:35,444
Chris: Yeah. It's like this remote. There's beyond remote, and then there's where Sergei and Nikita Zimov live and work.

312
00:50:35,492 --> 00:50:38,948
Kayla: What does he eat? How does he go to the store?

313
00:50:39,044 --> 00:50:48,222
Chris: I don't think there's a. There's a lot of logistical questions that I did not have the time to get into, but is there an airplane? I will ask them, etcetera.

314
00:50:48,316 --> 00:51:02,754
Kayla: I'm just saying it looks some of the logistics that. I'm just. Just looking at it right now. It look, it probably has similar logistics as, like, antarctic researchers in terms of, like, getting supplies. It just seems like there's probably some of those same logistics.

315
00:51:02,802 --> 00:51:10,794
Chris: Yeah. I don't know what. How reachable it is by various methods of transportation. I did not look at that. Like, there's definitely no trains or anything going there.

316
00:51:10,842 --> 00:51:11,430
Kayla: Right.

317
00:51:11,930 --> 00:51:36,864
Chris: If there's a road, it's probably, like, the most overgrown mud road. Maybe reachable by airplane only. I don't know. So picture the kind of gruff, old russian guy who would choose to live there and choose to dedicate his life to hard, physically demanding science. And you've pictured Sergei Zimov, giant, barrel.

318
00:51:36,912 --> 00:51:43,648
Kayla: Chested, tattooed forearms with the sleeves rolled up three quarters of the way. Probably has a beard.

319
00:51:43,784 --> 00:51:45,648
Chris: He's got a huge Santa Claus beard.

320
00:51:45,704 --> 00:51:46,072
Kayla: Yeah.

321
00:51:46,136 --> 00:51:48,224
Chris: He has long hair. It's all gray.

322
00:51:48,352 --> 00:51:51,120
Kayla: Probably has a prominent scar somewhere on his face.

323
00:51:51,200 --> 00:51:52,288
Chris: He loves vodka.

324
00:51:52,344 --> 00:51:52,624
Kayla: Yeah.

325
00:51:52,672 --> 00:51:54,360
Chris: He smokes. He's got a.

326
00:51:54,440 --> 00:51:55,144
Kayla: Wait, are we saying.

327
00:51:55,192 --> 00:51:56,848
Chris: Are you a bitchin hat that he wears mostly.

328
00:51:56,864 --> 00:51:58,800
Kayla: Are you still saying the stereotypes? Are you saying what he actually.

329
00:51:58,840 --> 00:52:01,060
Chris: No, this is him. I'm describing him.

330
00:52:01,560 --> 00:52:02,112
Kayla: Really?

331
00:52:02,216 --> 00:52:02,496
Chris: Yes.

332
00:52:02,528 --> 00:52:05,904
Kayla: Wait, so he's really big and Santa Claus beard with, like, do you want.

333
00:52:05,912 --> 00:52:06,448
Chris: To see a picture?

334
00:52:06,504 --> 00:52:10,496
Kayla: Yes. I thought you're gonna say, like, oh, picture the stereotype. He's the exact opposite.

335
00:52:10,568 --> 00:52:12,208
Chris: No, he is the exact stereotype.

336
00:52:12,264 --> 00:52:14,040
Kayla: This is the guy looks like.

337
00:52:14,080 --> 00:52:15,240
Chris: He looks like how you would picture.

338
00:52:15,280 --> 00:52:34,906
Kayla: A russian wilderness scientist version of the. Of the supposed villain in home alone. The, like, oh, the guy with the shovel. Yeah, the scary shovel man. That, you know, he murdered his family, and then you find out, no, he's just a lonely old man that saves Kevin. That's what that guy looks like, except for the gianter beard and a more intimidating presence.

339
00:52:35,018 --> 00:52:38,210
Chris: Yeah, well, instead of saving Kevin, he's saving the permafrost.

340
00:52:38,330 --> 00:52:39,030
Kayla: Cool.

341
00:52:39,410 --> 00:53:03,754
Chris: And he definitely has no time for your nonsense. He's like that kind of guy. Like, whatever the nonsense is, I don't. Whatever. He has no time for it. So now that you can kind of, hopefully our audience can picture him. If not, check out our instagram. But also, now that you're picturing him, good. Picture yourself shaking his hand, because he, his son and his team are standing against the forces of darkness like goddamn comic book heroes.

342
00:53:03,802 --> 00:53:04,750
Kayla: I like them.

343
00:53:05,450 --> 00:53:26,764
Chris: Honestly, as fascinating as the science is with Pleistocene park, the human interest tale of the Zmoffs is equally fascinating. Here's another couple quick hits. Other than just the how does he look and where do they live? First, there's the fact that it's been around for a while. It was officially founded in 1996, but Sergey actually started the project, the scientific part of the project, in 1988.

344
00:53:26,892 --> 00:53:28,276
Kayla: Oh, same. Me too.

345
00:53:28,388 --> 00:53:40,028
Chris: Yeah, same. I forgot that. Yes, Pleistocene park is as old as you. Yes, they have been running the experiment for 33 years. And when did you hear about it?

346
00:53:40,164 --> 00:53:40,740
Kayla: Right now.

347
00:53:40,820 --> 00:53:58,262
Chris: Yeah, today. So the thing is, Sergey wasn't really taken seriously for some time. Boo. Up to and including today. Actually, it would be more accurate to say that the greater scientific community didn't take hammer pleistocene park seriously early on, but now people are listening.

348
00:53:58,326 --> 00:53:58,838
Kayla: Good.

349
00:53:58,974 --> 00:54:13,526
Chris: The up to and including today part is just referencing the fact that Pleistocene rewilding as a concept isn't, like, 100% dogma acceptance the way something like quantum mechanics and physics is, or evolution and biology.

350
00:54:13,598 --> 00:54:16,268
Kayla: It's, like, still something that's kind of evolving scientifically.

351
00:54:16,374 --> 00:54:48,132
Chris: Exactly. There are still some legitimate good faith arguments against it or risks with it. Like, it's not like, you know, 100% set in stone, but it's gaining a lot of acceptance. The bottom line, though, is that there. Yeah, there's a story arc here where Sergey Zimov goes from more of, like, an outsider in the scientific community to having more acceptance. But, you know, that's kind of expected with the ideas that we're talking about. They're very big, and in many cases that we. We'll actually still get to. They have some unintuitive conclusions about environmental science. Oh.

352
00:54:48,156 --> 00:54:51,188
Kayla: So what are some of those conclusions? Cars are good.

353
00:54:51,284 --> 00:54:52,028
Chris: Yeah, cars are good.

354
00:54:52,044 --> 00:54:53,732
Kayla: Should be rewilding. But with drink.

355
00:54:53,796 --> 00:54:55,764
Chris: More vodka? No, with tanks, Kayla.

356
00:54:55,812 --> 00:54:59,660
Kayla: With tanks. Rewild, but with gas guzzling hummers.

357
00:54:59,820 --> 00:55:35,000
Chris: The other interesting human story here is the relationship his son Nikita has with him and the Pleistocene park project. Nikita heads up the project now, actually, but it wasn't always that way. As we said, Pleistocene park has been a decades long project. The key to Zimov is 38 at the time of this podcast here in 2021, Pleistocene park, if you measure all the way back to scientific origins, is 33. So let that soak in for a minute. Imagine being raised by a parent who is in charge of a generational science project, and the stakes couldn't be higher.

358
00:55:35,300 --> 00:55:36,800
Kayla: You know what this sounds like?

359
00:55:37,780 --> 00:55:41,428
Chris: I don't. What does it sound like?

360
00:55:41,564 --> 00:55:42,560
Kayla: Any anime?

361
00:55:44,380 --> 00:55:47,596
Chris: Yeah. Oh, they should totally do anime. On place to scene poiling.

362
00:55:47,628 --> 00:55:48,292
Kayla: I want this.

363
00:55:48,356 --> 00:55:48,916
Chris: That'd be tight.

364
00:55:48,988 --> 00:55:53,716
Kayla: My God. Scientist father, complicated relationship with coworker son.

365
00:55:53,828 --> 00:55:54,708
Chris: Super high stakes.

366
00:55:54,764 --> 00:55:57,388
Kayla: Super high stakes. Gotta save the world. Anime. This is anime.

367
00:55:57,484 --> 00:56:06,542
Chris: And imagine that project is so remote, dad can't just put an ad on craigslist for someone to come help him run the thing, right? So imagine the pressure.

368
00:56:06,646 --> 00:56:08,182
Kayla: Where's the mom? Where's the mom?

369
00:56:08,246 --> 00:56:14,950
Chris: Imagine the anime responsibility. I don't actually know where the mom is. I think they answer that in the Atlantic article.

370
00:56:15,070 --> 00:56:17,454
Kayla: I'm just saying we got some tropes here.

371
00:56:17,582 --> 00:57:07,252
Chris: Oh, it's tropes galore, baby. So if you're Sergei, there's a conflict between the needs of your critically important life's work and the agency and autonomy of your son. If you're Nikita, it's the same but in reverse. And for yourself. So here's a longish quote from that Atlantic article that I've mentioned a couple times now. It's extremely thorough. It's by a man by the name of Ross Anderson, who actually did visit Pleistocene park to get this story. And the article is entitled, appropriately enough, welcome to Pleistocene Park. I quote, the Zimovs have a complicated relationship. The father says he had to woo the son back to the Arctic. When Nikita was young, Sergey was, by his own admission, obsessed with work. Nikita told me. I don't even think he paid attention to me at all until I was 20.

372
00:57:07,436 --> 00:57:41,200
Chris: Nikita went away for high school to a prestigious science academy in Novacebersk, Siberia's largest city. He found life there to his liking and decided to stay for university. Sergei made the journey to Novosibirskhe during Nikita's freshman year and asked him to come home. It would have been easy for Nikita to say no. He soon started dating the woman he would go on to marry. Saying yes to Sergei meant asking her to live and raise children in the ice fields at the top of the world. And then there was his pride. Quote, it is difficult to dedicate your life to someone else's idea, he told me.

373
00:57:42,620 --> 00:57:51,828
Kayla: Isn't that what we all do, though? That's so just like, oh, man, that is something that we all grapple with every damn day. Because it's like, if you're not doing.

374
00:57:51,884 --> 00:57:53,292
Chris: Like that on steroids, if you're not.

375
00:57:53,316 --> 00:57:57,900
Kayla: In charge of your own thing, then you're helping somebody else's idea come into the world.

376
00:57:58,020 --> 00:58:00,676
Chris: Now imagine if that's you're living in someone else's dream.

377
00:58:00,828 --> 00:58:05,012
Kayla: But now imagine it's your dad's. But it's like, not even just, like, oh, the family business.

378
00:58:05,076 --> 00:58:12,300
Chris: It's like the family business of saving the world. Yeah, yeah, I know. The drama there is, like, through the freaking roof.

379
00:58:12,340 --> 00:58:19,384
Kayla: And it's like, oh, your dad didn't care about you until you could be of service to this thing, and now he needs you. And so it's like, oh, any of that.

380
00:58:19,432 --> 00:58:21,360
Chris: It's like somebody wrote this for, like, a tv show.

381
00:58:21,400 --> 00:58:28,020
Kayla: I'm telling you, it's literally anime. Somebody give me the anime of this. Somebody get a mech suit for this guy to go into and trample the grass himself.

382
00:58:29,480 --> 00:58:47,550
Chris: I can't help but grab an additional quote from further down in the same article just to plunk down next to the one I just read. Quote. When Sergey was out of earshot, I asked Nikita whether one of his daughters would one day take over a place scene park to see his plan through. We were watching two of them play in an old soviet military radar station.

383
00:58:47,630 --> 00:58:49,398
Kayla: Oh, my God. What a childhood.

384
00:58:49,534 --> 00:59:09,540
Chris: I took the girls to the park last week, and I don't think they were too impressed. Nikita told me, laughing. They thought the horses were unfriendly. The author then Ross says, I told him that this wasn't answer. I'm not as selfish as my father. He said, I won't force them to do this, end quote.

385
00:59:12,216 --> 00:59:13,980
Kayla: I have thoughts and feelings.

386
00:59:14,640 --> 00:59:19,616
Chris: Yeah, I know. It's, the whole thing is very fascinating.

387
00:59:19,728 --> 00:59:33,342
Kayla: It's like the father's clearly, I can clearly see why his son would use the word selfish and forced. And also, we are all masters of our own. Yeah. Destiny. There is a choice to be there.

388
00:59:33,496 --> 00:59:34,786
Chris: And he is choosing that.

389
00:59:34,858 --> 00:59:35,338
Kayla: Yeah.

390
00:59:36,570 --> 00:59:39,626
Chris: It's wonderful. It's just dripping with, like, human drama.

391
00:59:39,698 --> 00:59:44,522
Kayla: So this isn't about a cult. This is just. You wanted to talk about, like, this thing that should be anime.

392
00:59:44,626 --> 00:59:51,642
Chris: We'll get to that. Well, anyway, Kayla, the hero's journey is never a straight path.

393
00:59:51,826 --> 00:59:53,266
Kayla: Isn't that the truth?

394
00:59:53,418 --> 01:00:30,650
Chris: So again, I want to emphasize that these epic, decades long, emotionally packed storylines are. Are happening against the backdrop of an unforgiving siberian environment where the science is hard labor and the dirt never leaves from underneath your fingernails. Now, Kaylan listeners, if you're anything like me, you probably have some questions at this point. For instance, you might be wondering, okay, great. Pleistocene park is trying to restore a specific kind of ecology by bringing animals back to Siberia. But if there's a lack of fauna, if there's a lack of animals where it, quote, should be, then where did the original animals go?

395
01:00:30,990 --> 01:00:31,678
Kayla: Yeah, where did they go?

396
01:00:31,694 --> 01:00:32,870
Chris: Is that something you're wondering?

397
01:00:32,990 --> 01:00:35,438
Kayla: Well, I mean, you said that they got hunted.

398
01:00:35,574 --> 01:00:45,566
Chris: Yeah, actually, that's true. We have hinted at that. So I asked our atlas pro friend that same question. Where did they go?

399
01:00:45,598 --> 01:00:55,240
Chris: Like, why? If it was a good symbiotic relationship between all the animals that were there in the Pleistocene than what happened to them.

400
01:00:55,400 --> 01:01:01,432
AtlasPro: There's two theories on this, and people will get mad at me depending on whether or not I say one or the other.

401
01:01:01,616 --> 01:01:02,976
Chris: I'll get mad at you for both.

402
01:01:03,128 --> 01:01:53,604
AtlasPro: Yeah, I'll just get people mad no matter what. One theory is that it was climate change. One theory is that because we're not in the glacial period of the ice age anymore, that as the environment transitioned from being heavily glaciated to not very glaciated change in environment changing conditions, that can cause other things in the environment to change, too. Right. The main argument is that more moisture was brought into the interior of Russia and that increased moisture was able to better supply trees with water and more trees were able to grow. Grass doesn't take that much water. So that's theory behind climate change. But theory that I prefer is the overhunting hypothesis that states that it was humans that mostly came through as we expanded out of Africa, as we moved through the world. This was the ice age. We weren't farming.

403
01:01:53,652 --> 01:02:37,594
AtlasPro: We were still hunting and gathering. And like I said, there's not a lot of food resources up that far north. And we don't eat grass, we don't eat moss, and we don't eat trees. So the only thing to really eat up there were the animals. And people argue. People will say that we couldn't have killed them all, we couldn't have hunted all millions of these horses to extinction. But again, it comes back to cycles, and once you kill a few of the horses, a few of the mammoths, a few of the bisons, then they're less capable of maintaining their environment. Like we said, the animals maintain their environment. If we kill a few of them, they're less able to maintain the environment. Fewer bison means less grass means fewer bison.

404
01:02:37,722 --> 01:02:49,448
AtlasPro: And that, again, starts a cycle where we didn't have to kill every single one. We just had to initiate this feedback loop that just ran itself out eventually after we had maybe even left.

405
01:02:49,584 --> 01:02:50,620
Chris: That's interesting.

406
01:02:50,920 --> 01:02:55,136
AtlasPro: Yeah. And that's why I find that to be the more convincing argument.

407
01:02:55,288 --> 01:03:18,880
Chris: Yeah, well, I mean, the nice thing about the silver lining there is that it seems as though if there is a feedback system in place, which there is with animals sustaining the conditions in their environment, and we can disrupt that, then it suggests that we can also disrupt other feedback mechanisms that we don't like, such as the melting of the permafrost. So, yeah, so that part's good, I guess.

408
01:03:19,860 --> 01:03:20,148
Chris: Yeah.

409
01:03:20,164 --> 01:03:39,590
AtlasPro: Well, it is. It does give you hope, because if it's the animals that created the environment, then that shows that all we have to do to bring that environment back is to reintroduce the animals. If the animals come first and they can create that environment, it gives us hope, it gives us the possibility of recreating this environment.

410
01:03:40,090 --> 01:03:40,426
Chris: Right.

411
01:03:40,458 --> 01:03:41,130
Chris: Yeah. Which is.

412
01:03:41,170 --> 01:04:23,434
Chris: It's really fascinating because I just think that even for, like, more scientifically literate people, certainly for me anyway, just speaking for myself, I was. Not that I'm literate, but it was interesting to learn, as part of what I liked about your video, is interesting to learn just how symbiotic animals are with their environment. You usually, I feel like the default sort of assumption is that there's an environment that's like a setting, it's like a backdrop, and then you drop the little animals in it, and then as long as there's the stuff that they need, then they can, you know, as long as there's grass, then they can eat it. As long as there's trees, they can climb it, whatever it is. But this idea that. That it's symbiotic, that they're just part of all the same system, and it's not really.

413
01:04:23,602 --> 01:04:28,266
Chris: It's not a background that the animals exist in. It's like all part of the same painting, I guess.

414
01:04:28,418 --> 01:04:53,248
AtlasPro: Yeah. Well, I. I forgot what class it was in college, but I remember one of my professors telling me that, you know, the reason we have so many ideas that don't really end up panning out in the long term environment, like why species exist or niches or anything. It comes back to Christianity, actually, you know, it comes back to this idea that God created the world and then he populated it with these animals and.

415
01:04:53,304 --> 01:04:55,256
Chris: Oh, wow, that is a christian idea, isn't it?

416
01:04:55,288 --> 01:05:10,092
AtlasPro: It's very intertwined in our brains where I still find myself at fault, you know, making these assumptions, because it all comes back to this worldview that we've all been raised into, where the world existed, and then animals came into it, and they're just. They're two different folks.

417
01:05:10,116 --> 01:05:11,560
Chris: Oh, man, that's wild.

418
01:05:11,940 --> 01:05:12,516
AtlasPro: Yeah.

419
01:05:12,628 --> 01:05:14,228
Chris: Just blew my mind a little bit.

420
01:05:14,364 --> 01:05:28,708
AtlasPro: Yeah, that's why I remembered it when my professor said it. I was like, oh, my God. You know, that's why we think that species are different from one another, even though it's all a continuum of genetics. You know, it's all more complicated than the Bible makes it seem.

421
01:05:28,844 --> 01:05:31,600
Chris: Wow. The cultural thing there is really fascinating.

422
01:05:33,370 --> 01:05:43,910
Kayla: So, yeah, so me asking that, me making that statement earlier of, like, oh, it's so interesting to, like, be able to blame our ancestors for doing climate change shit.

423
01:05:44,890 --> 01:05:45,578
Chris: Yeah.

424
01:05:45,714 --> 01:05:48,010
Kayla: Totally validated. Clearly, I was on the right path.

425
01:05:48,050 --> 01:05:49,394
Chris: Oh, you were so right.

426
01:05:49,522 --> 01:05:52,610
Kayla: I'm so smart. Basically psychic with how intelligent I am.

427
01:05:52,690 --> 01:05:55,474
Chris: Actually, can I respond to your response there real quick?

428
01:05:55,602 --> 01:05:57,130
Kayla: Fine, because I.

429
01:05:57,250 --> 01:06:32,466
Chris: No, because I think it's interesting. You're like, we already said this, so I don't want to rehash, but, yeah, we usually think of, like, industrial nations, civilization. Us. Right? Like, humans of the 21st, 20th, and 21st century being this negative influence on the environment. And I think we're used to the idea that, like, because we absolutely could kill a million horses, right? Like, that's a possible thing we could do. And so we look back at tribal hunters and gatherers during the prehistoric age, like, they couldn't kill that many horses. But as Kaylin said, it's not just about, like, killing a million horses. It's about getting the ball rolling, which is kind of what this whole episode is about.

430
01:06:32,538 --> 01:07:28,676
Kayla: Right? And I think it was interesting when he was talking about kind of reinforcing the idea of, we tend to think of humans and animals as separate things as opposed to, no, humans are animals and our actions are part of the ecological system. And I could see somebody taking that idea and maybe extrapolating the wrong conclusions about, like, our current climate crisis from that. But I think that my argument would be, it's not that. Just the effects we're having on the climate right now is just us being animals. I think that actually the effects we are having on the climate right now is because of that idea of humans and animals as separate as humans. We are separate from the ecological process. That, to me, is probably something that's very much underlying the current climate crisis that we are in.

431
01:07:28,708 --> 01:07:46,606
Kayla: Like, the being so disconnected from our place in the natural, ecological system is part of why we're maybe not treating it the way we should. And we're not living with our ecology fighting against it in some pretty damaging ways.

432
01:07:46,718 --> 01:07:56,774
Chris: Yeah. I think there's always been, like, a bit of a binary that we're sort of having to grapple with now. Like, either. Either our ecology has been adversarial because it's been so dangerous to us.

433
01:07:56,822 --> 01:07:57,410
Kayla: Right.

434
01:07:57,830 --> 01:08:08,950
Chris: Or it's been sort of like this otherized, you know, ball of resources for us to tap into. But it's only recently, I think, that we've really understood the sort of interconnected.

435
01:08:08,990 --> 01:08:15,236
Kayla: Nature of things we should be. When we say were referring to, like, western industrialized.

436
01:08:15,308 --> 01:08:16,363
Chris: Right. That's another good point.

437
01:08:16,452 --> 01:08:16,964
Kayla: Society.

438
01:08:17,051 --> 01:08:46,192
Chris: Right. I mean, you heard him mention, like, the Zimovs had to go get horses from, like, native tribes in area. And I feel like we can very much relate to that here in the states where there's like this sort of like, eurocentric civilizational view of how we husband nature. And then there's like, all this technology that native folks to the north american continent have that we are actually kind of behind on. And it's interesting to hear that the Zimu had to get those horses from them.

439
01:08:46,256 --> 01:08:46,816
Kayla: Right.

440
01:08:46,968 --> 01:08:51,840
Chris: Because they're the only ones like, that had Yakushan horses anymore because they went extinct everywhere else.

441
01:08:51,880 --> 01:09:11,256
Kayla: And that's the thing that's. That's something that is probably going to help very much in the overall climate crisis, is tapping into the existing indigenous and native technologies and way of living within the ecological system. And I appreciate that we're doing an episode on, like, a very clear example of that.

442
01:09:11,287 --> 01:09:23,312
Chris: I think we absolutely have to. Yeah. And I think that. Yep, good example from Pleistocene park. And it's. It was also good to know that I'm, like, not alone in the. In the bias that there's, like, an environment and that animals just live in it.

443
01:09:23,376 --> 01:09:23,863
Kayla: Right.

444
01:09:23,992 --> 01:09:29,242
Chris: When in reality, animals are as much of a component of any environment as plants, soil, sunshine and rain.

445
01:09:29,305 --> 01:09:29,890
Kayla: Right.

446
01:09:30,050 --> 01:09:58,356
Chris: And again, Kaylin brings up this point that feedback systems are frighteningly powerful, but that also provides hope more animals contribute to more grasslands contribute to more animals shepherding. That process allows us humans to leverage what it takes to tackle problems at the scale of the global climate. So we talked about, how did all of the megafauna of the tundra go away?

447
01:09:58,508 --> 01:10:07,236
Kayla: Now can we talk about the megaflora? I want to talk about giant, huge Venus flytraps that will exist eating big old horses.

448
01:10:07,268 --> 01:10:08,684
Chris: Oh, there's still giant trees, Kayla.

449
01:10:08,732 --> 01:10:09,524
Kayla: Yeah, I know.

450
01:10:09,652 --> 01:10:21,800
Chris: Well, if you're anything like me, you may wonder, then, okay, but if humans hunted or disrupted all of the megafauna out of Asia and the Americas, why are there still megafauna in Africa?

451
01:10:22,300 --> 01:10:39,364
Kayla: Question. Before we hop into answering that question, another question. When you say megafauna, what exactly do you mean? Because. Yeah. When I think. When I think of megafauna, I think of, like. I don't know, that makes me think of, like, megalodon and, like, really gigantic ancient animals, as opposed to, like, rhinos and elephants.

452
01:10:39,452 --> 01:10:46,812
Chris: Okay, so rhinos and elephants are megafauna. So what we mean is, like, larger. And don't. Yeah, don't think of, like, brachiosaurus or whatever. We're just talking about.

453
01:10:46,836 --> 01:10:48,548
Kayla: Not dinosaurs in our current.

454
01:10:48,604 --> 01:11:33,412
Chris: Sort of, like, holocene. Pleistocene lasts tens of thousands of years. There are particular ecological niches that fill in, because, like, back when we're talking pleistocene, like, the world geographically looked the same. It wasn't like pangaea. It was still North America. It was still Asia, Africa, etcetera. Right? All the continents looked the same. So they had similar niches that were filled by similar animals. So, like, elephants exists in Africa. There used to be mastodons and mammoths that existed in the Americas. And Asia filled the exact same role. Very similar to elephants. There were woolly rhinos that were running around. Right. Rhinos exist now in Africa. There were a type of rhino that existed in Asia and North America.

455
01:11:33,476 --> 01:11:33,940
Kayla: Right.

456
01:11:34,060 --> 01:11:42,708
Chris: They even had very similar predator niches. Right, so you have, like, lions in Africa. There were cave lions in. In Asia. North America had saber toothed tigers.

457
01:11:42,764 --> 01:11:47,236
Kayla: Wait, North America had saber toothed tigers? I thought we only had buffaloes.

458
01:11:47,428 --> 01:11:55,228
Chris: No, well, we have buffaloes now. What I'm talking about is, like, what used to exist in the Pleistocene before they were allegedly over hunted.

459
01:11:55,284 --> 01:11:57,524
Kayla: I don't think I knew that we ever had biggies here.

460
01:11:57,652 --> 01:11:59,068
Chris: Yeah. Oh, yeah.

461
01:11:59,084 --> 01:11:59,580
Kayla: We had.

462
01:11:59,700 --> 01:12:08,062
Chris: The whole ecosystem was different. No, no. We had mammoth, or it was either mammoths or mastodons in North America. I forget we had all that stuff. We had big cats.

463
01:12:08,126 --> 01:12:10,726
Kayla: Where did they go? Tell. Explain.

464
01:12:10,798 --> 01:12:25,222
Chris: Well, so we said, where did they go? The answer to that, if you recall, was we either overhunted. There's some combination of over hunting and. Or getting the ball rolling, killing enough that they were no longer able to maintain that ecosystem, and then they died off.

465
01:12:25,246 --> 01:12:27,030
Kayla: But then why do some of them still be around?

466
01:12:27,150 --> 01:12:28,982
Chris: Why do the ones in Africa still be around?

467
01:12:29,046 --> 01:12:29,646
Kayla: Yeah.

468
01:12:29,798 --> 01:12:31,330
Chris: Well, that's what we're about to answer.

469
01:12:33,680 --> 01:12:50,440
Chris: One of the things I liked from your video was that you showed some pretty compelling charts for, like, when humans arrived in an area, and then when the megafauna of that area went away. But why did that not happen in Africa?

470
01:12:50,520 --> 01:12:51,792
Chris: We still have african megafauna.

471
01:12:51,816 --> 01:12:55,660
Chris: We still have giraffes and elephants and hippos and rhinos.

472
01:12:56,440 --> 01:13:46,968
AtlasPro: Yeah, I came to this problem a lot earlier than I actually came to the whole pleistocene problem, because I wanted to make a video asking why Africa's animals were so much bigger than everyone else's. You know, why. Why did they have elephants? Like, what? Where are. Where are elephants? You know, where are rhinos? Where are lions? And it turns out that everywhere else on earth did have giant animals until just a few thousand years ago. There were megafauna everywhere, and they were just as successful and just as prevalent and widespread as anywhere else. The only difference between Africa and everywhere else is the fact that humans evolved in Africa. And that's thought to be the big determining factor, is that as humans evolved, were evolving at the same speed as the elephants were, and everything was.

473
01:13:47,144 --> 01:14:06,220
AtlasPro: And everything had time to learn what humans were. There's a lot that we take for granted in our own minds, but one thing is having fears. If you see something, it inherently scares you. People are scared of spiders and snakes and all sorts of things without ever. I've never been by a snake, but I still don't want to get near them, you know?

474
01:14:06,300 --> 01:14:06,828
Chris: Right.

475
01:14:06,964 --> 01:14:56,994
AtlasPro: I don't need to, because it's been put into my brain by evolution, by poor ancestors who had bigger snakes to worry about, that they're dangerous, and they can be dangerous. And we think that the same thing happened in Africa where elephants, rhinos, they all learned very fast that these little monkeys chasing me with pointy sticks are bad news. So I should either run away from them when I see them, or I should attack them the moment I have the chance. And so their environment basically gave them behaviors, right. The environment influenced their own brains and what they did when they encountered us, but that didn't happen anywhere else because we didn't evolve anywhere else. So as we got out of Africa, we found that the rest of the animals had no idea how dangerous were. The mammoths, they looked exactly like elephants.

476
01:14:57,042 --> 01:15:42,040
AtlasPro: Had we hunting elephants, we would have known how to hunt a mammoth. If were hunting rhinos, we would have known how to hunt the woolly rhino, you know, and all these sorts of animals. So we got there, and it was likely the easiest thing to ever do. Like these. You can imagine these people just coming from Africa where all these animals are really mean, are really fast and get away from you before you can get them. And we just walk up right next to these mammoths and just. They wouldn't be scared of us at all, probably right. You know, we don't have records of that, but we assume, based on the behaviors that we've seen, elephants display similar animals that we think just a matter of their mentality. And I wasn't even too convinced by that until I saw the extent of it.

477
01:15:42,080 --> 01:16:29,744
AtlasPro: And it was amazing, because the further away the landmass, or the animal was from the origin point of humans, the greater degree of extinction occurred within the megafauna population. So, yeah, North America, where I am, has nothing like that. I mean, we have moose and stuff, but, you know, all the mammoths are gone. All the giant animals of that time are pretty much gone. And, you know, same with South America. South America got even worse because it was so secluded. Africa, they're still there. And, you know, close to Africa, they're still there. There's still some elephants in Asia, too. And because that was the first place humans got to after Africa, it's all about how much these animals knew about humans before they started to get hunted.

478
01:16:29,872 --> 01:16:30,352
Chris: Right.

479
01:16:30,456 --> 01:16:43,816
AtlasPro: Yeah, that's. That's really why we see this weird pattern of Africa having all the crazy animals, because they're. They're the only ones literally, evolutionarily smart enough to run away from us, right?

480
01:16:43,928 --> 01:17:20,108
Chris: And if you zoom away, too, from the. Just the mechanics of it, if you zoom away and just talk about it in terms of, like, there's just an arms race, right, between animals that don't want to get killed by humans and humans that want to kill them, the humans are going to get better at killing them, and they're going to better at surviving and so on and so forth. And then at a certain point, humans migrate, and then none of the animals that they encounter have gone through that arms race. So not only are they less afraid of humans have, like, all these strategies for killing giant tusk meat bags. So, yeah. So it's that from that 10,000 foot view, it's also really compelling.

481
01:17:20,244 --> 01:17:29,836
Chris: And when you put in your video, when you put that next to the charts that you were just sort of just talking about when humans arrived and then the degree to which the populations crashed, it was really compelling.

482
01:17:29,868 --> 01:17:31,404
Chris: I'd never encountered it before.

483
01:17:31,452 --> 01:17:33,640
Chris: And, like, right off the bat, I was like, that makes sense.

484
01:17:34,260 --> 01:18:09,960
AtlasPro: Yeah. I was so glad when I found those graphs, because it's hard to explain it just by voice, but when you see the sudden crash, the whole time before humans had arrived, 100% survival rates for all megafauna. And then humans arrive not even a thousand years later, a crash, like, maybe 20% survival rate of the megafauna. And that's seeing it in plain daylight. It's just seeing, like, oh, well, if I see exactly when humans arrive and I see an immediate reaction in the environment, how could I note, think that it's humans that are doing that are causing that?

485
01:18:12,460 --> 01:18:59,664
Chris: Interesting, right? Once again, this challenge and assumption I had, and so many assumptions that I had were challenged by learning about Pleistocene park from Atlas Pro and later from my own research. We already talked about my built in assumption of animals as actors on a stage, not part of the stage itself. And now my assumption that ice age megafauna just disappeared, along with the disappearing glaciers and warming earth. The data that Kalin presents in his video really opened my eyes on that. The existence of african megafauna helped convince me, and the timing really helped convince me. We talked about the, like, wow, what a coincidence. The evidence for megafauna population crashes is timed basically in every single case. Exactly. With the human fossils, when they started appearing in that area, we talked about that.

486
01:18:59,712 --> 01:19:37,090
Chris: But actually, there's another thing that he mentions in his video that we forgot to talk about, and that's that we are in the middle of an interglacial period right now. So interglacial, as he mentioned, means the ice has receded to only polar regions. But this Holocene interglacial period wasn't the first. There were many interglacial periods before this one. But megafauna populations had no problem surviving previous warming periods. So the warming planet caused population crash theory doesn't seem to have a great answer as to why this current interglacial period was somehow deadlier than others, aside from were here.

487
01:19:37,210 --> 01:20:02,824
Kayla: It's all our fault, as it always is. Here's the thing, okay, this is really important for me to say right now. Man, the world would be so much cooler if you were, like, driving to work and there was just like a saber toothed tiger. Or if you were just, like, heading to your 405. Yeah, just like, running. Or if you're, like, heading to your friend's house, you're like, oh, I gotta take a different road because the mammoth. Imagine how much cooler the world would be if we didn't kill off all the biggies.

488
01:20:02,952 --> 01:20:09,656
Chris: It would be much cooler. We are missing mega fun. I mean, that's why people love to safari in Africa is because they have, like, all the dope animals.

489
01:20:09,728 --> 01:20:18,728
Kayla: That's why people, like, get killed by bison and moose all the time here, because they get too damn close. They're like, oh, look at this gigantic animal. I've never seen anything like this. And then the bison runs them over.

490
01:20:18,784 --> 01:20:22,762
Chris: Right. It's probably why we still have bison is because the bison is smart enough to run over humans.

491
01:20:22,786 --> 01:20:23,738
Kayla: Yeah, keep doing it.

492
01:20:23,754 --> 01:20:25,570
Chris: Keep it up, buffalo, as we just talked about.

493
01:20:25,610 --> 01:20:26,658
Kayla: Good job, moose.

494
01:20:26,834 --> 01:20:30,914
Chris: How's your brain doing? Are you ready to have yet another assumption challenged?

495
01:20:31,042 --> 01:20:33,190
Kayla: Yeah, pull on my brain meat.

496
01:20:34,330 --> 01:20:37,394
Chris: There's a few things in your video where it kind of made me really?

497
01:20:37,442 --> 01:20:38,402
Chris: I didn't know that.

498
01:20:38,546 --> 01:20:43,618
Chris: This is an example. In pleistocene park, the zmops are actually knocking trees down.

499
01:20:43,714 --> 01:20:43,946
Chris: Right.

500
01:20:43,978 --> 01:20:53,736
Chris: But we hear all the. Like, especially recently, we've heard a lot of talk about, like, oh, yeah, we plant a bunch of trees, we will fix climate change. So this seems opposite of that.

501
01:20:53,768 --> 01:20:55,056
Chris: So what's going on there?

502
01:20:55,208 --> 01:21:43,446
AtlasPro: Yeah, so this deals with a misconception that I had and probably most, you know, most people have, that trees are the pinnacle of the environment. You know, that you can't do better in an environment than trees. But that's really not the case. You know, trees are just like any other plants. Trees are trying to advantage themselves just like any other plant. And in an environment as harsh as super North Siberia, trees don't really want to produce a lot of fruits. Trees don't really want to produce a lot of nutritious seeds for animals to eat because it's harder for them to survive. And so they don't. So they're very lacking in nutrition. And on another level, trees also don't store all that much carbon dioxide. I mean, they obviously put a lot into their bodies and into their trunks.

503
01:21:43,518 --> 01:22:23,936
AtlasPro: But once they die, trees don't grow at a rate where they're going to be buried by other trees. Right. Trees take years and years to grow and years to decompose. But trees almost always get to decompose before they get covered by stuff. That's where grass comes in is grass grows on top of itself. Grass will bury other grass in itself. And that just buries all of this carbon underneath a layer, layer of grass to the point where it can't decompose. It doesn't have the time to because it grows so rapidly. And grass also provides resources for the animals. So you knock down trees, thinking that's. That's a horrible thing for the environment.

504
01:22:24,008 --> 01:23:12,750
AtlasPro: But when you realize that trees don't provide anything for animals and trees don't store all that much carbon when compared to grasslands, then you realize that knocking them down and allowing grasses to grow not only helps support animals and a larger animal community, it also sequesters carbon more efficiently. And the reason we don't have these tame grasslands going on is because all the grasslands that we have basically just been turned into farms. And that's why we don't want to return anything to grasslands. The only reason it works up in Siberia is because there's no farms up there. It's just trees or moss. And that's why in that setting, removing trees is more environmentally effective at removing carbon and fostering animal communities.

505
01:23:13,250 --> 01:23:43,828
Chris: Interesting. Yeah, I had that. So that misconception you talked. Again, one of the things about your video that made me question my intuition was about the fact that, yeah, if you think of trees as being this sort of the final boss of ecology, right, when everything is fully developed, you have this fern Gully and there's just the most biodiversity, the most productiveness. And that's not always the case. Maybe it's the case for the Amazon, but not necessarily for these boreal forests.

506
01:23:43,924 --> 01:24:29,070
AtlasPro: Yeah, I mean, that's the thing. It's like when we think of forests, we either think of the forest that we live in, which is, I live in New York, it's a pretty productive forest. There's a lot of things going on, or we think of the tropical rainforest, but that's not what you're getting in the Arctic. It honestly comes back to the whole Christianity aspect, is we still think of the world as this orderly thing, where there's the top is the trees, and then below that's shrubs and below that's grass. And we think of it as a progression. We think of it as something that's been ordered and calculated and quantified. It isn't. Different things work better in different circumstances and for different reasons. And that just goes back to how complex of a system the earth is.

507
01:24:30,410 --> 01:24:38,394
Chris: Again, fascinating. Right. Did that challenge any of your assumptions about forest biomes versus grassland biomes?

508
01:24:38,442 --> 01:25:27,596
Kayla: It did. And it's really stressing me out because it feels like we're sitting here in this episode talking about this incredible thing that's being undertaken to preserve the life of our planet and, like, prevent the climate crisis or roll back the climate crisis. And then we're talking about these things that are challenging assumptions that, man, I'm just looking at it going, boy, people could extrapolate the wrong lessons from these things. And it's so terrifying. And it goes back to, like, the truth is ultimately the most important thing. Even when it's, like, someone dangerous. Even when it's dangerous. But it's like, just, even if you say, like, oh, the trees are not important, it doesn't mean we should go and, like, cut down every single tree and, like, destroy all the trees and fuck the trees.

509
01:25:27,788 --> 01:25:28,628
Chris: Don't fuck the trees.

510
01:25:28,684 --> 01:25:48,308
Kayla: Don't fuck the trees. But having a scientific understanding that puts trees in their place will help us put our energy where it needs to go in terms of, like, how do we preserve the environment, preserve our ecology, roll back the climate crisis, yada yada.

511
01:25:48,484 --> 01:25:50,236
Chris: Don't yada the climate crisis.

512
01:25:50,268 --> 01:25:51,292
Kayla: I'm just, it's not the.

513
01:25:51,396 --> 01:25:55,724
Chris: Have you learned nothing about yada ing from Seinfeld?

514
01:25:55,772 --> 01:25:59,720
Kayla: It is not the stance of this podcast that the crisis is not important.

515
01:26:00,020 --> 01:26:03,700
Chris: He's gonna be like, what's yada? Cause he's too young. He's not gonna know this.

516
01:26:03,740 --> 01:26:12,932
Kayla: Leave him alone. Anybody can watch Seinfeld. Oh, I'm so old. Climate change is real. Whatever you. Whatever you might extrapolate from this, climate change is real. Don't get down on the trees.

517
01:26:13,036 --> 01:26:52,320
Chris: As Kayla just said, this is complex. So let's be super clear here. And hopefully, in some way, this should go without saying, but I'm going to say it anyway. It is so much more complicated than trees good, grass bad, right? Or trees bad, grass good. Okay. It is much more useful to think of various plants and animals filling different roles in different ecosystems. And those roles can change and shift depending on different geographies. So what might be good to knock down a tree in pleistocene park is probably not a good thing for you to do in the forested areas of New York.

518
01:26:52,480 --> 01:26:53,536
Kayla: Don't do that.

519
01:26:53,648 --> 01:27:42,724
Chris: And as he also mentioned, boreal forest trees face a different survival puzzle than equatorial rainforest trees. Right? They're trying to survive in this cold northern climate, whereas equatorial rainforest trees have year round sunshine, heat, humidity. It's just a totally different puzzle. The same with any shrubs, grasses, animals, fungi, bacteria, viruses, and so on. The boreal tree's survival puzzle pushes them to be more guarded with their resources and generally less biologically productive in that region than something like mammoth steps might be. With all the grasslands in warmer, wetter climates, that's not necessarily the case, but since it is in the Arctic, that means boreal forests can't support animals the way a mammoth steppe could. And if the case is not clear, we've talked about it a couple times.

520
01:27:42,772 --> 01:27:54,142
Chris: Mammoth steppe is the name for that biome that no longer exists, which is like this sort of, like, arctic prairie grassland, where mammoths and woolly rhinos and all of these megafauna that used to exist, that's where they would have lived.

521
01:27:54,206 --> 01:27:57,262
Kayla: S t e p p e. Yeah, step.

522
01:27:57,446 --> 01:28:44,962
Chris: Stepi. And we've already talked about how the presence of such animals in such an environment might beneficial to us humans and how it can fight the climate crisis. It's a powerful check on the assumption, though, that more trees equals more better. But that doesn't mean that planting trees is bad. Far from it. Reforestation programs in different parts of the world can also be good at the exact same time. Managed logging is actually good for greenhouse gas sequestration because tree growth is what really captures carbon. Tree respiration is actually fairly carbon neutral. It's the growth that really does most of the carbon removal from the environment. And when those trees are logged and use as building material, for example, that carbon that went into growing the trees is removed from the cycle, and the trees planted to.

523
01:28:44,986 --> 01:29:07,986
Chris: To replace them keep removing carbon from the atmosphere. That's good, but maybe not so good for arctic permafrost. Hence Pleistocene rewilding. As yet another interesting side note about the zimovs. They have recommissioned a soviet era russian tank to knock down trees around the park to help kickstart the whole animal grassland symbiotic system.

524
01:29:08,058 --> 01:29:08,950
Kayla: Say that again.

525
01:29:09,570 --> 01:29:14,536
Chris: Do you remember earlier in the episode when you asked about them driving a car and I said, no tank?

526
01:29:14,728 --> 01:29:15,352
Kayla: Yes.

527
01:29:15,456 --> 01:29:16,448
Chris: Yeah, so they have one.

528
01:29:16,504 --> 01:29:20,552
Kayla: So they have a for real soviet era tank that they use to knock small.

529
01:29:20,696 --> 01:29:26,864
Chris: It's not like a gigantic tank. It's a small tank, but they use it to knock down trees in Pleistocene park.

530
01:29:26,992 --> 01:29:30,032
Kayla: Okay, I am doing the wrong thing with my life.

531
01:29:30,096 --> 01:29:40,758
Chris: I know. So there's literally a russian dude with, like, a gray beard who doesn't have time for your shit, smokes, drinks vodka, driving a yemenite tank around with a.

532
01:29:40,774 --> 01:29:42,878
Kayla: Complicated relationship with his son.

533
01:29:43,054 --> 01:30:30,598
Chris: Yes. Yes. All of this is real. I've seen. I've seen video of it. So it may seem counterintuitive to knock these trees down somewhere when someone is planting them elsewhere, both with the same goals of preventing climate disaster. So again, this is another point where I can emphasize just how complex a system the ecology and climate for the entire earth is. So that means the problem of climate change is equally complex, and in turn, the solution is going to involve many systems. It's going to be interdisciplinary, etcetera. And as I mentioned before, there's even a debate as to how effective rewilding is as a policy. It's a bit out of scope for right now, but pleistocene rewilding is only one type of rewilding. There are other rewilding projects and proposed projects.

534
01:30:30,784 --> 01:30:38,698
Chris: Some folks want to bring megafauna back to the north american prairie by introducing things like african rhinos and elephants and lions here in the good ol us of a.

535
01:30:38,754 --> 01:30:44,130
Kayla: Was I not just saying how much better it would be if there were mammoths running around all the damn time?

536
01:30:44,210 --> 01:31:39,710
Chris: It's a controversial proposal, to say the least. There's not to me, also something called the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation initiative that has rewilding as a core tenethead. The Pacific Northwest in the US has undergone a pretty successful rewilding project by removing most of their hydroelectric projects in the region. The UK has a bunch of rewilding projects. Europe does, Africa does, other non Siberia, parts of Asia do. I mean, literally, I could just list every continent, right? Except for Antarctica, I guess. But my point is that this is a whole metadiscipline within environmental and conservation science. And my secondary point is that depending on specifically which type of rewilding we're talking about, there's some legitimate debate as to effectiveness. These challenges range from economic arguments to arguments along the like, you know, you're playing God lines.

537
01:31:40,130 --> 01:31:49,806
Chris: The ZmoVs have a specific answer to this one because it's been levied at them so many times, which basically comes down to like, hey, we've been playing God this whole time. So, like, why is this where we should stop?

538
01:31:49,898 --> 01:31:50,366
Kayla: Right?

539
01:31:50,478 --> 01:32:16,978
Chris: Which I kind of subscribe to that, to be honest, to the like, hey, there may be unintended consequences here. Arguments. And actually, this is another great time to do a Jurassic park reference, because as we mentioned in the opening of the show, JP and the book, even more so than the movie, was kind of about the law of unintended consequences. And remember you were asking me earlier, like, what the hell? Why did they have so much character chaos theory in the book?

540
01:32:17,074 --> 01:32:19,482
Kayla: No, I asked. I didn't ask about the book. I asked about the movie.

541
01:32:19,586 --> 01:32:42,422
Chris: Okay, well, the movie was from the book. And the reason that chaos Theory featured as like a recurring theme in the book is that small changes can lead to unpredictably wild outcomes. The book was sort of about dinosaurs running loose, but the underlying theme was chaos theory. The underlying theme was unintended consequences of small changes.

542
01:32:42,486 --> 01:32:51,646
Kayla: And that's why I was asking about the movie, not the book, because that makes sense for the book. The movie was about Steven Spielberg's relationship.

543
01:32:51,678 --> 01:33:02,070
Chris: With his father, which is what every Steven Spielberg movie is about. That's a good point. They probably didn't need Doctor Ian Malcolm for that. Actually, they definitely didn't. But then we would miss that.

544
01:33:02,110 --> 01:33:03,174
Kayla: Excuse you, sir.

545
01:33:03,262 --> 01:33:04,750
Chris: But then we wouldn't have the Jeff Goldblum.

546
01:33:04,790 --> 01:33:05,286
Kayla: Yeah, exactly.

547
01:33:05,318 --> 01:33:07,430
Chris: Meme with him, like reclining.

548
01:33:07,470 --> 01:33:22,494
Kayla: Also that like unrepentantly horny scene in which he has taken Doctor Ellie Sattler's hand and is dripping drops of water upon it in order to demonstrate chaos theory.

549
01:33:22,622 --> 01:33:23,854
Chris: I forgot about that.

550
01:33:23,942 --> 01:33:30,046
Kayla: That's actually a good demonstration, though. Alan Grant looks on cuckolded and unable to intervene.

551
01:33:30,158 --> 01:33:32,526
Chris: My God. Did you just call Doctor Alan Grant.

552
01:33:32,558 --> 01:33:36,530
Kayla: A cuck in that scene? Absolutely has been cucked.

553
01:33:36,610 --> 01:33:37,890
Chris: Sorry. Oh my God.

554
01:33:38,010 --> 01:33:41,642
Kayla: We should all be so lucky as to be cucked by Jeff Goldblum.

555
01:33:41,786 --> 01:34:08,786
Chris: Fair enough. But yeah, like I said, I tend to agree with the zemovs here. Playing godship has long since sailed. We have always interfered with our natural environment. And also, just like the mammoth step megafauna, we are animals in that environment and we affect that environment. So let's endeavor to interfere with the natural environment in a conscious, scientific way rather than just doing it, you know.

556
01:34:08,818 --> 01:34:32,644
Kayla: Willy nilly or even in a positive way. Like there's, that's what I mean, there's nothing to say that like, oh, we're animals. We interact with the environment. Yeah, but we're also animals that are very different than other animals. Like, we can interact with our environment in a conscious way, like you said. Said. So there's nothing unnatural about trying to do so in a positive or restorative way.

557
01:34:32,732 --> 01:34:33,172
Chris: Right, exactly.

558
01:34:33,196 --> 01:34:34,692
Kayla: That's just as natural as anything else.

559
01:34:34,756 --> 01:35:20,102
Chris: It's unnatural to consider that we don't have that effect. I think that's kind of what you were saying before about the sort of like binary, like divorcing ourselves from nature. We need to understand that we are part of the environment that affects the environment, which affects us the same way that a yakutian horse or a mammoth does. Here are a few bits of information that support me and Kaylin in our respect for pleistocene scene park first is from the Atlantic article that I mentioned before. Like many Russians, he and they're talking about Sergey here. He has a poetic way of speaking. In the arctic research community, he is famous for his ability to think across several scientific disciplines. He will spend years nurturing a big idea before previewing it for the field's luminaries. It will sound crazy at first, several of them told me.

560
01:35:20,296 --> 01:36:11,930
Chris: But then you go away and you think, said Max Holmes, the deputy director of the Woods Hole Research center in Massachusetts, and the idea starts to make sense, and then you can't come up with a good reason as to why it's wrong, end quote. And if that isn't enough, here's a blurb from Wikipedia's entry on Mister Zimov and his park. Zimov's concept of Pleistocene park and repopulating the mammoth steppe is listed as one of the 100 most substantive solutions to global warming. By Project Drawdown, the list encompassing only technologically viable existing solutions, was compiled by a team of over 200 scholars, scientists, policymakers, business leaders, and activists. For each solution, the carbon impact through the year 2050 and the total net cost to society and total lifetime savings were measured and modeled, end quote.

561
01:36:13,040 --> 01:36:23,140
Chris: So, Kayla, what do you think so far of Pleistocene park? Or actually, wait, hold on. Here's a better question. How does it compare to your true love, Jurassic Park?

562
01:36:23,680 --> 01:36:59,190
Kayla: I mean, they're completely different because whilst both park. I don't think you understand what you've done here. Whilst both parks have at their head a foreboding and or charismatic figure with a large white beard, only one of these charismatic figures seems to have any concept of perhaps their own hubris whilst playing God, as opposed to the other, which thought he could overcome his hubris and then had his grandchildren almost eaten by velociraptors.

563
01:36:59,270 --> 01:37:00,810
Chris: Mmm, I see.

564
01:37:01,310 --> 01:37:02,822
Kayla: That's the only difference I'm really seeing here.

565
01:37:02,846 --> 01:37:09,680
Chris: That's the only difference? Yeah, it's just that, I mean, Pleistocene park is real. That's pretty nice, sir, and it's helpful.

566
01:37:09,720 --> 01:37:12,760
Kayla: Jurassic park is real. All of our hearts.

567
01:37:12,920 --> 01:37:16,480
Chris: I don't know. I think there's a lot speaking to Pleistocene park over Jurassic park.

568
01:37:16,600 --> 01:37:18,136
Kayla: What do you mean over? What do you mean?

569
01:37:18,208 --> 01:37:21,112
Chris: If we're stack ranking the two parks, I think it should.

570
01:37:21,136 --> 01:37:23,000
Kayla: You can't stack rank the two parks.

571
01:37:23,080 --> 01:37:23,816
Chris: I just did.

572
01:37:23,888 --> 01:37:26,640
Kayla: Okay, okay. You really want to stack rank them?

573
01:37:26,680 --> 01:37:26,920
Chris: Yeah.

574
01:37:26,960 --> 01:37:33,442
Kayla: Okay. Say Jurassic Park. I went like this. Okay, Jurassic park is real. You have the opportunity, okay? Just be in that universe for a minute.

575
01:37:33,466 --> 01:37:34,226
Chris: Okay, all right, fine.

576
01:37:34,258 --> 01:37:45,162
Kayla: Hold on, hold on. I'm not done yet. Jurassic park is real. Pleistocene park is real. God comes down and says, kris, I can transport you instantly to one of these parks.

577
01:37:45,226 --> 01:37:51,042
Chris: I already am gonna. I'm obviously gonna say Jurassic park. Not the reason for that.

578
01:37:51,066 --> 01:37:52,554
Kayla: I'm not shitting on Pleistocene park.

579
01:37:52,602 --> 01:38:03,830
Chris: The reason for that is that Jurassic park actually has extinct animals watching, walking around. Okay, fine, fair. But what if?

580
01:38:04,970 --> 01:38:15,618
Chris: Do we want the zimovs to be knocking down trees by themselves this whole time? Or do they have another answer for that? Well, sort of leading question.

581
01:38:15,794 --> 01:39:01,456
AtlasPro: Yeah, maybe in, like, the next ten years, they would. Back when all of this step tundra was maintained naturally, the real champions of it were the mammoths. You know, we call it the mammoth step because not only were they the biggest animals, but they were really the causes of it. Some animals will trample the moss or whatever and make sure that moss doesn't grow, but the only animal that really knocks down trees are mammoths and mastodons, I should say. And we witnessed this in Africa. Still, you probably remember that clip of an elephant knocking down trees. Elephants do this all the time. You know, they either can't reach the leaves at the top or there's things that in the roots that they want to eat, so they just knock the tree over and eat whatever they want out of it.

582
01:39:01,488 --> 01:39:50,416
AtlasPro: And we imagine, you know, considering just how related mammoths, mastodons and elephants are, that they would have the same exact impact on the environment, that we'd have mammoths running around and knocking trees over in order to get more food out of them. And that's why the z moths are doing it themselves, because we obviously don't have mammoths, but I. They're trying to actually de extinct the mammoth, and I think they set it up where pleistocene park would be a potential place to bring cloned mammoths or whatever test tube mammoths we come up with, whether it's splicing it with elephants or doing some DNA extraction on remains that are revealed from melting permafrost. How do we go about it? That's their end goal. I know they would accept it.

583
01:39:50,448 --> 01:40:37,762
AtlasPro: I know they'd welcome a mammoth, and that would really be the point where the experiment is sustainable from, like, a natural perspective. Unless without them now, it would have just returned to whatever environment was there before, because, yeah, the tree, you know, there's still. There's still that level of moisture there's there aren't huge populations of animals. These are like, maybe there's a hundred of one type of animal, but there's not herds. You know, that's the thing is, back in the day, there used to be herds of millions of these things. Like, that's what really did it. Not just a few hundred, but without that, without. First without the mammoth, and then without those sorts of numbers, there does need to be sort of human inputs to keep the system working the way it does.

584
01:40:37,946 --> 01:40:48,344
Chris: Right? So we're talking like Pleistocene park, but like Jurassic park now for bringing back mammoths, right? Hey, that sounds awesome. Yeah.

585
01:40:48,432 --> 01:40:56,640
AtlasPro: You know, I wrote, I made a video hoping that if one day they ever did make a mammoth, that I could, like, contact them and be like, can I go? Like, can I?

586
01:40:56,680 --> 01:41:09,488
Chris: Yeah, yeah. I mean, that's what I want to do with this podcast, right? I want to be like, hey, guys, so if you have a mammoth, can I write it? Or is that. Yeah, but I mean, honestly, like, there do you think that will be.

587
01:41:09,624 --> 01:41:11,712
Chris: It feels like if that happens, that's.

588
01:41:11,736 --> 01:41:16,694
Chris: Going to be like a big news story. Like, all of a sudden, like, everybody is going to be talking about this.

589
01:41:16,782 --> 01:41:50,150
AtlasPro: That would, I think in like the late nineties, early two thousands, they were able to clone a sheep, dolly the sheep. And that was. Yeah, that was like a huge moment, you know, in terms of just genetics and biology. And I think that would be like the Russians, like sending Sputnik up, but like bringing a mammoth back, that would be like Americans landing on the moon and, like, walking around that. Right? That would be like, such a big. That would honestly, not even to compare it to Sputnik, that would be like equivalent of humans landing on the moon. Like, that would be as significant of an advancement in all forms of technology.

590
01:41:50,450 --> 01:41:51,270
Chris: Yeah.

591
01:41:51,730 --> 01:42:06,986
AtlasPro: Personally, I am totally for it. I think it's cool if you're just doing it in labs or whatever stuff happens in labs all the time, but I really just don't know if it's possible. But if it is, Pleistocene park is probably where you're going to be able to see it.

592
01:42:07,178 --> 01:42:10,554
Chris: Yeah, I mean, I would see. I would be super jazzed about that, too. And it makes.

593
01:42:10,602 --> 01:42:10,786
Chris: Yeah.

594
01:42:10,818 --> 01:42:22,710
Chris: What you're saying about, like, comparing it to landing a man on the moon seems. Yeah, it seems equivalent. Like, if we brought back such a significant species, like, holy shit, that would be incredible.

595
01:42:23,130 --> 01:43:07,890
AtlasPro: Yeah. And that would, you know, even more space travel. That would open the door for just other species. You know, I just made a video about dodos and those only went extinct, like, 200 years ago, which means we still have some soft tissue from the dota. Like, we still have, like, their heads and some of their skin. And, you know, theoretically, like, we could actually extract full DNA. You know, there's just. There's so many other species that we could bring back. Honestly, thinking about it now, I don't think a mammoth would be the first animal that we brought back. I think it would. We'd probably have to work up to a mammoth. So, yeah, I'd probably expect a dodo before a mammoth, but either way, like, just to bring back any sort of animal that had been extinct would be remarkable.

596
01:43:08,590 --> 01:43:15,646
Chris: So do you see any risks to that, though? Like, you know, Jurassic park, we know, didn't go very well.

597
01:43:15,758 --> 01:43:17,330
Chris: Not a risky prospect.

598
01:43:17,710 --> 01:43:57,594
AtlasPro: You'd like to think that the animals we'd bring back would all be carefully selected and, like, purposefully selected, but more than that, like, a mammoth, the mammoth's not a hunter. You know, we're not going to get a Jurassic park scenario where the, you know, the raptors have escaped their enclosure or anything. It's more going to be like, oh, my God, there's, like, one mammoth that's escaped, you know, like, this thing that, like, is, to be honest, the animals that we do end up bringing back, if we do at all, they will very likely be very sickly animals. They will not be like, you know, we're not going to get, like, a bralette mammoth first try. Like, they're going to be very vulnerable. They could die in, like, a matter of days, honestly.

599
01:43:57,722 --> 01:43:58,202
Chris: Right.

600
01:43:58,306 --> 01:44:36,776
AtlasPro: I think that's how, like, the cloning of the sheep went. So I just. I can't picture us getting to the point where we're like, oh, my God. Like, the mammoths all escaped. Like, they're going to eat us all. It's like, they, like, they'll knock down a few trees, but, like, that's at worst, you know, the only thing I can mention is that a lot of people commented this on my video, but I didn't mention them bringing predators back, which would have to be done eventually, you know? Yeah, yeah. So, like, you know, you're introducing all these grazing animals, eventually you need to bring back predators, too. And there were some predators that went extinct. You know, there were, like, cave lions and all sorts of stuff.

601
01:44:36,808 --> 01:45:02,816
AtlasPro: You know, there were lions that were all the way up there, but I don't think we'd bother bringing those back. I think. I think we could still breed lions to be cold hardy if we really wanted to, or we could bring back wolves to the area. We have solutions to that problem where it wouldn't be, like, some animal that we've never seen, just, like, hunting humans, you know, it would just. It would more likely be us moving animals around that already exist here.

602
01:45:02,968 --> 01:45:03,376
Chris: Right.

603
01:45:03,448 --> 01:45:08,272
AtlasPro: Other than things like mammoths, that really, we cannot find a replacement for.

604
01:45:08,456 --> 01:45:19,986
Chris: Right, right. I mean, realistically speaking, no offense to the Jurassic park fans, which I am one of them, but, like, we're. We're fine, you know? Like, even in the Jurassic park, like.

605
01:45:20,058 --> 01:45:21,530
Chris: Okay, we have nukes and they don't.

606
01:45:21,570 --> 01:45:33,830
Chris: So at the very least, we could just nuke the island. You know what I mean? Like, our technology is so far advanced, like, we, you know, our ancestors with spears were completely dominating these mammoths. So I don't think we would.

607
01:45:34,450 --> 01:45:43,570
AtlasPro: Our current technology, it's really, like, laughable to think that we would have the technology to bring them back, but not the technology to, like, deal with them.

608
01:45:43,730 --> 01:45:51,470
Chris: Right, right. In general, are there any other risks or downsides to rewilding?

609
01:45:52,890 --> 01:46:33,316
AtlasPro: There are always ecological risks. If you consider it as an introduced species or as an invasive species, you could see it like that, which it could be. The mammoths could be so successful that they end up running amok in Siberia and knock down too many trees. And all of that causes a sudden spike in decomposition. Something that I read about recently was that diseases could come back, too. Like, certain animals were susceptible to more diseases or different diseases. If we brought back a mammoth, an elephant disease reached its way into the mammoth, it could just train even more diseases, which I don't think is necessarily that plausible.

610
01:46:33,428 --> 01:46:57,800
AtlasPro: But it does bring back this worry that just something could be hiding in the behavior or, like, the physiology or anything of these animals that we don't really know about because we haven't seen them scientifically yet that could come back to bite us. And I think a mammoth's never going to hunt people, but a disease that comes from a mammoth might, right?

611
01:46:57,960 --> 01:47:20,346
Chris: Yeah, I guess if you take Jurassic park to be more metaphor than literal, then actually it does give some warning as to, like, there are things that we can't necessarily predict about these animals that have never existed during our lifetimes or during many lifetimes that, like you said, maybe it's disease, maybe it's behavior, maybe it's some interaction with some other thing.

612
01:47:20,378 --> 01:47:22,298
Chris: With some interaction with some other thing.

613
01:47:22,474 --> 01:47:25,746
Chris: And that is definitely something worth being cautious about.

614
01:47:25,818 --> 01:47:38,550
AtlasPro: Yeah. Just being aware of how complex all of these relationships are before it's revealed to us. It could be something that's super obvious to us now, but we would have no way of knowing before bringing it back.

615
01:47:40,580 --> 01:47:49,156
Chris: Kayla, what do you think of the fact that in the next decade, we get to see a real life mammoth walking around in Siberia?

616
01:47:49,348 --> 01:47:54,228
Kayla: I have a lot of thoughts, shockingly, I have a lot of thoughts about this.

617
01:47:54,324 --> 01:47:54,924
Chris: Okay.

618
01:47:55,012 --> 01:48:03,404
Kayla: Shocking to no one. First, God, I hope it happens, because as of this moment, I'm just assuming we will all be dead from climate change within the next ten years.

619
01:48:03,492 --> 01:48:06,254
Chris: Not a pleistocene park has anything to say about it.

620
01:48:06,342 --> 01:48:10,438
Kayla: Yeah. So I hope we're alive to see it. I hope we're alive to have it happen. That'd be cool and great.

621
01:48:10,494 --> 01:48:10,942
Chris: Yeah.

622
01:48:11,046 --> 01:48:37,614
Kayla: Second, I'm pretty sure, pretty, pretty sure that. I don't know. I can't imagine if we actually are able to bring back a mammoth at this point. I have very little faith that it'll, like, be under the, like, protection of science. It'll immediately be so that Jeff Bezos can eat it. Like, that is what is going to motivate us to bring a mammoth back before any sort of climate.

623
01:48:37,662 --> 01:48:47,878
Chris: If it makes me feel any better. If it makes you feel any better, there's a few, I think, a few different labs working on it. The one, there's a Harvard lab working on the problem. They specifically do have a deal with Sergey Zimov.

624
01:48:47,974 --> 01:48:48,558
Kayla: Okay.

625
01:48:48,654 --> 01:48:49,622
Chris: To give him a mammoth.

626
01:48:49,686 --> 01:48:50,214
Kayla: Oh, my God.

627
01:48:50,262 --> 01:48:50,870
Chris: That's already.

628
01:48:50,950 --> 01:49:17,604
Kayla: The only thing I care about in life is that he gets his because, you know it'll be a baby. You know it'll be a baby mammoth. He'll get to take care of a little baby mammoth will have these pictures. Shut up. Don't talk about that part of him, this old grizzled man with a baby mammoth wrapped up in a blankie, feeding in a dang bottle. We need this to happen. We need to stave off the climate crisis just so we get those pictures of Sergey Zimov bottle feeding a baby mammoth.

629
01:49:17,692 --> 01:49:18,960
Chris: Fingers crossed.

630
01:49:19,900 --> 01:49:21,914
Kayla: Yes. Those are my immediate thoughts.

631
01:49:22,052 --> 01:50:09,508
Chris: So there's another video, by the way, that Atlas pro references in his Pleistocene park video on de extinction on the YouTube channel called Real Science, which is another great science communication. YouTube channel. Way too much for me to cover here. Again, I will link in the show notes, but this episode covers the detailed mechanics of the various methods of de extinction, including they cover back breeding, cloning, and CRISPR gene editing techniques. It's super fascinating. You should definitely watch it. If you want to know more about how the hell are they actually planning to bring a mammoth back, the other great thing from this video is that they talk about some of the de extinction projects that scientists have already done, such as the back breeding they did for the quagga, which is the extinct half zebra, half horse looking thing.

632
01:50:09,644 --> 01:50:13,932
Chris: You know, there's like, a zebra in the front, horse in the back kind of deal. Have you ever seen a quagga?

633
01:50:13,956 --> 01:50:15,900
Kayla: Yeah. Quine version of a mullethood.

634
01:50:18,590 --> 01:50:49,104
Chris: And the semi successful cloning of animal called a Pyrenean. Pyrenean ibex. So, as Kaylin mentioned, so far, our de extinction efforts with cloning have produced mostly sickly animals. The ibex that the scientists birthed did not live very long, but that was all the way back in 1999. So I'm assuming some progress has been made. But, you know, speaking to his, like, well, we'll probably try something else first. It has already been tried. Like, they already tried to de extinct the Pyrenean ibex.

635
01:50:49,192 --> 01:51:00,688
Kayla: Okay. And as he mentioned, you know, just. Just reminding us all that ancient scientific event in which dolly the sheep was cloned.

636
01:51:00,824 --> 01:51:08,324
Chris: We're getting to that age, Kayla, where, like, things that happened when were kids are, like, history book stuff. I know people that.

637
01:51:08,412 --> 01:51:16,332
Kayla: It makes me very excited. I just. I want people to think that I have a knowledge. I want people to think that I'm cool because I live through something.

638
01:51:16,436 --> 01:51:22,364
Chris: Yeah, I remember when Dolly happened. That was dope. And the fact that there's, like, somebody that refers to that as a historical event. It's kind of cool.

639
01:51:22,412 --> 01:51:23,612
Kayla: It was a historical event.

640
01:51:23,716 --> 01:51:28,052
Chris: Yeah. All right, so I have a confession to make.

641
01:51:28,156 --> 01:51:29,200
Kayla: Confess away.

642
01:51:30,020 --> 01:51:31,148
Chris: Okay. It's not really confessing.

643
01:51:31,164 --> 01:51:38,370
Kayla: Why are you gonna tell me that pleistocene park doesn't actually exist? I'll kill myself. I will jump in front of traffic.

644
01:51:38,830 --> 01:51:51,390
Chris: I would not do that to you. But, no, it's not really a confession, since you and our listeners have probably already noticed. I think you actually even commented on this, but this topic is a bit of a stretch for the cult thing.

645
01:51:51,470 --> 01:51:57,390
Kayla: Yeah. What's the. Where's the cult? I mean, you've got a charismatic leader. You've got potentially chain of victims.

646
01:51:57,550 --> 01:52:01,992
Chris: Well, we'll get. Yeah, we'll get to our criteria. It's like. And it's definitely weird.

647
01:52:02,096 --> 01:52:03,240
Kayla: Yeah, it's for certain weird.

648
01:52:03,280 --> 01:52:24,328
Chris: Cloning mammoths and vodka pounding siberian super scientists is, like, kind of weird, but maybe not culty. So I kind of got into this as more of, like, you know, how you did cicada, or the line where just. I just really love the topic. I really wanted to do it on the show, come hell or high water. Even though the cult connection here is tenuous at best, I'm afraid for what.

649
01:52:24,344 --> 01:52:30,710
Kayla: You'Re about to say next, because I can see. See your face. Our listeners can't see your face, but I know the visage you have upon your face.

650
01:52:32,690 --> 01:52:33,458
Chris: Or is it.

651
01:52:33,514 --> 01:52:34,390
Kayla: Oh, no.

652
01:52:36,450 --> 01:53:29,250
AtlasPro: I knew you were struggling to find out a way to tie this to cults or anything. And Sergey Zimov's ideas fit well into somebody else's ideas. And this guy, more than anything, is what I would think is where the cult starts to come into things. This man's name is Alan Savery, and he's from Africa. He's this white guy, though. He gave a TED talk a while ago. I actually had to watch it when I was in college, too. And he came up with this system called holistic management, or holistic land management. And it's the same thing. It's the same concept as Pleistocene park, except instead of protecting permafrost, you unleashed animals, grazing animals, onto lands that are becoming desertified. And they have the same effect. Right? They move moisture in the environment around.

653
01:53:29,290 --> 01:54:07,446
AtlasPro: They take it from one place to the other, and they supposedly can bring back. The pictures that he's shared are amazing. But he has had far more reach and far more success at pushing this idea that holistic land management is a solution to not only desertification, but to climate change. And he, you know, it's the same idea, and he's come up with it. The reason that I didn't want to mention him in the video, and I didn't really want to send anyone his way, is that he. I don't know if he trademarked it, but he. He somehow made it his intellectual property to do this thing, to do holistic land management.

654
01:54:07,598 --> 01:54:09,422
Chris: He owns rewilding. I don't know about that.

655
01:54:09,446 --> 01:54:29,244
AtlasPro: Yeah, yeah. It's kind of like, you know, it's his operation at a certain point, and that's where it's like, it's one thing to educate people. You know, like, I. My videos are free online. Like, I don't have. I don't care. Watch it. Don't watch it. But don't charge people for letting cows loose in a pasture. Like, that's not. That's not really, you know, science in the same way.

656
01:54:29,412 --> 01:54:30,740
Chris: Yeah, agreed.

657
01:54:30,900 --> 01:54:58,010
AtlasPro: Yeah. I made that video, and obviously it connected with some other people. Lots of other people were like, have you read or watched Alan Savery? And I had, but then, you know, people started just, like, commenting on everything I would do. Like, they would everything on Twitter, emails, just like, hey, please contact me. Please contact me. I have to tell you about this amazing thing that's going to save the world, that's going to fight climate change. This is the solution.

658
01:54:58,310 --> 01:54:59,054
Chris: Interesting.

659
01:54:59,142 --> 01:55:40,394
AtlasPro: That's when I started to get weirded out by it, when people thought that this was the solution, not a solution. Pleistocene park, that's a solution, not the solution. And there is no the solution. If you study in the environment, you know that there's not a single thing, not one act that you can do to save, you know, something as complicated as this. And that's really showed me that there is an aspect of this where some people are going to find the problem, right? In any cult, right? There's always a problem in a cult. Like, we're persecuted or we. The volcanoes erupting or something, or the crops aren't growing, and now we have this problem of climate change.

660
01:55:40,482 --> 01:56:30,116
AtlasPro: And so as much as we have problems of the past, we still have them of today, and then we still have these people who will come out and say that they're the solution. Like, I can save you. I can be your savior, and only I have it, right? Only I have the ability to save you from climate change, to save you from desertification. So I think more than even the Pleistocene park. And Sergey Zimov, I'd say savory, has kind of cultivated a cult around his very similar, very, you know, it's just rewilding. It's just introducing animals. But he's gotten to the point where he has a following and people are very vocal and very convinced about his. His soul ability to end climate change.

661
01:56:30,308 --> 01:56:37,400
Chris: That is a fantastic lead because I didn't know about that guy, and I am definitely, as soon as we hang up here, gonna check it out.

662
01:56:38,140 --> 01:56:38,716
Chris: Do it.

663
01:56:38,788 --> 01:56:41,640
AtlasPro: He has a TED talk. You watch. That's all. Need to watch. Really?

664
01:56:41,760 --> 01:56:42,312
Chris: Okay.

665
01:56:42,416 --> 01:56:43,144
Chris: Okay. Yeah.

666
01:56:43,232 --> 01:57:03,660
Chris: Like, the stuff you're talking about, like, really rings a bell for some of the things that we've talked about on the show before. Specifically, there's this. This idea, especially in, like, wellness and pseudoscience around wellness is the idea that there's, like, there's a one true cure, right? So, like, an example is like, back when most chiropractors still thought that subluxations was a thing.

667
01:57:03,960 --> 01:57:05,792
Chris: Every. Anything that you could possibly be wrong.

668
01:57:05,816 --> 01:57:42,060
Chris: With, you could fix by going to a chiropractor, right? Like, is all they had to do is adjust the subluxations in your spine, and they could fix disease, they could fix pain, they could fix cancer, they could anything, right? Yeah, that sounds like it's ringing a bell here, where there's, like, the one true cure for climate change, which is this, like, gigantic, massive, complex thing. And it brings me a question I was going to ask. I guess you sort of answered this already, but if you want to elaborate on it, I was going to ask you if this was like a silver bullet. Right? If we do this, Pleistocene rewilding all over Eurasia and North America, will that just completely solve the problem by itself?

669
01:57:43,560 --> 01:57:45,020
AtlasPro: You know, definitely not.

670
01:57:45,640 --> 01:57:46,600
Chris: You know, I feel like I already.

671
01:57:46,640 --> 01:58:41,440
AtlasPro: Answered that aspect, you know. You know, on a basic level. No, because the main function of pleistocene park and rewilding is to protect the permafrost. So while it definitely will prevent, you know, more carbon from being released, there's still all this carbon that's already been released. You know, there's already a 200, 300 years of industrialized pollution that is already unaccounted for. And even though the other aspect of Pleistocene rewilding is building soil, which is a hugely carbon intensive process, and it stores a lot of carbon, that's something that takes thousands of years. These are natural cycles. These aren't. Turn them on and they start running at the speed that we think. It's gradual. How fast? Soil buildup. I took a few classes in soil and I think we build, like, one inch of topsoil for a thousand years.

672
01:58:41,820 --> 01:58:44,252
Chris: Oh, man. That's not the speed of humans.

673
01:58:44,396 --> 01:58:56,580
AtlasPro: Yeah, exactly. And so even if the whole world is like that, you know, we. That's. It would not get to the point where we could combat our releases by just sequestering it through grasslands.

674
01:58:56,700 --> 01:59:04,822
Chris: Right. So it sounds like we're sort of like this might like it would diffuse a potential bomb, but it's more than we have. Yeah, yeah.

675
01:59:04,966 --> 01:59:53,034
AtlasPro: I've been thinking about it a little ever since you wrote to me. And I think. Yeah, I think we're just in a time where new cults around climate change can occur. I said it before, but cults always sort of arise from issues, whether it's the Romans killing us all or us being persecuted or even perceived threats. Right. They don't even need to be real threats. But I. The problem is that people think there's an issue, and that's ingredient one and two is somebody offers a solution. And as more and more people become aware and become worried about the climate and about the direction our earth is heading in, that opens up a possibility of just in this culture. And it starts as something that's harmless. It starts as people using paper straws instead of plastic straws or stuff like that.

676
01:59:53,172 --> 02:00:39,904
AtlasPro: But the opportunity is always there for people to take advantage of people. And climate change is something that the more you know about science, the more likely you are to believe in climate change and to understand climate change. So the cults or the whatever that arise from that are all going to also be more science based. Right? Like, you can never tell somebody who believes in climate change that God is going to fix it or that me, the Messiah, is going to fix it, right? People who believe in climate change aren't going to really believe that, or most of them won't. But you can tell them that I have these special cows. I have this special way of doing something that's innate to me, and that's what you have to spread to other people.

677
02:00:39,992 --> 02:01:10,072
AtlasPro: So I think the more dire the climate crisis becomes, the more people get involved and try to help, the more we'll start to see people sneaking in, people who don't really care, who just want to benefit themselves. Or maybe they'll probably start with trying to help the environment. It's an entry point. I can't really even imagine what people will say one day, but I don't think that it's hard to assume that we will see more stuff like that.

678
02:01:10,256 --> 02:01:51,004
Chris: Yeah, actually, that's really insightful. I think you're absolutely right about the threat thing. There's a lot that people will do when they feel justified means ends justified. In fact, we talked about this a little bit back when we did QAnon last year. Becoming self reflective a little bit. A lot of what you see with QAnon followers is they're willing to do almost anything because the threat is so great in their minds. The threat is so great that it's kind of like, whatever is just. Yeah, totally. Let's line up a bunch of politicians and hang them, right? Because what they're doing is they are abusing children and sucking their blood.

679
02:01:51,052 --> 02:01:51,236
AtlasPro: Right.

680
02:01:51,268 --> 02:02:05,440
Chris: Which is, like, just so horrible that we're justified in almost anything to try to fix this. Now, obviously, that's absurd, but the self reflective part is like, do I feel that way about climate change? Like, am I susceptible to.

681
02:02:07,460 --> 02:02:08,212
Chris: Doing bad.

682
02:02:08,276 --> 02:02:17,214
Chris: Things as a means to an end? That is so compelling. And I think that's sort of what you're bringing up here. Is that like, then. Yeah, that opens the door.

683
02:02:17,382 --> 02:02:59,186
AtlasPro: Yeah. When I, you know, when I first started learning about the environment, we learned about these different paradigms that were like, the environment is something that humans are a part of. The one that struck me as most extreme is something called deep ecology, which is that humans by nature destroy the environment. Humans by nature harm the world, which I don't really believe. I mean, obviously we do, but we are also, you know, there is value in the human world. But if you don't find value in the human world, if you think it's your duty to protect life, not even like a living thing, like all living things, if you think that's your purpose or that's your goal, then yeah, what will stand in your way?

684
02:02:59,258 --> 02:03:40,136
AtlasPro: What will tell you not, oh, if I have to murder all these people, if I have to convince people to drink all this poison, all this Kool Aid, it's for the environment, you know, it's to save us all, you know, and it's the same threat that anyone, right. About any sort of issue. This might be a bit before my time, but there were, there was a time where there were like climate terrorists even. You know, there were people who would like, attack oil rigs and there were people who would attack things and, you know, whether or not they were justified, I don't know, like, I'm not gonna say. But you can see that there is this very clear potential for people to be radicalized into thinking that they're protecting all of life on earth.

685
02:03:40,288 --> 02:03:54,192
AtlasPro: And that's equally as tantalizing for human brains as stopping people from eating babies and stuff. Yeah, it fulfills the same goal or the same desire humans have to make things right.

686
02:03:54,296 --> 02:04:14,206
Chris: Yeah, I think people who are science minded to tend to like, you know, think in utilitarian terms more than like, you know, dogmatic moralist terms. And I, you know that I can see the person attacking the oil rig thinking like, okay, well, yeah, maybe I'm going to kill ten people in this oil rig, but I'm actually going to save 1000 people because the oil won't pollute, blah, blah, you know, lung cancer.

687
02:04:14,238 --> 02:04:34,390
AtlasPro: Yeah, I'll save 1000 people in the year 2022 or something, you know, 20, like 2100. Yeah. It's all a justification. But you have to realize that the best way we do this is not by becoming crazy, it's figuring out actual solid things that show clear results and that don't harm other people.

688
02:04:34,690 --> 02:04:47,266
Chris: Right, right. And I think that a lot, and this is my preferred sort of framework for it is just that climate change isn't about saving the planet. Like, the planet's going to be fine. Like, it's been here for a long time.

689
02:04:47,298 --> 02:04:49,090
Chris: It will be here a long time after we're gone.

690
02:04:49,210 --> 02:05:16,152
Chris: And by the planet, I mean, like the whole biosphere, the whole ecosphere. Right. So it's really about saving a us, right. It's really about preserving our privileged place in it right now. You know, we've been worse off before, and we could potentially be worse off after right now. And so the question is, can we preserve our place and our comfort level in our way of life? Because the. Yeah, the earth is going to be fine. Like, it will continue.

691
02:05:16,296 --> 02:05:59,190
AtlasPro: Life will still be around. But yeah. It's more of a question is, are the fields that used to farm today going to be the same fields that we've used to farm tomorrow? That if you have all these shifting weather patterns, are the places that reliably grow food going to be the same places that reliably grow food in a decade? And those are the real issues. That's the real implications of climate change. It's not, oh, my God, this ice is disappearing. No. The systems that we rely on, everything that we take for granted, that we don't even understand, that we take for granted, those can also go away. Those can also disappear in no time at all. Like, we can have floods ten times than we've ever experienced if we just keep doing this.

692
02:05:59,230 --> 02:06:06,810
AtlasPro: And people don't realize that it is self preservation, it is still, again, about ourselves, as it always will be. But.

693
02:06:10,670 --> 02:06:24,422
Chris: There'S a lot of themes there that we've talked about on the show before. Utilitarianism leading to dangerous thoughts of means, justifying the ends. The whole, like, I can save a thousand people by murdering ten thing. Right? We've talked about that.

694
02:06:24,526 --> 02:06:25,134
Kayla: We have.

695
02:06:25,222 --> 02:06:49,110
Chris: We've talked about the one true cure. Right? We've seen that before. Actually, one of the articles I read, this one from the New Yorker, mentioned a fun word that I had never read before, probably because some obscure philosopher made it up as sort of like a joke. But here, let me try to pronounce it. Mono causotaxophilia. Monochazotaxophilia.

696
02:06:49,150 --> 02:06:50,814
Kayla: Mono causotaxophilia.

697
02:06:50,902 --> 02:07:39,656
Chris: Which you can kinda get from the. Like he just jammed a bunch of words together. But it means the love of single causes that explain everything. I've been plagued by this many times in the past, and I think we all get plagued by this problem, right? It's a very easy hole to fall into, right? In the New Yorker article, the author was explaining that simple solutions to the climate crisis don't exist. And if you think one thing is going to silver bullet it, then you're suffering from mono causa taxophilia. I think Alan Savery, and therefore some of his followers definitely suffer from this. And while I didn't talk to any of his followers for this episode, I can say that I absolutely watched his TED talk. And, well, here's a quote. What are we going to do? And then he takes a long pause.

698
02:07:39,688 --> 02:08:04,310
Chris: This is during his TED talk. There is only one option, I repeat to you. Only one. He raises his voice. Only one option left to climatologists and scientists, and that is to do the unthinkable. To use livestock bunched and moving as a proxy for herds mimicking nature. There is no other alternative left to mankind. End quote.

699
02:08:04,810 --> 02:08:10,234
Kayla: Man, what must it feel like to have that level of confidence?

700
02:08:10,362 --> 02:08:11,910
Chris: He got a standing ovation.

701
02:08:12,250 --> 02:08:33,932
Kayla: Of course he did. As we have learned from history, if you get up with enough confidence and speaking ability and passion, you can say a lot of stuff that will get people on their feet cheering for you. Not that I'm not saying that he's like a fascist, but I'm just saying a standing ovation is not necessarily an indicator of the value of your ideas.

702
02:08:34,076 --> 02:09:23,392
Chris: Right? By the way, as an aside, I also checked the Savory Institute website, and yes, holistic land management is in fact trademarked. Anyway, now, I'm not an environmental scientist like Alan Savery was, but I can tell you beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is wrong. Not only are there many alternatives that we can pursue, but there are many alternatives that we absolutely must pursue if this is something we're going to defeat and save our civilization. And I have some backup here, too. On this very video's page on Ted.com, there's a statement listed immediately below the video, which reads, note, statements in this talk have been challenged by scientists working in this field. Please read criticism and updates below for more details.

703
02:09:23,576 --> 02:10:15,670
Chris: And those more details, read as in his talk at TED 2013, how to fight desertification and reverse climate change, biologist Alan Savery offered a surprising solution to the spread of deserts around the globe, grazing. By reversing the transformation of grassland into desert, he said such holistic, planned grazing could help solve climate change. Savery notes that such grazing is just one component of appropriate land stewardship, not a prescribed system, and its potential for success is influenced by each unique environment and context. But some critics have challenged the hypothesis. For example, one recent report argues that any gains from greening after grazing are more than offset by methane emitted from the grazing animals. In other words, the science around Savory's idea is complicated as with every area of inquiry, research is ongoing, end quote.

704
02:10:16,450 --> 02:10:41,236
Chris: Now, specifically, as it regards Pleistocene park, this whole, like, methane produced versus carbon sequestered problem. Yeah, it exists, but remember that the primary goal of the animal rewilding there is to use the animal's activity to lower the average temperature of permafrost, to prevent it from melting, not necessarily to balance like, you know, greenhouse gas in greenhouse gas out.

705
02:10:41,308 --> 02:10:41,612
Kayla: Right.

706
02:10:41,676 --> 02:11:29,040
Chris: As Kaylin mentioned, grass decay, sequestering carbon takes a long time, but, you know, cows fart methane in real time, they do. But the larger point here again is about the silver bullet, or lack thereof. Pleistocene park is one bullet in that chamber, just a regular bullet, not silver. It is critical work that the Zmoffs are doing. It's critical science that they're exploring. But we have to also be open to other strategies, of which there are many new building techniques. Using wood for things that we would normally use, concrete or steel, for example. We should be open to carbon capture technology. We should be open to using more nuclear power to reduce consumption, especially in the west, to improving renewable power such as wind and solar, but also things like tidal energy.

707
02:11:29,380 --> 02:11:41,476
Chris: We should also be open to considering out of the box scary things like geoengineering projects at this point. Hell, we should even be open to weird stuff like Kalin mentioned about putting white tarps over large tracts of land in the north. Who knows?

708
02:11:41,508 --> 02:11:42,540
Kayla: It doesn't even seem that weird.

709
02:11:42,580 --> 02:11:43,348
Chris: See if it does anything.

710
02:11:43,404 --> 02:11:49,572
Kayla: Yeah, like that seems like easy, cheap, right? Common sense, you know what I mean?

711
02:11:49,596 --> 02:12:37,186
Chris: It doesn't seem that weird, actually. You're right. That's a good point. But all these things, now's the time to try. The fact is, the climate has already changed. Like yakutian horses and mammoths, like all animals, we humans affect our environment, and it will have an effect on us. Climate change is scary, but also it was never avoidable in the first place, in the platonic ideal sense. We never had the ability to freeze our planetary ecosystem in time and have it never change. The question is, are we going to be thoughtful about it or not? Are we going to take some control of the undeniable and incredibly powerful effect our species has on the environment? Or are we just going to let those effects kill us off? Do we want to live in a world where we can sustainably allow our population to survive?

712
02:12:37,338 --> 02:13:20,812
Chris: Or do we want to live in one where New York and Philadelphia are underwater, California is on fire, and the southeastern US gets ripped apart by hurricanes, or one where desertification of farmland causes widespread famine and refugee crises and wars over dwindling resources. Climate action isn't about saving the planet, it's about saving ourselves. And there are as many strategies to solve this puzzle out there as the human imagination can pump out, which is to say, endless. We talked about a few just now. If you want some specific actions you can take immediately, I recommend going over to place scene parks Patreon and giving them a bit of cash. I know we're also all politically exhausted in the United States right now, but if you get the chance, learn which politicians support climate oriented policies.

713
02:13:20,956 --> 02:14:02,830
Chris: It's hard here, I know, because on both sides of the aisle there's a lot of either explicit denial on the right and a lot of, like, worthless lip service on the left. So you need to figure out how to support things like the Green New Deal. A good source for this, again in the interest of actions you can take, is the sunrise movement. They've done an excellent job recently of supporting climate friendly candidates. And as an example, they are in large part responsible for Ed Markey getting elected to the Senate over a Kennedy in Massachusetts. That's pretty huge. So once again, we'll put a lot of this stuff in our show notes, but there's action all across the board. There are a lot of things that people are working on to solve this problem across the world and there is no one silver bullet.

714
02:14:04,610 --> 02:14:10,310
Chris: All right, Kayla, it is time for our gimmick.

715
02:14:10,690 --> 02:14:11,842
Kayla: I don't have a piece of paper.

716
02:14:11,946 --> 02:14:13,390
Chris: Cult criteria.

717
02:14:14,090 --> 02:14:17,410
Kayla: Hold on. Oh, God. Paper, paper.

718
02:14:17,570 --> 02:14:20,002
Chris: There we go. There's the criteria.

719
02:14:20,186 --> 02:14:23,110
Kayla: This is absolutely a piece of paper that has the criteria written on them.

720
02:14:23,450 --> 02:14:31,506
Chris: Don't tell people. Now I think we can maybe talk about both Alan Savory and Pleistocene even though the topic is Pleistocene Park.

721
02:14:31,578 --> 02:14:32,506
Kayla: I don't know.

722
02:14:32,658 --> 02:14:33,626
Chris: Fine. Pleistocene park.

723
02:14:33,658 --> 02:14:40,154
Kayla: Fine. Yeah, I don't think charismatic leader, in terms of what we're. Just to finish my thought in terms of what we're evaluating. We're evaluating pleistocene park.

724
02:14:40,202 --> 02:14:40,810
Chris: Fine.

725
02:14:40,930 --> 02:14:52,402
Kayla: Charismatic leader, obviously present. I could not be more charisma'd. I want six seasons in a movie of the anime about pleistocene park and the father son journey.

726
02:14:52,546 --> 02:14:55,150
Chris: Absolutely expected harm.

727
02:14:55,690 --> 02:14:56,634
Kayla: That. See, that's hard.

728
02:14:56,682 --> 02:14:58,098
Chris: Look, it's uncertain.

729
02:14:58,194 --> 02:15:04,030
Kayla: It's uncertain for the folks involved in it seems like there's high.

730
02:15:05,010 --> 02:15:05,562
Chris: No.

731
02:15:05,666 --> 02:15:08,554
Kayla: For the sun. He's had a lot of harm. He has been.

732
02:15:08,602 --> 02:15:11,234
Chris: You don't know that. It's complicated, Kayla. He.

733
02:15:11,362 --> 02:15:13,834
Kayla: He said as much in his interview.

734
02:15:13,922 --> 02:15:18,538
Chris: No, he said that. He said that his father was selfish. It doesn't necessarily mean that.

735
02:15:18,594 --> 02:15:20,630
Kayla: And he was forced to be there.

736
02:15:21,100 --> 02:15:22,180
Chris: But he wasn't, though.

737
02:15:22,220 --> 02:15:36,764
Kayla: Like, he wasn't it. I'm just saying I know for. Okay, well, you and I need to have a conversation outside of this. But in terms of, like, the greater involvement. Yeah, it's probably not. Probably not that high.

738
02:15:36,852 --> 02:15:44,636
Chris: Yeah. I think, like, the harm to the rest of society is, like, there's maybe some chance of something backfiring that we talked about. Right. Some unintended consequence.

739
02:15:44,788 --> 02:15:48,180
Kayla: I don't think the cute little chubby horses are going to do anything bad to us.

740
02:15:48,260 --> 02:15:52,540
Chris: No, but, like, what about the mammoths running amok and knocking trees?

741
02:15:52,620 --> 02:15:53,920
Kayla: He's so cute.

742
02:15:56,020 --> 02:16:02,804
Chris: I think there's a small chance that we could have, like, a mammoth related crisis. But for the most part, I think they're doing good.

743
02:16:02,892 --> 02:16:04,420
Kayla: Nah, I think they'll be fine.

744
02:16:04,500 --> 02:16:04,876
Chris: Yeah.

745
02:16:04,948 --> 02:16:06,916
Kayla: I want to see a mammoth knock some trees down.

746
02:16:07,068 --> 02:16:08,372
Chris: Presence of ritual.

747
02:16:08,556 --> 02:16:09,236
Kayla: Hi.

748
02:16:09,388 --> 02:16:10,080
Chris: Really?

749
02:16:11,060 --> 02:16:11,612
Kayla: I don't know.

750
02:16:11,636 --> 02:16:16,732
Chris: Probably mammoth. I guess if they, like, resurrect a mammoth in, like, a pentagram with candlest, I just.

751
02:16:16,796 --> 02:16:20,040
Kayla: I just. Yeah, it's probably not. I don't know.

752
02:16:21,540 --> 02:16:23,640
Chris: You just said that for no reason.

753
02:16:24,740 --> 02:16:28,708
Kayla: I just pick. I just figure if it's science, then the ritual is high.

754
02:16:28,844 --> 02:16:32,436
Chris: Oh, that is not what we say here on the show.

755
02:16:32,548 --> 02:16:33,388
Kayla: Why not?

756
02:16:33,564 --> 02:16:42,964
Chris: I mean, there are rituals associated with science, but that's not what science is, bro. Besides, like, they're not wearing a lab. You saw the pictures I showed you of Sergey. He's not out there.

757
02:16:43,092 --> 02:16:44,236
Kayla: Certainly not lab coding.

758
02:16:44,268 --> 02:16:48,474
Chris: Erlenmeyer flask. He's out there, like, knocking down trees with a tank.

759
02:16:48,562 --> 02:16:49,745
Kayla: That feels like ritual to me.

760
02:16:49,778 --> 02:16:53,209
Chris: That is not ritual. That is just doing whatever the fuck you have available to you.

761
02:16:53,250 --> 02:16:53,657
Kayla: Say hello.

762
02:16:53,714 --> 02:16:55,049
Chris: Say hello. I think it's low.

763
02:16:55,090 --> 02:16:57,433
Kayla: They're definitely. There's no lab coding going on in this episode.

764
02:16:57,482 --> 02:17:00,618
Chris: No niche within society. Yes, I think it's pretty niche, because.

765
02:17:00,634 --> 02:17:01,889
Kayla: I hadn't heard of dang niche.

766
02:17:01,930 --> 02:17:06,394
Chris: And I love science, and I was. I've. I watch science stuff on YouTube, as I mentioned.

767
02:17:06,482 --> 02:17:07,129
Kayla: I'm okay, actually.

768
02:17:07,170 --> 02:17:08,281
Chris: Didn't know about it till this year.

769
02:17:08,346 --> 02:17:12,498
Kayla: Question for you. Does Sergey Zimov call this place Pleistocene park?

770
02:17:12,593 --> 02:17:12,938
Chris: Yeah.

771
02:17:12,994 --> 02:17:14,618
Kayla: Has he seen the movie Jurassic park?

772
02:17:14,714 --> 02:17:15,482
Chris: I don't know.

773
02:17:15,585 --> 02:17:20,186
Kayla: Like, I'm just kind of surprised that he would tolerate the whimsy.

774
02:17:20,338 --> 02:17:36,894
Chris: I'm not sure, because it says that he started the project in 88, but, like, the park wasn't officially created until 96, so I don't know what started the project means. If that just means he was, like, dithering around with, like, some, you know, Excel spreadsheets or if it means he, like, had this whole vision. I don't know.

775
02:17:36,962 --> 02:17:59,090
Kayla: I mean, 96 is not that long after Jurassic park came out. Maybe he could not coalesce around the project until he had the cheeky name. Jurassic park came out, and then it was like, oh, this is the last puzzle piece I needed to fall into place. Pleistocene park. I'm just saying I'm a little shocked at, and this is my own bias, that the man that we saw would be into the cheeky name.

776
02:18:00,150 --> 02:18:03,776
Chris: Maybe he was different when he was younger, maybe before he had his.

777
02:18:03,968 --> 02:18:11,384
Kayla: Maybe his son loved. Oh, my God. Maybe his son loved the movie Jurassic park, and so he named it Pleistocene park as a way to connect with the sun that he felt isolated from.

778
02:18:11,472 --> 02:18:37,245
Chris: Yeah, and I just looked up the book published date for Jurassic park, and that's 1990, so that doesn't. That doesn't encompass that 88 date. I don't know. But we're saying niche antifactuality, absolutely not low. I I mean, unless. I guess there's probably some people that still disagree with rewilding and specifically priced Pleistocene rewilding. They might say that the facts are not on their side.

779
02:18:37,317 --> 02:18:39,494
Kayla: I would say that they're wrong there.

780
02:18:39,541 --> 02:18:42,902
Chris: There's also maybe a little bit of motivated reasoning on the part of Sergey Zenith.

781
02:18:42,925 --> 02:18:43,549
Kayla: Absolutely.

782
02:18:43,670 --> 02:18:57,959
Chris: I mean, I've seen him say things that are, like, very, like, oh, this is how it is when, you know, granted, he's seen data now from his studies, but he definitely had a theory that he wanted to prove true. Right. Which is a little.

783
02:18:58,120 --> 02:19:02,103
Kayla: That's not really how science works, as we discussed in the last episode.

784
02:19:02,191 --> 02:19:08,448
Chris: Right. Percentage of life consumed. See, I think this is where you're going for. With life, with expected harm.

785
02:19:08,504 --> 02:19:10,059
Kayla: Hundo. Hundo percent.

786
02:19:10,360 --> 02:19:14,480
Chris: It has consumed the life of two generations of russian scientists.

787
02:19:14,600 --> 02:19:17,096
Kayla: Three, because the son's children live there.

788
02:19:17,128 --> 02:19:18,672
Chris: The daughters play there.

789
02:19:18,776 --> 02:19:22,570
Kayla: They currently are fully isolated from the rest of society.

790
02:19:22,730 --> 02:19:23,834
Chris: Awesome. They get cute.

791
02:19:23,882 --> 02:19:28,786
Kayla: I'm not saying it's not awesome, but that doesn't mean that 100% of your life is not considered fair.

792
02:19:28,858 --> 02:19:31,825
Chris: Fair. All right. Are their beliefs dogmatic?

793
02:19:31,977 --> 02:19:33,353
Kayla: I don't know. You tell me.

794
02:19:33,522 --> 02:19:45,954
Chris: Limited amount of information I've heard from the Zimovs themselves. I don't think it's dogmatic. Like, it seems to fit well within the greater paradigm of environmental science, at least at this point.

795
02:19:46,082 --> 02:19:54,146
Kayla: They're on that top hundred list that save, like, Doctor Savory flavor, where this is the only thing.

796
02:19:54,258 --> 02:19:55,394
Chris: Oh, yeah, that's a good point.

797
02:19:55,442 --> 02:19:56,314
Kayla: Which is the Doctor.

798
02:19:56,362 --> 02:20:07,082
Chris: It definitely doesn't have that, which I super got that from him. Finally. Chain of victims. Is there a chain of victims here? Don't bring up the sun thing again.

799
02:20:07,266 --> 02:20:14,760
Kayla: How can I not? That's what it's all about. Do you think I care? The rest is bullshit. No, I care about the Shakespeare experience story at the heart of it all.

800
02:20:17,140 --> 02:20:18,240
Chris: Effort here.

801
02:20:18,580 --> 02:20:20,620
Kayla: What are you talking about?

802
02:20:20,740 --> 02:20:25,948
Chris: Single recruiting effort from the father to the son. But there's not, like, a pyramid of people underneath.

803
02:20:26,004 --> 02:20:36,428
Kayla: No, but you said chain, and I. They got. There's only. There's two links. Two links make a chain. I'm pretty sure that's the saying. Two links make a chain. Maybe the daughters are gonna get ripped into this too. You don't know.

804
02:20:36,524 --> 02:20:37,172
Chris: Yes.

805
02:20:37,316 --> 02:21:02,950
Kayla: The wife. The wife, she, like, fell in love with this man and then, you know, chained into it, forced to, like, decide, do I want to be with the man I love? Oh, I'm just reacting to the information that you have given me. And literally, the son was like, I had to. Had this wife, and she had to decide, you know, whether she was gonna go with me or not. Like, it was not presented as, like, oh, it was presented. It's like, this is a hard, tough thing.

806
02:21:03,030 --> 02:21:10,390
Chris: So I think the authorization of the article was simply trying to point out that it's a tough decision in general. Not that there was, like, coercion happening.

807
02:21:10,430 --> 02:21:16,930
Kayla: Necessarily, but the son was saying that because he used the word forced.

808
02:21:17,430 --> 02:21:21,398
Chris: Okay, yeah, fine. Fair. So maybe there's some chain of victims, then.

809
02:21:21,454 --> 02:21:37,600
Kayla: I'm just. There is a. There is pain between the father and son. Maybe pain between the son, his wife, his daughters. Either way, I'm just saying there's, along with all of the good that I'm sure there is, there's also pain here. I don't know if that means there's a chain of victims. I just wanted to point it out.

810
02:21:37,680 --> 02:21:41,860
Chris: Medium. All right, so is it a cult or is it not a cult?

811
02:21:42,320 --> 02:21:43,064
Kayla: Bro.

812
02:21:43,232 --> 02:21:43,680
Chris: What?

813
02:21:43,760 --> 02:21:44,448
Kayla: It's not a cult.

814
02:21:44,504 --> 02:21:52,792
Chris: Yeah, of course it's not a cult. I thought you were gonna bro me into saying it was a cult. No, no, it's obviously not a cult. What about the savory institute?

815
02:21:52,936 --> 02:22:01,938
Kayla: I don't know enough about them to say if it's a cult, but it definitely seems dogmatic. Seems a little more problematic than the pleistocene park.

816
02:22:02,034 --> 02:22:09,514
Chris: Yeah, I think there's definitely some. I would say their antifactuality is definitely higher because they have that, like, one true cause thing right.

817
02:22:09,562 --> 02:22:11,434
Kayla: What is it? Mesothelioma. What is it?

818
02:22:11,482 --> 02:22:13,750
Chris: Yeah, it's mesothelioma. You got it.

819
02:22:14,250 --> 02:22:16,250
Kayla: Maxofaxotaxilomelia.

820
02:22:16,330 --> 02:22:20,074
Chris: Maxofaxo tivola. It's mono causotaxophilia.

821
02:22:20,122 --> 02:22:21,514
Kayla: Monocazo taxophilia.

822
02:22:21,602 --> 02:22:35,292
Chris: Monosingle cause causo taxo. I don't know what the fuck that means. Philia, love of. Oh, taxo means like, everything, I guess. Okay, okay, so not a cult. Alan Savery's thing. A bit culty.

823
02:22:35,396 --> 02:22:35,852
Kayla: Right?

824
02:22:35,956 --> 02:22:50,004
Chris: And I think that Kaylin brought up a good point about the increasing pressures and fears of the climate crisis driving people towards solutions that are hopeful but maybe not.

825
02:22:50,132 --> 02:23:35,414
Kayla: We are gonna see some wild shit over the next few years. We are going to see some wild shit. And I love that he brought up kind of the more seventies and eighties style Greenpeace actions that used to be. I'm assuming Greenpeace is still around, and I'm assuming those actions are still a thing, but they're less of a thing than they were in the eighties. I wouldn't be surprised if we see some return to some of those activities as well. If we see a spike in eco terrorism, we're going to see spikes in eco fascism, we're going to see some weird groups, we're going to see some weird cults. It's going to be wild. Yeah, but we can always just move to Pleistocene park and do the good work. I'm sure it will be cold enough there.

826
02:23:35,542 --> 02:23:38,574
Chris: Yeah, I mean, well, actually, it'll probably be pretty temperate there in a few years.

827
02:23:38,622 --> 02:23:40,130
Kayla: Yeah, yeah, that's what I mean.

828
02:23:40,980 --> 02:24:28,090
Chris: Alright, as we sign off here, this is usually where we do the action items. Now, I've already talked about some action items with supporting Pleistocene Park's Patreon or checking out the sunrise movement. The usual action item also still applies. Don't like, don't subscribe, just enjoy the show. But I also want to circle all the way back to theme that we open the show on, that we've talked several times about, theme that feedback loops are powerful. And I want to remind you of that because the climate crisis seems so overwhelming sometimes that small actions don't feel like they can help at all. Why bother? What hope is there? And what I hope I've communicated here, is that small actions can have extremely powerful effects. And thanks to chaos theory, this is actually mathematically true.

829
02:24:28,470 --> 02:25:10,708
Chris: I want to leave you with a cool little adage or thought experiment that has sort of made the rounds online over the years. I don't remember where this was first posted or who posted it, but the story goes something like in time travel stories we always talk about how dangerous it is to travel to the past because tiny changes in the past can have such a huge effect on the present. You know the old time travel trope of like oops, if I step on the wrong blade of grass in ancient Greece then when I come back home to 2021 we're all speaking German in America because we lost world War two or something. That's the butterfly effect and it's a popular time travel trope, but we never seem to consider that when we think about our own actions being useless in the present.

830
02:25:10,844 --> 02:25:28,294
Chris: We never consider that from the perspective of a time traveler from the future. We actually have an extraordinary amount of power to create change. This is Chris, this is Kayla, and this has been cult or just weird shit. No, that's fine. It harmonized.

831
02:25:28,462 --> 02:25:28,790
Kayla: Terrible.